Hannah Cones v. Kyle Noble

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LOGAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA HANNAH GRACE CONES PLAINTIFF V. KYLE NOBLE (STEVENS), DEPUTY KOPF (Logan County Sheriff's Office), JOHN and JANE DOES 1-10 (Unknown Co-Conspirators) DEFENDANTS. CAUSE NO. CJ-2L-39 PETITION FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, DEFAMATION PER SE, IDENTITY THEFT, AND THE FABRICATION OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Hannah Grace Cones, appearing Pro Se, and files this Petition for Malicious Prosecution and Defamation Per Se. Following her full exoneration on February 20, 2025, Plaintiff brings this civil action to seek redress for identity theft, the fabrication of digital evidence, and the specific acts of perjury committed by Kyle Noble (Stevens) and/or unknown co-conspirators. I. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 1. Plaintiff, Hannah Grace Cones, affirms that she was wrongly accused, unjustly prosecuted, and falsely implicated in the alleged offense of Electronic Harassment purported to have occurred between March 20, 2024, and February 20, 2025. 2. Plaintiff has been the victim of a sophisticated scheme involving online impersonation and conspiracy, intended to commit Defamation Per Se and damage both her reputation and personal freedom. 3. The individuals responsible for this identity theft and impersonation acted with malice, motivated by a desire for control, deception, and fear of exposure. Their scheme involved exploiting Defendant Kyle Noble (Stevens)—anticipating she would file false charges and provide perjured testimony regarding the origin of the messages—by fabricating a fraudulent TextNow account and a counterfeit Yahoo email address bearing Plaintiff's name. 4. Plaintiff alleges that Kyle Noble (Stevens), and/or unknown co-conspirators, engaged in perjury by providing false statements under oath in the filing of Victim Protective Orders (VPOs) and the subsequent criminal investigation, with the intent to mislead the Court and law enforcement. 5. This account was deliberately created to malign Plaintiff's character, flagrantly violating her ethical and Christian values, and to publish false, defamatory statements to the court system. 6. Plaintiff seeks civil judgment against the Defendants for Malicious Prosecution and Defamation, as the legal proceedings against her were initiated without probable cause, sustained by perjury and fabricated evidence, and terminated in her favor via full exoneration. II. THE INSTRUMENTS OF DEFAMATION AND IDENTITY THEFT 6. The specific instruments used to carry out this defamatory scheme were a fraudulent TextNow account associated with phone number 580-205-5128 and a counterfeit Yahoo email address: [email protected]. 7. These accounts were created and manipulated for the express purpose of wrongfully implicating Plaintiff in criminal electronic harassment and unjustly damaging her reputation within the community and the court system. 8. Defendants used these fraudulent accounts to send fabricated "terroristic threats." These malicious acts occurred during Plaintiff's divorce from Douglas J. Cones and were part of a calculated campaign to distribute digital evidence in a manner designed to prevent tracing the activity back to the true authors. 9. The use of Plaintiff's name on these accounts constitutes Identity Theft and Defamation Per Se, as the accounts were used to publish false statements to law enforcement, the District Attorney, and legal counsel, asserting that Plaintiff had committed violent criminal acts. 10. Despite Plaintiff's ethical and Christian values, the Defendants purposefully linked her identity to these "666" and "idgaf" monikers to further malign her character and portray her as unstable and dangerous to the Court. I have been the victim of a sophisticated scheme involving online impersonation and conspiracy, intended to damage both my reputation and personal freedom. The individuals responsible for this identity theft and impersonation acted with malice, motivated by a desire for control, deception, and fear of exposure. Their scheme involved exploiting Kyle Noble, anticipating she would quickly file charges, by fabricating a TextNow account and a counterfeit Yahoo email address bearing my name, both tied to this fraudulent TextNow account. The phone number used by the impersonator through the TextNow account was 580-205-5128, and the associated Yahoo email address was [email protected]. This account was deliberately created to malign my character, flagrantly violating my ethical and Christian values. The purpose of establishing this TextNow account was to wrongfully implicate me in electronic harassment and unjustly damage my reputation. The account was manipulated to send terroristic threats. This malicious act occurred in the context of my divorce from my former husband and was part of a calculated campaign against me, carried out with full awareness of my innocence. The conspirators sought to distribute digital evidence in a manner designed to prevent tracing the activity back to the individual who created the TextNow and Yahoo accounts. Judging from the evidence given to me by my attorney, it appears a phone call was made to Kyle, and there is no evidence of a message sent, yet in her denied protective order, she says she was sent a message by Hannah. My attorney, Joan Lopez, sent an email with a screenshot of a message that was printed off and sent to her at 1:03 p.m. It stated, "I received the attached from opposing counsel. Did one of you send this to Kyle Stevens?" asking if I or Santiago Hernandez had sent Kyle Stevens the message. This message has only been documented by our attorney sending it and asking if we sent it. It was seen on April 12, 2024, at Santiago Hernandez’s Protective Order Hearing, during which Kyle showed Judge Duel the message, trying to get her protective order approved. Thankfully, the message was sent to us by our previous attorney asking if we had sent it because, after that and April 12, it was as if it never existed, and it was somehow implied that I had fabricated evidence and that the DA had no record of when the message was sent or the true date. Yet my attorney, Tim McKinney, told me that, and I quickly showed him the email from my lawyer, Joan Lopez, which included a screenshot that was taken and printed out, with Joan stating, "I received the attached from opposing counsel. Did one of you send this to Kyle Stevens?" She was asking if I or Santiago Hernandez had sent Kyle Stevens the message that Joan Lopez had sent by email. It can be seen that it is still different, and it could be argued that someone called her and told her what to write, especially considering the evidence given to me by my lawyer, Tim McKinney, who says he got it from the DA and shows a phone call made at 10:26 a.m., not a message. She never said in the protective order that she received a call; instead, she says she received a text message, which she had written out, at the exact same time she received a call at 10:26 a.m. Although it is very close to the message sent by email by Joan Lopez, it can be seen that it is still different, and it could be argued that someone called her and told her what to write, especially considering the evidence given to me by my lawyer, Tim McKinney, who says he got it from the DA and shows a phone call made at 10:26 a.m., not a message. It appears as if the plan was for either one individual to text themselves or another participant, and then one of them was to call her to tell her what to write, afterward sending the message to their lawyer to send to me and Santiago Hernandez’s lawyer at the time, who was representing Santiago in his custody battle over his daughter with Kyle, and my divorce attorney for my divorce from Douglas J. Cones. Later, when a charge was filed after the protective order was denied, it appears as if the message was withheld because at no time did the probable cause affidavit show it, nor did the DA ever present it. The incriminating message was known to be fabricated, derived from an original text I sent on August 29, 2023, which was altered to imitate my voice by incorporating language similar to that of the original message. My ex-husband, Douglas J. Cones, provided screenshots of Facebook Messenger conversations between Kyle and himself. On September 6, 2023, Douglas requested from Kyle, "Can you send me those messages because I really need them? It shows that Hannah and James are unstable," referencing the original August 29 text, which was later altered by adding threatening language. The dates presented in the alleged report and Kyle Stevens's date of birth are inaccurate. Furthermore, the report retroactively applies to a VPO filed 113 days—more than sixteen weeks—earlier. The probable cause affidavit omits the photograph attached to the report and falsely claims a meeting between Deputy Kopf and Kyle Stevens at 11:18 a.m., failing to associate a report number with the protective order on that date. A VPO was recorded and timestamped at 12:59 a.m., which should have been noted as 12:59 p.m. The purported statements do not correspond with the message in question, which was actually sent by email from my attorney, Joan Lopez, at 1:03 p.m., stating, "I received the attached from opposing counsel. Did one of you send this to Kyle Stevens?" The phone log was mistakenly labeled as "messages," although the inclusion of Logan County dispatch indicates a call made to that number at 1:25 p.m. This is illogical, as dispatch cannot send messages; therefore, this cannot represent a message log. On that day, only a handwritten VPO against me was filed, which Judge Duel subsequently denied on March 26, 2024. The charge at issue was filed 113 days later, yet no physical messages exist to support the claim. Moreover, no reports corroborate allegations of breaking and entering within the denied VPO, nor does the filed charge reference such an incident. Prior to the jury trial, accompanied by my attorney, I personally visited the county clerk’s office and police station to inquire about any reports purportedly filed against me regarding the break-ins; none were found. Kyle Stevens lacked probable cause to initiate criminal proceedings against me and failed to appear as a subpoenaed witness at trial. Notably, the impersonator employed language mirroring my own expressions, such as "You do not intimidate me" and "You have crossed boundaries," attempting to replicate my original text. Please refer to Exhibit 1—the original text I sent—and compare it with Exhibit 2—the fabricated message intended to incriminate me. On March 20, 2024, Kyle Noble claimed to have submitted two police reports related to a protective order. These reports were false and fabricated to support the protective order; subsequently, Judge Duel dismissed the order on two occasions. She accused me of unlawfully entering her residence, toppling her Christmas tree, and stealing court documents. However, according to Deputy Kopf’s statement in the probable cause affidavit from their meeting that day, it appears that either Deputy Kopf or Kyle Stevens omitted any reference to the break-ins, as well as the protective order Kyle filed against her ex-husband at 12:58 p.m.