CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1061

Beverly Banks v. U.S. Foods, Inc.

Filed: Feb 14, 2023
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: this is not a slip and fall in the traditional sense. There was no banana peel, no rogue puddle of spilled soda, no dramatic slow-motion trip over a misplaced mop bucket. No, what we have here is a full-on avalanche of frozen muffin mix — an 18-pound cylinder of doughy doom — that came crashing down on an unsuspecting employee like a carb-laden anvil from the sky. And now, Beverly Banks wants $1 million. Yes, one million dollars — for what sounds like the world’s most aggressive breakfast attack.

Meet Beverly Banks: a hardworking employee at a store located in the Southern Plaza shopping center in Bethany, Oklahoma. She’s not suing her boss. Nope. She’s aiming higher — or maybe just at the company that dropped the ball (or in this case, the giant frozen cylinder). That company? U.S. Foods, Inc., a national food distributor that supplies restaurants, grocery stores, and, apparently, the occasional frozen food death trap. On November 4, 2022, one of their delivery drivers — acting as an employee or agent of the company — rolled up to the store, unloaded a truck full of frozen goods, and stacked them inside the store’s freezer. Now, stacking boxes isn’t exactly rocket science, but it is something you’re supposed to do without creating a Jenga tower of doom in a commercial kitchen. And yet, that’s exactly what happened. The delivery person stacked multiple boxes, side by side, and perched an 18-pound cylindrical container of muffin dough mix on top of one of them. It looked less like a responsible delivery and more like a dare.

Beverly, ever the dutiful employee, clocked in and headed to the freezer to start unloading — a task she’d done “numerous times before,” the petition helpfully notes, as if to emphasize that she wasn’t some rookie fumbling around in subzero temps. She begins working on the front stack. Everything’s going fine. Then — wham. The stack behind her collapses. The muffin dough cylinder leads the charge, tumbling down like the boulder from Indiana Jones, followed by a cascade of frozen food items. Beverly gets hit. She gets hurt. And now, according to her attorneys, she’s dealing with significant injuries — pain, medical treatment, possible long-term issues — all because someone at U.S. Foods apparently thought freezer organization was an abstract art form.

So why is she suing? Because, the petition argues, U.S. Foods failed in its basic duty to keep the workplace safe — not just for its own employees, but for others who might interact with their deliveries. This isn’t about Beverly being clumsy or in the wrong place at the wrong time. It’s about negligence. Specifically, the legal kind. The filing lays out a laundry list of ways U.S. Foods allegedly dropped the ball: failing to follow their own safety protocols, not properly training their staff, not supervising their employees, and — the big one — creating a dangerous condition and not warning anyone about it. The law calls this negligence, and in plain English, it means: “You had a responsibility to act reasonably, and you didn’t.” And when that failure leads to someone getting hurt? That’s when lawsuits happen.

Now, here’s where it gets juicy. Beverly isn’t just asking for her medical bills. She’s not just asking for lost wages. She’s demanding over $75,000 — the threshold for diversity jurisdiction in federal court — but her attorneys are clearly angling for way more. The filing says she’s seeking damages “in excess of” that amount, and the hook? Yeah, the hook says $1 million. Is that realistic? Well… maybe not in the “judge hands over a briefcase full of cash” sense. But in the world of civil litigation, especially personal injury cases, million-dollar demands are often less about the exact number and more about sending a message: We’re not messing around. Still, let’s be real — $1 million for a muffin mix mishap? That’s enough to buy a small bakery. Or, you know, a lifetime supply of English muffins. For context, most slip-and-fall cases settle for way less unless there are catastrophic injuries — think broken bones, surgeries, long-term disability. If Beverly’s injuries are truly severe, the number might make sense. If it’s bruises and a doctor’s visit? Well, let’s just say the math gets a little… doughy.

What’s wild here isn’t just the scale of the claim — it’s the sheer specificity of the disaster. It’s not every day you see a lawsuit involving a rogue cylinder of muffin mix. It sounds like a sketch from a workplace safety training video gone rogue: “And this, employees, is what happens when you don’t secure the baked goods.” There’s also a delicious irony in the fact that U.S. Foods — a company literally in the business of feeding people — may have instead injured one. Was the delivery person in a rush? Were they stacking boxes like they were playing Tetris? Did no one think, “Huh, maybe don’t put an 18-pound tube of dough on a wobbly stack next to a walkway”? We may never know. But the filing makes it clear: this wasn’t just an accident. It was foreseeable. And in legal terms, that’s the golden ticket. If a reasonable person could predict that poorly stacked frozen goods might fall and hurt someone, then the company has a duty to prevent it. And if they don’t? Lawsuit city.

Look, we’ve all had a moment where we knocked something over in a freezer and just… left it. Maybe you were in a hurry. Maybe you thought, “Someone else will deal with it.” But when you’re a multi-million-dollar food distributor, “someone else” isn’t a viable safety policy. And while $1 million might sound like overkill for a muffin mix mauling, the principle matters: companies have a responsibility to act safely, even in the mundane moments. That said, if this case goes to trial and Beverly’s biggest injury is a bruised ego and a slightly dented pride, we might have to question whether this is justice — or just a very creative way to upgrade from a 401(k) to a seven-figure payout.

