CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1119

Kruse & Associates, Inc. v. Titan Staffing Network, Inc.

Filed: Mar 11, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s talk about the time a staffing company basically played Russian roulette with workers’ comp insurance — and when the gun went off, tried to make someone else pay for the bullet. That’s the gist of this wild $75,000 lawsuit out of Tulsa County, where one business is accusing another of ghosting on its legal responsibilities, leaving innocent bystanders (and balance sheets) to take the hit.

So who are we even talking about here? On one side, you’ve got Kruse & Associates, Inc., a Tulsa-based payroll and HR services provider that helps companies manage their employees — think of them as the quiet, responsible friend who always pays their taxes on time and keeps immaculate spreadsheets. On the other side, we have Titan Staffing Network, Inc., a Maryland-based temp agency with a name that sounds like a minor superhero team from a 1980s cartoon, and its alleged mastermind, Jonas Purisch, who appears to be the director, registered agent, and controlling shareholder — basically, the guy calling the shots.

Back in April 2018, Kruse and Titan Staffing signed a contract. It wasn’t a marriage, but in the corporate world, it might as well have been — complete with vows, expectations, and eventually, betrayal. The deal was simple: Titan would supply temporary workers to clients, and Kruse would handle payroll, taxes, and workers’ compensation insurance for those employees — but only the ones Titan actually told them about. There were rules. Lots of them. And like any good contract, it had clauses bold enough to make an accountant cry: Titan had to submit time sheets, report wages, and confirm which employees were covered. Most importantly, if someone wasn’t on Kruse’s list? Titan was supposed to cover them — including carrying its own workers’ comp policy.

Spoiler alert: They didn’t.

According to the filing, Titan started hiring people — real live humans who showed up to work, punched clocks, and presumably spilled coffee in break rooms — but never once said, “Hey Kruse, meet Dave. He’s lifting boxes all day and could totally throw his back out. Please insure him.” Nope. Radio silence. No notifications. No time sheets. Nothing. It was like they thought Kruse ran a magical employee insurance cloak that automatically protected anyone within 50 feet of a worksite.

Then, as fate and physics would have it, some of these unreported workers got injured on the job. Again, not shocking — people get hurt working. But here’s where it gets juicy: when the workers’ comp claims came in, someone had to pay. And guess what? Titan hadn’t bought insurance for these mystery employees. They weren’t covered under Kruse’s policy because Kruse didn’t know they existed. So who got stuck with the bill?

Kruse.

That’s right — the company that played by the rules, kept the books clean, and probably sends thank-you notes after Zoom meetings — suddenly found itself on the hook for medical bills, lost wages, and legal headaches from injuries it never agreed to cover. Because Titan Staffing either forgot, ignored, or actively decided that workers’ comp was optional — like skipping the extended warranty on a used car and then acting surprised when the transmission explodes.

Now, let’s be clear: workers’ comp isn’t just some nice-to-have perk. In Oklahoma, it’s the law. Companies are required to protect their workers. And if you subcontract or outsource labor, you can’t just vanish into the ether when someone gets hurt. But Titan allegedly did exactly that — operated like a corporate ninja, deploying workers into the field while staying off the insurance grid.

Kruse says, “We warned you. The contract said you had to tell us who you were hiring. It said you had to maintain your own coverage for anyone we didn’t know about. You didn’t do either. Now we’re paying for your shortcuts — and we want our money back.”

And not just a little bit. We’re talking over $75,000 in damages. Is that a lot? For a small business, absolutely. That’s not chump change — that’s payroll for multiple employees, a new roof for the office, or enough legal fees to make your accountant weep. For failing to do basic paperwork and buy a required insurance policy, Titan may now owe more than triple the average annual deductible for a small business health plan. And again — this isn’t speculative. People got hurt. Claims were filed. Checks were cut. And Kruse is not thrilled about being the designated patsy.

So why are they in court? Legally, Kruse is making two big arguments. First: Breach of Contract — a fancy way of saying, “You signed a piece of paper with promises, and you broke every single one.” Specifically, Titan failed to report employees, failed to submit time sheets, and failed to carry their own insurance for workers outside the agreement. That’s not just sloppy — it’s a direct violation of the contract they willingly entered.