—incorrectly recorded as 12:58 a.m., despite clear evidence of the correct filing time. Remarkably, one minute before the protective order against me was filed, another protective order was filed against her ex-husband. There was no mention of the protective order she initiated against her ex-husband, nor any alleged break-ins similar to those claimed in the denied VPO. Additionally, no reference was made to the protective order filed on that day, which was ultimately denied six days later. The purported message said to have been photographed and attached to the probable cause affidavit is missing, and even her written reference to it was omitted from the affidavit, with no report documenting its filing, contrary to Deputy Kopf’s assertion. Deputy Kopf displayed negligence by failing to conduct a thorough investigation before filing charges and neglected her duty to review the evidence or subpoena TextNow records to confirm the sender’s identity. This lapse resulted in a lack of probable cause. For eight harrowing months, I endured online impersonation and identity theft. Despite this, I was wrongfully charged with Electronic Harassment, had a warrant issued for my arrest, and was forced to defend myself against a misdemeanor allegation. Throughout every court appearance, I was repeatedly denied the opportunity to provide my testimony before the Honorable Judge Vaughn. I was innocent; nonetheless, Kyle Noble persistently pursued the charges without any genuine intention to testify as the sole witness supporting the case. I have suffered significant emotional distress, including shock, devastation, and humiliation. When I attempted to file a protective police report at the Guthrie Police Station, my request was refused, thereby infringing upon my due process rights and indicating a failure to conduct an investigation prior to Deputy Kopf filing charges 113 days later. The charge was officially filed by Deputy Kopf on July 11, 2024. However, a probable cause affidavit was not provided until July 18, 2024, despite the charge having been filed on July 11. In this charge, Sarah Conley, having been duly sworn under oath, affirmed that the statements contained in the aforementioned information and within the probable cause affidavit reviewed by the arresting officer in the court file are true and accurate to the best of her knowledge and belief. How can this be possible when the probable cause affidavit did not exist until July 18? Furthermore, why does the affidavit retroactively date to March 20 and reference a report that was never created or documented? I was subjected to prosecution without probable cause, resulting in my being scheduled for a jury trial on February 20 and 24. Despite eight plea offers being declined by my attorney, he reported that the District Attorney remained determined to secure a conviction against me. Kyle failed to comply with a subpoena on November 19, 2024, and was subsequently subpoenaed again on January 6, 2025, yet still did not comply. Deputy Kopf was also subpoenaed on November 19, 2024. There is no online evidence indicating that the subpoena was ever issued for Kyle’s second subpoena; it was prepared and signed by Sarah Conley, ADA, but was neither formally authorized nor notarized as having been served. Kyle neither complied nor appeared at the jury trial. On November 20, 2024, I obtained an order for the release of records, followed by a NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER TO RELEASE RECORDS on November 22, 2024, concerning the TextNow account records, and a SECOND NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER TO RELEASE RECORDS on December 12, 2024. I did not receive the materials required to be disclosed, specifically the information identifying the creator of the message account or the Yahoo account associated with the TextNow account. The requested documents, which TextNow usually provides, were missing from the evidence supplied to me by my attorney, Tim McKinney, who indicated that the DA had furnished them. The data mandated by my NUNC orders and the directive to release records from TextNow were absent, along with a certificate of authenticity that TextNow provides. This suggests that I was impersonated and defrauded, with no analysis of IP addresses conducted and an improper substitution of a phone log in place of the actual message record. Also, the DA didn’t give the evidence until February 9, 2024, a day prior to the discovery deadline, which was February 10, 2024. An investigation revealed that dispatch sent a message to the number on March 20, 2024, at 1:25 p.m.; however, dispatch is only authorized to make calls, not send messages. Furthermore, calls made by Santiago and me correspond with our phone records, yet no messages were sent by us. The message log itself is missing, along with any evidence that Kyle Stevens ever received a message; the records indicate only that a phone call was placed. The evidence given also shows the TextNow account was created on March 20, 2024, at 10:20 a.m., and the call was made at 10:26 a.m. that day. I have reason to suspect that Douglas Cones created, or had another person create, a fraudulent email under the address [email protected]. Then either the person who created the email made a TextNow account themselves or had someone do so, where TextNow provided them with the number 580-205-5128. He either sent it to himself or arranged for someone else to send it to him or themselves, leaving the song he played, "The Man I Want to Be" by Chris Young, intentionally or unintentionally included as a covert claim of responsibility. The night he agreed to give me our daughters back, he dedicated that song to me while we were sitting together in his car, and he also knew that I had sent that song to my other ex, who is currently his roommate. Then Kyle was called at 10:26 and told what to write. The message was then printed off and emailed or faxed to either Doug's attorney, Phillip Peak, or Kyle's attorney, Chris Harper, for transmission to my attorney, Joan Lopez, who inquired at 1:03 p.m. whether Santiago or I had sent the message. The message consisted of a screenshot printed and sent via email or fax to conceal the digital trail. The evidence provided by my lawyer included an IP address of the TextNow account holder sender/caller address which, upon inspection through an IP locator, was found to have ASN 7018 registered in Tulsa. Kyle filed the PO in Guthrie, not in Tulsa. This legal pursuit culminated in my being scheduled for a jury trial on February 20 and 24, where the judge ultimately exonerated me. Kyle was subpoenaed but did not sign the subpoena, failed to appear at trial, and was neither issued an arrest warrant nor questioned regarding her absence I was the victim of a drive-by shooting along with my 8-year-old daughter on February 28th, 2025, while sitting on my porch swing at exactly 2:12 p.m. I have a police report providing details of that day, which I will be adding to this. Also, on February 15, 2026, I was impersonated and harassed. My old Facebook name was Daisey Branson because everybody in my hometown called me Daisey, and my dad’s name is Glen. This person changed their name on that profile to Daisy B. Glenn. The Facebook link: https://www.facebook.com/share/1DEyQGcrBw/?mibextid=wwXlfr We also had someone come into our home and, we believe, place a listening device underneath my bedstand because there was black duct tape, presumably Gorilla Tape, left there. We don’t know how it got there; it appeared to be holding something large. This person changed their profile picture to a listening device underneath a bedstand, which was just a generic picture, and they’re harassing me through my Santiago Hernandez account, saying all kinds of unnecessary things. I have attached pictures showing the harassment, and I am still being impersonated, showing this has been ongoing since March 20, 2024. It is critical that I have two court-ordered subpoenas: the Order to Release Records and the Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Release Records, which I can submit to Yahoo and TextNow. This is so I can regain control of my life because there has been no accountability or responsibility regarding me being a victim of online impersonation and identity theft. Those who created this against me want me to understand what it’s like to be wrongfully accused and wrongfully prosecuted for a crime I did not commit. It is also for the safety of me and my children due to the ongoing harassment and legal battles. This will allow me to file charges and protect myself against the individuals who plotted and executed this against me, and so that I can also file for a permanent restraining order. Throughout this process, there was no genuine effort to uncover the truth about who authored the message or, more importantly, who orchestrated the framing against me. AFFIDAVIT OF FACT I, Hannah Grace Cones, being of lawful age and having been first duly sworn upon oath, state as follows: 1. Exoneration: On February 20, 2025, I was fully exonerated of the charge of Electronic Harassment in Logan County. 