CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-635

Kristy Crouch v. Aspen Dental Management, Inc. d/b/a Aspen Dental, Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., and Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., PLLC

Filed: Feb 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: this isn’t about a cavity or a chipped tooth. This is about a woman who walked into a dentist’s office with four dental implants and walked out with permanent nerve damage, a dislocated jaw, and a mouth that no longer works like a mouth should. And the worst part? She says an unlicensed assistant was jamming dentures into her face like a DIY project gone horribly wrong — all under the supervision of a dentist who allegedly responded by forcefully yanking the thing out again and again, like he was playing a sadistic game of Operation. Welcome to Crazy Civil Court, where your warranty doesn’t cover nerve trauma, but apparently, a $500,000 lawsuit might.

Meet Kristy Crouch, a regular Tulsa County resident who, like many of us in our 50s and 60s, had invested in dental implants to avoid the denture dance of slipping, clicking, and constant adhesive refills. In 2021 or 2022, she got four implants in her lower jaw — a major procedure, not cheap, and thankfully under warranty. She went to Aspen Dental, a national chain that promises “smiles made easy,” which, let’s be honest, sounds more like a gym slogan than a dental philosophy. The man behind the chair? Dr. Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., operating under his own PLLC and backed by Aspen Dental Management, Inc., the corporate dental machine that’s popped up in strip malls from coast to coast like a fast-food franchise for molars.

Things started going sideways — literally — in October 2023, when Dr. Vo told Kristy one of her implants might be failing. A few months later, in April 2024, he confirmed all four were still intact. But the dentures on top of those implants? They kept breaking. Like, five times. That’s not bad luck — that’s either shoddy craftsmanship or a systemic failure in fit. Either way, Kristy was back in the chair, over and over, trying to get a set of fake teeth that wouldn’t snap in half when she bit into a granola bar.

Then came the day. April 3, 2024. Dr. Vo’s assistant — not a dentist, not even a licensed dental professional, according to the filing — tried to fit a new denture. But it was the wrong size. And instead of saying, “Hmm, this doesn’t fit, let’s try again,” they kept shoving it in. Eventually, it got lodged. Stuck. Trapped in Kristy’s mouth like a dental booby trap. And here’s where it gets wild: the assistant was allegedly not licensed to perform this kind of procedure, which violates Oklahoma law (59 O.S. §328.19). That’s not just a paperwork issue — that’s negligence per se, meaning the law itself says what they did was wrong, no debate needed.

But the horror show wasn’t over. Dr. Vo himself then stepped in — and instead of carefully removing the denture, he allegedly forcibly yanked it out, multiple times, causing Kristy “considerable pain.” And get this: on two of those occasions, he gave her numbing injections without her informed consent. No forms signed. No “Hey, I’m about to inject your face, cool?” Just boom — needle time. After repeated trauma, her jaw dislocated. And the numbness? It didn’t go away. Not after the anesthesia wore off. Not after a few days. Not ever.

Four days later, her mouth was so swollen, even Dr. Vo couldn’t remove the denture. It took three weeks and multiple anesthetic sessions before he finally got it out. And by then, the damage was done. Two weeks after the incident, one of her implants — the very thing she paid thousands for — fell out of her jawbone. Just… popped out. Like a loose screw in a wobbly chair.

She saw an oral surgeon, Dr. Christopher Ray, who confirmed the nightmare: left lingual nerve injury — meaning permanent numbness on the left side of her tongue. No surgical fix. No recovery expected. He also noted generalized bone loss, worst on the left side, and recommended immediate action to save the remaining implants. But Aspen Dental? They refused. Ignored the recommendations. Left her hanging. Even sent her to their own oral surgeons, who confirmed the damage — and still, nothing. No corrective care. No warranty repair. Just silence.

Then came the neurologist, Dr. Farooq. His verdict? “No neurological intervention possible.” The nerve damage is permanent. Kristy will never feel the left side of her tongue again. She bites it constantly. She drools. Her sense of taste is altered. Her jaw pops and aches — TMD, or temporomandibular joint disorder — likely from the unstable bite and repeated trauma. And the implants? One is broken, half stuck in her jaw. One’s gone. One’s dislodged. The last one’s hanging on by a thread. Replacing them all? Around $35,000. And that’s if she has enough bone left to even support new ones — which, thanks to the bone loss, might not be possible without grafts.

So why is she suing? Because this wasn’t just bad luck. It was a cascade of failures. First, letting an unlicensed assistant perform procedures they’re not legally allowed to do. Then, forcing a denture in and out like it’s a stuck drawer. Then, injecting someone without consent. Then ignoring expert medical advice to prevent further damage. The legal claims? Negligence, obviously. But also negligence per se — because violating a state licensing law is an automatic legal wrong. And breach of warranty — because those implants were under warranty, and Aspen Dental isn’t honoring it, even though the damage was caused by their own team’s actions.

