CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CREEK COUNTY • CS-2026-00261

LVNV Funding LLC v. Michael Titus

Filed: Mar 18, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: someone just got sued for $917.65 — less than a decent used laptop — and an entire legal machine roared to life in Creek County, Oklahoma, complete with notarized affidavits, corporate lineage tracing, and a law firm that sounds like it belongs in a 1950s noir film. We’re not talking about embezzlement, fraud, or even a dramatic unpaid bar tab. No, this is peak American capitalism: a debt collector suing a man for a credit card balance so small it could’ve been settled with three Amazon returns and a gift card trade on Reddit.

Meet Michael Titus, the defendant in this saga, a regular guy whose name appears exactly once in this filing — right there in the caption, sandwiched between “vs.” and “IN THE DISTRICT COURT.” We don’t know what he does for a living, whether he’s got a dog named Buddy, or if he remembers ever opening the credit card at the heart of this drama. But we do know this: back on May 18, 2020 — right in the middle of global lockdowns, sourdough starters, and Zoom weddings — Michael Titus was extended credit by Credit One Bank, N.A., on an account ending in 4125. What he bought? Who knows. Maybe it was groceries during the toilet paper famine. Maybe it was a Peloton he never assembled. Maybe it was one of those cursed “subscribe and save” buttons that charge you every month for dog shampoo you don’t need. The court doesn’t say. But what we do know is that at some point, Michael stopped paying. He defaulted. And in the grand tradition of American finance, that debt didn’t just vanish. Oh no. It went on a journey.

First, Credit One Bank got tired of waiting. So they sold the debt — probably for pennies on the dollar — to a company called Credit Asset Sales LLC, which sounds like a firm that specializes in quietly buying up sadness and spreadsheets. Then, on December 16, 2022 — a cold winter day when most of us were worrying about holiday travel or whether the new Star Wars show was worth watching — that debt was bundled into something called Portfolio 41120 (sounds like a spy mission, but was likely just a spreadsheet with 10,000 other delinquent accounts) and sold again — this time to LVNV Funding LLC. That’s our plaintiff. LVNV doesn’t make products. It doesn’t sell services. Its entire business model is buying old debts and suing people for them. It’s the legal equivalent of a vulture, but with better dental and a notary stamp.

Now, LVNV didn’t come knocking with a clipboard and a stern look. No, they brought the full weight of the Creek County judicial system. On November 13, 2025 — yes, the future, if you’re reading this before then — attorney William L. Nixon, Jr. (of the delightfully old-timey firm Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C.) filed a Petition for Indebtedness against Michael Titus. The claim? That Michael owes $917.65. That’s it. Not $10,000. Not even $2,000. Nine hundred seventeen dollars and sixty-five cents. For context, that’s about what you’d spend on a mid-tier smartphone, two months of Netflix and Hulu, or a single night in a decent hotel in Tulsa. And yet, here we are, with lawyers drafting legal documents, notaries logging in remotely via SIGNIX®, and a judge potentially being asked to rule on whether Michael Titus must pay.

The legal claim is as dry as it gets: “Petition for Indebtedness.” In plain English? “Hey, this guy borrowed money. He didn’t pay it back. Now we own that debt, and we want the court to force him to pay us.” There’s no accusation of fraud, no claim that Michael maxed out the card and fled the country. Just a cold, hard assertion: the money is owed, the debt was legally transferred, and the plaintiff wants judgment from the court. They’re asking for the $917.65, plus interest (at whatever the state of Oklahoma says is fair), court costs, and — here’s the kicker — a “reasonable attorney’s fee.” Which is wild, because the amount they’re suing for is less than what many lawyers charge for an hour of work. If William L. Nixon, Jr. spent more than two hours on this case, LVNV is already losing money. Unless, of course, they file 50 of these a week — which, let’s be honest, they probably do.

So what do they want? $917.65. And while that might not sound like much, for someone living paycheck to paycheck — and let’s face it, if you’re being sued by a debt buyer, you’re probably not swimming in cash — that’s still a hit. It’s car repairs. It’s a month of electric bills. It’s a chunk of rent. But here’s the absurd part: LVNV isn’t asking for punitive damages. They’re not demanding Michael apologize in writing or attend a financial literacy seminar. They’re not even asking for more than the balance. They just want the money. And they’re willing to spend legal fees, notary services, and court resources to get it.

Now, let’s talk about the real story here. Because buried beneath the legalese and corporate transfers is a system that feels more like a glitch in the Matrix than actual justice. A man defaults on a credit card. The bank sells the debt. The debt gets resold. Then someone — a company with no prior relationship to Michael — sues him in court, armed with an affidavit from someone named Rebekah Odaniel, who swears under penalty of perjury that, based on “business records,” the debt is valid. But did she ever see the original contract? Did she talk to Michael? No. She’s just reading data that was handed to her. And yet, that’s enough to file a lawsuit.

And here’s the kicker: Michael might not even know about this. He might not get served. He might not show up. And then — boom — default judgment. The court rules against him automatically. His wages could be garnished. His credit score tanks further. And LVNV pockets the cash, minus whatever they paid for the debt. It’s a machine. A well-oiled, slightly dystopian machine that grinds on, one $900 lawsuit at a time.

Our take? We’re not rooting for the debt collector. Sorry, Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. — your name is fantastic, but your client is basically a financial zombie, feeding on expired debts. We’re also not saying Michael Titus is a saint. Maybe he went on a shopping spree and ghosted the bill. But at some point, we have to ask: is this how we want our legal system used? To chase down people for less than a thousand bucks? Should judges, clerks, and notaries be spending their time on cases that could’ve been resolved with a single phone call or a payment plan?

And let’s not pretend this is rare. This isn’t some bizarre outlier. This is how it works. Thousands of these cases get filed every day across America. Tiny debts. Faceless corporations. Overworked courts. It’s not dramatic. There’s no blood. No betrayal. Just paperwork, profit, and the slow, quiet erosion of dignity.

So here’s to Michael Titus. May he fight the good fight. Or at least remember to check his mail. And here’s to LVNV Funding LLC — may your portfolios be ever profitable, and your attorney fees never exceed your judgments. Because honestly? At this rate, you’re running a charity.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
DISTRICT COURT OF CREEK COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$918 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS Credit One Bank, N.A. provided credit to the defendant, who defaulted on the obligation, and the account was assigned to Plaintiff.

Petition Text

562 words
25-50552-0 ZH1 010 LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Michael Titus, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CREEK COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXX4125. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $917.65. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $917.65, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR CREEK COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Michael Titus Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXX4125 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Michael Titus by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 05/18/2020. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit Asset Sales LLC. Credit Asset Sales LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 41120, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 12/16/2022. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $917.65 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Rebekah Odaniel November 13, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Thursday, November 13, 2025. (Notary Public) Online Notary Public. Notarization facilitated by SIGNIX® PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.