CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LE FLORE COUNTY • CJ-2026-00082

Miken Francis v. Ethan Williams

Filed: Apr 13, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: in the grand tradition of Oklahoma road rage and vehicular slapstick, nothing says “I wasn’t paying attention” quite like rear-ending someone in a bucket truck — especially when you’re a commercial driver for a fiber internet company that sounds like it was named during a particularly aggressive game of corporate Scrabble. But this isn’t just another fender-bender with a side of ego. No, this is Miken Francis v. Ethan Williams and Uniti Fiber, LLC, a case so rich in irony and minor tragedy that it practically demands a theme song — maybe something off-key played on a slightly out-of-tune steel guitar.

Miken Francis, a regular guy with a 2009 Silverado that’s seen better days (but not nearly as rough as the day in question), was just cruising down Highway 9 in Le Flore County, minding his own business, probably listening to classic rock or contemplating the existential dread of middle age, when his life was abruptly interrupted by the unmistakable sound of metal meeting metal. Behind him, like a slow-motion freight train of poor judgment, came Ethan Williams — not a name you’d expect to see on a wanted poster, but certainly one now immortalized in a district court filing. Williams wasn’t just driving any old car; he was piloting an S150 Bucket Truck, the kind of vehicle that says, “Yes, I am essential infrastructure,” while simultaneously screaming, “I am three seconds from tipping over.” And he was doing it for Uniti Fiber, LLC — a Delaware-registered company with a Little Rock address that sounds like it sells fiber-optic dreams but apparently forgot to include “defensive driving” in its employee training module.

The incident? Simple, brutal, and tragically avoidable. On May 8, 2024 — which, fun fact, was also the same day this lawsuit was filed, suggesting someone really wanted to beat the statute of limitations by exactly zero days — Williams allegedly slammed into the back of Francis’s truck. No storm. No deer. No mechanical failure. Just… too close for comfort. According to the complaint, Oklahoma Highway Patrol Trooper Wes Odom (who deserves an award for showing up at all, given how many crashes go unreported in rural Oklahoma) determined that the primary cause was Williams following too closely and failing to stop in time. Which, translated from legalese, means: “He wasn’t paying attention and hit the guy in front of him.” The cherry on top? Officer Odom didn’t even file a report. So we’re left with a crash so forgettable to law enforcement that it didn’t merit paperwork, yet significant enough to leave a man with a fractured vertebra and a chiropractor’s phone number on speed dial.

Now, let’s talk about injuries, because this is where the case stops being a slapstick road mishap and starts veering into “ouch, that’s gonna cost” territory. Miken Francis didn’t walk away with a few bruises and a good story. Nope. He walked — or more accurately, was probably carried — into Baptist Health Fort Smith the next day with a fractured T1 vertebra (that’s the top of your spine, folks — not exactly where you want a crack), severe neck and lower back pain, headaches, a sprained ankle, and knee pain. Whether the ankle got twisted in the impact or from hopping out of the truck yelling, “Seriously?!” we may never know. But the aftermath is clear: ER visits, follow-ups at Mercy Health, a steady rotation at Guthrie Clinic and Poteau Community Care, and enough medical bills to make even a billionaire wince. The total? Over $15,000 in billed charges — and that’s before we factor in future care, permanent impairment, or the emotional toll of realizing your spine is now held together more by chiropractic adjustments than bone density.

So why are we in court? Because Miken Francis is saying, quite reasonably, “Hey, you smashed into me, broke my back, and now I’m stuck paying for it — so you should pay.” The legal claim is negligence — a term that sounds fancy but really just means “you had a duty to drive safely, and you failed.” Specifically, the complaint accuses Williams of three classic driver no-nos: following too close (a.k.a. tailgating like a maniac), failing to keep a proper lookout (a.k.a. probably texting, eating, or daydreaming about fiber-optic bandwidth), and generally operating the vehicle in a “negligent and careless manner.” Standard stuff, really — but when you’re driving a bucket truck for a company, “careless” becomes a four-letter word in court. And here’s where it gets juicy: Uniti Fiber, LLC isn’t just named because it sounds cool. It’s named because under the legal doctrine of respondeat superior — Latin for “the boss pays when the employee screws up” — the company is on the hook for its employee’s actions, if he was working at the time. And according to the filing, Williams absolutely was — driving a company-owned truck, doing company things, presumably installing or repairing fiber lines like a modern-day digital pioneer. So yes, folks, this isn’t just a case against a distracted driver. It’s a case against a corporation that may now have to answer for its employee’s lack of spatial awareness.

