CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
JEFFERSON COUNTY • CS-2026-00025

Synchony Bank v. Cash Alsup

Filed: Apr 9, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: this is not a murder mystery. There are no secret love letters, no dramatic courtroom confessions, no masked witnesses. But what is happening in Jefferson County, Oklahoma, is somehow even more American: a bank is suing a man named Cash Alsup — yes, that’s his real name — over a debt of $3,233.69. Three thousand two hundred thirty-three dollars and sixty-nine cents. Not for a house. Not for a car. Not even for a fancy vacation. We’re talking about a credit card bill so aggressively average it might as well be narrated by Mike Rowe over stock footage of a suburban cul-de-sac.

Now, meet the players. On one side: Synchony Bank — a financial institution so committed to the quiet grind of debt collection that they’ve outsourced their legal muscle to Rausch Sturm LLP, a firm that proudly bills itself as “Attorneys in the Practice of Debt Collection,” like that’s a niche worth putting on a business card. On the other side: Cash Alsup. That’s Cash. Not “Cash Money.” Not “Cash Rules Everything Around Me.” Just Cash. The kind of name that makes you wonder if his parents were hoping he’d grow up to be a professional gambler or a country music outlaw. Instead, he opened a credit card in September 2024, spent some amount of money on things we’ll never know (probably Amazon, possibly tires, definitely not a solid gold toilet), made his last payment in February 2025, and then… vanished. Or at least, stopped paying.

And so, the saga begins — or rather, the lawsuit begins, because when you don’t pay your credit card bill, the bank doesn’t send a concerned text. They send a law firm. And not just any law firm — a firm that, based on their letterhead, seems to exist solely to file documents like this one. Synchony Bank, through their legal proxies, is alleging that Cash Alsup opened an account, used it, and then failed to pay up. That’s it. That’s the whole case. No betrayal. No fraud. No embezzlement from a small-town zoo. Just a man, a piece of plastic, and a balance that went from manageable to “we’re going to court now.”

The filing is sparse — almost comically so. There’s no dramatic backstory, no explanation of why Cash stopped paying. Did he lose his job? Did he have a medical emergency? Did he blow the whole thing on a surprise trip to Vegas and come back with nothing but a tattoo and regret? We don’t know. The petition doesn’t say. It just says: “He didn’t pay. We closed the account. We want our money.” The account was “charged off” in October 2025 — accounting jargon for “we’ve given up pretending you’ll pay us back voluntarily, so now we’re going to try the legal route.” But here’s the kicker: they’re not just asking for the $3,233.69. They’re also demanding that the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission hand over Cash Alsup’s employment history. Which sounds… intense? Like, are they planning to track him down at his new job and serve him papers during a team huddle? Or is this just standard procedure — a paper trail so they can figure out if he’s gainfully employed enough to actually collect from?

Now, let’s talk about the money. $3,233.69. Is that a lot? Is it a little? Depends on your perspective. If you’re a multinational bank that issues millions of credit cards, that’s pocket lint. It’s less than the deductible on a mid-range SUV. But if you’re a single guy named Cash living in rural Oklahoma, that could be two months’ rent, a year’s worth of car insurance, or a lot of frozen pizzas. It’s not poverty-level debt, but it’s not nothing, either. And yet — and this is the part that makes you chuckle — the bank didn’t just write it off. They didn’t sell it to a third-party collector and wash their hands of it. They filed a lawsuit. In Jefferson County, which has a population of around 6,000 people. That’s smaller than most high schools. This case might be the most exciting thing to happen in that courthouse since the time the judge’s dog wandered in during testimony.

So what does Synchony Bank actually want? Judgment for $3,233.69, plus court costs, plus whatever “subsequent costs” might pop up (lawyer snacks? mileage to Jefferson County?). They also want the court to force the state unemployment office to cough up Cash’s work history — which feels a little Big Brother, but honestly, in debt collection court, that’s just Tuesday. No punitive damages, no injunctions, no dramatic demands for public apologies. Just cold, hard cash. Or, more accurately, a certified check.