At the end of the day, we’re rooting for accountability — not necessarily the million bucks. We want to believe that someone at U.S. Foods will look at this case, cringe, and finally write a proper freezer stacking manual. Because if there’s one thing the world needs less of, it’s airborne muffin mix. And one thing it needs more of? Basic common sense. But hey — if justice comes with a side of doughy vengeance? Pass the syrup. We’re here for it.

(Also, can we get the security footage? Pretty please?)

Case Overview

$1,332 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1 Monetary
$0 Punitive
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Negligence Slip and fall injury due to defendant's failure to follow safety protocols

Petition Text

891 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA BEVERLY BANKS, Plaintiff, v. U.S. FOODS, INC., a Foreign For-Profit Business Corporation, Defendant, Case No. CJ - 2026 - 1061 PETITION COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Beverly Banks, by and through her attorneys of record, Matthew Reinstein and Grace Pence, of the Firm, Lawter & associates, PLLC, for her cause of action against Defendant, U.S. Foods, Inc., and states: 1. Plaintiff, Beverly Banks (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is now and, all times relevant to this action, has been a resident of Canadian County, Oklahoma. 2. On information and belief, Defendant, U.S. Foods, Inc., (hereinafter “Defendant”) is now and all times relevant to this action, has been a Foreign For-Profit Business Corporation that supplies food products to multiple facilities in the State of Oklahoma, including, but not limited to, the store located at 3737 N. College, Bethany, Oklahoma, known as Southern Plaza (hereinafter “Premises”). 3. The events and circumstances giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. 4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this claim, personal jurisdiction over the parties, and venue is properly lodged with this court. OPERATIVE FACTS 5. On or about November 4, 2022, Defendant via its employee or agent delivered several items in an assortment of sizes and containers and stacked them in multiple stacks in Plaintiff’s employer’s freezer. These stacked boxes were set next to each other. On top of one of the stacks was a heavy, approximately 18-pound, cylinder-shaped container with the contents of muffin dough mix. 6. Shortly after, Plaintiff entered the Premises to report for her job duties and then began to unload Defendant’s delivery as Plaintiff had successfully done numerous times before. As Plaintiff was finishing the front stack of items, a stack of items located directly behind the front stack fell on to Plaintiff, including the container of muffin mix followed by other frozen food items, causing injuries to Plaintiff. 7. Defendant had or should have had policies in place and procedures designed and intended to remedy dangerous conditions, that would have prevented the incident in question from happening if properly followed and employed. 8. That it was both generally and specifically foreseeable to Defendant that this type of incident could occur if Defendant’s agent, servant, and/or employee did not diligently perform their duties and follow and employ Defendant’s written policies and procedures. 9. Plaintiff sustained significant injuries as a result of the incident on the Premises. That said, injuries were the direct, foreseeable, and proximate result of Defendant’s agents, servants, and employees failing to practice reasonable care and diligence in the workplace. 10. That Defendant’s agents, servants, and employees negligently performed their duties, in that they failed to warn or correct the dangerous, hidden, and hazardous condition that they knew or should have known existed. 11. That Defendant’s agents, servants, or employees were careless and/or negligent by failing to follow and employ Defendant’s written policies and procedures regarding the safety protocols of their required duties. 12. That Defendant, by and through its agents, servants, and employees, was also negligent in one or more, but not limited to, the following particulars: a. In that it failed to act as reasonable and prudent persons would have acted under the same or similar circumstances; b. In that it failed to properly train its agents, servants, or employees to promote a safe condition as to protect others from harm; c. In that it failed to adequately supervise its employees, agents, servants, and representatives to ensure that the Premises was left in a safe and nonhazardous condition so as to prevent harm to its patrons and any other individuals at the Premises; d. In that it breached its duty of ordinary care, which led to Plaintiff’s injuries; e. In that it failed to follow its own policies and procedures regarding the loading and unloading of products at the Premises and the safety of its patrons and other individuals lawfully at the Premises. f. That Defendant is liable for the actions of any and all of its employees, agents, servants, managers, and/or representatives working at or involved with, in any way, the Premises and whom caused or contributed to this incident and Plaintiff’s injuries. Defendant’s liability regarding said persons can also be found based upon, but not limited to, the Doctrine of Respondeat Superior. g. That Defendant is liable to Plaintiff, for all her injuries and damages including her past, present, and future pain and discomfort; her past, present, and future medical treatment; and any permanent or persistent disability she has sustained in an in excess of the amount required for diversity jurisdiction pursuant to § 1322 of Title 28 of the United States Code. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that judgment be entered against Defendant in an amount in excess of the amount required for diversity jurisdiction pursuant to § 1332 of Title 28 of the United States Code for Plaintiff’s injuries and medical expenses, lost wages, property damages, all attorney’s fees and expenses incurred seeking same, interest on any judgment at the legal rate, costs of the Court, and for any other relief that this Court deems just, equitable, and proper. Respectfully Submitted, LAWTER & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. By: Matthew Reinstein, OBA #17127 Grace Pence, OBA #36745 3313 North Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK. 73118 Tel: (405) 525-4131 Fax: (405) 525-7855 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.