2. Discovery of Identity Theft: During the course of the criminal proceedings, it was discovered that a TextNow account was created using the phone number 580-205-5128 and linked to a fraudulent Yahoo email address, [email protected]. 3. Fabrication of Evidence: These accounts were used to impersonate me and send a death threat message to Kyle Noble (Stevens). This message was a "spoofed" or altered version of a legitimate text message I sent on August 29, 2023. The alterations were made with the specific intent to have me wrongfully prosecuted. 4. IP Address Evidence: Preliminary evidence provided by counsel indicates the TextNow account was accessed via an IP address registered in Tulsa (ASN 7018) on March 20, 2024, at 10:20 a.m. I was not in Tulsa at that time, nor did I create this account. 5. Refusal of Police Report: On [March 21,2024 and July 23, 2024], I attempted to file a formal police report regarding this Identity Theft and Online Impersonation at the Guthrie Police Department. My request was refused, denying me my right to a criminal investigation into the theft of my identity. 6. Ongoing Danger: I believe the individuals responsible for this identity theft are the same individuals involved in an ongoing campaign of harassment, which escalated to a drive-by shooting at my residence on February 28, 2025). 7. Purpose: I am filing this Affidavit to establish a formal record of these crimes and to facilitate the release of records from TextNow and Yahoo to identify the true perpetrator(s). Based on the evidence uncovered during my defense and the subsequent discovery process, the following facts necessitate an immediate inquiry: 1. Perjury and False Statements Under oath and within the Probable Cause Affidavit filed on July 11, 2024, Kyle Noble claimed to have received threatening text messages from me. However, records obtained via my attorney, Tim McKinney, show that at the time of the alleged incident (March 20, 2024, at 10:26 AM), only a phone call was placed from a TextNow account. No record of a text message exists in the logs provided by the DA, yet Ms. Noble presented a handwritten/printed version of a message to the court. 2. Identity Theft and Fraudulent Accounts A TextNow account and a Yahoo email address ([email protected]) were created on March 20, 2024, at 10:20 AM—six minutes before the alleged contact. This account was used to impersonate me and malign my character. IP logs associated with this account point to an ASN 7018 registration in Tulsa, which is inconsistent with my location and activity. 3. Intentional Fabrication of Evidence Evidence suggests that messages were altered or fabricated to include threatening language not present in original communications. Furthermore, the Probable Cause Affidavit was authored on July 18, 2024, yet retroactively applied to a report from March, containing inaccuracies regarding timestamps and meeting locations with Deputy Kopf. 4. Exercise of Court-Ordered Subpoenas I currently hold a Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Release Records (issued November 22, 2024, and December 12, 2024). I intend to use these orders to compel Yahoo and TextNow to release the subscriber information and IP logs to identify the true creator of these accounts. She filed a false protective order against me containing lies, done solely to have charges pushed through so she would have a case against me. The protective order was denied three times for not meeting statutory requirements. It listed herself, Kyle Noble, and her four kids: Callyn Hernandez, Jax Stevens, Ryan Stevens, and Tatum Stevens. The order was denied on March 26, 2024. Lack of Probable Cause Timeline of Events: Hannah Grace Cones Subject: Wrongful Prosecution and Identity Theft Investigation Preceding Events (2023) • August 29, 2023: Original text message sent by Hannah (Exhibit 1). • September 6, 2023: Douglas J. Cones requests messages from Kyle Stevens via Facebook Messenger, explicitly stating a need to show Hannah is "unstable." The Fabrication & Initial Filing (March 2024) • March 20, 2024 (10:20 AM): Fraudulent TextNow account created using the email [email protected]. • March 20, 2024 (10:26 AM): A phone call is placed to Kyle Stevens (IP address traced to Tulsa, ASN 7018). • March 20, 2024 (11:18 AM): Alleged meeting between Kyle Stevens and Deputy Kopf (later disputed). • March 20, 2024 (12:58 PM): Kyle Stevens files a VPO (incorrectly timestamped as 12:58 AM). • March 26, 2024: Judge Duel denies the initial VPO against Hannah Cones. Legal Discovery & Discrepancies (March – July 2024) • March 20, 2024 (1:03 PM): Attorney Joan Lopez emails a screenshot of a message received from opposing counsel, asking Hannah if she sent it. • March 21, 2024 The police report was rejected due to the anticipated denial of the protective order. I expressed my intention to file the report and informed them that she was determined to secure a protective order or pursue formal charges. Additionally, I pointed out that no reports had been filed concerning the alleged break-ins on February 15 and 16, indicating that she fabricated police reports in an effort to advance the protective order. I was advised that if the protective order were granted or if she pursued charges, I could then file a report and obtain the TextNow information to identify the true sender of the message. • April 12, 2024: At Santiago Hernandez’s Protective Order Hearing, Kyle Stevens presents a message to Judge Duel in an attempt to get him to approve the denied protective order. • July 11, 2024: Deputy Kopf officially files the charge of Electronic Harassment against Hannah Cones (113 days after the alleged incident). • July 18, 2024: The Probable Cause Affidavit is finally authored/provided, despite the charge being filed a week prior. • July 23, 2024: I was once again refused the opportunity to file a report. Upon returning to submit my report, I was informed that it could not be accepted due to a conflict of police interests and because the matter is already being pursued as a charge. The Legal Battle (July 2024 – February 2025) • November 19, 2024: Subpoenas issued for Kyle Stevens and Deputy Kopf; Kyle fails to comply. • November 20, 2024: Order for Release of Records obtained. • November 22, 2024: Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Release Records (TextNow) issued. • December 12, 2024: Second Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Release Records issued. • January 6, 2025: Second subpoena for Kyle Stevens prepared by ADA Sarah Conley (later noted as not formally authorized/served). Exoneration (February 2025) • February 9, 2025: Discovery deadline eve; a phone log is substituted for the actual message record in the DA's evidence. • February 10, 2025: Discovery deadline. • February 20, 2025: Exoneration. Hannah Grace Cones is cleared of all charges. Kyle Stevens fails to appear for the jury trial. Key Discrepancies for Investigation <table> <tr> <th>Feature</th> <th>Evidence Provided</th> <th>Claim in Affidavit/VPO</th> </tr> <tr> <td>Communication Type</td> <td>Phone Log (10:26 AM)</td> <td>Text Message</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Filing Time</td> <td>Afternoon (approx. 12:59 PM)</td> <td>Recorded as 12:59 AM</td> </tr> </table> <table> <tr> <th>Evidence Origin</th> <th>TextNow/Yahoo (Tulsa IP)</th> <th>Evidence given to Hannah Cones from Tim McKinney stating he got it from the DA</th> </tr> <tr> <th>Police Reports</th> <td>No record found at station for break-in entry on February 15 and 16 listed in denied Protective order March 20, 2024.</td> <td>Claimed to exist by Kyle Noble</td> </tr> </table> The Mirroring Effect: "The Digital Doppelgänger" Mirroring in fabrication cases occurs when a bad actor takes your real concerns and "reflects" them back with criminal intent. • Your Real Voice (Aug 2023): Focused on personal boundaries, marriage, and "James." This is a civil, private dispute. • The Fabricated Mirror (March 2024): Takes those same keywords ("boundaries," "James," "marriage") and reflects them through a "580" number, but adds Arson and Stalking. • The Legal Argument: You are arguing that the 580 number is a "Digital Doppelgänger"—a fake version of you created to make your legitimate civil concerns look like criminal threats. Evidence of Fabrication: Linguistic "Tells" <table> <tr> <th>Theme</th> <th>Your Genuine Message (Aug 29)</th> <th>The Fabricated "Mirror" (Mar 20)</th> <th>The "Tell"</th> </tr> <tr> <th>Boundaries</th> <td>You discussed marital boundaries.</td> <td>"Watch who you cross boundaries with."</td> <td>Uses your specific word as a threat.</td> </tr> </table> <table> <tr> <th>The Subject</th> <th>Discussion of "James."</th> <th>"Jealous of me and James."</th> <th>Mirrors the target of your original frustration.</th> </tr> <tr> <th>The Escalation</th> <td>Setting a limit.</td> <td>Threatening to burn a house down.</td> <td>A massive, non-organic jump in tone.</td> </tr> </table> "The Defendant engaged in a 'Mirroring Fabrication' by adopting the Plaintiff's unique vocabulary and personal concerns from August 2023 and transplanting them into a series of violent, criminal threats sent via an anonymous 580 number in March 2024. This was a calculated attempt to use the Plaintiff's own identity as a weapon to initiate a Malicious Prosecution." Statement of Facts: The "Mirroring" Scheme 1. The Baseline: Plaintiff’s Authentic Communications On August 29, 2023, the Plaintiff sent a series of text messages (Exhibit A) regarding personal and marital boundaries. • These messages were sent from the Plaintiff’s verified device. • The tone was assertive but remained within the bounds of a civil, private dispute. • Key themes included "boundaries," "James," and "marriage." 