And here’s where we, the people, step in with our hot takes. Because let’s be real: this case is boring. And that’s what makes it fascinating. This isn’t John vs. Jane: The Great Lawn Mower War of 2023. This isn’t someone suing their neighbor because the dog ate their heirloom tomatoes. This is the legal equivalent of a parking ticket — but with more paperwork and a law firm in Wisconsin. The most absurd part? Not the name. Not the amount. It’s that a company with the resources of Synchony Bank — a subsidiary of one of the largest financial conglomerates in the country — is spending attorney hours, filing fees, and judicial bandwidth to chase down a little over three grand. They probably spent more on coffee during the drafting of this petition.

But also — side-eye to Cash Alsup. Dude, Cash. You had one job: pay your bill. Maybe you had a hard year. Maybe the world turned upside down. We’ve all been there. But if you’re going to use a credit card, at least expect the follow-up. This isn’t a surprise. This is how capitalism works. You borrow, you pay. You don’t pay, someone sues. It’s not evil. It’s not noble. It’s just… paperwork.

Still, you can’t help but root for the underdog. Not because Cash is innocent — we don’t know that — but because there’s something almost poetic about a man named Cash Alsup getting sued by a bank for not having enough cash. It’s like the universe trolling him. And if this case ever goes to trial, we’re begging the judge to address him as “Mr. Money” just once. For the culture.

Look, we’re not lawyers. We’re entertainers. But if we were on the jury, we’d probably split the difference. Pay half, walk away with dignity. But in the world of debt collection, dignity doesn’t matter. The balance does. And right now, according to the District Court of Jefferson County, Cash Alsup owes $3,233.69. Plus interest. Plus costs. Plus the quiet shame of being the most ironically named defendant in Oklahoma this week.

So to Synchony Bank, we say: mission creep is real. Maybe outsource this to a robot. And to Cash — if you’re out there, man: pay the bill, close the account, and maybe consider a nickname. “Cash” is cool, but right now, it’s just… ironic.

Case Overview

$3,234 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Jefferson County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$3,234 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 debt collection collection of $3233.69

Petition Text

337 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA SYNCHRONY BANK PLAINTIFF, vs. CASH ALSUP DEFENDANT(S). FILED APR 09 2026 No. CS-2026-25 KIM BERRY, COURT CLERK JEFFERSON COUNTY PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, RAUSCH STURM LLP, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states the following: 1. Plaintiff is duly and legally organized and is authorized to transact business in the State of Oklahoma. 2. On or about September 8, 2024, Defendant(s) opened a credit account with SYNCHRONY BANK. 3. Defendant(s) used the account and thereby became obligated to pay the balance accrued. Plaintiff’s records indicate Defendant’s(s’) last payment occurred on or about February 24, 2025. Defendants(s) thereafter defaulted on Defendant’s(s’) obligation. 4. On or about October 14, 2025, based on Defendant's failure to pay, Plaintiff closed and/or charged off Defendant's account, then numbered ************6172, with a balance due. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant(s) in the sum of $3,233.69, plus costs, and for all subsequent costs; that the Court order the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC) to produce in writing the employment history for the Defendant for the period specified in Plaintiff’s request; and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem equitable, just, and proper. RAUSCH STURM LLP ATTORNEYS IN THE PRACTICE OF DEBT COLLECTION By: Michael J. Kidman, OBA # 35912 Account Representative Contact Information: (833) 899-0421 ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED Mailing Address: 300 N. Executive Drive, Suite 200 Brookfield WI 53005 (877) 215-2552 TTY: 711 Fax: (855) 272-3575 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VERIFIED STATEMENT OF COUNSEL I, the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff, pursuant to Oklahoma Statutes Title 12, section 426, state under penalty of perjury under the laws of Oklahoma that the statements made in the foregoing Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed 04/02/2026 , in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Michael J. Kidman, OBA # 35912 This is a communication from a debt collector. This communication is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained from this communication will be used for that purpose. Our File No. 5461628
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.