Jennifer Velez v. The Estate of Brett Edwards Philen, Deceased
What's This Case About?
Five people are dead because one man decided to drive a pickup truck while high on LSD and drunk on booze—on a dark, rural highway, in the pre-dawn hours, like some kind of demented oilfield horror movie. And not just any driver: this was a consultant for a fracking operation, allegedly working the night shift, who somehow got behind the wheel in a state so chemically compromised that even the coroner doing the autopsy did a double-take when two strips of acid were pulled from his pants pocket. Let that sink in: acid tabs found on a dead man at a fatal crash scene. This isn’t a plot twist from Breaking Bad—this is real life, Beaver County, Oklahoma, April 29, 2024.
On one side of this tragic equation: Clemente Velez, his wife Griselda Lomez de Velez, their daughter-in-law Maria Ernstina Velez de Mendoza, and a family friend, Esther Espino Puentes. They were driving north on U.S. Highway 83, just half a mile over the Texas border into Oklahoma, minding their own business, presumably headed home or maybe just passing through. They were in a 2011 Toyota Camry—nothing flashy, just a humble family car. On the other side: Brett Edwards Philen, late of Texas, a self-employed oilfield consultant driving a 2008 Ford F-150 that wasn’t even his. The truck belonged to Ryan McCollum, an Oklahoma man whose name now anchors a wrongful death lawsuit that’s equal parts gut-wrenching and absurdly complicated. Philen was allegedly working a night shift for Philen Consulting, Inc.—his own company—under contract with Duncan Oil Properties, Inc., possibly coordinated through staffing platforms like RigUp and Sierra Hamilton, LLC. In other words, he wasn’t just some random guy; he was a contractor in the booming, chaotic world of Oklahoma oilfields, where schedules are brutal, oversight is spotty, and now, apparently, so are sobriety checks.
What happened? Well, according to the petition, Philen was driving south on that same stretch of Highway 83 when he veered off to the right, overcorrected violently to the left, crossed the centerline, and then swerved right again, spinning his truck sideways directly into the path of Clemente Velez’s oncoming Camry. It was a head-on collision of the most devastating kind—no skid marks, no last-second swerve to avoid it. Everyone in the Camry died instantly at the scene. Philen was rushed to a hospital in Texas, where he later died too. So complete was the carnage that the only survivors were the people left behind to grieve—and to sue.
The lawsuit was filed by Jennifer Velez, daughter of Clemente and Griselda, and Juan Carlos Mendoza, husband of Maria Ernstina. They’re not just seeking justice—they’re trying to make sense of a senseless night. And they’re pointing fingers in every direction. The primary claim? Negligence. Plain and simple: Philen was driving like a man not in control of his faculties, which, given the LSD and alcohol, checks out. But they go further. They allege negligence per se, which in normal human terms means: “He broke the law, and people died because of it.” Oklahoma law says you can’t drive drunk, high, or under the influence of any intoxicating substance. Philen allegedly violated all of the above. There was an open alcohol bottle in his truck, and two strips of LSD in his pocket. No blood test results are mentioned, but the circumstantial evidence is… well, acidic.
Then comes the big one: wrongful death. This is where the law steps in to say, “Yes, your loved ones are gone, and yes, someone else’s actions caused it, and yes, you deserve compensation.” The plaintiffs are asking for damages related to mental pain, pecuniary loss (basically, how much money the deceased would’ve earned), grief, loss of companionship, and—crucially—punitive damages. That last one is important. Punitive damages aren’t about making the family whole; they’re about punishing the defendant for being especially reckless. And make no mistake: driving a truck while tripping on LSD after drinking is about as reckless as it gets.
