Edward Fisher v. Ramona Smith
What's This Case About?
Let’s get one thing straight: this is not your average fender-bender. We’re not talking about a ding in the bumper from a distracted driver at a red light. No, this is a full-blown, multi-vehicle, commercial truck vs. compact car pileup in the sleepy town of Porter, Oklahoma — a place where the most exciting thing on a Tuesday might be a particularly aggressive squirrel at the gas station. But on March 1, 2024, the universe decided to spice things up, and Edward Fisher got caught right in the middle of it, walking away with $150,000 in claimed damages and a lawsuit that reads like a legal game of Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, but with semi-trucks and negligent car dealerships.
So who are these people? Well, we’ve got Edward Fisher — our plaintiff, the guy who just wanted to drive down Highway 69 like a normal human being, minding his own business, probably listening to classic rock or an audiobook about survivalist prepping (it’s Oklahoma, after all). Then there’s Ramona Smith, who allegedly stopped her car — for reasons still unknown — smack dab in the middle of the road like she was auditioning for a music video. Was she checking her lipstick? Did she see a deer? Did she just decide, “You know what? I’m done with motion”? The filing doesn’t say, but what we do know is that Edward Fisher stopped behind her, like any responsible driver would. And then… enter Marc Johnson, a professional trucker behind the wheel of a commercial behemoth, who apparently didn’t get the memo about “stopping before hitting other vehicles.” He plowed into Fisher’s car from behind, turning what might’ve been a minor inconvenience into a full-on collision cascade.
Now, you might think, “Okay, Marc Johnson screwed up. End of story.” But no. Because in true legal soap opera fashion, this case has more layers than a Baptist potluck lasagna. Fisher isn’t just suing the people directly involved — he’s going full scorched earth, dragging in everyone who might’ve had a hand in the disaster, from trucking companies to car dealerships, like he’s building a Jenga tower of liability and daring it not to collapse.
Let’s unpack the chaos. First, there’s Ramona Smith — accused not just of stopping in the middle of the road like a confused GPS voice, but also of driving a vehicle that allegedly belonged to one of four nearly identical-sounding car dealerships: Patriot Hyundai GMC, Patriot Hyundai, Patriot GMC, or Patriot GMC of Bartlesville. Seriously, how many Patriot GMCs does one town need? It’s like they franchised confusion. Fisher claims that whichever Patriot entity owned the car negligently entrusted it to Smith — legalese for “you shouldn’t have let her drive this thing.” Maybe she had a history of erratic driving. Maybe she once parallel parked into a fire hydrant. We don’t know. But the implication is that the dealership knew or should’ve known she was a danger on wheels.
Then we’ve got Marc Johnson, the trucker. He’s not just some guy with a CDL — he’s a professional driver, operating under strict federal safety rules meant to keep 80,000-pound vehicles from turning highways into demolition derbies. And yet, according to the filing, he was speeding, not paying attention, following too closely — basically committing every cardinal sin of truck driving in one go. So Fisher says he’s liable for negligence, or worse — gross negligence, which is lawyer-speak for “you didn’t just mess up, you messed up epically.”
But here’s where it gets juicy: Fisher isn’t stopping at Johnson. He’s going after his employers — or at least the companies that might have employed him. Enter Success Truck Leasing Inc. and Spot on TMS, LLC — names that sound less like real companies and more like aliases from a mid-tier spy movie. Fisher claims these two are on the hook under vicarious liability, meaning “you pay because your guy did the crime.” It’s the legal version of “you hired him, you deal with the fallout.” And not only that — he’s accusing them of negligent entrustment too. That’s right — they allegedly gave a massive commercial truck to a guy who may have been unqualified, untrained, or just plain reckless, and now someone’s demanding six figures because of it.
And just to make sure no legal stone is left unturned, Fisher throws in a claim that these trucking companies failed to follow federal safety regulations — things like background checks, driver training, hours-of-service monitoring — all the safeguards meant to prevent exactly this kind of disaster. If true, that’s not just a mistake. That’s a systemic failure. If false? Well, then it’s a very aggressive legal strategy.
So what does Fisher want? A cool $150,000 — split evenly between actual damages (medical bills, car repairs, pain and suffering) and punitive damages (money meant to punish the defendants, not just compensate the plaintiff). Now, is $150,000 a lot for a car crash? Depends. If Fisher suffered serious injuries — broken bones, surgeries, long-term therapy — then sure, that’s in the ballpark. But if it’s just whiplash and a dented fender? That’s where things get… questionable. And let’s not forget — he’s demanding a jury trial, which means this isn’t just about money. It’s about making a point. It’s about dragging all these parties into a courtroom and saying, “Explain yourselves.”
Our take? Look, we’re not here to defend people who stop in the middle of highways or truckers who treat brake lights as optional. But this lawsuit feels like using a flamethrower to light a candle. Ramona Smith stopping in traffic? That’s bizarre and dangerous. Marc Johnson not stopping behind her? That’s inexcusable. But suing four car dealerships that may or may not have owned Smith’s vehicle? Going after two trucking companies on multiple theories of liability? It’s the legal equivalent of bringing a bazooka to a fender-bender.
The most absurd part? The sheer number of defendants. Patriot Hyundai GMC, Patriot Hyundai, Patriot GMC, Patriot GMC of Bartlesville — are these four separate entities, or just different names on the same dealership’s business cards? It’s like Fisher’s lawyer copy-pasted the Yellow Pages. And the trucking companies — Success Truck Leasing and Spot — are being accused of failing to monitor a driver’s behavior, but we don’t yet know if Johnson had a history of violations, or if this was a one-time lapse. Until then, this feels less like a clear-cut case of negligence and more like a legal fishing expedition.
Still… we’re rooting for clarity. For answers. For someone — anyone — to explain why a car was just… sitting… in the middle of a highway. Because if that’s becoming normal, we’ve got bigger problems than lawsuits.
Case Overview
-
Edward Fisher
individual
Rep: Monty L. Cain, OBA #15891 & Rilee D. Harrison, OBA #33742
- Ramona Smith individual
- Patriot Hyundai GMC business
- Patriot Hyundai business
- Patriot GMC business
- Patriot GMC of Bartlesville business
- Marc Johnson individual
- Spot on TMS, LLC business
- Success Truck Leasing Inc business
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligence Entrustment | Plaintiff claims Defendants negligently entrusted a vehicle to Ramona Smith, who caused a collision with another vehicle driven by Marc Johnson. |
| 2 | Negligence/Gross Negligence Defendant Marc Johnson | Plaintiff claims Marc Johnson's negligent driving caused a collision with Plaintiff's vehicle. |
| 3 | Vicarious Liability Defendant Success Truck Leasing Inc and Defendant Spot | Plaintiff claims Success Truck Leasing Inc and/or Defendant Spot is vicariously liable for Marc Johnson's negligent acts. |
| 4 | Negligence Entrustment Defendant Success Truck Leasing Inc | Plaintiff claims Success Truck Leasing Inc negligently entrusted a commercial motor vehicle to Marc Johnson. |