CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1374

Leroy Langley v. Maltbie's Escort, LLC, Estate of Mary Maltbie, Deceased

Filed: Feb 17, 2023
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: someone died while trying to turn her pickup truck around on a two-lane highway in the middle of nowhere Oklahoma, and now a man is suing for $250,000 because he got hurt in the multi-vehicle pileup that followed. And no, this isn’t just another tragic road accident — it’s a full-blown legal showdown involving a ghost employee, a defunct escort service, and a fatal U-turn that somehow became a corporate liability nightmare. Welcome to rural Oklahoma’s version of Furious 7, except instead of Vin Diesel, we’ve got a 2003 Ford F-150, a dead driver, and a law firm named DiPasquale Moore ready to go full courtroom mode.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Leroy Langley — the plaintiff, resident of Oklahoma, and, per the filing, a guy who walked (or maybe limped) away from a crash with “serious and permanent injuries,” including multiple fractures. He’s represented by two attorneys from DiPasquale Moore, a firm that, despite the name, does not appear to specialize in Italian cuisine. On the other side? A corporate entity with a name that raises eyebrows: Maltbie’s Escort, LLC. Before you start imagining neon signs and bouncers, let’s clarify — this is almost certainly not a gentlemen’s club or a dating service. In transportation and oilfield lingo, an “escort” often refers to a pilot or safety vehicle that guides oversized loads — like massive drilling equipment or wind turbine blades — through tight spaces or hazardous routes. So this is less Magic Mike, more Big Rig Energy. But still — Maltbie’s Escort? Come on. That name’s begging for a late-night comedy roast.

Then there’s Mary Maltbie, who, according to the court documents, is very much deceased. She was apparently driving a 2003 Ford F-150 — a truck so old it probably remembers when flip phones were cool — and acting as a pilot vehicle operator for her own company. Yes, you read that right: Mary Maltbie appears to have been driving for her own LLC. That’s like being your own boss, your own employee, and your own worst HR violation all at once. And now that she’s gone, her estate — managed by someone named Sherri Maltbie, likely a relative — is getting dragged into court like a supporting character in a Southern Gothic soap opera.

Now, let’s talk about what actually happened. On June 20, 2025 — a date that hasn’t even occurred yet as of this writing, which either means this case is from the future or someone made a typo in the filing — Mary Maltbie was cruising northbound on U.S. Highway 287 near Boise City, Oklahoma. For those unfamiliar, Boise City isn’t exactly a metropolis. It’s a tiny town in the Oklahoma Panhandle where the wind blows harder than your last breakup text and the nearest Starbucks is a two-hour drive. Highway 287 is a straight shot through flat, open terrain — the kind of road where you can see trouble coming from a mile away. Unless, of course, trouble is a 20-year-old Ford F-150 suddenly deciding to do a 180 in the middle of the highway.

According to the petition, Mary attempted a U-turn — not at an intersection, not at a designated turn lane, but right there in the northbound lanes. And she didn’t yield to oncoming traffic. The result? A “violent and fatal collision” involving multiple vehicles. Let’s unpack that phrase: violent and fatal. This wasn’t a fender bender. This was metal on metal, airbags deploying, ambulances racing across the prairie. And yes — Mary Maltbie died in the crash. But so did the peaceful coexistence of everyone else on that stretch of road that day, because someone else — namely, Leroy Langley — ended up with broken bones, medical bills, and a future full of physical therapy appointments.

Now, why are we in court? Because Langley’s lawyers are arguing that Mary wasn’t just some random driver making a dumb move — she was on the clock. They claim she was an employee or agent of Maltbie’s Escort, LLC, and that she was acting within the “course and scope” of her employment when she caused the crash. That’s legalese for: “She wasn’t running errands — she was working.” If that’s true, then the LLC could be held liable for her actions under a legal principle called respondeat superior — which, roughly translated from Latin, means “the boss pays when the employee screws up.” They’re also throwing in claims of negligence, gross negligence (which is like regular negligence but with extra recklessness), and negligence per se — a fancy way of saying she probably broke traffic laws so badly that it automatically counts as negligence.

The damages Langley is seeking? Over $250,000. Is that a lot? Well, for a car crash in rural Oklahoma, sure — it’s not a million-dollar Beverly Hills lawsuit, but it’s enough to buy a very nice house in Cimarron County or pay for a lot of physical therapy sessions. The petition mentions past and future medical costs, pain and suffering (both physical and mental), loss of income, and even future earning capacity — meaning Langley may never be able to work the same way again. That’s serious. But here’s the catch: Mary Maltbie is dead. The company appears to be inactive or possibly defunct. And the estate? It might not have a dime. So is this lawsuit really about justice — or is it a Hail Mary pass to get someone to pay up before the trail goes cold?

