CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
GARFIELD COUNTY • CS-2026-165

LVNV Funding LLC v. Arturo O Ortega

Filed: Mar 17, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: in a courtroom in Garfield County, Oklahoma, a man named Arturo O. Ortega is being sued for $6,012.34 — not because he stole a car, committed fraud, or ran off with someone’s spouse — but because, somewhere around 2019, he opened a credit card with Capital One, spent some money, didn’t pay it all back, and now, six years later, that debt has been bought, sold, shuffled through corporate portfolios like a crumpled Monopoly IOU, and finally landed in the hands of a debt-buying company that’s now demanding a judge force him to pay up. Yes, this is not a murder mystery. No one disappeared. There’s no twist ending involving a secret twin. But in the quiet, soul-sucking world of civil court, where capitalism meets paperwork, this is peak drama.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Arturo O. Ortega — a private individual, presumably just trying to live his life, pay his bills, and avoid becoming the subject of a snarky legal deep-dive. We don’t know much about him, and that’s the point. He’s not a villain. He’s not even necessarily negligent. He’s just… a guy who once had a credit card. On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC — a name that sounds like a rejected tech startup or a tax shelter in the Cayman Islands, but is in fact a professional debt collector. They don’t care about your credit score, your sob story, or whether you used that card to buy groceries during a rough patch. They exist to buy defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then sue to collect the full amount. And they’re very good at it. Represented by the legal powerhouse Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. — yes, that’s really the firm’s name, like a law office from a 1950s noir film — LVNV is here not for justice, but for judgment.

Here’s how we got here: back in May 2019, Arturo was approved for a Capital One credit card, account number ending in 5357. Whether he used it to buy a new laptop, cover an emergency, or finally take that trip to Vegas, we’ll never know. What we do know is that at some point, he stopped making payments. Default happened. Capital One, like most banks, doesn’t sit around waiting for people to come back with cash and remorse. They cut their losses, write off the debt as a loss for tax purposes, and then — here’s the fun part — sell the debt to a third party. In this case, the debt bounced from Capital One to Goldman Sachs Bank USA — because apparently Goldman Sachs is now in the business of buying random credit card defaults? — and then, in June 2025 (yes, the filing says 2025, which either means this document was filed in the future or someone really needs to proofread), Goldman Sachs sold a whole portfolio of debts — including Arturo’s — to LVNV Funding or one of its predecessors. And just like that, Arturo’s financial hiccup became someone else’s profit opportunity.

Now, LVNV didn’t come knocking with a polite letter. No, they went straight to court — District Court of Garfield County, to be exact — and filed a “Petition for Indebtedness,” which is legalese for “hey judge, this guy owes us money and we want you to make him pay.” Attached to the petition is an “Affidavit of Indebtedness,” signed by one Andy Valdez, who claims to be an authorized representative of LVNV. He swears — under penalty of perjury, no less — that the records show Arturo owes exactly $6,012.34, that the debt was properly acquired, and that all legal offsets and credits have been accounted for. They even claim they sent a demand for payment more than 30 days ago, which, in debt-collection land, is the legal equivalent of knocking once before kicking the door in.

So what exactly are they asking for? Judgment in the amount of $6,012.34 — that’s the principal. Plus interest, accruing from the date of judgment at whatever the state of Oklahoma allows (currently 5% for civil judgments, if no contract specifies otherwise). Plus court costs — filing fees, service of process, notary charges, the whole bureaucratic buffet. And, crucially, a “reasonable attorney’s fee.” Now, that last one is the sneaky kicker. LVNV didn’t hire Love, Beal & Nixon out of the kindness of their hearts. They’re billing by the hour or on a contingency, and they expect to get paid — ideally, by Arturo. If the court grants their request, Arturo could end up owing thousands more than the original debt just in legal fees. And let’s be real: $6,000 might not sound like a fortune, but for the average person, it’s not nothing. That’s a car transmission. That’s a year of rent in some parts of Oklahoma. That’s two iPhones. Or, if you’re unlucky, it’s six months of minimum payments on another credit card.

But here’s the thing — and this is where our inner court jester starts cackling — none of this hinges on whether Arturo actually spent the money, whether the charges were legitimate, or whether he was even properly notified of the debt sale. LVNV isn’t alleging fraud, breach of contract with specific terms, or any complex financial wrongdoing. This is a routine debt collection case. The kind that gets filed hundreds of times a day across America. The kind where the plaintiff doesn’t need to prove Arturo bought a $400 blender on Amazon in 2020 — they just need to prove they own the debt and the math adds up. And if Arturo doesn’t show up to court? Automatic win for LVNV. Default judgment. Case closed. No drama. No cross-examination. Just a number stamped onto a docket.

And that’s the most absurd part: this entire legal showdown rests on paperwork, not people. Arturo might not even know he’s being sued. He might have moved, changed his number, or simply ignored a letter he assumed was spam. But LVNV? They’ve got a notarized affidavit, a chain of ownership that reads like a corporate game of hot potato, and a team of lawyers with names straight out of a legal drama. They’re not here to negotiate. They’re here to collect — efficiently, coldly, and with the full force of the law.

So where do we stand? If you’re rooting for the little guy, you’re probably hoping Arturo fights back — demands proof of the debt, challenges the interest, questions how Goldman Sachs ended up with a Capital One account in the first place. But if you’re rooting for the system to work as designed — cold, mechanical, indifferent — then LVNV’s clean, by-the-book petition is a thing of beauty. Either way, this case is a perfect microcosm of modern American debt: invisible, transferable, and relentlessly pursued. It’s not sexy. It’s not violent. But it’s happening every day, in courtrooms just like this one, to people just like Arturo. And while we may not be able to stop the machine, we can at least laugh at the absurdity of a future-dated affidavit and a law firm called Love, Beal & Nixon. Because if you can’t chuckle at the poetry of capitalism in action, what can you do?

Case Overview

$6,012 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Garfield County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$6,012 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Indebtedness

Petition Text

556 words
25-50503-0 ZH1 010 LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Arturo O Ortega, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GARFIELD COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Capital One, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX5357. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $6,012.34. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $6,012.34, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR GARFIELD COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Arturo O Ortega Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXX5357 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Arturo O Ortega by Capital One, N.A. on or about 05/11/2019. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Goldman Sachs Bank USA. Goldman Sachs Bank USA later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 45883, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 06/16/2025. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $6,012.34 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Andy Valdez November 25, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Tuesday, November 25, 2025. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.