But here’s where it gets really spicy. The plaintiffs aren’t just suing a dead guy’s estate. They’re also suing Ryan McCollum, the owner of the truck, under a legal theory called negligent entrustment. That’s legalese for: “You let someone use your car, and you should’ve known they were a danger.” Did McCollum know Philen was a substance user? Was he aware of his mental state that night? The petition doesn’t say—but it implies that giving a high-risk individual access to a vehicle, especially one used for work in remote areas, is a recipe for disaster. And then, the net widens: Philen’s own company, Duncan Oil, Sierra Hamilton, RigUp—every link in the chain of contract labor is being dragged into court. The argument? That these companies failed to properly hire, supervise, or retain Philen, despite allegedly knowing (or should’ve known) he was unfit to operate a vehicle, let alone perform high-stakes oilfield consulting at night.
Now, here’s the kicker: the plaintiffs are demanding $75,000—plus punitive damages. At first glance, that number might seem shockingly low. Five lives lost. Multiple families shattered. A man found with acid in his pocket after killing four innocent people. But context matters. This is a petition, not a trial verdict. $75,000 is likely the minimum they can ask to get into Oklahoma state court—anything under that would go to small claims, which doesn’t handle wrongful death cases. The real value of this case? It could be millions, especially with punitive damages in play. But for now, they’re just getting the ball rolling. And they’re doing it with a jury trial demand—meaning they don’t want a judge quietly settling this. They want a jury of peers to look at the facts and say: This was unacceptable.
Our take? The most absurd part isn’t just that someone was on LSD while driving a work truck through rural Oklahoma. It’s that the entire system allowed it to happen. An oilfield consultant—working overnight, allegedly under contract with multiple companies, coordinated through digital platforms—ends up high, drunk, and behind the wheel, and nobody saw it coming? No drug testing? No check-ins? No safety protocols? And someone gave him the keys to a truck. The fact that two strips of acid were just… casually in his pocket like expired coupons? That’s not just tragic. It’s surreal. It’s a Saturday Night Live sketch written by a trauma surgeon.
We’re not rooting for blood money. We’re not even rooting for corporate heads to roll—though that’d be satisfying. We’re rooting for accountability. For the idea that just because you’re a contractor, working odd hours in a dangerous industry, doesn’t mean you get a free pass to operate a vehicle like a human pinball. And we’re rooting for the families—Jennifer and Juan Carlos—who didn’t just lose their loved ones in a crash. They lost them to a perfect storm of poor judgment, systemic negligence, and a substance combo so bizarre it sounds fictional. This case isn’t just about a car wreck. It’s about how thin the line is between a paycheck and a body bag when no one’s watching the watchmen. And in Beaver County, Oklahoma, that line may have just been erased by a bad trip.
Case Overview
-
Jennifer Velez
individual
Rep: Benjamin R. Grubb, OBA #31569
-
Juan Carlos Mendoza
individual
Rep: Benjamin R. Grubb, OBA #31569
- The Estate of Brett Edwards Philen, Deceased government
- Ryan McCollum individual
- Philen Consulting, Inc. business
- Duncan Oil Properties, Inc. business
- Sierra Hamilton, LLC business
- RigUp, Inc. business
- Unknown Principals and/or Assigns government
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligence | Plaintiffs claim that Defendants' Decedent Brett Edwards Philen negligently operated his vehicle and was distracted during the time prior to and including the moment of impact, causing the deaths of Plaintiffs' Decedents. |
| 2 | Negligence Per Se | Plaintiffs claim that Defendants were negligent per se in causing the collision at issue, in violation of Oklahoma statutes. |
| 3 | Wrongful Death | Plaintiffs claim that Defendants' actions were a direct and proximate cause of the deaths of Plaintiffs' Decedents, and seek recovery for damages and injuries suffered by their respective Decedents and allowed under Oklahoma's wrongful death statutes. |
| 4 | Negligent Entrustment | Plaintiffs claim that Defendants McCollum negligently entrusted his vehicle to Defendant's Decedent Brett Edwards Philen, a person who said Defendant knew or should have known would operate said vehicle in a dangerous or reckless manner and/or under the influence of alcohol and/or controlled substances. |