CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LINCOLN COUNTY • CJ-2026-00046

Windstream Communications, LLC v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.

Filed: Mar 20, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: two construction companies in Oklahoma allegedly dug into the ground like they were on a treasure hunt, completely forgot to check for buried utilities, and wham — severed a fiber optic line like they were cutting the ribbon at a grand opening. The bill? Just shy of $15,000. And no, they didn’t even have the decency to call “Dig Safe” first — because apparently, in 2024, some people still treat underground infrastructure like a game of Minesweeper they can just wing.

So who are we talking about here? On one side, we’ve got Windstream Communications, LLC — not some tiny mom-and-pop internet shop, but a major telecom player that provides high-speed internet, phone, and data services across multiple states, including Oklahoma. Think of them as the folks quietly making sure your Netflix binges don’t buffer during the final season of Love Is Blind. They own and maintain a vast network of fiber optic cables — those delicate, hair-thin strands that carry your entire digital life at the speed of light. One wrong move, and boom: dead Zoom calls, frozen security cameras, and a very angry ISP.

On the other side? Two construction companies with names that sound like they belong on a fantasy football team: Crossland Construction Company, Inc. and Home Run Construction, LLC. Crossland appears to be a larger, out-of-state operation (hence “foreign corporation” in legalese), while Home Run is a local Oklahoma LLC — so maybe they’re the neighborhood sluggers trying to knock one out of the park. Together, they were hired to do some leveling and excavation work — basically flattening land and digging trenches — for a new construction project at 338446 E. Highway 66 in Chandler, a small town in Lincoln County with a population smaller than the cast of The Bachelor franchise. It’s the kind of place where everyone knows your business, and now, thanks to this lawsuit, they definitely know these contractors messed up.

Now, here’s how things went off the rails. On March 21, 2024 — yes, the same day the petition was filed two years later, which either means someone’s calendar is cursed or this is a clerical typo — these two companies started digging. No permits checked. No calls made. No “Hey, maybe there’s something important under here?” discussions had. According to Windstream’s filing, they struck and damaged a 48-strand fiber optic cable — that’s not just one line, but a bundle of 48 individual fibers, each capable of carrying massive amounts of data. This wasn’t a nick. This was a full-on amputation of digital connectivity.

And here’s the kicker: Oklahoma has a law — the Oklahoma Underground Facilities Damage Prevention Act — that literally exists to prevent this exact scenario. It requires anyone planning to dig to notify a central service (think “811” — the “Call Before You Dig” hotline) so that utility companies can come out and mark where their lines are buried. It’s not rocket science. It’s not even algebra. It’s “don’t dig where you haven’t been told it’s safe.” But Crossland and Home Run allegedly skipped this step entirely. No notice. No markings. Just shovels and ambition.

Because of that failure, Windstream is arguing they’re not just dealing with a repair bill — they’re dealing with a legally preventable disaster. In legal terms, Windstream is making two big claims: negligence and negligence per se. Let’s break that down like we’re explaining it at a backyard barbecue. Negligence means you didn’t act with reasonable care, and your lack of care caused harm. Like if you leave a banana peel on the stairs and your neighbor slips — congrats, you’re negligent. But negligence per se is like negligence with a badge: it means you broke a specific law designed to protect people, and because you broke it, the law says you’re automatically on the hook if someone gets hurt. In this case, the law is Oklahoma’s Damage Prevention Act, and by allegedly failing to call before digging, the contractors didn’t just make a mistake — they violated a statute, and that violation, Windstream claims, makes them strictly liable. Translation: “You broke the rules. You pay the bill. No excuses.”

So what does Windstream want? A cool $14,832.09. That’s not chump change — it’s enough to buy a used car, take a solid vacation, or fund an entire year of TikTok ad campaigns. For a telecom giant like Windstream, it might not bankrupt them, but it’s not nothing — especially when you factor in the labor, materials, and downtime involved in repairing a severed fiber line in rural Oklahoma. They’re also asking for attorney fees, costs, and interest, which could push the total higher. But notably, they’re not asking for punitive damages — the kind meant to punish truly outrageous behavior — and they didn’t demand a jury trial, which suggests they’re treating this as a straightforward, “you broke it, you bought it” situation rather than a dramatic courtroom showdown.