2. The Seven-Month "Incubation" Period Between August 29, 2023, and March 20, 2024, there was a total cessation of the specific conflict described in Exhibit A. During this seven-month gap, the Defendant had ample time to: • Study the Plaintiff’s linguistic patterns and vocabulary. • Procure a secondary "580" area code number to facilitate Identity Theft. • Plan a digital "frame-up" to trigger a Malicious Prosecution. 3. The Fabricated "Mirror" (March 20, 2024) On March 20, 2024, the "580" number (Exhibit B) began sending messages that were a distorted "mirror" of the August 2023 communications. The Defendant intentionally hijacked the Plaintiff’s identity by: • Thematic Recycling: Using the Plaintiff’s previous mentions of "James" and "marriage" to make the fake messages appear authentic. • Criminal Escalation: Taking the Plaintiff's word "boundaries" and twisting it into a violent threat: "Be careful who you cross boundaries with... I will burn your house down." • Targeted Malice: By including specific threats against the Plaintiff’s children, the Defendant sought to create "evidence" of a crime (Arson/Stalking) that would justify a police intervention or a protective order against the Plaintiff. 4. Defamation Per Se and Malicious Prosecution The Defendant then published these fabricated "580" messages to third parties (law enforcement, the court, or mutual associates). Because these messages falsely accuse the Plaintiff of heinous crimes (arson and child endangerment), they constitute Defamation Per Se. The Defendant's intent was to utilize the legal system as a weapon of harassment, meeting the standard for Malicious Prosecution. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Hannah Grace Cones respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in her favor and against the Defendants, granting the following relief: 1. Compensatory Damages Plaintiff requests an award of actual and compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial for: • Legal fees and costs incurred in defending against the malicious criminal prosecution in Case No. CM-2024-173. • General damages for severe emotional distress, humiliation, and damage to reputation caused by the Defendants’ defamatory statements and perjury. 2. Punitive Damages Plaintiff requests punitive (exemplary) damages against Defendants Kyle Noble (Stevens) and/or unknown co-conspirators in an amount sufficient to punish their malicious conduct and to deter others from engaging in identity theft, the fabrication of evidence, and the misuse of the judicial system. 3. Mandatory Injunctive Relief (Subpoena Power) Plaintiff requests that the Court immediately issue an Order or authorize the issuance of subpoenas duces tecum directed to TextNow, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. to release all subscriber information, IP address logs, and metadata associated with the following accounts used to defame the Plaintiff: • TextNow Number: 580-205-5128 • Yahoo Email: [email protected] 4. Corrective Relief Plaintiff requests an Order declaring that the "death threat" message used in Case No. CM-2024-173 was a fabrication, to aid in the restoration of Plaintiff's character and to assist in the investigation of the identity theft. 5. Other Relief Plaintiff requests any other and further relief, both in law and in equity, which this Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Hannah Grace Cones Pro Se 1624 W Cleveland Ave. Guthrie, Oklahoma 73044 (405) 696-9602 [email protected] 11-13-2024 [CTFREE] JUDGE VAUGHAN-STATE APPEARS BY MATTHEW ADAMS AND SARAH CONLEY, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH ATTORNEY TIM MCKINNEY. AT THE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST, CASE IS SET FOR JURY TRIAL FEBRUARY 24, 2025 AT 9:00 A.M. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FEBRUARY 20, 2025 AT 9:00 A.M. MOTION AND DISCOVERY DEADLINE CLOSE OF BUSINESS FEBRUARY 10, 2025. Subpoena Returned - Served Document Available (#1060261036) TIFF PDF Subpoena Returned - Served Document Available (#1060261040) TIFF PDF Order to Release Records Document Available (#1060261087) TIFF PDF Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Release Records Document Available (#1060261222) TIFF PDF Second Nunc For Tunc Order to Release Records Document Available (#1060709383) TIFF PDF Subpoena Issued to Logan Co Sheriff for Service on KS Document Available (#1060710020) TIFF PDF Oklahoma Court Information System Revolving Fund Cones, Hannah Grace $25.00 JUDGE VAUGHAN-THE STATE APPEARS BY SARAH CONLEY AND MATTHEW ADAMS, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON AND WITH THERE ATTORNEY TIM MCKINNEY. UPON MOTION BY THE STATE, THE COURT DISMISSES THIS CASE AT STATE'S COST. Diane Vaughan, Judge: Case Disposed. Dismissed. The Status of The Bond Entry Detailed In Docket Serial #4416448 Above Has Changed To Read As Follows: Recognizance Bond For Cones, Hannah Grace Posted By Cones, Hannah Grace, Posted 08/01/2024, Exonerated 02/20/2025 OSC N IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR LOGAN COUNTY, OKLAHOMA No. CM-2024-173 (Criminal Misdemeanor) State of Oklahoma v. Cones, Hannah Grace Filed: 07/11/2024 Closed: 02/20/2025 Judge: Vaughan, Diane CASE MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONLINE PAYMENTS PARTIES Cones, Hannah Grace, Defendant STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff ATTORNEYS None EVENTS Thursday, August 1, 2024 at 1:30 PM ARRAIGNMENT Party Name: Cones, Hannah Grace Thursday, September 12, 2024 at 9:00 AM Misdemeanor Docket Party Name: Cones, Hannah Grace Docket: Diane Vaughan Thursday, October 10, 2024 at 8:00 AM Misdemeanor Docket Party Name: Cones, Hannah Grace Docket: Diane Vaughan Wednesday, November 13, 2024 at 9:00 AM Misdemeanor Docket Party Name: Cones, Hannah Grace Docket: Diane Vaughan Thursday, February 20, 2025 at 9:00 AM FINAL PRETRIAL Party Name: Cones, Hannah Grace Docket: Diane Vaughan Monday, February 24, 2025 at 9:00 AM JURY TRIAL (ISSUE) Party Name: Cones, Hannah Grace Docket: Diane Vaughan COUNTS Parties appear only under the counts with which they were charged. For complete sentence information, see the court minute on the docket. Count #1. Count as Filed: TELE, Harassment by Electronic Communication, in violation of 21 O.S. 1172 (a)(2) Date of Offense: 03/20/2024 Party Name: Cones, Hannah Grace Disposed: DISMISSED, 02/20/2025. Dismissed- Request of the State Count as Disposed: Harassment by Electronic Communication(TELE) Violation of 21 O.S. 1172 (a)(2) DOCKET Date Code Description Party Count Amount 07-11-2024 [ TEXT ] CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR INITIAL FILING. Document Available at Court Clerk's Office Cones, Hannah Grace #1 07-11-2024 [ INFORMATION ] DEFENDANT HANNAH GRACE CONES WAS CHARGED WITH COUNT #1, HARASSMENT BY ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION IN VIOLATION OF 21 O.S. 1172 (A)(2) 07-11-2024 [ LT ] LETTER FROM LOGAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO DEFENDANT ADVISING OF COURT DATE OF JULY 25, 2024 AT 1:30 PM. Document Available (#1058768564) TIFF PDF 07-11-2024 [ TEXT ] OGIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE VAUGHAN, DIANE TO THIS CASE. 07-18-2024 [ AFPC ] PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FOR ARREST WARRANT Document Available at Court Clerk's Office 07-22-2024 [ COPY ] COPIES CHARGED 07-22-2024 [ ACCOUNT ] RECEIPT #2024-337891 ON 07/22/2024. PAYOR: HANNAH GRACE CONES TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 2.50. LINE ITEMS: CM-2024-173: $2.50 ON AC01 CLERK FEES FOR CONES, HANNAH GRACE. 08-01-2024 [ PR ] RECOGNIZANCE BOND FOR CONES, HANNAH GRACE POSTED BY CONES, HANNAH GRACE, POSTED 08/01/2024 Document Available (#1058768873) TIFF PDF 08-01-2024 [ BOJ ] BOND INITIAL FILING JAIL FUND FEE Cones, Hannah Grace $ 25.00 08-01-2024 [ CCADMIN25 ] COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $25 COLLECTIONS Cones, Hannah Grace $ 2.50 08-01-2024 [ DCADMIN25 ] DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $25 COLLECTIONS Cones, Hannah Grace $ 3.75 08-01-2024 [ CTFREE ] JUDGE VAUGHAN-STATE APPEARS BY SARAH CONLEY, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH ATTORNEY TIM MCKINNEY. DEFENDANT WAIVES READING OF THE INFORMATION AND PLEADS NOT GUILTY. DEFENDANT ALLOWED RELEASE UPON SIGNING A PR BOND. DEFENDANT TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH THE NAMED VICTIM. COURT SETS THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 AT 9:00 A.M. 09-12-2024 [ CTFREE ] JUDGE VAUGHAN-STATE APPEARS BY MATTHEW ADAMS AND SARAH CONLEY, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH ATTORNEY TIM MCKINNEY. CASE IS CONTINUED TO THE NEXT DOCKET OCTOBER 10, 2024 AT 9:00 A.M. 10-10-2024 [ CTFREE ] JUDGE VAUGHAN-STATE APPEARS BY MATTHEW ADAMS, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH ATTORNEY TIM MCKINNEY. COURT CONTINUES THIS CASE TO THE DOCKET NOVEMBER 13, 2024 AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LOGAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, VS. HANNAH CONES, Defendant. ORDER TO RELEASE RECORDS The Court makes the following findings and orders in the above styled case; 1. That the Defendant Hannah Grace Cones is charged with a criminal act of making threats by electronic communication. 2. That the Court finds that the company TEXT NOW has information regarding the registration and ownership of the telephonic number used to send threatening messages. 3. That TEXT NOW indicates that they will release information regarding the telephonic number in question with an Order signed by a Judge of the District Court. 