CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
SEQUOYAH COUNTY • CJ-2026-00028

State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. David Harris

Filed: Feb 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: David Harris, a man whose name sounds like a background character in a 1970s cop drama, now owes the state of Oklahoma nearly $13,000 in unpaid income taxes, penalties, interest, and fees — and the government is coming for him like he stole the state seal and tried to sell it on eBay. We’re not talking about a rogue tax evader with offshore accounts or a secret bunker in the Ozarks. We’re talking about someone who, at some point, just… didn’t pay his taxes. And now, thanks to the magic of compound interest and bureaucratic escalation, a few hundred bucks in unpaid tax has snowballed into a full-blown legal showdown in Sequoyah County. It’s not Bonnie and Clyde, but it is the kind of paperwork-fueled drama that keeps civil courts humming like a fluorescent light in a DMV waiting room.

So who is David Harris? Honestly, we don’t know much — and that’s part of the fun. He’s not a celebrity, not a politician, not a TikTok star who claimed his pet ferret was a dependent. He’s just a guy. A regular, presumably non-famous David Harris with a Social Security number ending in 2750 and, apparently, a complicated relationship with tax season. The plaintiff? Oh, you know them — it’s the State of Oklahoma, acting through the Oklahoma Tax Commission, which is basically the government’s version of that one friend who always reminds you when you owe them $20 from lunch three months ago. They don’t forget. They don’t forgive. And they definitely charge interest. Represented by the law firm Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson — a name so generic it sounds like it was generated by a legal AI — the state is not here to negotiate. They’re here to collect. And they’ve brought receipts. Literally.

Now, let’s unpack what actually happened, because it’s less “high-stakes tax fraud” and more “slow-motion financial unraveling.” Back in 2016, David Harris apparently earned enough money to owe the state $3,861 in income tax. That’s not outrageous — could’ve been a good year, maybe a bonus, maybe he finally sold that vintage Camaro on Craigslist. But instead of paying up, he… didn’t. Fast forward to 2018, and he’s at it again — this time owing a much more modest $450 in income tax. Again, not the end of the world. But again — no payment. And here’s where the tax code turns into a horror movie: the longer you ignore the bill, the scarier it gets. By the time the Oklahoma Tax Commission got serious, those two unpaid tax bills had ballooned. The 2016 debt? It grew to $7,277.31 — more than doubling thanks to $2,794 in interest and hundreds more in penalties. The 2018 bill? Climbed to $727.85. Add them together, toss in a few administrative fees, and suddenly David Harris isn’t just behind on taxes — he’s facing a $12,976.06 debt, and the state has filed not one, but two tax warrants against him. These aren’t subpoenas or warnings — they’re legal instruments that treat unpaid tax debt like a court judgment, meaning the state can potentially seize property, garnish wages, or freeze bank accounts. It’s like getting a parking ticket, ignoring it, and then getting your car towed, fined, and auctioned off — except with more forms and fewer dramatic impound lot chases.

So why are we in court? Because the state isn’t just waiting around anymore. They’ve moved from “friendly reminder” mode to “full enforcement protocol.” The filing is an Application for State Tax Enforcement — basically the government saying, “We’ve sent the letters, we’ve assessed the penalties, we’ve waited long enough. Now we want the court to force David Harris to show up, explain what he owns, and start paying.” The legal claim is straightforward: the state wants the court to order Harris to appear at a hearing on his assets — a “debtor’s exam,” where he’d have to disclose everything from his bank accounts to his lawn mower — so they can figure out how to collect. They’re also asking for permission to initiate garnishment actions, meaning they could start pulling money directly from his paycheck or bank account. No punitive damages, no dramatic courtroom showdowns — just the cold, mechanical process of debt collection, state-style. It’s not flashy, but it’s effective. And honestly, kind of terrifying if you’re the one getting served.

Now, what do they want? $12,976.06. Is that a lot? Well, it depends. If you’re a multimillion-dollar corporation, that’s a rounding error. If you’re a single guy in rural Oklahoma trying to keep the lights on, that’s a life-altering sum. That’s a used car. That’s a year of rent. That’s a lot of propane for the winter. And remember — this isn’t just the original tax. Over half of that amount is interest and penalties. The $2,794 in interest on the 2016 tax alone is more than the original debt from 2018. That’s the real villain here: time. The longer Harris didn’t pay, the more the debt grew, like a financial mold spreading under the kitchen sink. The state isn’t asking for anything outrageous — no jail time, no public shaming (though we’re doing that for them). They just want their money, plus the legally allowed extras, and they want the court’s help making it happen.

