CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
MCCLAIN COUNTY • CS-2026-00019

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Micah L Bell

Filed: Jan 6, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a debt collector is suing a man in Oklahoma for $3,110.51—less than the cost of a used car down payment—over a credit card balance he allegedly never paid. That’s it. No murder, no affair, no stolen llamas. Just cold, hard, petty financial drama. And yet, somehow, this is exactly the kind of civil war we live for.

Meet Micah L. Bell, a name that sounds like a minor outlaw from a Western novel, but in this story, he’s just… a guy. A regular, presumably non-cowboy Oklahoma resident who, like most of us, once opened a credit card. The card was issued by Synchrony Bank—yes, that Synchrony, the one that powers store credit cards for places like Amazon, Lowe’s, and Old Navy. Maybe Micah bought a mattress. Maybe he maxed out on power tools. The court doesn’t say. All we know is that on December 19, 2021, he opened the account, used it like a normal human, and started making payments. For a while, everything was fine. The American Dream, humming along.

But then—plot twist!—he stopped paying. His last recorded payment was on December 21, 2023. Two days after his birthday? Right before Christmas? Was it financial hardship? Did he forget? Did he move? Did he get hit by a meteor? Again, the filing is silent. But what we do know is that by March 29, 2024, the account was officially closed and “charged off”—which, in finance-speak, means the bank gave up on getting paid and wrote it off as a loss. It’s like a breakup: “We’re done. You owe us, but we’re emotionally detaching.”

Except… not really. Because here’s where it gets juicy. Instead of accepting their loss like mature financial institutions, Synchrony Bank did what banks love to do: they sold the debt. To a company called Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. Now, let’s be real—this isn’t some mom-and-pop collection agency with a dial-up phone and a coffee-stained ledger. Portfolio Recovery is a debt-buying empire. They purchase defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then try to collect the full amount. It’s like buying a haunted house at auction for $10,000 and then suing the ghost for back rent.

And now, here we are. January 6, 2026. Portfolio Recovery, armed with a lawsuit and the full force of the Oklahoma legal system, is asking the District Court of McClain County to make Micah L. Bell pay up. Their argument? Simple: Micah owed money. The bank sold the debt. Now they own it. And the balance—$3,110.51—is still due. They even filed a verified statement under penalty of perjury, swearing that all this is true. It’s as if they’re saying, “We may be a faceless corporation, but we swear on our legal binders, this is real.”

So why are they in court? Let’s break it down without the legalese. Portfolio Recovery is filing a “debt collection” lawsuit—basically, a formal “pay up or else” letter with judicial backing. They’re not accusing Micah of fraud. They’re not saying he stole anything. They’re just saying, “You owed this money, the debt was legally transferred to us, and now you owe us.” It’s like if your friend borrowed $50 from you, you sold that IOU to a stranger at a yard sale, and now the stranger shows up at your friend’s door with a notarized demand. Technically legal? Sure. Morally weird? Absolutely.

And what do they want? $3,110.51. That’s the headline number. Plus “costs”—which usually means filing fees, service fees, and maybe a few copies at Staples. But here’s the kicker: they also want the court to force the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to hand over Micah’s employment history. Why? So they can figure out where he works and potentially garnish his wages if they win. That’s not just about the money—it’s about sending a message: “We will find you. We will collect.”

Now, is $3,110.51 a lot? In the grand scheme of lawsuits, no. You can buy a decent used car for that. Or pay off a chunk of student debt. Or fund a really nice vacation to the Bahamas. But for a single credit card balance? It’s not chump change, but it’s not life-altering either. The absurdity isn’t in the amount—it’s in the machinery. A man allegedly stops paying a bill. Two years later, a billion-dollar debt collection firm sues him in rural Oklahoma, demanding not just payment but access to his employment records, all for an amount that probably cost the collector less than $500 to acquire.

And let’s talk about the vibe. The filing is signed by Nicholas Tait of RAUSCH STURM LLP, a law firm that proudly identifies itself as “Attorneys in the Practice of Debt Collection.” That’s like a law firm specializing in parking ticket appeals putting “We Love Meter Maids” on their letterhead. There’s a cold, robotic efficiency to it. No drama. No emotion. Just: We have the paperwork. We have the lien. Pay us.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t that someone’s being sued for three grand. It’s that this is normal. This is how the American debt machine runs. People fall behind. Banks sell the scraps. Corporations litigate. And suddenly, a routine credit card balance becomes a court case in McClain County, Oklahoma, with lawyers demanding employment histories like they’re building a dossier for a spy thriller.

We’re not rooting for the debt collector. We’re not even really rooting for Micah—we don’t know his side. But we are rooting for the sheer ridiculousness of it all. For the fact that somewhere, a man named Micah L. Bell is now legally entangled with a multi-million-dollar debt buyer over an amount that wouldn’t even cover the legal fees if this went to trial. For the fact that the court system is being used to chase down $3,110.51 like it’s a missing briefcase of diamonds.

This isn’t Law & Order. It’s Ledger & Order. And honestly? We’re here for it. Because in the grand theater of civil court, sometimes the smallest claims make the loudest noise. And if nothing else, let this be a warning: don’t skip out on your Old Navy credit card. The debt collectors are watching. And they will send a lawyer named Nicholas Tait to sue you in 2026.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if we were, we’d bill by the absurdity. And this case? It’s worth every penny.

Case Overview

$3,111 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of McClain County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$3,111 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Debt Collection Unpaid credit account balance

Petition Text

392 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCCLAIN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC PLAINTIFF, vs. MICAH L BELL DEFENDANT(S). No. CS-26-19 Kristel Gray, Court Clerk Deputy PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, RAUSCH STURM LLP, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states the following: 1. Plaintiff is duly and legally organized and is authorized to transact business in the State of Oklahoma. 2. On or about December 19, 2021, Defendant(s) opened a credit account with SYNCHRONY BANK ("Original Creditor"). 3. Defendant(s) used the account and thereby became obligated to pay the balance accrued. Defendant's(s') last payment towards the balance occurred on or about December 21, 2023. Defendants(s) thereafter defaulted on Defendant's(s') obligation. 4. On or about March 29, 2024, based on Defendant's failure to pay, Defendant's account, then numbered *************6179, was closed and/or charged. The account balance remained due and owing by Defendant. 5. The Original Creditor assigned its rights in Defendant's account to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current holder of Defendant's account, and is the sole proper party in interest to bring this lawsuit and to whom the debt is owed. 6. The balance remaining on the credit account, $3,110.51, is presently due and payable in full to Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant(s) in the sum of $3,110.51, plus costs, and for all subsequent costs; that the Court order the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC) to produce in writing the employment history for the Defendant for the period specified in Plaintiff’s request; and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem equitable, just, and proper. RAUSCH STURM LLP ATTORNEYS IN THE PRACTICE OF DEBT COLLECTION Account Representative Contact Information: (833) 899-0421 ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED By: Nicholas Tait, OBA #22739 Mailing Address: 300 N. Executive Drive, Suite 200 Brookfield WI 53005 (877) 215-2552 TTY: 711 Fax: (855) 272-3575 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VERIFIED STATEMENT OF COUNSEL I, the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff, pursuant to Oklahoma Statutes Title 12, section 426, state under penalty of perjury under the laws of Oklahoma that the statements made in the foregoing Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed 01/06/2026 , in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Nicholas Tait, OBA #22739 This is a communication from a debt collector. This communication is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained from this communication will be used for that purpose. Our File No. 5351711
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.