4. That the Court now orders TEXT NOW to release the following information associated with the telephone number 580-205-5128. for the dates of March 14th to March 27th 2024 1. All text messages sent and the targets they were sent to between the aforementioned dates. 2. All telephone calls made during the aforementioned dates, and the numbers such calls were made to. 3. All email addresses that are associated with the aforementioned number. 4. The name of the person or persons that the number was registered to during the aforementioned time period. 5. Verification process used in establishing the name of the person in question number four above. 6. Any information that tends to show that the TEXT NOW system was used in sending the texts identified in number one above. IT IS ALL SO ORDERED Signed on this 20 day of November 2024 Cones Order Approved as to form and content; Tim McKinney OBA #20773 Attorney for the Defendant Matthew Adams OBA #/ Attorney for the State of Oklahoma Special Judge Diane Vaquahn Judge of the District Court IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LOGAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, VS. HANNAH CONES, Defendant. CM-2024-173 NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER TO RELEASE RECORDS The Court makes the following findings and orders in the above styled case; 1. That the Defendant Hannah Grace Cones is charged with a criminal act of making threats by electronic communication. 2. That the Court finds that the company TEXTNOW has information regarding the registration and ownership of the telephonic number used to send threatening messages. 3. That TEXT NOW indicates that they will release information regarding the telephonic number in question with an Order signed by a Judge of the District Court. 4. That the Court now orders TEXTNOW to release the following information associated with the telephone number 580-205-5128. for the dates of March 14th to March 27th 2024 1. All text messages sent and the targets they were sent to between the aforementioned dates. 2. All telephone calls made during the aforementioned dates, and the numbers such calls were made to. 3. All email addresses that are associated with the aforementioned number. 4. The name of the person or persons that the number was registered to during the aforementioned time period. 5. Verification process used in establishing the name of the person in question number four above. 6. Any information that tends to show that the TEXTNOW system was used in sending the texts identified in number one above. IT IS ALL SO ORDERED Signed on this ____ day of November 2024 Special Judge Diane Vaughan Judge of the District Court IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LOGAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, VS. HANNAH CONES, Defendant. CM-2024-173 SECOND NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER TO RELEASE RECORDS The Court makes the following findings and orders in the above styled case; 1. That the Defendant Hannah Grace Cones is charged with a criminal act of making threats by electronic communication. 2. That the Court finds that the company TEXTNOW INC. has information regarding the registration and ownership of the telephonic number used to send threatening messages. 3. That TEXTNOW INC. indicates that they will release information regarding the telephonic number in question with an Order signed by a Judge of the District Court. 4. That the Court now orders TEXTNOW INC. to release the following information associated with the telephone number 580-205-5128. for the dates of March 14th to March 27th 2024 1. All text messages sent and the targets they were sent to between the aforementioned dates. 2. All telephone calls made during the aforementioned dates, and the numbers such calls were made to. 3. All email addresses that are associated with the aforementioned number. 4. The name of the person or persons that the number was registered to during the aforementioned time period. 5. Verification process used in establishing the name of the person in question number four above. 6. Any information that tends to show that the TEXTNOW INC. system was used in sending the texts identified in number one above. 7. All information to be released to the Attorney for the Defendant by email at the following address: IT IS ALL SO ORDERED Signed on this 11th day of December 2024 Special Judge Diane Vaughan Judge of the District Court Kyle Noble Aug 29, 2023 at 2:16 PM You don’t tell me what to do! Worry about your own damn marriage that burnt to the ground already because you wanna act like a man instead of a wife and beat on your husband that works his ass off for you. Your crossing boundaries OUTSIDE of your own Marriage and your also crossing boundaries inside a no one cares what you think kyle keep my name out of your mouth I’m not scared or intimated by you at all your life must be so boring that you have to dig in someone’s else’s past life that or your marriage must be just that dead! Be careful who you cross boundaries with because you don’t know who I am and it’s not met for you too my past life shouldn’t so interesting to you that you have to go look to try to find someone to talk too about me! James knows ALL about how I fucked Kevin and Doug and that has nothing to do with you now does it! Me and James are now believe me when I say I won’t make the same mistakes you did and and then leave my newborn baby with her daddy to take care of while you could be an 18 year old party girl instead of being a responsible Wife and Mom! This is just a short version of what it feels like when someone crosses boundaries with you doesn’t feel very good does it! I’m laughing my fucking ass off right now your so pitty, I also have to remember your two years younger then me so that’s where immaturity stems from! If you think for one minute that James doesn’t know about the both of my baby daddies and my past Kyle Noble minute that James doesn’t know about the both of my baby daddies and my past you’re completely wrong! You already pissed someone off before where your family was split up you would think you would learned your lesson in the past but I guess not but just so you know if you water your own grass in your own marriage it wouldn’t be dead like it is and you need to put all your energy and focus into your marriage! You’re just a bully like you were in school and I’m not cowarding down to someone as low as you! Your just jealous of James while your marriage is tore up from the floor up and your that miserable that you try to make those around you the same damn no wonder why John became an alcoholic it’s because he has a Man as a wife that beats on him and takes him down on a weekly basis! If he knew how much better he could do if he knew that he was way to good for you if his confidence wouldn’t of been destroyed as a Man and as a Father he would of never became that person! I’m not scared of you and I’m not intimidated by you that’s why I haven’t said one word to you yet until now because I don’t have time for ppl like you and neither does James! You’re his past and that’s where you belong! Go be a better mom and better wife instead of putting your energy into someone’s past you think you know but you don’t know shit about me you’ve been jealous of me sense day 1 it shows that you have to find me so interesting that you take the time out of your days to do all of this! Lmao! Grow the fuck up kyle and go be a real wife to John because he deserves way better than someone like you! And you’ve been harassing me and I’m done it! Original Text I Sent Kyle Highlighted words that later was used to frame me on 03-20-2024 Kyle Noble you’ve been harassing me and I’m done it I will take matters into my own hands just like you tried to do. Get the fuck over being so obsessed with me that you have to look to cause trouble. If another woman did this to your past you would have beat their ass, my past is between me and God NOT ME GOD AND YOU! God will deal with you! You think you know but you don’t know shit! And James has took care of callynn and been a parent to her more then you ever have in your life this is all what you did he’s not a horrible father your the one being a horrible mother your just jealous that your life is so dead while ours is thriving! Fuck off and your obsession with me really creeps me the fuck out! don’t talk about it be about it baby girl! Be careful who you cross boundaries with because you don't know who I am or what I'm capable of you are just jealous of me and James in the life that we have that you could never have with him. You've crossed a boundary and you will fucking regret it! Watch your fucking back you fat Cunt bitch you don't know who you're messing with I will burn your house down with you in it! You're fucking with the wrong bitch you're trying to take money out of my pocket because you don't want to let your child's father see his daughter I can guarantee you you won't see a dime of my money or his! I dare you to keep going in court. Good luck with your pathetic ass life you ugly fucking bitch. You have met your match YOU DO NOT INTIMIDATE ME Watch you're back. KNقط أن I no when you are at home and when you leave and when you're Kids and OUR daughter are outside playing basketball or riding bicycles. Do you feel safe??????? Kyle Noble Aug 29, 2023 at 8:07 AM The conversation that you wanted to have last night we can have today while the kids are in school. I learned a lot of information last night from one of her family members that I reached out to that I’m sure you would love to hear. I’m not back yet and what family member? I can’t tell you that but if you wanna hear what they have to say, feel free to call me. They have all been threatened by her to not say a word to anybody, so they’re all scared to even talk about her because she is threatening to do crazy things. Hope you know there’s two other guys involved that she just quit fucking right before she moved into your house I’m