And what’s she asking for? $500,000. Is that a lot? For a few cracked dentures? Maybe. But we’re not talking about dentures anymore. We’re talking about permanent nerve damage, chronic pain, disability, loss of function, and emotional distress. We’re talking about a woman who can’t eat, speak, or even control her own mouth the way she used to. We’re talking about future medical costs, lost quality of life, and a corporate dental chain that treated her like a warranty claim, not a human being. In that context? $500,000 isn’t greedy — it’s reasonable.

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part isn’t even the nerve damage. It’s that a national dental chain — one with the word “professional” in its branding — allegedly let an unlicensed person jam a denture into a patient’s mouth until it got stuck, then responded by ripping it out like a caveman with pliers. This isn’t dentistry. This is dental demolition. And the fact that they still refused to fix it, even after multiple specialists said the damage was preventable? That’s not just negligence. That’s corporate callousness at its finest.

We’re not saying every dentist is a menace. But when you turn oral healthcare into a high-volume, low-overhead franchise model, you start cutting corners. And sometimes, those corners are nerves. We’re rooting for Kristy Crouch — not because she wants half a million bucks, but because she wants accountability. She wants to know that when you trust a dentist with your face, they won’t treat it like a prototype in a lab. She wants to be able to taste her coffee again. And honestly? So do we.

Because if this can happen to her at Aspen Dental… whose mouth is next?

Case Overview

Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$500,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • Kristy Crouch individual
    Rep: James R. Hicks, DBA #11345 (BARROW & GRIMM, P.C.)
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 negligence: negligence per se and breach of warranty of the implants Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendants for negligence and breach of warranty, alleging that Defendants' actions caused her permanent and irreversible injuries.