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t the name “Maltbie’s Escort” — though seriously, rebrand. No, the real absurdity is the idea that a woman was out there driving a two-decade-old truck, doing U-turns on a highway while piloting for a company she owned, and no one thought, “Maybe we should update our equipment — or at least our risk management strategy?” This feels less like corporate negligence and more like a family-run operation that skipped the business school part and went straight to “let’s just figure it out as we go.” And now, in the aftermath of a fatal crash, we’re left untangling whether a dead woman’s side hustle qualifies as a legitimate enterprise under Oklahoma law.

Do we feel for Leroy Langley? Absolutely. Getting injured in a multi-vehicle collision is no joke. But do we also feel like this case is a legal ghost story — a lawsuit chasing shadows of a woman and a company that may not have much left to give? Yeah, a little. Still, we’re rooting for clarity. Someone needs to explain what Maltbie’s Escort was actually escorting, why a pilot vehicle was making unsanctioned U-turns on a highway, and whether Oklahoma’s Panhandle has enough traffic to justify pilot vehicles in the first place. Until then, we’ll be here — popcorn ready, waiting for the next chapter in America’s least sexy corporate drama.

Case Overview

$250,000 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$250,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • Leroy Langley individual
    Rep: Jay M. Mitchel, OBA No. 20784, R. Chad Nelson, OBA No. 33986
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 negligence, gross negligence, negligence per se motor vehicle collision

Petition Text

447 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LEROY LANGLEY, Plaintiff, v. MALTBIE’S ESCORT, LLC, MARY MALTBIE, Deceased, and ESTATE OF MARY MALTBIE, Deceased. Defendants. PETITION COMES NOW Plaintiff LEROY LANGLEY (hereafter “Plaintiff”) and brings the following claims and causes of actions against Defendants MALTBIE’S ESCORT, LLC (hereafter “Defendant LLC”) and the ESTATE OF MARY MALTBIE, Deceased (hereafter “Defendant Estate”), as follows: 1. Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the State of Oklahoma. 2. Defendant MALTBIE’S ESCORT, LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Oklahoma and conducting business in and through Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. 3. Defendant ESTATE OF MARY MALTBIE, Deceased may be served by and through its Special Administrator, Sherri Maltbie. Sherri Maltbie is, upon information and belief, a resident of Cimarron County, Oklahoma. 4. Defendant MARY MALTBIE, Deceased, upon information and belief, was a resident of Cimarron County, Oklahoma. 5. The motor vehicle collision giving rise to this action occurred on or about June 20, 2025, on U.S. Highway 287, near Boise City, Oklahoma (hereafter “subject collision”). 6. This Court has proper jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter. 7. Venue is proper before this Court. 8. On or about June 20, 2025, Mary Maltbie, deceased, was driving a 2003 Ford F-150 as a pilot vehicle in the northbound lanes of U.S. Highway 287 in Cimarron County, Oklahoma. While attempting to make a U-turn, Mary Maltbie, deceased, did not yield to oncoming traffic and cause a violent and fatal collision involving multiple vehicles. 9. Mary Maltbie was negligent, grossly negligent, and negligent per se in the operation of a motor vehicle she was operating as a pilot vehicle for Defendant LLC at the time of the subject collision. 10. Mary Maltbie was an employee and/or agent of Defendant LLC and was acting within the course and scope of her employment and/or agency at the time she caused the subject collision. 11. As a result of the negligence, gross negligence, and negligence per se of the Defendants, Plaintiff suffered serious and permanent injuries including multiple fractures. 12. Plaintiff damages include past medical costs and expenses; future medical care and treatment; physical pain and suffering, past and future; mental pain and suffering, past and future; physical impairment; loss of earnings; and impairment of future earning capacity. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants in an amount in excess of $250,000.00, together with interest, costs, attorney fees, and all such relief as the Court deems reasonable and just. Respectfully submitted, DIPASQUALE MOORE Jay M. Mitchel, OBA No. 20784 R. Chad Nelson, OBA No. 33986 529 West Main Street Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102 Telephone: (405) 900-9000 Facsimile: (405) 200-1400 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff ATTORNEYS' LIEN CLAIMED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.