sure you’re not gonna care and you’re gonna listen to everything that she has to say. You’re making yourself look like a clown. I have text message proof that she sent someone six weeks ago how bad she wanted to ride their dick so you keep on believing everything your innocent “wife” has to tell you. You don’t wanna hear anything I have to say about it you just wanna go ahead and believe her so you go ahead. I’ll go ahead and stay out of it. And no one’s keeping your child from you. Your child is begging not to be around you guys at this point. Edited There isn’t proof she’s say anything like that Ok whatever you believe… I have plenty of video recordings as well. Just let me know if you wanna come over and hear them or anything like that if you’d rather remain delusional, that’s on you, but I have evidence. Tue, Aug 29 at 12:27 PM How is that even possible? Don’t worry about it. If you’re not worried about it I’m not worried about it as long as my child is here and safe that’s all I’m concerned with. Hope you’re happy. I’m gonna leave you and your relationship alone. She is not worth my time. I have my daughter I know my daughter is safe that’s all I care about. What do you even mean video recordings You weren’t worried about it earlier just don’t be worried about it. It’s fine. Just trust your “wife” I’m done talking to you Kyle I promise, neither one of us told them anything about any conversation that we had. James was blowing my phone up last night trying to convince me that it was you that we were talking to. They're obviously out of their minds. He has now threaten to blow my husband's head off And he's telling all of his family and my family that I am withholding Kelen from him and not allowing him to have a relationship with his daughter and basically calling me everything but a white woman. But Callynn tried to call him today four different times and on the last time Hannah answered the phone and said that she could not talk to him because he was on the phone with the cops and I was like what the hell why so Callynn asked her why and she just told her not to worry about it. And about 45 minutes later the sheriff shows up at our house because they got a call that we were drug smuggler's. John drives a big van for work. He is a supervisor over three dealerships so he has to have plenty of equipment. That's why he needs the big van and that's what he told the cops. The cops didn't see anything. Kyle and said that she could not talk to him because he was on the phone with the cops and I was like what the hell why so Callynn asked her why and she just told her not to worry about it. And about 45 minutes later the sheriff shows up at our house because they got a call that we were drug smuggler's. John drives a big van for work. He is a supervisor over three dealerships so he has to have plenty of equipment. That's why he needs the big van and that's what he told the cops. The cops didn't Missed audio call 7:14 PM CALL BACK WED AT 7:42 PM MY EX Doug care Can you send me those messages to me because I really need them because then it shows them that Hannah and Kyle To MY EX-Husband requesting she send original text that was later used to frame me. On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 1:03 PM, joan lopez <[email protected]> wrote: I received the attached from opposing counsel. Did one of you send this to Kyle Stevens? Joan L. Lopez Lopez & Johnson 1103 NW 87th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73114 Telephone: (405) 557-7887 Fax: (405) 235-5587 [email protected] From: Tim McKinney <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 05:16:49 PM CST Subject: TEXTNOW DOCUMENTS I am going to try to attach all the files that were sent. Hopefully, I get the unencrypted ones. From: Tim McKinney <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 05:16:49 PM CST Subject: TEXTNOW DOCUMENTS I am going to try to attach all the files that were sent. Hopefully, I get the unencrypted ones. #5802055128.subscriber_20241216-202546.csv Username Phone Number Name Email Dob Registration Date Registration Ip Phone Ownership From Phone Ownership To Plan hannahgidga666 +1 580-205-5128 [email protected] 2024-03-20 15:20:57 UTC 107.115.239.142 2024-03-20 15:22:03 UTC 2024-03-28 03:59:59 UTC Free * Ownership dates are restricted to the beginning and end of the requested date range. * Phone number is no longer assigned to the final username. * TextNow, Inc #5802055128.messages_20241216-202547.csv <table> <tr> <th>Time</th> <th>Direction</th> <th>Contact</th> <th>Deleted</th> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-20 15:26:00 UTC</td> <td>Sent</td> <td>+14055130050</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-20 18:25:50 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+14052824100</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-21 07:00:40 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+2999999999</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-21 19:36:40 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+14057192861</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-23 18:02:12 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+19049331082</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-23 18:15:25 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+19049331082</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-23 23:03:01 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+14055134835</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-23 23:03:46 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+14055134835</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2024-03-23 23:26:16 UTC</td> <td>Received</td> <td>+14055134835</td> <td>No</td> </tr> </table> * TextNow, Inc #5802055128.subscriber_20241216-202546.csv Evidence from DA Labeler Messages but is only a call log. Not what I was court ordered to receive in my Nanc sub- Daisy B Glenn 7 posts Guthrie, OK Cosmetique, Dermatology, Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center, Lahore,Pakistan University of Oklahoma Add friend Photos Apps Personal details Guthrie, Oklahoma Daisy B Glenn To keep Facebook safe, we're showing information about people and their profiles. Joined Facebook August 2025 Profile updated 4 days ago Daisy B Glenn You're not friends on Facebook Lives in Guthrie, Oklahoma Works at Cosmetique, Dermatology, Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center, Lahore, Pakistan View profile Messages and calls are secured with end-to-end encryption. Only people in this chat can read, listen to, or share them. Learn more 11:16 AM Daisy B Glenn replied to your story Why is she built like a door active status and when you have read messages. Daisy B Glenn Then charges Name to my old FB name using my dad's name. Daisy B Glenn At least my woman isn't fake And no she's not built like a door frame. Just jealous cause she's hot and you're not. Gwen Thomas Boobs.. fake.. weight.. surgery / fake.. personality...fake.. where's the real? Hannah looks like someone's ran through grandpa. So scared to say who you are you try to pretend to be here. Jealousy is the biggest form flattery Let me guess Kyle, Amanda, Kevin, or Doug? Keep guessing Daisy B Glenn Keep guessing lol you're still fake and don't worry I got ways to find out and this will go along with the stack of other charges coming for impersonation. lmao Alright maybe Adam Damn is big tits a private investigator Then charges Profile pic to listening device by edad stand. Daisy B Glenn Keep with the games you're just giving me more for a case I would to with how hot ur wife is good god Unread messages Ur the one building the case u tell me huh ? I would to with how hot ur wife is good god What do you mean? Daisy B Glenn I will when I find out who this is for harassment and impersonation I would to with how hot ur wife is good god What do you mean? Daisy B Glenn Idek u have a case against me I will when I find out who this is for harassment and impersonation I would to with how hot ur wife is good god Daisy B Glenn Idek u have a case against me I will when I find out who this is for harassment and impersonation I would to with how hot ur wife is good god What do you mean? 5 unread messages. Summarize with Meta AI I'm saying that's why ur wife tried trading u in for me not that long ago Dude she even try to bribe me with her income taxes not to message you but money ain't been sent yet so here I am in ur inbox's now tell her to try to figure it out it shouldn't be to hard man There ain't no reason that she should be able to claim my damn kids and I don't even get a dime Come on Man U dropped her off to go see me all the time She ain't tell u? Daisy B Glenn Nvm bro I was just trying to help u out if you can't tell me who you are how can i believe you You believe her over everybody else so nvm You don't have proof of anything your saying There ain't no reason that she should be able to claim my damn kids and I don't even get a dime? What do you mean claim your kids? She can't do that only her kids can she claim. Ok believe what u want "big guy" Gwen Thomas 1 friend Add friend Details Works at Cosmetique, Dermatology, Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center, Lahore, Pakistan Studied at University of Oklahoma Lives in Guthrie, Oklahoma From Fountain Valley, California See Gwen's About Info Daisy B Glenn 1 friend Add friend Message Details Works at Cosmetique, Dermatology, Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center, Lahore, Pakistan Studied at University of Oklahoma Lives in Guthrie, Oklahoma From Fountain Valley, California See Daisy's About Info Friends 1 friend Work Works at Cosmetique, Dermatology, Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center, Lahore, Pakistan August 19, 2025 - Present Education Studied at University of Oklahoma Places lived Guthrie, Oklahoma Current city Fountain Valley, California Hometown Following Miranda Hayes 12 mutual friends See all Daisy B Glenn 1 friend Add friend Message Posts Photos Reels Details Works at Cosmetique, Dermatology, Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center, Lahore, Pakistan Studied at University of Oklahoma Lives in Guthrie, Oklahoma From Fountain Valley, California See Daisy's About Info Daisy B Glenn 1 friend Add friend Message ... Posts Photos Reels Daisy's photos and videos Photos Albums Posts Photos Reels Studied at University of Oklahoma Lives in Guthrie, Oklahoma From Fountain Valley, California See Daisy's About Info Friends 2 friends Adam Foshee Glen Branson See all friends Daisy's posts Daisy B Glenn updated her profile picture. 