CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1160

Jody Bursveen v. Wal-Mart Corporation

Filed: Mar 16, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: Jody Bursveen did not trip over a banana peel, a rogue shopping cart, or even a careless teenager on a hoverboard. No, folks—she tripped over a garden hoseat a Walmartin the middle of the garden center doorway—like it was some kind of cursed obstacle course disguised as retail therapy. And not just once. She tripped over the same hose twice, because apparently, the first time wasn’t traumatic enough. This is not a slip-and-fall. This is a slip-and-hose, and it’s now the centerpiece of a $75,000 lawsuit that has all the drama of a daytime soap opera, with the added bonus of actual medical bills.

Jody Bursveen is, by all accounts, a regular human being who enjoys plants. On July 17, 2025, she walked into the Walmart in Skiatook, Oklahoma—a town so wholesome it sounds like a sitcom set—looking to buy some greenery. She’s not a thrill-seeker. She’s not a parkour enthusiast. She’s just a woman who wanted to spruce up her yard and possibly impress her HOA. She loaded up her cart with plants, did her shopping like a responsible adult, and then—like so many of us have done—tried to navigate the chaotic gauntlet that is Walmart’s garden center exit. And there it was: a garden hose, casually draped across the doorway like a lazy snake sunbathing on a sidewalk. Not coiled. Not tucked away. Not labeled with a “Caution: Wet Hose” sign. Just… there. Lying in wait.

Now, here’s where it gets wild. Jody, being the responsible citizen she is, didn’t just leave her cart in the middle of the parking lot like a modern-day vandal. Oh no. She hauled her plants to her car, then circled back—like a retail samurai returning the sword to the sheath—to return the shopping cart to the garden center. And guess what was still in the doorway? That same garden hose. Still unattended. Still unmarked. Still just chilling there like it owned the place. And when Jody stepped over it—presumably with more caution this time—she tripped again and fell, sustaining injuries serious enough to land her in this courtroom.

Let’s pause for a second and appreciate the absurdity: a multi-billion-dollar corporation, one of the largest retailers in human history, failed to manage a garden hose. Not a supply chain crisis. Not a cyberattack. Not even a shortage of avocados. A hose. The kind of thing you’d expect to see neatly coiled behind a suburban dad’s garage, not stretched across a high-traffic entrance like a booby trap in a low-budget spy movie. And yet, here we are. Walmart, a company that tracks inventory down to the last pack of gum, somehow couldn’t track a 50-foot length of rubber tubing lying in a doorway. It’s like if NASA lost a rocket in the parking lot and just said, “Eh, someone’ll find it.”

So why is Jody suing? Because under Oklahoma law, businesses like Walmart have a duty to keep their premises safe for customers—especially when those customers are invited onto the property to spend money. That’s called premises liability, and it’s not just legal jargon—it’s common sense. If you’re going to invite people in to buy petunias, you can’t also set up tripping hazards like it’s American Ninja Warrior: Garden Edition. Walmart allegedly failed on multiple fronts: they didn’t inspect the area, didn’t remove or secure the hose, didn’t warn anyone about it, and didn’t fix the dangerous condition. In legal terms, that’s a four-star failure in basic store maintenance.

Jody’s lawsuit claims she suffered injuries serious enough to rack up medical bills, endure pain and suffering, and possibly lose wages—either because she missed work or because her ability to work in the future has been impaired. That’s why she’s asking for $75,000. Now, is that a lot? For a garden hose incident? On paper, maybe it sounds excessive. But let’s be real—medical care in America is a horror story even when you don’t fall at Walmart. A single ER visit can cost thousands. Physical therapy? Also not cheap. And if Jody, say, broke a wrist, tore a ligament, or suffered a back injury, we’re not talking about a band-aid and a Tylenol. We’re talking life disruption. And $75,000 isn’t some outrageous windfall—it’s not even close to what you’d see in a major personal injury case. It’s the minimum needed to cover real damages without going full “I’m suing for emotional distress because my kalanchoe looked sad after the fall.”

Now, here’s the kicker: Walmart knew or should have known about this hazard. The hose wasn’t some sudden act of nature. It didn’t fall from the sky during a tornado. It was placed there, presumably by an employee watering plants. And nobody thought, “Hey, maybe we shouldn’t leave this across the only exit?” No warning cones. No employee on duty. No “Watch Your Step” sign written in Comic Sans. Just… a hose. And when Jody fell—twice—it wasn’t because she was sprinting or texting or wearing roller skates. She was doing the exact thing Walmart wanted her to do: shop, leave, return the cart. She followed the rules. The store did not.