Second claim: Alter Ego / Piercing the Corporate Veil — which sounds like a Marvel villain origin story, but in legal terms, it means “Jonas Purisch and Titan Staffing are basically the same person, so don’t hide behind the company like it’s a cardboard cutout.” Kruse is arguing that Purisch ran Titan so loosely — letting it fall out of good standing in Maryland, failing to secure basic insurance — that the company isn’t really a separate entity anymore. It’s just an extension of him. And if the company can’t pay, he should.

That’s a bold move — piercing the corporate veil is not easy. Courts usually respect the separation between a person and their business, unless there’s serious misconduct. But if Purisch really did treat Titan like a personal piggy bank — skipping insurance, ignoring compliance, letting the business go dormant — then yeah, the court might say, “Sorry, Jonas, you can’t wear the ‘corporation’ mask when it’s convenient.”

Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this whole mess isn’t even the injury claims. It’s the sheer laziness of it all. This wasn’t some complex financial scheme or offshore shell game. This was basic adulting: report your workers. Buy insurance. Follow the contract. It’s like showing up to a potluck and eating everyone’s food but bringing a bag of stale chips you found in your car. Rude? Yes. But also, kind of pathetic.

We’re not rooting for blood. We’re not saying someone should go to jail. But come on — if you’re running a staffing company, you know people get hurt on jobsites. That’s why workers’ comp exists. To act surprised when an injury happens is either willful ignorance or outright negligence. And now Kruse — the company that did everything right — is stuck cleaning up the mess.

So as this case unfolds in Tulsa County District Court, we’ll be watching closely. Will Titan Staffing finally face consequences? Will Jonas Purisch have to open his personal wallet? Or will this whole thing vanish into the legal void like so many unpaid invoices?

One thing’s for sure: when you play fast and loose with employee safety and contractual obligations, eventually, the bill comes due. And sometimes, it arrives with interest — and attorneys’ fees.

Case Overview

$75,000 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
Tulsa County District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Breach of Contract Kruse & Associates, Inc. alleges Titan Staffing Network, Inc. and Jonas Purisch breached their contract by failing to comply with terms, resulting in workers' compensation claims and damages exceeding $75,000.
2 Alter Ego – Piercing the Corporate Veil Kruse & Associates, Inc. alleges Jonas Purisch as shareholder, director, and registered agent of Titan Staffing Network, Inc. is liable for the company's breaches of the contract and should be viewed as synonymous for purposes of liability.