15m James Hernandez Daisy B Glenn 2:30 PM Daisy B Glenn Daisy B Glenn is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Daisy B Glenn and others you may know. Facebook gi... Sent https://www.facebook.com/share/1Ph83aiJMt/?mibextid=wwXIfF Kyle Noble Add friend Report profile Help Kyle Block Search Invite friends Share profile Kyle Noble's Profile link https://facebook.com/kyle.noble.339933 https://www.facebook.com/share/18Hqv4DSYq/?mibextid=wwXIfF PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER District Court of Logan County State of Oklahoma Case No. PO-2024-LC Court Phone Number (405) 282-0123 Petitioner Kyle Alexandria Stevens First Middle Last and/or on behalf of minor family member(s) Additional Petitioner Information Name(s) and age(s) of minor family member(s) Caynn Hernandez(11) Jax Stevens(8) Ryan Stevens(7) Tatum Stevens(5) -VS- Defendant Hannah Grace Cones(Branson) First Middle Last Relationship to Petitioner: exhusbands girlfriend Defendant's Address (Street address, City, State, Zip Code) 1621 W Cleveland Ave Branson MO 73604-4 Defendant Identifiers SEX RACE DOB HT WT F W 5'0" 100? EYES HAIR DISTINGUISHING FEATURES Brwn Blk DRIVERS LICENSE # STATE EXPIRES Other (Clerk's File Stamp Below) 1. Information About the Parties. Several factors may apply. Please read ALL items below carefully & check any that apply. A. The Defendant's Relationship to Petitioner(s): I. Intimate Partner: ☐ Defendant is my current spouse ☐ Defendant is my former spouse ☐ Defendant and I are dating, or have dated, each other ☐ Defendant and I are, or have been, engaged in a sexual relationship ☐ Defendant and I are the biological parents of the same child ☐ Defendant and I currently live together, or previously lived together, in an intimate relationship ☐ Defendant is an Intimate Partner of a minor child listed above II. Family or Household Member: ☐ Defendant is my parent, grandparent, stepparent, adoptive parent, or foster parent ☐ Defendant is my child, grandchild, stepchild, adopted child, or foster child ☐ Defendant is otherwise related to me (by marriage or blood) and _____ does or _____ does not (check one) live in the same household as me ☐ Defendant lives in the same household as me, or lived with me within the past year, but is NOT related to me (by marriage or blood) ☐ Defendant is a _____ Family Member and/or _____ Household Member (check one or both) of the minor child(ren) listed above B. If you DID check one or more items in Section A above, then complete this section. Petitioner is a (check all that apply): ☐ Victim of Domestic Violence/Abuse* ☐ Victim of Harassment* ☐ Adult Victim of Other Crime ☐ Family or Household Member of the Minor Child/Children Listed Above ☐ Victim of Stalking* ☐ Victim of Rape ☐ Victim of Child Abuse C. If you DID NOT check one or more items in Section A above, then complete this section. Defendant has committed the following acts against Petitioner and/or the minor(s) listed above: ☐ Rape ☐ Forcible Sodomy ☐ Sex Offense ☐ Kidnapping ☐ Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon ☐ Child Abuse ☒ Stalking* ☐ Other Crime against an Adult Victim POLICE REPORT: If you are NOT a family or household member, or in a dating relationship with Defendant, please see Appendix 1 for further information about whether you must attach a police report. DEFINITIONS: Terms with an asterisk (*) have specific meanings. See Appendix 2 for important definitions. D. ☐ First Degree Murder (check if applicable). Petitioner is an Immediate Family Member of a Victim of First Degree Murder, and Defendant has Been Charged and Convicted of that Crime 2. Statement of Jurisdiction. INSTRUCTION: Check all that apply ☑ Petitioner is a resident of the county wherein this Petition is filed. ☑ Defendant is a resident of the county wherein this Petition is filed. ☐ The domestic abuse occurred in the county wherein this Petition is filed. 3. Actions of the Defendant INSTRUCTION: Check and complete one or more of the following. Fill in the blank lines of checked items. DEFINITIONS: Terms with an asterisk (*) have specific meanings. See Appendix 2 for important definitions. DOMESTIC ABUSE*: The Defendant has caused or attempted to cause physical harm to ________________________ (Name(s)) DOMESTIC ABUSE*: The Defendant has threatened* imminent physical harm to: Kyle Stevens, Caylyn Hernandez, Jax Stevens, Ryan Stevens. The Defendant has harassed* Kyle Stevens, Caylyn Hernandez, Jax Stevens. The Defendant has stalked* Kyle Stevens, Caylyn Hernandez, Jax Stevens. The Defendant has committed: □ Rape □ Forcible Sodomy □ Sex Offense □ Kidnapping □ Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon □ Child Abuse □ First Degree Murder against _____________________________________________________________ (Name(s)) The Defendant has committed the crime of ________________ against Petitioner (adult victim of crime, 22 O.S. §60.2(A)). 4. Description of Incident(s) The incident(s) which caused the filing of the petition occurred on or about March 21st (Date(s)). Describe what happened, when and where the event(s) occurred. List all actions or behaviors you intend to present to the Court at the hearing. Today at 10:26am I got a text from Hannah saying "be careful who you cross boundaries with because you don't know who I am or what I am capable of you are just jealous of Jamie and I & the life we have you could never have with him. You've crossed abounds and you will fucking regret it! Watch your fucking back you fat cunt bitch you don't know who you're messing with. I will burn your house down with you in it! You're fucking with the wrong bitch you're trying to take money out of my pocket because you won't let your child's father see his daughter I can guarantee you won't see a dime of my money or his! I dare you to keep going in court. Good luck with your pathetic ass life you ugly fucking bitch you have met your match. Tree was turned around backwards, I'm guessing just so I knew someone had been in the house. (Police report made, police never came) ny kids and I live in fear every single day. Having a threat that she will "burn my house down with me in it" is very scary and we all are afraid for our lives. She has stated she knows when we are and are not home and knows and sees us outside playing, this is affecting our lives in a huge way and desperately want the stalking, harassments, breaking, and threats to stop. you don’t know when you are at home and when you leave and where your kids and OUR daughter is outside playing basketball or riding bicycles. Do you feel safe????? (kissy face emoji) Also on Feb 15th I let my home was broken into Court paperwork was taken on the 15th break in and my Christmas next page. ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY 5. Other Cases. Please list all cases (divorce, protection orders, paternity, guardianship, criminal, juvenile, civil) involving the Defendant and yourself, or a child you have with the Defendant (attach additional sheets of paper if necessary): Case Name Case Number County & State 6. Type of Order Requested. INSTRUCTION: Check either A or B ☐ A. Petitioner does not request an Emergency Ex Parte Protective Order but does request the following relief, checked below, after notice and hearing, in a Final Order: OR ☑️ B. Petitioner does request an Emergency Ex Parte Order because it is necessary to protect the petitioner(s) from immediate and present danger. Petitioner requests the following relief, checked below, in the Ex Parte Order AND, after notice and hearing, requests the same relief in a Final Order. RELIEF REQUESTED INSTRUCTION: Check EACH item which you are requesting from the Court ☑️ 1. Defendant should be prohibited from attempting or having ANY CONTACT whatsoever with the Petitioner, either in person, through others or by telephone, mail, electronic means, or any other manner, at any time or place unless specifically authorized by the Court. ☑2. Defendant should be prohibited from injuring, abusing, sexually assaulting, molesting, harassing, stalking or threatening the Petitioner, and from use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against the Petitioner that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury. ☑3. Defendant should be prohibited from engaging in other conduct that would place the Petitioner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the Petitioner or the Petitioner's household members or relatives. ☐4. Defendant should be ordered to leave and remain away from the residence located at: ____________________________________________, ____________________________, Oklahoma, on or before the _______________________ day of______________________, 20__at ______a.m./p.m., and take no action to change utilities or telephone service. ☐5. The Court should order Law Enforcement Officers to accompany the Defendant to the above residence to remove necessary clothing and personal effects, and remain in attendance until Defendant leaves the premises, and the Court should further order Defendant NOT to go to the above residence to remove necessary clothing and personal effects unless Law Enforcement Officers are present. ☐6. The Court should Order Law Enforcement Officers to accompany the Petitioner (i.e. provide a "civil standby") to the current or recent past residence to remove necessary clothing and personal effects, and remain in attendance until Petitioner leaves the premises. Such residence is located at the following address: _____________________________________________. Oklahoma. ☐7. The Court should Order Defendant, who is a minor, to leave the residence located at ______________________________________________ (address, city, state) by immediately placing Defendant in any type of care authorized for children taken into custody pursuant to 10A O.S. §2-2-101(A). Circle Age of Minor Defendant: 13 14 15 16 17 ☐8. There is an existing child visitation order and the Court should suspend or modify child visitation to protect from threats of abuse or physical violence by the Defendant or a threat to violate a custody order. 