CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CANADIAN COUNTY • CS-2026-664

LVNV Funding LLC v. Mark Sage

Filed: Mar 17, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a man in Oklahoma owes $2,452… and now a company with a name that sounds like a rejected tech startup is suing him in court over it. That’s it. That’s the whole case. No murder, no scandal, no secret affair — just a credit card debt that got bought, sold, and resold like a slightly used mattress on Craigslist, until it landed in the hands of a debt collector who’s now asking a judge to make Mark Sage pay up. Welcome to the wild, soul-sucking circus of American debt collection, where your late payment becomes someone else’s payday.

So who are these players? On one side, we’ve got Mark Sage — a regular guy, presumably with a job, a Netflix account, and a growing sense of dread as yet another envelope from a law firm shows up in his mailbox. We don’t know much about him, except that at some point he opened a credit card with Credit One Bank, N.A. — the kind of bank that specializes in giving credit to people who maybe shouldn’t have it, often with sky-high interest rates and fees that multiply faster than rabbits. On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC — a name so bland and corporate it could be a subsidiary of “Generic Finance Inc.” Spoiler: it basically is. LVNV isn’t a bank. It’s not even a store. It’s a debt buyer — a company that purchases defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then sues people to collect the full amount. Think of them as vultures with law degrees — or at least lawyers on retainer.

And yes, they’ve got a whole law firm on speed dial: LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. — a firm so committed to debt collection they listed seven attorneys on this one tiny lawsuit. Seven. That’s more lawyers than some murder trials get. William L. Nixon, Jr. is the point person, but let’s be real: this case was probably drafted by a paralegal in 12 minutes between coffee breaks. This isn’t personal. It’s not even particularly legal. It’s industrial-scale debt litigation, the fast food of the justice system — cheap, repetitive, and designed to churn out judgments like a factory line.

Now, here’s how we got here. Back on June 22, 2023 — a date etched into the affidavit like it’s the day the world changed — Mark Sage allegedly opened a credit card account with Credit One Bank. What he bought? Who knows. A new phone? Groceries? A very expensive emotional support hedgehog? The filing doesn’t say. What we do know is that at some point, he stopped paying. The account went south. Default city. Population: you, if you’ve ever missed a bill.

But instead of Credit One chasing him down, they sold the debt. Not to a friend. Not to a family member. To Credit Asset Sales LLC — another company whose name sounds like a PowerPoint slide titled “Monetization Strategy.” Then, in April 2024, that company bundled Sage’s debt with hundreds of others into something called “Portfolio 43495” — because nothing says “I care about your financial hardship” like being part of a numbered portfolio. That portfolio was then sold to LVNV Funding LLC, who now claims full ownership of the debt and the right to collect every last penny.

Let that sink in: LVNV didn’t lend Mark Sage a dime. They never checked his credit. They didn’t send him a card in the mail or offer him 0% APR for 18 months. They just bought his failure at auction and are now suing him for the full amount — $2,452 — plus interest, court costs, and attorney’s fees. It’s like if someone stole your bike, sold it to a pawn shop, and then the pawn shop sued you for not returning it.

And that’s exactly why they’re in court. LVNV is filing what’s called a “petition for indebtedness” — legalese for “he owes us money, make him pay.” They’re not accusing Sage of fraud. They’re not claiming he denied the debt or refused to communicate. They’re just saying: the records show he owes it, we own it, and we want a judge to stamp it official. The evidence? An affidavit from a woman named Rebekah Odaniel, who swears — under penalty of perjury — that LVNV’s business records confirm the debt is real, valid, and properly transferred. Is she an employee of LVNV? Probably. Has she ever met Mark Sage? Almost certainly not. But her signature is enough to launch a lawsuit.

Now, what do they want? $2,452. Is that a lot? Well, it’s not nothing. That’s a car repair. A plane ticket to Cancun. Six months of DoorDash if you’re really committed to never cooking again. But in the world of debt collection lawsuits, it’s actually on the smaller side. These cases often involve debts under $5,000 — small enough that people might not hire a lawyer, but big enough that debt buyers can make a profit if they win even half of their cases. And win they often do, because most people don’t show up to court. They ignore the summons. They assume it’s a scam. They’re too embarrassed. And then — bam — a default judgment is entered, wages get garnished, and suddenly your paycheck is 25% smaller.

But here’s the real kicker: LVNV didn’t pay $2,452 for this debt. They probably paid hundreds of dollars — maybe even less. Debt portfolios are sold in bulk, often for 3 to 10 cents on the dollar. So if they paid 5 cents on the dollar, they shelled out about $122 for the right to sue Mark Sage for $2,452. That’s a potential return of over 2,000%. In Wall Street terms, that’s a home run. In human terms? It’s kind of gross.

So what’s our take? Look, no one feels great about debt. If you borrow money and don’t pay it back, yeah, you should probably make good on it. But the system here is bananas. A man defaults on a credit card — maybe due to job loss, medical bills, or just poor choices — and instead of a conversation, he gets funneled into a machine designed to extract money through legal intimidation. The original lender is long gone. The debt has changed hands like a hot potato. The “evidence” is a stack of computer records and a signature from someone who’s never met him. And the punishment? A lawsuit that could follow him for years, damage his credit, and lead to wage garnishment — all over a debt that, to the plaintiff, was basically found money.

The most absurd part? That this is completely normal. This isn’t an outlier. This is how millions of Americans get sued every year — not for crimes, not for fraud, but for being poor, unlucky, or overwhelmed. And the courts? They’re packed with cases just like this, where the real victim isn’t the plaintiff, and the defendant isn’t exactly innocent — but the whole thing feels less like justice and more like a billing dispute with a side of legal theater.

Do we root for Mark Sage to win? Honestly? We root for the system to stop treating people like balance sheets. We root for a world where $2,452 doesn’t end up in court because a company saw a profit margin instead of a person. But until then, grab your popcorn — because in Canadian County, Oklahoma, the debt circus is open for business.

Case Overview

$2,452 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Canadian County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$2,452 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 petition for indebtedness Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendant for $2,452.00, with interest and attorney's fees

Petition Text

552 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CANADIAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Mark Sage, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX6623. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $2,452.00. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $2,452.00, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR CANADIAN COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Mark Sage Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXX6623 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Mark Sage by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 06/22/2023. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit Asset Sales LLC. Credit Asset Sales LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43495, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 04/17/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $2,452.00 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Rebekah Odaniel January 22, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Thursday, January 22, 2026. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.