What does Francis want? Well, he’s not asking for a mansion or a lifetime supply of painkillers (though honestly, at this point, who could blame him?). He’s asking for compensatory damages — a legal term for “make me whole again.” That includes past and future medical expenses, pain and suffering (both physical and mental), loss of enjoyment of life (goodbye, weekend hikes; hello, heating pads), and permanent impairment (because a fractured vertebra doesn’t just heal with time — it leaves scars, both literal and metaphorical). The amount? Unclear — the filing doesn’t specify a number, just says “to be determined by the trier of fact,” which is legalese for “let the jury decide.” But we do know medical bills are already over $15,000, and in Oklahoma, that’s not chump change — especially when you’re not independently wealthy. For context, the average annual income in Le Flore County is around $40,000. So $15,000 in medical debt is like dropping a third of your yearly paycheck on a single Tuesday morning fender-bender. And that’s before lost wages, future surgeries, or the emotional cost of knowing your body now has a “pre-existing condition” section on every form you fill out.

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this case isn’t the bucket truck, the missing police report, or even the fact that someone fractured their spine on a highway in eastern Oklahoma and no one wrote it down. It’s that this whole mess — the pain, the medical bills, the legal drama — likely could’ve been avoided with two seconds of attention. Two seconds. That’s all it takes to keep a safe distance, to look ahead, to not turn your commercial vehicle into a human pinball machine. Instead, we get a man with a broken back, a company now on legal alert, and a court case that hinges on whether a jury believes “following too close” is worth thousands in damages. We’re rooting for Francis — not because he’s perfect, but because he was just driving his truck, minding his business, and got turned into a cautionary tale. And we’re side-eyeing Uniti Fiber, LLC — not because fiber internet isn’t important (it is), but because if your employee can’t operate a bucket truck without causing spinal fractures, maybe it’s time for a company-wide refresher on “driving 101.”

Bottom line? This case is a masterclass in how quickly life can go off the rails — sometimes literally. And while it may not involve murder, blackmail, or secret twins, it’s got all the drama you need: pain, paperwork, and the quiet fury of a man who just wanted to get from point A to point B without becoming a medical case study. Tune in next time, when the jury decides whether $15,000 — or more — is a fair price for a shattered vertebra and the death of spinal confidence.

Case Overview

Jury Trial Complaint
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Negligence Rear-end collision resulting in serious bodily injuries