So what’s our take? Look, we’re not here to defend tax evasion. If you make money, you pay taxes. That’s the deal. But the sheer escalation of this situation is wild. A few thousand dollars in unpaid taxes turns into a $13,000 legal enforcement action, all because someone either couldn’t or wouldn’t deal with it early. The most absurd part? That the interest on the 2016 tax is nearly as much as the entire 2018 debt. That’s like ordering a $5 coffee and, five years later, owing $25 because you forgot to tip. The system is designed to punish delay — but at what point does it stop being justice and start being financial suffocation? We’re not rooting for tax dodgers, but we are rooting for clarity, for fairness, and for a system that doesn’t turn a manageable mistake into a decade-long debt spiral. And honestly? We’re also rooting for David Harris to at least show up to the hearing. Because if he doesn’t, the next episode of this saga might involve a sheriff at his door, and nobody wants that kind of plot twist.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Sequoyah County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$12,796 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 enforcement of tax warrant -

Petition Text

730 words
In the District Court of Sequoyah County State of Oklahoma STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX. REL. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. DAVID HARRIS SSN XXX-XX-2750 Defendant(s) Case No. CF 21-28 (To be entered by Court Clerk) Application for State Tax Enforcement COMES NOW the Plaintiff herein and alleges and states as follows: 1. That the Tax Warrant attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference incorporated herein as if set out in full was filed in the County Clerk’s Office, as reflected, by the Plaintiff against the real and personal property of the above-named defendant(s). 2. That the total indebtedness as of the date of said tax warrant(s) was $8,005.16, such indebtedness arising as a result of the Defendant’s failure to pay taxes for the following tax types and periods: <table> <tr> <th>Tax Warrant</th> <th colspan="2">1314942976 , 806563840</th> </tr> <tr> <th>Tax Type</th> <th>Periods</th> </tr> <tr> <td>INCOME</td> <td>2016</td> </tr> <tr> <td>INCOME</td> <td>2018</td> </tr> </table> 3. That a total indebtedness in the amount of $12,976.06 as of 02-04-26 remains unpaid. 4. That the above-referenced tax warrant(s) have been filed as provided by law and the Oklahoma Tax Commission therefore has all of the remedies and may take all of the proceedings thereon for collection thereof which may be had or taken upon a judgment of the District Court per Title 68 O.S. §231 - §255. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant(s) be ordered to appear at a hearing on assets; that such garnishment action or actions be maintained, or any other actions as are needed against said Defendant(s) in order to collect the full amount of indebtedness, together with interest, penalty, and fees as provided by Title 68 O.S. §217 or other laws, and for the costs of this action. DATED this date: 02-04-26 BY: Scott McGlasson, OBA#20591 Elizabeth Paul, OBA#32714 Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP P.O. Box 950391 Oklahoma City, OK 73195-0391 877-304-6848 / 877-304-6847 (fax) [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Oklahoma Tax Commission PO Box 26930 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73129 Sequoyah County Tax Warrant #: 1314942976 Date Assessed: June 11, 2021 FEIN/SSN: **-**-2750 Taxpayer: DAVID HARRIS THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Sequoyah County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for ITI with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: IIT-14961036-02 01/01/2016-12/31/2016 Total Tax: $ 3,861.00 Interest to date of issuance: $ 2,794.21 Penalties to date of issuance: $ 386.10 Tax warrant penalty: $ 200.00 Filing Fee: $ 36.00 Total Amount Due: $ 7,277.31 Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid, and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma Law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgement, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this February 15, 2022 Oklahoma Tax Commission: [signature] Assistant Secretary EXHIBIT Oklahoma Tax Commission 2501 Lincoln Blvd. PO Box 269060 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73126-9060 Sequoyah County Tax Warrant #: 806563840 Date Assessed: March 4, 2021 FEIN/SSN: **-****2750 Taxpayer: DAVID HARRIS THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Sequoyah County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for ITI with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: IIT-14961036-02 01/01/2018-12/31/2018 Total Tax: $ 450.00 Interest to date of issuance: $ 156.45 Penalties to date of issuance: $ 22.50 Tax warrant penalty: $ 62.90 Filing Fee: $ 36.00 Total Amount Due: $ 727.85 Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid, and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma Law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgement, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this August 16, 2021 Oklahoma Tax Commission: [Signature] Assistant Secretary
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.