22 O.S. §60.4(I)(1). ☑9. The Defendant should be ordered to obtain domestic abuse counseling or treatment. 22 O.S. §60.4(C)(1) and (E)(1). ☐10. To protect an animal(s) owned by either of the parties or any child living in the household, the Court should order Defendant to have no contact with said animal(s) and order possession and exclusive care of said animal(s) to the Petitioner. ☑11. Pursuant to 22 O.S. §60.17, Petitioner makes application to monitor the location of the Defendant by computer or cellular inquiry. The Defendant should be ordered to use an active, real-time, twenty-four-hour GPS monitoring device, and costs of the GPS device and monitoring should be paid by Defendant. 12. Pursuant to 22 O.S. §60.4, Petitioner requests that billing responsibility and rights to the following household utilities and/or wireless telephone number (and wireless numbers for minor children) be transferred to petitioner's name. Note: A public utility or wireless service provider's normal requirements for setting up a new account still apply. Petitioner will be responsible for paying for the account. 13. Defendant should immediately surrender all firearms and other dangerous weapons within the Defendant's possession or control and any concealed carry license to ________________________________. 14. The Defendant should be ordered to pay the court costs and service of process fees (pursuant to 22 O.S. §60.2(C)(1), no fees or costs shall be charged to the petitioner except if the Court finds this petition has been filed frivolously). 15. The Defendant should be ordered to pay the Petitioner's attorney's fees in the amount of $____________________ PETITIONER REQUESTS THE COURT TO ORDER THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RELIEF: 7. Warnings To Petitioner: A. Whoever makes a statement or allegation in this Petition for Protective Order but does not believe that the statement or allegation is true, or knows that it is not true, or intends thereby to avoid or obstruct the ascertainment of the truth, may be found guilty of perjury. Pursuant to 21 O.S. §§500 and 504, the penalty for perjury, or subornation of perjury, is a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than five (5) years. B. If the court makes specific findings that a petition for a protective order has been filed frivolously and no victim exists, the court may assess attorney fees and court costs against the plaintiff pursuant to 22 O.S. §60.2 (C)(2). It is against the law to file a petition for a protective order against a spouse or former spouse for the purposes of harassment, undue advantage, intimidation or limitation of child visitation rights in any divorce proceeding or separation action without justifiable cause. Violators may be subject to criminal penalties pursuant to 22 O.S. §60.4(H). 8. Sworn Statement/Affirmation of Truth I state, under penalty of perjury under the laws of Oklahoma, that I have read the above and foregoing document, understand the meaning thereof, and declare that the facts and statements contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. [signature] PETITIONER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20 day of March, 2074. [signature] Deputy Court Clerk, Judge or Notary Petitioner requests the following law enforcement agencies receive a copy of any Protective Order entered herein: Name of Agency or Agencies (use additional pages if necessary) STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) COUNTY OF LOGAN I, Sarah Conley being duly sworn on my oath, declare that the statements set forth in the above information, and in reave of the Probable Cause Affidavit by the arresting officer contained in the court file, are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. [Signature] Sarah Conley Assistant District Attorney LAURA AUSTIN THOMAS DISTRICT ATTORNEY Subscribed and sworn to before me the 11th day of July, 2024 [Signature] Kim Wainwright Notary Public My Commission expires: 07/01/2026 Commission number: [Redacted] WITNESSES ENDORSED FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Tess Koop, Logan County Sheriff's Department K.S. Bo Logan County Sheriff's Department LAURA AUSTIN THOMAS DISTRICT ATTORNEY Hannah Cones 1824 W. Cleveland Guthrie, OK 73044 Re: State of Oklahoma vs. Cones, Hannah Case No. CM-2024-173 Dear Ms. Cones: Please be advised that our office has filed a charge against you for the offense of Harassment by Electronic Communication. A copy of the complaint is enclosed. You may arrange a voluntary appearance before the Court on July 25, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. for arraignment. If you do not appear on or before that date, there will be a warrant issued for your arrest. Sincerely, Sarah Conley Assistant District Attorney OKLAHOMA PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT STATE OF OKLAHOMA VS CONES, HANNAH Plaintiff, STATE OF OKLAHOMA VS Defendant, CONES, HANNAH PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FOR ARREST WARRANT Comes now the undersigned Affiant, and swears upon Oath or Affirmation that the following information and facts are current to the best of the Affiant's knowledge and belief. The undersigned believes that probable cause exists for the detention of the below named ARRESTEE for the below listed crimes committed on the below listed date, in Logan County, Oklahoma. Subject Name: CONES, HANNAH DOB: 01/1991 (MM/YYYY) Race: White Height: 5 ft. 2 in. Address: 1624 WEST CLEVELAND, GUTHRIE, Oklahoma 73044 SSN: 220-08-1452 Hair: Brown Weight: 90 Ethnicity: Not Hispanic Origin Arrest Date / Time: Arrest Location / City: Offense Location / City: Offense(s) Committed / Anticipated Charge(s) 21 O.S. § 1787.1(A)(7) - Uses telephone or other communication device to make any threat or convey information known to be false, containing an attempt to kill, injure or intimidate any person or damage any property by explosion OKLAHOMA PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT STATE OF OKLAHOMA VS CONES, HANNAH (Continued) Facts & Circumstances that support probable cause to arrest the above named person are On Wednesday, March 20th 2024 at approximately 11:41am I, Deputy Koffi returned to the Logan County Sheriff Office at 214 S Main Street, OK-73044 where I met with the victim’s wife, Sharon Cones. The victim is identified as Upon arrival I was told by Kate Alessandra Stevens (DOB: 10/08/1983) who resides at 306 E Waterloo Rd #88 Ardmore, OK, County of Logan who stated a Hannah Cones (DOB: 01/04/1991) was making threats to her via text messages. Sharon showed me the text message from number (850) 289-6138 which she stated “I will burn your house down with you in it.” Sharon clarified the number as a number Cones uses to communicate via text messages. A picture of the text message was taken and attached to the report. APFD t [ ] Time t [ ] Time t [ ] Other Upon oath, I declare that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Officer Name: KOFFI, TESS J | Badge number: 300 [Signature] 2 300 Disclaimer and waiver before signing on 3-20-24 My commission number 33012117 My commission expires 09-07-27 [NO] Mirror’s Attestation Required ? [ ] I Swear/State ?[ ] [ ] A probable cause determination is not necessary, the arrestee bailed out of jail on ____________________________ [ ] I Appear in Court ? The undersigned Judge of this Court having conducted a probable cause determination for the above named person’s arrest with warrant by the undersigned affiant Officer TESS J. KOFFI. [ ] This affidavit/testimony contains sufficient facts showing probable cause for the person’s arrest existed at the time of the OKLAHOMA PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT STATE OF OKLAHOMA VS CONES, HANNAH (Continued) arrest. Arrangement before a court is ordered on ____________________________. [ ] This affidavit/testimony contains insufficient facts to show probable cause for the person’s arrest existed at the time of arrest. The arrestee is ordered released from custody immediately. I make the proceeding findings and order pursuant to Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), and County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, Inc. 99-1617 (U.S. May 13, 1991) (Louis 2528). PENDING OF PROBABLE CAUSE The Undersigned Judge of this Court, upon sworn affidavit, hereby determines there to be probable cause for issuance of an arrest warrant. Date 7-15-24 JUDGE OF THE COURT OFFICER / SUPERVISOR SIGNATURE VERIFICATION STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) COUNTY OF LOGAN ) SS: I, Hannah Grace Cones, being of lawful age and being first duly sworn upon oath, state: That I am the Plaintiff in the above-styled action; that I have read the foregoing Petition for Malicious Prosecution, Defamation Per Se, Identity Theft, and the Fabrication of Digital Evidence and know the contents thereof; and that the facts, allegations, and statements contained therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. Hannah Grace Cones HANNAH GRACE CONES, Plaintiff Pro Se Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20th day of February, 2026. NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: 01/02/2029 Commission Number: 25000051