Petition Text

926 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LE FLORE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA MIKEN FRANCIS, ) PLAINTIFF ) VS. ) ETHAN WILLIAMS, and UNITI FIBER, LLC. ) DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CJ-26-82 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Comes now the Plaintiff, Miken Francis, by and through his undersigned counsel, Rob Lambert of the Lambert Law Firm, and William J. Trentham of Bickett, Matney & Trentham Law Partners, LLP, and for his cause of action against the Defendants states as follows: PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff Miken Francis is an adult resident of the State of Oklahoma. 2. Defendant Ethan Williams is an adult individual who, at all times relevant hereto, is believed to be a resident of the State of Oklahoma and is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. 3. Defendant UNITI FIBER, LLC is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in 2101 Riverfront Dr. Suite, A Little Rock AR 72202. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Ethan Williams was operating a commercial truck and trailer owned by and within the course and scope of his employment with Uniti Fiber, LLC, rendering the LLC vicariously liable for Williams’s negligence. Uniti Fiber, LLC may be served through its registered agent, the Corporation Service Company, 10300 Greenbriar Place, Oklahoma City OK. 4. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this action, as this is a civil action for damages arising from a tort occurring within the State of Oklahoma. 5. Venue is proper in Le Flore County, Oklahoma, because the tortious acts and omissions giving rise to this cause of action occurred in Le Flore County, Oklahoma. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 6. On or about May 8, 2024, at approximately 10:00 a.m., Plaintiff Miken Francis was operating his 2009 Chevrolet Truck Silverado 1500 on Hwy 9 in Le Flore County, Oklahoma. 7. At the same time and place, Defendant Ethan Williams was operating an S150 Bucket Truck (owned by and operated within the course and scope of his employment with Defendant Uniti Fiber, LLC). 8. The collision occurred when Defendant, Ethan Williams vehicle rear-ended Miken Francis’s vehicle. The responding Oklahoma Highway Patrol Trooper, Officer Wes Odom, determined that the contributing factor to the crash was Defendant Ethan Williams following too close and being unable to stop in time. Officer Wes Odom failed to write a report on this crash. 9. At all relevant times, Defendants owed Plaintiff a duty to operate the motor vehicle in a reasonably safe and prudent manner, and to obey all traffic laws. 10. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ negligence, Plaintiff sustained serious bodily injuries, including but not limited to a fractured T1 vertebra, severe neck pain, lower back pain, headaches, sprained ankle, and knee pain. These injuries required medical treatment at Baptist Health Fort Smith on May 9, 2024, and Mercy Health, followed by extensive chiropractic care at Guthrie Clinic and follow up with Poteau Community Care. 11. Plaintiff has incurred substantial medical expenses as a direct result of the collision, with total billed charges exceeding $15,000.00 to date. Plaintiff has also suffered and will continue to suffer permanent impairment, disfigurement, and the need for future medical care. 12. Plaintiff has endured significant past and future physical pain and suffering, mental pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and a general diminishment in his quality of life as a direct and proximate result of the injuries caused by Defendants’ negligence. CAUSE OF ACTION – NEGLIGENCE 13. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 14. Defendants owed Plaintiff a duty of ordinary care to operate their vehicle safely and to obey all applicable traffic laws. 15. Defendants breached that duty by, among other things: a. Following too close b. Failing to keep a proper lookout; c. Otherwise operating the vehicle in a negligent and careless manner under the circumstances then and there existing. 16. Defendant Uniti Fiber, LLC is vicariously liable for the negligence of its employee, Defendant Ethan Williams, under the doctrine of respondeat superior, as the truck were owned by the LLC and operated within the course and scope of Williams employment at the time of the collision. 17. Defendants’ breaches of duty were the direct and proximate cause of the collision and of Plaintiff’s injuries and damages. 18. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ negligence, Plaintiff has sustained damages including, but not limited to, past and future medical expenses, physical pain and suffering (past and future), mental pain and suffering (past and future), the nature and extent of his injuries (including permanent impairment), loss of enjoyment of life, and all other economic and non-economic damages allowable under Oklahoma law. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Miken Francis prays for judgment against Defendants Ethan Williams and Uniti Fiber, LLC, jointly and severally, as follows: A. For compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by the trier of fact, including all past and future medical expenses, physical and mental pain and suffering, the nature and extent of injuries, permanent impairment, loss of enjoyment of life, and all other damages allowable under Oklahoma law; B. For prejudgment interest as allowed by law, costs of this action, and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate allowed by law; C. For a trial by jury on all issues so triable; and D. For such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, By: ____________________________ Rob Lambert (OBA 21981) P.O. Box 9 Poteau, OK 74953 Arkansas 72712 (405) 657-9445 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Miken Francis ATTORNEY'S LIEN CLAIMED /s/ William J. Trentham William J. Trentham Oklahoma Bar No. Pro Hoc Pending 205 NW “A” Street, 2nd Floor Bentonville, Telephone: (479) 250-0843 Facsimile: (479) 273-0117 [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.