Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Dane Conine
What's This Case About?
Let’s cut right to the chase: the Oklahoma Tax Commission is suing a man named Dane Conine for $9,994.38—yes, and thirty-eight cents—because he allegedly forgot to pay his state income taxes for 2015 and 2018. Not $10,000. Not even $9,995. We’re talking $9,994.38. That’s not just a number—that’s a statement. It’s the financial equivalent of your mom texting you “I’m not mad, just disappointed” with a screenshot of your credit card bill.
Now, who is Dane Conine? Honestly, we don’t know much. He’s not a celebrity. He’s not a politician. He’s not even someone who’s been in court before for anything dramatic like “allegedly training raccoons to steal from neighbors.” He’s just a regular guy with a Social Security number ending in 5430 and, apparently, a complicated relationship with tax season. The Oklahoma Tax Commission, on the other hand, is not just some clipboard-wielding bureaucrat in a sad fluorescent-lit office. No, this is the full-force arm of the state government, represented by Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP—a law firm whose name sounds like a villainous corporate law duo from a 1980s action movie. These are the people who show up at your door with a garnishment order and a very serious email signature.
So what went down? Picture this: It’s 2015. You’re probably listening to “Uptown Funk,” wearing jeggings, and thinking, “I’ll file my taxes… eventually.” Dane Conine may have done the same. According to the filing, he owed $3,478.03 in income tax for that year. But he didn’t pay. And the clock started ticking. Interest began to accrue. Penalties piled on. By the time the tax warrant was issued in 2018, that original tax bill had ballooned to $5,312.14 in penalties and interest alone—more than the actual tax he owed. That’s like buying a $35 concert ticket and ending up owing $500 because you forgot to RSVP to the parking RSVP email.
Fast forward to 2018—yes, the year that gave us the Infinity War trailer, avocado toast backlash, and apparently, another missed tax payment from Dane. This time, the base tax was smaller: $1,018. But again, no payment. And again, the penalties started stacking up. By October 2019, when the second tax warrant was issued, the added interest, penalties, and fees brought that 2018 debt to $1,440.24. Combine that with the 2015 mess, and you’ve got a total debt of $6,588.76—officially warrant-worthy. The Tax Commission filed those warrants like they were dropping a mic: “You didn’t pay? Fine. Now it’s a judgment.”
But here’s where it gets juicy. The lawsuit wasn’t filed in 2019. Or 2020. Or even 2025. No, the Oklahoma Tax Commission waited until March 17, 2026—St. Patrick’s Day, might we add—to officially sue Dane Conine. And by that point, the debt had grown even more. The filing says the total unpaid balance as of March 12, 2026, was $9,994.38. That’s nearly $3,500 in additional penalties, interest, and fees accrued after the warrants were already filed. At this point, the government isn’t just trying to collect what Dane owed—they’re collecting what the collection process itself cost. It’s like being late on your library book, getting a fine, then getting another fine for not paying the first fine, then getting taken to small claims court for the privilege of being reminded that overdue books accrue interest.
So why are we in court? Legally speaking, this is a “tax enforcement” action. The Oklahoma Tax Commission isn’t asking for a jury trial or demanding Dane be thrown in jail (though we’d pay to see that episode of Cops: Tax Edition). Instead, they’re asking the court to force Dane to show up for a “hearing on assets”—basically a financial interrogation where he’d have to disclose everything he owns, from his car to his savings account to that vintage Beanie Baby collection he’s been hiding in the attic. They also want permission to garnish his wages, seize property, or do whatever else the law allows to squeeze that $9,994.38 out of him. Under Oklahoma law, once a tax warrant is filed, it’s treated like a court judgment—meaning the state can treat Dane’s bank account like a piñata at a toddler’s birthday party.
And what do they want? $9,994.38. In context, that’s not chump change—but it’s also not life-altering wealth. For most people, it’s about three months’ rent in Oklahoma City, or the cost of a used car. But here’s the kicker: the original tax debt was just over $4,500. The rest? All penalties, interest, fees, and the bureaucratic equivalent of compound interest on regret. The state isn’t just recovering what Dane didn’t pay—they’re profiting from his forgetfulness. And while we’re not saying the government should just forget about taxes (imagine that world—chaos, anarchy, no roads, just people bartering with homemade candles), there’s something almost comically excessive about chasing a guy for nearly $10,000 because he missed two tax filings—especially when the filing date of the lawsuit is four years after the second warrant was issued. Did they forget about him? Was he low priority? Did someone misplace a folder labeled “Conine, D. - Mildly Annoying Tax Guy”?
Here’s our take: the most absurd part isn’t that Dane didn’t pay his taxes. We’ve all been late on something. The absurdity is in the math. A $3,478 tax bill turning into over five thousand dollars in penalties? A $1,000 tax debt growing to $1,440 in fees? And then waiting until 2026 to file suit, letting the interest keep compounding like a snowball rolling down a hill made of late fees? This isn’t just tax enforcement—it’s tax escalation. It’s the government playing Jenga with someone’s finances and then blaming them when the tower falls.
We’re not rooting for tax evasion. We’re not saying Dane is a hero. But we are saying that when a system allows penalties to nearly double the original debt, and then waits years to act, maybe the real villain isn’t the guy who forgot to file—it’s the machine that turned a paperwork snafu into a $10,000 nightmare. If Dane shows up to court with a shoebox of receipts and a sad PowerPoint explaining his 2015 financial situation, we’re giving him a standing ovation. And if the Tax Commission shows up with a garnishment order and a clipboard taller than a Texas skyscraper? Well, we’ll be here, popcorn ready, waiting for the next chapter in The Ballad of Dane Conine and the 38 Cents That Broke the Bank.
Case Overview
-
Oklahoma Tax Commission
government
Rep: Scott McGlasson, OBA#20591, Elizabeth Paul, OBA#32714, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
- Dane Conine individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tax enforcement | Unpaid taxes and penalties |