Now, let’s talk about what’s really wild here. First, the location: Highway 66. That’s Route 66 — the Mother Road, the iconic highway that runs through Chandler and dozens of other small towns. This isn’t some remote wilderness; it’s a historic corridor where infrastructure should be well-documented and highly visible. Second, fiber optic lines aren’t exactly stealthy. They’re usually marked, mapped, and registered. And third — and most baffling — this kind of mistake is so preventable. One phone call. That’s it. The 811 system exists for free, nationwide, and it’s been around for years. You call, they send someone out to mark the lines, and you dig with confidence. Skipping it is like driving without a seatbelt because you’re “in a hurry.”

Our take? This case is the legal equivalent of a “how not to” manual for contractors. It’s not about greed or betrayal or secret affairs — it’s about basic professional responsibility. And honestly, we’re rooting for Windstream, not because they’re innocent angels of the internet, but because someone has to draw the line. If construction companies can just go around slicing through critical communications infrastructure like it’s spaghetti, what’s next? Accidentally drilling into a gas line? Cutting a water main during a drought? This isn’t just about $14,832.09 — it’s about setting a precedent that you can’t treat public utilities like an afterthought.

Also, can we appreciate the irony? These contractors were leveling land for new construction — probably a home or business that will need high-speed internet. And in their rush to build something modern, they destroyed the very infrastructure that makes modern life possible. Poetic justice? Maybe. A cautionary tale? Absolutely.

So next time you see a backhoe in your neighborhood, don’t assume they know what they’re doing. And if you hear a snap followed by your Wi-Fi going out — check the news. It might not be your router’s fault. It might be Home Run Construction swinging for the fences… and striking out.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$14,832 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Negligence, Strict Liability, and Violation of Oklahoma Underground Facilities Damage Prevention Act Defendants damaged Windstream's fiber optic lines while performing excavation work.

Petition Text

367 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY MAR 2 O 2026 STATE OF OKLAHOMA WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS, LLC ) ) Kristie Hammock, Court Clerk Plaintiff, ) Lincoln County, Oklahoma vs. ) Case No. CJ-2026- CROSSLAND CONSTRUCTION ) COMPANY, INC., AND HOME RUN ) CONSTRUCTION, LLC ) Defendants. PETITION Plaintiff, Windstream Communications, LLC., for its cause of action against the Defendants, Crossland Construction Company, Inc., and Home Run Construction, LLC, alleges and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Windstream Communications, LLC, is a foreign corporation conducting business in Oklahoma. 2. Defendant, Crossland Construction Company, Inc., is a foreign corporation doing business in Oklahoma. 3. Defendant, Home Run Construction, Inc., is an Oklahoma LLC conducting business in Oklahoma. 4. The amount in controversy is $14,832.09, exclusive of costs and interest. 5. This Court’s jurisdiction is just and proper as the events giving rise to this cause of action occurred in Lincoln County, State of Oklahoma. 6. On March 21, 2024, Defendants, Crossland Construction Company, Inc., and Home Run Construction, LLC, were performing leveling and excavation work for new construction on land located at 338446 E. Highway 66 in Chandler, Lincoln County, State of Oklahoma. 7. While performing leveling and excavation work, Defendants struck and damaged Windstream 48 Strand Fiber Optic lines. 8. Defendants failed to provide notice of its excavation as required by the Oklahoma Underground Facilities Damage Prevention Act, 63 O.S. §142.1 et seq. 9. Defendants violated the Oklahoma Underground Facilities Damage Prevention Act and are strictly liable for Plaintiff's damages per 63 O.S. §142.9a. 10. Defendants acted negligently in performing the leveling and excavation work. 11. Defendants' violation of the Oklahoma Underground Facilities Damage Prevention Act constitutes negligence per se. 12. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' actions and omissions, Plaintiff's fiber optic lines were damaged. 13. As a result of Defendants' actions and omissions, Plaintiff seeks damages against Defendants in the amount of $14,832.09. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Windstream Communications, LLC, prays that judgment be entered in its favor and against the Defendants, Crossland Construction Company, Inc., and Home Run Construction, LLC, for actual damages in the amount of $14,832.09, together with attorney fees, costs, interest, and any such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, CATHCART & DOOLEY [Signature] Virginia Cathcart Holleman, OBA #15422 2807 North Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73106 Telephone: (405) 524-1110 Facsimile: (405) 524-4143 [email protected] ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY LIEN CLAIMED
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.