And yet, the most absurd part of this whole saga isn’t even the hose. It’s the fact that this had to become a lawsuit. That Jody needed a lawyer—Jacob Morton of the Daspit Law Firm, who is now formally demanding Walmart preserve all evidence, including photos and incident reports—just to get accountability for a garden hose in a doorway. This shouldn’t be a court case. This should be a five-minute conversation between a store manager and an employee: “Hey, Bob, stop leaving the hose in the walkway.” But instead, we’re here. In Tulsa County District Court. Arguing about whether a multinational corporation can be bothered to basic safety.

Look, we’re not saying every stumble deserves a settlement. If you trip over your own feet while doing the floss dance in Aisle 3, that’s on you. But this? This is different. This is a known, preventable hazard that wasn’t just ignored once—it was ignored twice, long enough for the same person to fall over it on the way out and on the way back. If Walmart had left a bear trap in the garden center, we’d all agree that’s a problem. A garden hose? Same energy.

So where do we stand? We’re rooting for Jody—not because we love lawsuits, but because we love basic decency. We’re rooting for the idea that a store can sell you a hanging basket and let you leave without becoming a human lawn ornament. We’re rooting for the principle that if you’re going to sell gardening supplies, you should probably know how to use them safely. And honestly? If Walmart loses this case, maybe—just maybe—they’ll finally invest in a hose reel. Or at the very least, a “Please Don’t Trip” sign. The world would be a better place. And Jody Bursveen might finally get the peace of mind—and the medical care—she deserves. All because a hose had a little too much garden variety danger.

Case Overview

$75,000 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Premises Liability & Negligence Plaintiff tripped over a garden hose at a Wal-Mart store and sustained injuries.

Petition Text

575 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA JODY BURSVEEN Plaintiff, vs. WAL-MART CORPORATION Defendant Case No. CJ-2026-01160 PETITION KELLY M. GREENOUGH Comes now, Plaintiff, Jody Bursveen, (hereinafter, "Plaintiff"), complains of Defendant, Wal-Mart Corporation (hereinafter, "Defendant."), and would respectfully show the court that: 1. Plaintiff, Jody Brusveen, is an individual residing in Collinsville, Oklahoma. 2. Defendant, Wal-Mart Corporation, is a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Oklahoma and operates a retail store located at 700 W. Rodgers Blvd. Skiatook, Oklahoma 74070. 3. Defendant may be served at CT Corporation System, 1833 S Morgan Road, Oklahoma City, OK 73128 or wherever found. 4. This lawsuit arises from the personal injuries Plaintiff sustained on or about July 17, 2025. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was a business invitee at Defendant's store. After completing her purchases in the garden center and placing her plants in a shopping cart, Plaintiff proceeded toward the exit. As she attempted to leave, she encountered a garden hose laid across the doorway, which obstructed her path and made it difficult to maneuver her cart. Plaintiff then transported her purchases to her vehicle and returned to the garden center to place the cart inside. While doing so, she tripped over the same garden hose and fell, sustaining injuries. The garden hose had been positioned across the entryway in a manner that created an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm to customers, including Plaintiff. 5. Defendant had a duty to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition and to warn patrons of any dangerous conditions, including hazards such as the hose laid across the garden center entryway. Defendant breached its duty by failing to remove or properly secure the hose and failing to provide any warning to Plaintiff of the dangerous condition. **CAUSE OF ACTION- PREMISES LIABILITY & NEGLIGENCE** 6. Defendant is liable to Plaintiff under the theory of premises liability and negligence based on the following negligent conduct on their property at 700 W. Rodgers Blvd. Skiatook, Oklahoma 74070: a. Failure to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition; b. Failure to inspect the premises where the dangerous condition existed; c. Failure to correct the condition by taking reasonable measures to safeguard persons who entered the premises; d. Failure to inform Plaintiff of the dangerous condition existing on the premises; and e. Other acts deemed negligent. **DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY PLAINTIFF** 7. That as the result of negligent acts and actions of Defendant, Plaintiff was seriously injured; 8. As a result, the Defendant is liable to Plaintiff for damages suffered as follows: a. Past and future medical expenses; b. Past and future pain, suffering and mental anguish; c. Past and future physical impairment; d. Past and future physical disfigurement; and e. Past lost wages and future loss of earning capacity. 9. Plaintiff requests that Defendant preserve any and all evidence related to this client and this accident, including but not limited to photos, videos, and incident reports. 10. By reason of the above, Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages from Defendant in an amount within the jurisdictional limits of this Court, as well as pre- and post-judgment interest. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jody Brusveen, prays for judgment against Defendant for personal injuries in an amount not to exceed $75,000.00 including attorney fees, interest, costs, and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, DASPIT LAW FIRM /s/ Jacob Morton Oklahoma State Bar No. 36476 1601 Northwest Expressway, Suite 1600 Oklahoma City, OK 73118 Telephone: (405) 901-1454 Facsimile: (713) 587-9086 Email: [email protected]; Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.