CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CUSTER COUNTY • SC-2026-00088

Julio Ramirez v. Micaela Rodarte

Filed: Mar 26, 2026
Type: SC

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: nobody wins in a landlord-tenant war. But when the battle cry is “Pay $833 or get kicked out,” and the only weapon is a notarized piece of paper, you know you’re not in a courtroom drama—you’re in the trenches of CrazyCivilCourt, where the stakes are low, the tension is high, and the rent is always due yesterday.

Julio Ramirez, a man whose name sounds like a minor character in a telenovela but whose life choices scream “I just want to collect rent in peace,” owns a modest little number at 701 Cotton Avenue in Clinton, Oklahoma—a town so small it probably has one traffic light and a gas station that doubles as a taco stand. Into this humble abode moved Micaela Rodarte, presumably with a suitcase, some dreams, and—at some point—a growing stack of unpaid bills. They weren’t lovers, business partners, or siblings. Just landlord and tenant. The kind of relationship that starts with a handshake and ends with a court filing, like so many American romances these days.

Now, what happened? Well, according to Julio’s sworn statement—delivered with the gravitas of a man who’s had it up to here with excuses—Micaela stopped paying rent. Not a little bit. Not “I’ll pay you next week” kind of late. We’re talking $833 worth of “I guess I forgot?” or “My dog ate my checkbook (again).” The document doesn’t say how long she was behind, but in eviction math, it doesn’t take much. One missed payment? Often enough. Two? Practically a declaration of war. And while Julio could’ve opted for the passive-aggressive route—changing the locks, leaving passive notes in Comic Sans, or blasting country music at 6 a.m.—he went full legal: he served her with a formal notice saying, “Pay up, fix your mess, or pack your stuff.” Classic Oklahoma eviction playbook.

The method of delivery? Hand-delivered. Personal service. Which means someone—possibly Julio himself, possibly a local process server who moonlights at the feed store—showed up at her door, handed her the notice, and said, “Sign here, please, or don’t, I don’t care, I’m getting paid either way.” The date is blank, but the intent is clear: this wasn’t an email. This wasn’t a text that got lost in the void. This was face-to-face, real-world “you owe me money” energy. And Micaela? She didn’t pay. She didn’t leave. She just… stayed. Like a houseplant that’s been forgotten in the corner but somehow still alive.

So here we are, in the hallowed halls of the District Court of Custer County (population: probably fewer than the number of eviction cases filed this year), where Judge Jones—bless their judicial soul—must now decide whether Micaela Rodarte gets to keep crashing at 701 Cotton Ave or gets booted into the Oklahoma wind. The legal claim? Eviction. Simple as that. But let’s break it down like we’re explaining it to a jury of people who only watch court shows for the yelling.

In plain English: Julio says, “I own this house. Micaela agreed to pay me rent to live in it. She hasn’t paid $833. I told her to pay or leave. She did neither. Therefore, she should be removed by the power of the state, preferably before she starts charging me rent.” That’s it. No allegations of wild parties, no reports of pet llamas in the living room, no claims she turned the garage into a meth lab or a TikTok studio. Just unpaid rent. The most boring crime in America, but somehow the one that fills court dockets from Tulsa to Timbuktu.

Now, what does Julio want? Officially, the filing doesn’t list a total monetary demand. No line for fees, no tally for damages. Just that $833 figure sitting there like a lonely number on a bingo card. But make no mistake—he’s not just after the cash. He wants Micaela out. That’s the real prize. The eviction itself is the goal. The money? That’s just the excuse. Because let’s be real: if he thought she had $833 lying around, he’d have already taken it. But he didn’t. So now he’s using the court system to get what he couldn’t get at the door.

And is $833 a lot? Well, depends on who you ask. To a billionaire, it’s a tip. To a college student, it’s three months of ramen. To someone in rural Oklahoma, it might be a car payment, a month of groceries, or the difference between keeping the lights on and living like a pioneer. But in eviction court? $833 is the magic number. It’s enough to justify legal action, not enough to hire a lawyer. It’s the financial sweet spot where landlords draw the line: “I didn’t get rich renting to people, but I didn’t sign up to be a charity either.”

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this whole saga isn’t the amount. It’s the silence. The filing is bare. No lease violations listed. No criminal activity. No “tenant turned the backyard into a raccoon sanctuary.” Just unpaid rent and a blank line where the landlord could’ve written anything—“plays bagpipes at 3 a.m.” or “refuses to stop calling me ‘Papi’”—but didn’t. It’s so clean, so by-the-book, it’s almost suspicious. Did Micaela have a reason? A job loss? A medical crisis? A sudden obsession with competitive knitting that drained her savings? We don’t know. The filing doesn’t say. And that’s the problem with these cases—they’re not about stories. They’re about forms. Boxes checked. Deadlines met. Notices served.

But here’s who we’re rooting for: the truth. Not Julio. Not Micaela. The truth. Because behind every $833 is a story. Maybe she’s a deadbeat. Maybe he’s a slumlord. Maybe they had a falling out over a shared Netflix password. We’ll never know, because this case isn’t about justice. It’s about procedure. And in Custer County, procedure says: no pay, no stay.

So will Micaela get evicted? Probably. Will Julio get his $833? Probably not. Will either of them learn anything? Unlikely. But one thing’s for sure: the next tenant at 701 Cotton Ave is going to pay rent on time. Or else they, too, will become a line on someone’s sworn statement, a name in a case file, a cautionary tale in the wild, wild world of civil court.

And remember, folks: we’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if you’re behind on rent, maybe—just maybe—don’t ignore the guy with the clipboard.

Case Overview

Landlord's sworn statement requesting eviction
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 - Eviction due to unpaid rent and lease violations

Petition Text

197 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Custer COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Plaintiff/Landlord Julio Ramirez vs. Defendant/Tenant Micaela Rodarte Case No. 5L-20216-88 Judge Jones LANDLORD'S SWORN STATEMENT REQUESTING EVICTION STATE OF Oklahoma COUNTY OF Custer SS. Landlord's Name: Julio Ramirez Rental property address: 701 Cotton Ave Clints OK 73001 Renter's Name: Micaela Rodarte Tenant's address, if different: I, the landlord, state: (check all that apply) ☐ I have demanded that the tenant permanently leave the property, but the renter has not left. ☑ I have asked the tenant to pay past-due rent of $833, unpaid fees of $______________, and $______________ for damages, but the tenant has not paid. ☐ The tenant is in violation of the lease because: ____________________________ ☐ The lease is over, and the tenant has not moved out. ☐ The tenant has caused imminent danger or engaged in criminal activity: _________________________________________________________________ I have given the tenant a notice to pay what is owed, address the lease violation, or leave the property by: ☑ Hand delivery / personal service on ___________ (date). ☐ Posting, followed by certified mail. I mailed the notice on ___________ (date). Landlord's Signature Subscribed and sworn before me this ___ day of March My Commission Expires Notary Public (or Clerk) State Hunter District Court Clerk Custer County, Oklahoma
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.