CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LOGAN COUNTY • CJ-2026-83

Capital One, N.A. v. Ryan Copple

Filed: Apr 20, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: Ryan Copple didn’t get sued because he forgot to return a library book or because he let his dog poop on the neighbor’s lawn. No. Ryan is in court — or more accurately, being dragged into court — because Capital One wants $25,830.14. That’s not a typo. Twenty-five thousand, eight hundred and thirty dollars and fourteen cents. For a credit card.

Yes, this is technically a civil lawsuit, but at this dollar amount, it’s less “forgot to pay the bill” and more “apparently went full medieval shopping spree and vanished.” And now, years later, the financial hounds are howling.

So who is Ryan Copple? Honestly? We don’t know much. He’s not a celebrity. He’s not a disgraced politician caught on tape doing something wild. He’s just… a guy. A guy who, at some point, signed up for a Discover credit card — yes, that Discover — and presumably used it to buy things. Maybe it was medical bills. Maybe it was a new truck. Maybe it was a three-year-long Amazon bender fueled by late-night insomnia and questionable life choices. We don’t know. But what we do know is that he stopped paying. And now, Capital One — a bank so large it makes Discover look like its slightly nerdy cousin — has sent a legal army after him.

Let’s talk about that legal army. The petition lists seven attorneys. Seven. Stephen L. Bruce, Everette C. Altdoerffer, Leah K. Clark, Clay P. Booth, Roger M. Coil, Adam W. Sullivan, and Katelyn M. Conner — all listed like they’re the Avengers of debt collection. These are not people who show up to argue about parking tickets. These are professionals who specialize in making sure corporations get their money back, even if it means chasing down a guy in Logan County, Oklahoma, for nearly twenty-six grand.

Here’s how we got here: Ryan Copple, at some point in the not-so-distant past, signed a Discover Cardmember Agreement. That’s the fine print you click through when you get a credit card — the part where you promise, legally, to pay back what you spend, plus interest and fees, in monthly installments. Standard stuff. But then, somewhere along the line, Ryan stopped making those payments. He defaulted. That’s the legal way of saying “he didn’t pay, and now we’re mad.”

Now, the filing doesn’t say why he stopped paying. Was he unemployed? Was he sick? Did he just decide, “You know what? I’m not paying this anymore,” and toss the bill into the void? We don’t know. And frankly, Capital One doesn’t care. They’re not here to judge Ryan’s life choices — they’re here to collect. And collect they will, if the court agrees.

So what exactly is Capital One asking for? $25,830.14. Plus interest — statutory interest, which in Oklahoma is 6% per year if there’s no contract rate specified, though credit card agreements usually have their own sky-high rates. Plus the costs of the action, which means filing fees, service of process, and probably a few cups of coffee for the paralegal who had to track Ryan down. Oh, and one more thing: they want the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission — that’s the state unemployment agency — to hand over Ryan’s employment information. Why? Because if they win — and they almost certainly will — they’ll want to know where Ryan works so they can garnish his wages. That’s right. If a judge rules in Capital One’s favor, they could start taking money directly out of Ryan’s paycheck. And they’re not waiting for that to happen — they’re asking the court to order it now.

Now, is $25,830 a lot of money? Absolutely. For most people, that’s a car. A down payment on a house. Two years of rent. A solidly middle-class vacation to Mars. It’s not a small debt. But here’s the thing: in the world of credit card debt, $25k isn’t unheard of. According to the Federal Reserve, the average credit card balance in the U.S. is around $6,000. But that’s an average. Some people have zero. Some have $2,000. And some — like Ryan — have enough to make a bank lawyer wake up in a cold sweat and mutter, “We need to file.”

But let’s be real. This isn’t really about Ryan Copple. It’s about the machine. Capital One didn’t wake up one morning and say, “Hey, let’s sue Ryan!” No. This is a process. They have algorithms scanning accounts. They have departments that decide when to sue. They have law firms on retainer — like Bruce Law in Edmond — that specialize in exactly this kind of thing. It’s not personal. It’s just business. And the business is collecting money.

Now, what’s the most absurd part of all this? It’s not the debt. It’s not even the seven lawyers. It’s the fact that Ryan’s fate — whether he gets sued, whether his wages get garnished, whether he has to declare bankruptcy — hinges on a document he probably signed on his phone in 2014 while ordering groceries online. That “Discover Cardmember Agreement”? He likely clicked “I agree” without reading a single word. And now, over a decade later, that split-second decision is worth $25,830.14.

We’re rooting for transparency, honestly. We’re rooting for the day when credit card agreements are written in plain English, not ancient banking hieroglyphics. We’re rooting for a world where people understand what they’re signing — and where banks don’t act like loan sharks with JD degrees. But mostly? We’re rooting for Ryan to at least get a good lawyer. Because right now, he’s one guy with no attorney listed, up against a corporate Goliath with seven lawyers and a spreadsheet that probably has his Social Security number in bold.

And if Ryan does lose? Well, then the next time you get a credit card offer in the mail — “No annual fee! 0% APR for 18 months!” — just remember: someone, somewhere, is getting sued for $25,830.14 over one of those. And his name is Ryan Copple.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But even we know this much: never underestimate the power of compound interest — or the wrath of a well-funded debt collection department.

Case Overview

$25,830 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$25,830 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • Capital One, N.A. business
    Rep: Stephen L. Bruce, OBA #1241, Everette C. Altdoerffer, OBA #30006, Leah K. Clark, OBA #31819, Clay P. Booth, OBA #11767, Roger M. Coil, OBA #17002, Adam W. Sullivan, OBA #35748, Katelyn M. Conner, OBA #366601
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1

Petition Text

269 words
THE DISTRICT COURT OF LOGAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CAPITAL ONE, N.A. Successor by merger to Discover Bank Plaintiff, vs. RYAN COPPLE Defendant Case No P E T I T I O N COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Capital One, N.A., successor by merger to Discover Bank, and for its cause of action against the Defendant RYAN COPPLE (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) alleges and states as follows: 1. That the Defendant entered into an agreement referred to as a “Discover Cardmember Agreement” with the Plaintiff whereby the Plaintiff agreed to extend a revolving line of credit to the Defendant for cash advances or the purchase of goods and services. 2. The Defendant agreed to pay the account balance plus finance charges and other charges and fees in monthly installments according to the terms of the above referenced agreement. 3. The Defendant defaulted under the terms of the agreement referred to in paragraph 1 above. 4. The Defendant is currently indebted to Plaintiff for charges made under the above referenced agreement in the sum of $25830.14. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $25830.14, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment until paid, and costs of this action. Plaintiff further requests an order directing the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to produce employment information of the judgment debtor(s) pursuant to 40 O.S. § 4-508(D). Stephen L. Bruce, OBA #1241 Everette C. Altdoerffer, OBA #30006 Leah K. Clark, OBA #31819 Clay P. Booth, OBA #11767 Roger M. Coil, OBA #17002 Adam W. Sullivan, OBA #35748 Katelyn M. Conner, OBA #366601 Attorneys for Plaintiff P.O. Box 808 Edmond, Oklahoma 73083-0808 (405) 330-4110 | [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.