CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CRAIG COUNTY • CS-2026-00041

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A. v. DON H SIMMONS

Filed: Mar 18, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: a man in rural Oklahoma is being sued for $5,006… by a faceless financial entity based in a fancy office park in Connecticut… over a credit card debt he supposedly never paid. No drama. No scandal. No missing persons. Just one guy, one bill, and one very determined debt collector playing corporate whack-a-mole with delinquent accounts. If this were a movie, it would be titled The Audacity of Billing. But welcome, dear listener, to the wild world of civil court — where the stakes are low, the paperwork is high, and the only thing sharper than the legal arguments is the edge of your seat as it slowly tips backward from sheer boredom.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, we’ve got Don H. Simmons — a man whose entire legal footprint, at least in this filing, consists of a name, an address on Highway 60 near Vinita (population: small enough that everyone knows your cousin’s dog), and the quiet dignity of someone who probably just wanted to buy a lawnmower or some tires back in the day. That’s it. No criminal record. No Twitter rants. Just Don, living his life, possibly unaware that his financial past was about to come knocking — not with a friendly reminder, but with a lawsuit. On the other side? CAVALRY SPV I, LLC — and no, that’s not a medieval reenactment group. It’s a debt-buying company, the kind that lurks in the shadows of the financial system, purchasing old credit card debt for pennies on the dollar, then suing people to collect the full amount. Their address? A suite in Greenwich, Connecticut — one of the wealthiest ZIP codes in America. The irony writes itself: a billion-dollar debt machine suing a guy in Craig County, Oklahoma, which, let’s be honest, isn’t exactly known for its hedge fund scene.

Now, what actually happened? Well, buckle up, because it’s… underwhelming. At some point — the filing doesn’t say when, how, or why — Don Simmons opened a credit card account with Citibank, N.A. Maybe it was for groceries. Maybe it was for a surprise birthday party that got way out of hand. Maybe it was one of those “0% APR for 18 months!” deals that turns into a financial horror story. We don’t know. What we do know is that Don allegedly failed to pay off $5,006.00. Citibank, like banks do, eventually sold that debt to Cavalry SPV I, LLC — a common practice in the world of consumer finance, where unpaid debts are bundled, auctioned, and resold like expired airline miles. Once Cavalry bought it, they inherited the right to collect — and, more importantly, to sue. And sue they did. With a two-paragraph petition that reads like a form letter someone typed while half-asleep, Cavalry claims Don “promised to pay” but didn’t. That’s it. That’s the whole story. There are no receipts. No emails. No dramatic confrontation at a Walmart parking lot. Just a number, a name, and a demand.

So why are they in court? Let’s translate the legalese. The lawsuit is filed under “Petition on an Account and Money Lent,” which sounds like something from a 19th-century ledger but really just means: “You borrowed money. You didn’t pay it back. Now we want the court to make you pay.” In Oklahoma, this is a standard way for creditors (or, more accurately, debt buyers) to sue individuals over unpaid balances. The burden is on the plaintiff — Cavalry — to prove that Don actually owed the money, that the debt was properly assigned to them, and that they’re entitled to collect. But here’s the kicker: Cavalry didn’t attach the original contract. No credit agreement. No payment history. No proof that Don ever signed anything. They’re basically saying, “Trust us, Your Honor, he owes us five grand.” And while that might fly in some courts, it’s also the kind of thing that makes consumer advocates throw their hands up and scream, “This is exactly the problem with debt collection!”

Now, what do they want? $5,006.00 — plus interest, court costs, and attorney’s fees. Is that a lot? In the grand scheme of lawsuits, no. You could buy a decent used pickup truck for that. Or a really nice wedding ring. Or, if you’re Cavalry SPV I, LLC, approximately 0.0003% of your quarterly revenue. But for Don Simmons? That’s a mortgage payment. That’s a year of car insurance. That’s a chunk of change for anyone living paycheck to paycheck in rural Oklahoma. And let’s not forget — Cavalry likely paid maybe $500 for this debt. If they win, they’re making a 1,000% return on investment. That’s not capitalism. That’s vulture capitalism — and it’s perfectly legal.

Here’s the thing: we don’t know if Don actually owes the money. Maybe he does. Maybe he maxed out the card and ghosted Citibank. Maybe he forgot about it. Maybe he disputed the charges years ago and never heard back. Maybe he’s one of the millions of Americans buried under credit card debt through no fault of their own — medical bills, job loss, the economy collapsing during a global pandemic. We don’t know. And Cavalry’s filing doesn’t help us know. They didn’t provide evidence. They didn’t explain how they calculated the amount. They didn’t even bother to say what the debt was for. It’s like showing up to a fight with a foam finger and claiming you’re the heavyweight champion.

And yet, this is how it works. Thousands of these cases get filed every year — not just in Oklahoma, but across the country. Debt buyers file boilerplate lawsuits, often without proper documentation, banking on the fact that most people won’t show up to court. And when the defendant doesn’t appear? Boom. Default judgment. The plaintiff wins by forfeit. It’s less Law & Order and more Kafkaesque paperwork nightmare. Don might not even know he’s being sued. The summons could be sitting in his mailbox, buried under junk mail and tractor supply catalogs. Or maybe he’ll show up, confused, unrepresented, and forced to defend himself against a corporation with a team of lawyers on speed dial.

So what’s our take? The most absurd part isn’t that someone owes $5,000. It’s not even that a company in Connecticut is suing a guy in Vinita. It’s that this entire system runs on autopilot — where debt is bought and sold like fantasy football trades, where people are reduced to account numbers, and where justice often comes down to who has the better template. Cavalry didn’t write a story. They filed a form. And if Don doesn’t respond, the court might just hand them five grand like it’s nothing. That’s not justice. That’s bureaucracy with a law degree.

We’re rooting for Don — not because he’s innocent, but because he represents every person who’s ever been blindsided by a debt they thought was resolved, disputed, or just… gone. We’re rooting for a system that requires proof, not just promises. And we’re rooting for a day when a $5,000 lawsuit requires more than two paragraphs and a prayer. Until then, stay vigilant, keep your receipts, and for the love of all that is holy — read your mail.

Case Overview

$5,006 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
DISTRICT COURT, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$5,006 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 PETITION ON AN ACCOUNT AND MONEY LENT Defendant owes Plaintiff $5,006.00 according to a credit agreement assigned to Plaintiff by Citibank, N.A.

Petition Text

186 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAIG COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A. Plaintiff v. DON H SIMMONS Defendant PETITION ON AN ACCOUNT AND MONEY LENT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff, CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A. files this Petition on Account and Money Lent, and in support thereof will show the Court as follows: I. Plaintiff is CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A., whose business address is 1 American Lane, Suite 220, Greenwich CT 06831. Defendant is Don H Simmons, who may be served with process at 437572 E Highway 60, Vinita OK 74301-7648. II. Defendant owes Plaintiff the sum of $5,006.00 according to a credit agreement assigned to Plaintiff by Citibank, N.A.. Defendant promised to pay, but failed to do so. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for the sum of $5,006.00, plus interest and costs including reasonable attorney's fees. Respectfully submitted, JENKINS & YOUNG, P.C. P.O. Box 420 Lubbock, Texas 79408-0420 Telephone: (806) 687-9172 Facsimile: (806) 771-8755 Email: [email protected] By: [signature] Dan G. Young Oklahoma State Bar No. 20915 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.