CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
BRYAN COUNTY • CS-2026-00217

Midland Credit Management, Inc. v. Rodney Colbert

Filed: Feb 26, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: someone is suing Rodney Colbert of Oklahoma for $1,185.03—yes, three cents past the grand—over a credit card he didn’t pay. And not just any plaintiff. It’s Midland Credit Management, Inc., one of those shadowy debt-buying companies that pops up like a roach in your kitchen at 2 a.m., waving a spreadsheet and demanding judgment. This isn’t Law & Order: SVU. This is Law & Order: Minimum Payment Due.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, you’ve got Rodney Colbert—a regular guy, presumably, with a job, a mailbox, and a growing list of reasons to dread opening his mail. He lives in Bryan County, Oklahoma, which is about as far from Wall Street as you can get without hitting Texas. On the other side? Midland Credit Management, Inc.—a debt collection agency based in Minnesota that makes its living buying up delinquent credit card accounts for pennies on the dollar and then suing people to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the American financial ecosystem: they don’t issue credit, they don’t hand out cash, they just swoop in after the crash and start pecking.

And what exactly crashed here? A credit card account with The Bank of Missouri, under the brand name Milestone—yes, the same Milestone that sends out those pre-approved offers to college freshmen and people who just got out of bankruptcy. Rodney opened the account on February 13, 2024. For a few months, things were fine. He made purchases. He made payments. The last one posted? June 11, 2024. Then… silence. No more payments. The account went dark. By February 7, 2025, the bank had given up and “charged off” the debt—accounting-speak for “we’re not getting this money back, so let’s sell it to someone who might.” That’s when Midland stepped in, bought the debt for who knows how much—maybe $200, maybe less—and became the proud new owner of Rodney Colbert’s $1,185.03 headache.

Now, before you start drafting Rodney’s obituary, let’s be clear: this wasn’t some $10,000 shopping spree on Neiman Marcus. We’re talking about a little over a grand. Maybe it was medical bills. Maybe it was car repairs. Maybe it was a vacation he’ll never take. The filing doesn’t say. What we do know is that Midland didn’t just call Rodney and say, “Hey, wanna pay this off in installments?” No. They lawyered up. On December 5, 2025, they filed a petition in the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma—right before Thanksgiving, because nothing says “season of giving” like a lawsuit for three cents over a thousand bucks.

The legal claim? “Indebtedness.” Fancy word for “you owe us money.” Midland says Rodney defaulted on his obligation, they now own the debt, and they want their $1,185.03 plus interest, court costs, and whatever else the judge feels like tossing in. To back it up, they’ve attached an affidavit from one Lucas Hoffman, a “Legal Specialist” at Midland, who swears under penalty of perjury that all the records are accurate, that he has personal knowledge of the account, and that yes, Rodney owes exactly $1,185.03 as of the day the suit was filed. No more. No less. Not even a round number. Three cents shy of clean math. It’s the financial equivalent of leaving three pennies on the counter at a diner and expecting the waitress to chase you down the street.

Now, let’s talk about what Midland wants. $1,185.03. Is that a lot? In the grand scheme of civil lawsuits, it’s pocket lint. It’s less than the deductible on most car insurance policies. It’s the cost of a decent used tire. But here’s the thing: for the person on the receiving end, it’s not about the principle. It’s about the principle. Because once a judgment is entered, it can follow Rodney for years. It can show up on his credit report. It can lead to wage garnishment. It can snowball with interest. And all of this over a debt that Midland probably paid less than $200 to acquire. That’s the dirty little secret of the debt-buying industry: they don’t need to win every case. They just need to scare enough people into paying to make a profit. It’s a volume game. Sue 1,000 people, win 300, and you’re laughing all the way to the bank—even if the debts are old, the paperwork is flimsy, and the original lender already wrote it off.

And yet, here we are. Midland didn’t send a letter. They didn’t negotiate. They didn’t offer a settlement. They went straight to court, represented by the legal powerhouse of LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C.—yes, that’s really the firm’s name, like a law firm from a 1980s cop show. Their attorney, William L. Nixon, Jr., filed the petition with all the flair of someone ordering a sandwich. No drama. No outrage. Just cold, hard paperwork. And Lucas Hoffman’s affidavit? It reads like a robot wrote it after reading too many legal templates. “I have access to electronic records.” “I am trained on the manner and method.” “It was in the regular course of business.” It’s the financial version of I saw it on the internet, so it must be true.