Petition Text

1,022 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA KRUSE & ASSOCIATES, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation, Plaintiff, v. TITAN STAFFING NETWORK, INC., a Maryland Corporation, and JONAS PURSICH, an individual, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CJ-2026-01119 Case No. ___________ ) ) ) ) KELLY M. GREENOUGH PETITION COMES NOW Kruse & Associates, Inc., by and through its counsel of record, Rachel C. Mathis and L. Paul Hood, III, of Pray Walker, PC, and for its claims against the defendants, Titan Staffing Network, Inc. and Jonas Purisch, asserts the following: JURISDICTION & VENUE 1. Kruse & Associates, Inc. ("Kruse") is an Oklahoma corporation with its principal place of business in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 2. Titan Staffing Network, Inc. ("Titan Staffing") is a Maryland corporation with its principal place of business in Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Jonas Purisch ("Mr. Purisch") is an individual residing in the state of Maryland, who, upon information and belief, is the director, registered agent, and controlling shareholder of Titan Staffing Network, Inc. 4. This matter arises out of a service agreement entered into between Kruse and Titan Staffing on April 17, 2018 ("Contract"). 5. The Contract provides that it "shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Oklahoma and venue for any disputes shall be in Tulsa County District Court in Tulsa, Oklahoma." As such, venue is proper in this court. 6. The Contract further provides that both Titan Staffing and Kruse are subject to the jurisdiction of the District Court of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. As such, jurisdiction is proper in this court for all parties as detailed herein. 7. The Contract further provides that it shall be governed according to the laws of the State of Oklahoma. COUNT I: BREACH OF CONTRACT (against Titan Staffing Network, Inc.) 8. Kruse restates and realleges each and every fact set forth above as if fully stated herein. 9. The services provided to Kruse's client, Titan Staffing, and the responsibilities of Titan Staffing in exchange for those services, were set forth within the Contract. 10. The Contract required Titan Staffing to notify Kruse, in writing, of all employees who would be covered by the Contract. 11. The Contract required Titan Staffing to "[a]ppropriately maintain and approve the weekly time sheets and submit the same to Kruse in a timely manner for payroll and invoicing[.]" 12. The Contract required Titan Staffing to warrant that the list of workers' compensation classifications for the employees to be covered by the Contract was accurate and complete. 13. Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, Titan Staffing assumed full and unconditional responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the payroll records submitted to Kruse. 14. Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, Titan Staffing agreed that all wages and other taxable compensation of an employee to be covered by the terms of the Contract would be reported to Kruse and that Titan Staffing would not pay employees from its own account. 15. All of Kruse’s responsibilities under the Contract’s terms were subject to Titan Staffing’s complete, timely and accurate reporting of employee wages or hours worked. 16. The Contract provided that Kruse would maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all employees who were covered by the terms of the contract; however, it also specifically required Titan Staffing to maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all employees who **were not** covered by the terms of the Contract. 17. The Contract provided that Titan Staffing “assumes full responsibility for workers’ compensation claims” pertaining in any way to any individual for whom payroll information was not supplied to Kruse during any payroll period or who was paid in whole or in part by Titan Staffing. 18. The Contract stated that, “[i]n no event will any independent contractor be covered by KRUSE workers’ compensation policy.” 19. Titan Staffing breached the Contract by failing to comply with its terms. Specifically, Titan Staffing failed to: a. Notify Kruse of Titan Staffing’s hiring and employment of several individuals; b. Provide Kruse with weekly time sheets for payroll and invoicing as related to several individuals Titan Staffing employed; and c. Maintain workers’ compensation coverage effective for the state(s) Titan Staffing was providing services within for all employees who fell outside of the Contract with Kruse. 20. While performing work through Titan Staffing, several individuals who Titan Staffing had not disclosed to Kruse, as required by the Contract, sustained on-the-job injuries. 21. As a result of the on-the-job injuries, multiple workers compensation claims were filed. 22. After the workers’ compensation claims were filed, it was determined that Titan Staffing had failed to obtain and maintain workers’ compensation insurance for the named individuals. 23. As a result of Titan Staffing’s breaches of the Contract, Kruse was required to defend and pay multiple workers compensation claims for which it had not obtained workers’ compensation coverage. 24. As a direct and proximate result of Titan Staffing’s breaches of the Contract, Kruse has suffered damages in an amount greater than $75,000.00. COUNT II: ALTER EGO – PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL (against Jonas Purisch) 25. Kruse restates and realleges each and every fact set forth above as if fully stated herein. 26. Upon information and belief, Mr. Purisch, as shareholder, director, and the registered agent of Titan Staffing, failed to secure adequate workers’ compensation insurance and allowed Titan Staffing to become a forfeited business not in good standing with the State of Maryland. 27. Due to his failures, Mr. Purisch is liable for Titan Staffing’s breaches of the Contract and should be viewed as synonymous for purposes of liability herein. 28. As noted in Paragraph 24 of this Petition, Kruse has suffered damages in an amount greater than $75,000.00 as a direct and proximate result of Titan Staffing’s breaches of the Contract and Mr. Purisch is equally liable for such damages. Wherefore, Kruse & Associates, Inc. respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against the Defendants in an amount greater than $75,000.00 and award it attorneys’ fees, costs and interest associated with the prosecution of this action, along with all other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted by: PRAY WALKER, P.C. [Signature] Rachel C. Mathis, OBA No. 16360 L. Paul Hood, III, OBA No. 35134 PRAY WALKER, P.C. 21 North Greenwood Avenue, Suite 400 Tulsa, OK 74120 Tele: (918) 581-5500 Fax: (918) 581-5599 [email protected] [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.