CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LE FLORE COUNTY • CS-2026-00158

LVNV Funding LLC v. Nathan Hudlow

Filed: Mar 10, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: in the grand tradition of American civil litigation, few things are more gloriously mundane than a company suing a man for $1,358.16 because he didn’t pay his credit card bill. But this case? This isn’t just a debt collection — it’s a full-blown financial ghost story, where the original creditor vanishes into the corporate ether, the debt gets passed around like a lukewarm casserole at a church potluck, and now, somehow, a faceless LLC in Delaware is suing a guy in Le Flore County, Oklahoma, over a balance that probably started with a Target run and ended with a legal filing. Welcome to the American debt machine, folks — where your $1,300 mistake can become someone else’s profit margin.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, we’ve got Nathan Hudlow — a regular guy, presumably living his life, maybe working a job, maybe trying to keep the lights on in rural Oklahoma. We don’t know much about him, and honestly, we don’t need to. He’s the defendant, the debtor, the guy who — according to the paperwork — once had a credit card with Credit One Bank, N.A., that little financial gremlin known for issuing subprime cards to people trying to claw their way up the credit ladder. The card number? XXXXXXXXXXXX9858. The kind of number you scribble on a sticky note and then lose behind the fridge. The kind of account you forget about until the calls start.

And then there’s the plaintiff: LVNV Funding LLC. Now, that name sounds like something generated by a corporate AI trained on tax law and nightmares. LVNV isn’t a bank. It’s not a store. It’s not even a person. It’s a debt buyer — a company that purchases defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then sues to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the financial ecosystem: they don’t lend the money, they don’t issue the cards, they just swoop in after the crash and say, “Cool, we’ll take it from here.” And in this case, they didn’t even buy the debt directly from Credit One. Oh no. That would be too simple. First, the debt went to Credit Asset Sales LLC — another shadowy entity with a name that sounds like a rejected boy band — which then bundled it into “Portfolio 43322” (yes, really) and sold it to LVNV’s predecessor. By the time the paperwork lands in court, the original $1,358.16 has changed hands at least twice, possibly more, each transfer marked by a quiet profit for someone who never met Nathan Hudlow and doesn’t care if he’s having a bad harvest season.

So what happened? Well, according to the petition — and this is the whole story, folks — Nathan Hudlow got a credit card. He used it. He stopped paying it. Credit One Bank, like banks do, eventually wrote it off as a loss and sold the debt to a collection portfolio. That portfolio was then purchased by LVNV Funding, which now claims the legal right to collect every penny. They sent a demand letter — the filing says “more than thirty days ago,” which is the legal courtesy knock before the lawsuit hammer comes down — and when Nathan didn’t pay up (or maybe didn’t respond, or maybe didn’t even know about it), they filed this case. That’s it. No dramatic betrayal. No embezzlement. No secret affair paid for on the card. Just silence, followed by a lawsuit. It’s so quiet, you can almost hear the tumbleweeds rolling through the courtroom.

Now, why are they in court? Legally speaking, this is a “Petition for Indebtedness” — which is legalese for “you owe us money and we want a judge to say so.” The claim is straightforward: LVNV says Nathan owes $1,358.16, and they’ve attached an affidavit from someone named John Wright, who claims to be an “Authorized Representative” (a title so vague it could mean anything from CEO to intern) and swears that the records are accurate. They’re asking for a judgment — a court order saying, yes, Nathan Hudlow owes this money — plus interest from the date of judgment, court costs, and “a reasonable attorney’s fee.” That last part is key: LVNV didn’t file this case out of the goodness of their heart. They hired a whole law firm — Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., a debt collection powerhouse with more attorneys on this single petition than most people have in their entire Rolodex — and they expect to get paid for it. And guess who’ll foot that bill? If the court rules in their favor, Nathan will. That means he could end up owing closer to $1,500 or more — all so a company that paid maybe $200 for his debt can squeeze out every last drop.

And what do they want? $1,358.16. Is that a lot? Well, in the grand scheme of lawsuits, it’s pocket change. You could buy a decent used car for that. Or pay six months of rent in some parts of Oklahoma. Or cover a major car repair. But in the world of debt buying? It’s a jackpot. LVNV probably paid less than $150 for this account. If they win — and in these cases, they usually do, especially if the defendant doesn’t show up — they collect the full amount, keep the difference, and move on to the next name on the spreadsheet. It’s litigation as a business model. And let’s be real: Nathan Hudlow isn’t getting a jury trial. He’s not getting a dramatic courtroom showdown. He’s getting a summons in the mail and a ticking clock. If he ignores it, he loses by default. If he shows up, he’ll need a lawyer — and legal help isn’t cheap, especially when you’re already broke enough to have a credit card go to collections.

So what’s our take? The most absurd part of this case isn’t the amount. It’s the machine. It’s the fact that a man’s financial misstep — maybe a medical bill, maybe a rough month, maybe just bad timing — gets packaged, sold, resold, and then weaponized by a company that never lent him a dime. It’s the fact that LVNV Funding LLC, a Delaware-registered entity with no physical presence in Oklahoma, can sue someone in Le Flore County over a debt that changed hands like a hot potato. It’s the fact that the “evidence” is an affidavit from a guy named John Wright who claims to know about the account but wasn’t there when the card was issued, wasn’t there when the payments stopped, and probably hasn’t spoken to Nathan Hudlow in his life. This isn’t justice. It’s bureaucracy with a garnishment order.

Are we rooting for Nathan Hudlow? Sure, in the same way we root for the cockroach that survives the nuclear apocalypse. He’s not a hero. He probably did rack up a debt he didn’t pay. But the idea that a faceless corporation can buy that debt, mark it up, and then sue for full value with the full force of the court — that’s not fairness. That’s financial alchemy: turning $200 of risk into $1,500 of profit, all because the system lets them.

And the craziest part? This case is happening right now in hundreds of courtrooms across America. Same script. Different names. Same outcome. So next time you get a credit card offer in the mail, remember: it’s not just a piece of plastic. It’s a potential future court case. And your debt? It might not die with you. It might just get sold to LVNV.

Case Overview

$1,358 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,358 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness Collection of debt

Petition Text

558 words
25-60765-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LE FLORE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. Nathan Hudlow, ) ) ) Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXX9858. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,358.16. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,358.16, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. [Signature] William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR LE FLORE COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Nathan Hudlow Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXX9858 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Nathan Hudlow by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 11/21/2019. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit Asset Sales LLC. Credit Asset Sales LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43322, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 03/21/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $1,358.16 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. ________________________________________ John Wright January 22, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Thursday, January 22, 2026. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.