What’s the most absurd part? It’s not the amount. It’s not even the three cents. It’s the sheer machine-like nature of this whole thing. Rodney probably didn’t even know Midland existed until the lawsuit landed in his lap. He didn’t sign a contract with them. He didn’t borrow money from them. They just bought his debt, slapped their name on it, and now they’re suing him like they’re the wronged party. It’s like if a guy stole your bike, you reported it stolen, and then a stranger bought the bike off the thief, painted it a different color, and sued you for not returning it.

We’re not rooting for debt evasion. If Rodney charged $1,185.03 worth of stuff and never paid, he should pay it back. But there’s something deeply unsettling about a system where a company that paid pennies for a debt can turn around and sue for the full amount—plus interest, plus fees, plus the emotional toll of being dragged into court—while the original lender walks away clean. It turns personal financial hardship into a profit center for third-party corporations that had nothing to do with the original agreement.

So what happens next? Rodney has 30 days to respond. He can fight it, settle it, or ignore it and risk a default judgment. If he ignores it, Midland wins by forfeit. If he fights it, he might ask for proof the debt is really his, or that Midland actually owns it, or that the amount is accurate. And that’s where things could get messy. Because in cases like this, the paperwork often doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. But most people don’t show up. Most people don’t have lawyers. Most people just pay up to make it go away.

And that’s the real story here. Not Rodney Colbert. Not $1,185.03. It’s about a system that profits from confusion, fear, and the fact that most people would rather pay $1,200 than spend $2,000 on a lawyer to fight a $1,185.03 lawsuit. It’s not high drama. It’s not a murder mystery. But it is a crime—just a slow, quiet, paperwork-based one. And the victim? Probably sitting at home, wondering why his credit score dropped and who the hell Midland Credit Management thinks they are.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if we were betting people, we’d say: Rodney better check his mail. And maybe start setting aside three cents.

Case Overview

$1,185 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,185 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Debt Collection Defendant defaulted on a bank obligation and owes $1,185.03

Petition Text

667 words
25-58054-0 YE1 008 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF BRYAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc., ) ) ) vs. ) ) No. CS 26-217 Rodney Colbert, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states: 1. Defendant Defaulted on THE BANK OF MISSOURI obligation with account number XXXXXXXXXXXX9392. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,185.03. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,185.03, with interest at the statutory rate, all court costs, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] STATE OF OKLAHOMA Midland Credit Management, Inc, Plaintiff -vs- Colbert, Rodney, Defendant(s). AFFIDAVIT OF LUCAS HOFFMAN Lucas Hoffman, whose business address is 600 W. Saint Germain St Suite 200, St. Cloud, MN 56301-3616, certifies and says: 1. I am employed as a Legal Specialist and have access to pertinent account records for Midland Credit Management, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "MCM"). I am a competent person over eighteen years of age, and make the statements herein based upon personal knowledge of those account records maintained by Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current owner of, and was assigned all the rights, title and interest to Defendant's THE BANK OF MISSOURI/MILESTONE account XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX9392 (MCM Number 331930515) (hereinafter "the Account"). 2. I have access to and have reviewed the electronic records pertaining to the Account maintained by MCM and am authorized to make this affidavit on MCM's behalf. The electronic records reviewed consist of (i) data and records acquired from the seller or assignor when MCM purchased or was assigned the Account, which were incorporated into MCM's business records upon purchase or assignment, and (ii) data and records generated by MCM in connection with servicing the Account since the date the Account was purchased by or was assigned to MCM. 3. I am familiar with and trained on the manner and method by which MCM creates and maintains its business records pertaining to the Account, which consist of (i) data and documents acquired from the seller or assignor, and (ii) subsequent collection and/or servicing activities by MCM. The records are acquired or created, and are kept in the regular course of MCM's business. It was in the regular course of MCM's business for a person with knowledge of the subsequent collection and/or servicing activities recorded, and a business duty to report, to make the record or data compilation, or to transmit information thereof to be included in such record, or for such information to be posted in MCM's records by a computer or similar digital means. In the regular course of MCM's business, the record or compilation of the subsequent collection activities is made at or near the time of the act or event by MCM as a regular practice. 4. MCM's records show that Defendant(s) owed a balance of $1,185.03 as of 2025-12-05. 5. On or about 2025-02-25, Midland Credit Management, Inc became the successor in interest to this Account. 6. MCM's records show that: 1) the Account was opened on 2024-02-13; 2) the last payment posted to the Account on 2024-06-11; and 3) the Account was charged off on 2025-02-07. 7. If called to testify as a witness thereon, I could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated herein. Left Blank Intentionally I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. DEC 2 3 2025 Date STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS Signed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on DEC 2 3 2025 by Lucas Hoffman. Karla Ann Sutter Notary Public - Minnesota My Commission Expires 01/31/2029 Notary Public OK038
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.