Petition Text

1,375 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA KRISTY CROUCH PLAINTIFF, v. ASPEN DENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC D/B/A ASPEN DENTAL, JONATHAN VO, D.M.D., AND JONATHAN VO D.M.D., PLLC DEFENDANTS. FILED DISTRICT COURT TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA February 12, 2026 11:13 AM Case No. DON NEWBERRY, COURT CLERK Case Number CJ-2026-635 ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED PETITION Plaintiff, Kristy Crouch, for her cause of action against Defendants Aspen Dental Management, Inc. d/b/a Aspen Dental, Jonathan Vo, D.M.D and Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., PLLC, hereby alleges and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Kristy Crouch, is a resident of Tulsa County, Oklahoma. 2. Defendant, Aspen Dental Management, Inc., is a Delaware corporation d/b/a Aspen Dental qualified in Oklahoma and operating at 5510 E. 41st Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135. 3. Defendant, Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., is a dentist licensed by the State of Oklahoma and was employed by Aspen Dental and/or Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., PLLC at all time relevant. 4. Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., PLLC is an Oklahoma professional limited liability company, whose RSA is Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., 8416 S. 69th E, Ave., Tulsa, OK 74133. 5. Jurisdiction and venue are proper in this Court as the negligent dental treatment which forms the basis of this suit occurred in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. 6. This claim is for injury arising from dental treatment on or about April 3, 2024; allowing a non-licensed assistant to perform dental procedures on Plaintiff and breach of warranty. As a result of Defendants’ negligence, Plaintiff lost feeling in the left side of her tongue and her right jaw was dislocated. 7. In October 2023, Kristy Crouch was informed by Dr. Vo at Aspen Dental that one of her four dental implants, which were still under warranty, might fail. A subsequent examination in April 2024 confirmed all four implants were intact at that time. However, Plaintiff experienced repeated issues with the dentures fitted over these implants. The dentures fractured five times, necessitating replacements. During one fitting in April 2024, Dr. Vo's assistant repeatedly attempted to insert an incorrectly sized denture, resulting in it becoming firmly lodged. This treatment by an unlicensed assistant, employed and supervised by Defendants, violated 59 O.S. §328.19 and constitutes negligence per se. 8. Subsequently, Dr. Vo forcibly removed the denture on multiple occasions, causing Plaintiff considerable pain. On two occasions, he administered a numbing injection without obtaining Plaintiff’s informed consent or a signed consent form. These repeated instances of improper fitting and forceful removal ultimately led to Plaintiff’s jaw being dislocated, and lingual nerve damage. 9. The incident resulted in severe pain, numbness in Plaintiff’s lower jaw and left side of her face, tongue, and gums, and a significant alteration in her sense of taste. Four days later, the swelling in Plaintiff’s mouth prevented Dr. Vo from removing the denture. It took three weeks before he could finally remove it after administering more anesthesia. 10. Approximately two weeks after the incident involving the improperly fitted dentures, one of the implants completely dislodged from the bone and fell out. This was a direct result of the repeated, forceful removal attempts by Dr. Vo and his assistant. As previously stated, the improper fitting and forceful removal of the dentures, along with the multiple administrations of numbing injections without informed consent, caused significant damage. These actions resulted in a dislocated jaw, lingual nerve damage, severe pain, numbness in Plaintiff’s lower jaw and the left side of her face, tongue and gums, and a noticeable alteration in her sense of taste. The implant fell out later due to this incident. 11. Kristy Crouch was examined by an oral surgeon, Christopher Ray with Central Oklahoma Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, on December 31, 2024. His notes reflect the following: “Patient presents today for consultation regarding stripped abutment screw site 20 and left lingual nerve injury. Currently reports anesthesia to left side of tongue. Implants lower arch placed in 2021 or 2022. Reports she had a denture break 4 times, then new set of dentures got “stuck” in May of 2024 and one implant became dislodged. Reports in May of 2024 she had to be numbed numerous times during dislodgement of dentures and that her tongue and her left IAN never returned to normal sensation after local anesthesia administered. Now is able to taste but otherwise reports sensation is not normalizing. Also mentions that opening was reduced around May 2024 from this episode but has somewhat returned to normal.” Dr. Ray’s findings were as follows: 1. Left lingual nerve injury – seems to be injection related, given poor prognosis of injection related lingual nerve trauma to surgical intervention, I do not recommend surgical intervention. Recommend f/u with neurologist for possible medical intervention since no amenable to surgical intervention. 2. Lower implants – bone loss generalized, most significant on left side, least significant in lower right; has lost a lower posterior implant; lower left posterior implant with stripped screw portion that is reatiend in implant body. Recommend removal of current implant locator housings and replacement with lesser torque value so that there is less stress on implants, less perpetuation of bone loss. 3. TMJ pain – recommend evaluation with TMJ specialist like Dr. Terry Bennett. TMJ pain likely from unstable occlusion currently. 12. Despite the severity of the situation and the recommendations of a maxillofacial surgeon to preserve Plaintiff’s implants and bone structure, Defendants have refused to take any corrective action, leaving Plaintiff without recourse despite the existing warranty. 13. As a direct consequence of Dr. Vo’s actions, one implant is now completely broken, with half remaining in Plaintiff’s mouth, another has been entirely removed, one is dislodged, and the remaining implant is precariously attached. The maxillofacial surgeon's recommendations, which could have mitigated further damage, have been disregarded by Aspen Dental. Plaintiff now suffers from significantly limited mouth opening and ongoing issues, including TMD on the right side and lingual nerve damage on the left. 14. Kristy Crouch has consulted with several medical professionals regarding these complications. She consulted two oral surgeons, presumably associated with Aspen Dental, and was also referred to a Maxillofacial surgeon by Aspen Dental. During these evaluations, significant bone loss was noted, which the Maxillofacial surgeon indicated could have been prevented; however, Aspen Dental declined appropriate intervention. 15. More recently, Kristy Crouch sought an evaluation from Dr. Farooq, a Neurologist in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. Dr. Farooq confirmed that there is no neurological intervention possible to reverse the damage. He explicitly stated that the damage is permanent, resulting in a complete loss of sensation in Kristy Crouch’s lower left gums, the left side of her tongue, and her lower left jaw. Furthermore, he noted that the temporomandibular disorder (TMD) she is experiencing can only be managed symptomatically with medication. This nerve damage significantly impacts my daily life, manifesting in issues such as frequently biting her tongue and occasional drooling. Dental bone grafting and replacing the implants are estimated at $6,500.00 each. Ms. Crouch has four (4) implants. This would roughly be estimated to cost close to $35,000.00 or more. 16. Given the permanent and irreversible nature of these injuries, as confirmed by medical professionals, the concept of "future dental costs" for repair is applicable in the traditional sense. Kristy Crouch now faces the long-term impact of permanent impairment and ongoing management of symptoms. WHEREFORE Plaintiff, Kristy Crouch demands judgment against Defendants Aspen Dental Management, Inc. d/b/a Aspen Dental, Jonathan Vo, D.M.D and Jonathan Vo, D.M.D., PLLC. for negligence: negligence per se and breach of warranty of the implants, in an amount in excess of $500,000.00, plus to be determined costs including but not limited to expenses and attorneys' fees, and for such other and further relief to which the Plaintiff may be entitled. Respectfully submitted. James R. Hicks, DBA #11345 BARROW & GRIMM, P.C. 110 W. 7th, Suite 900 Tulsa, OK 74119 Telephone: 918-584-1600 Facsimile: 918-585-2444 [email protected] COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, KRISTY CROUCH VERIFICATION PURSUANT TO 12 O.S. §426 I state under penalty of perjury under the laws of Oklahoma that I am the Plaintiff in the above-entitled action; that I have read the above and foregoing PETITION, and I believe that the facts and matters therein set forth are true and correct. February Dated: January 9, 2026 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Kristy Crouch, Plaintiff SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 9 day of February, 2026. Notary Public My Commission Expires: __________ My Commission Number: __________
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.