CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CANADIAN COUNTY • CS-2026-649

LVNV Funding LLC v. Patrick Yeary

Filed: Mar 17, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: a man in Oklahoma is being sued for $2,086.44—yes, that’s two thousand eighty-six dollars and forty-four cents—by a company that didn’t even lend him the money, doesn’t know him personally, and probably couldn’t pick him out of a lineup if their lives depended on it. But hey, the paperwork is impeccable, the notary showed up, and the legal machine grinds forward, because in America, even your forgotten credit card balance from 2019 can come back to haunt you like a bad ex with a restraining order.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Patrick Yeary, a regular dude from Canadian County, Oklahoma, who, based on the court filing, once got a credit card from Credit One Bank back in October 2019. We don’t know what he bought—maybe it was a new grill, maybe it was a series of DoorDash orders during a particularly rough week, maybe it was that one impulse Peloton purchase we all regret. What we do know is that at some point, he stopped paying it. Life happened. Bills piled up. The card got maxed out. And like so many Americans, he probably figured the debt would just… fade into the ether. Spoiler: it did not.

On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC. Sounds like a tech startup or maybe a hedge fund that trades in distressed dreams. In reality, it’s a debt buyer—a company that specializes in purchasing old, delinquent debts for pennies on the dollar, then trying to collect the full amount (plus fees, interest, and legal costs) from the original borrower. Think of them as the vultures of the financial world: they didn’t lend you the money, they didn’t watch you struggle to make payments, they just swooped in after the original creditor gave up and said, “Hey, we’ll take that $2,000 IOU for, like, $200.” Now, they’re acting like they’ve been personally wronged and want their money back—plus court costs, interest, and a “reasonable attorney’s fee,” because of course they do.

Here’s how we got here: Back in 2019, Patrick opened a Credit One Bank credit card. He used it. He didn’t pay it off. The account went delinquent. Credit One, like many banks, eventually wrote off the debt as a loss for tax purposes—meaning they stopped trying to collect and moved on with their lives. But instead of vanishing into the void, the debt was sold—first to a company called Credit Asset Sales LLC (because nothing says “I care about your financial well-being” like a name that sounds like a tax form), and then, in March 2024, that entire portfolio of deadbeat accounts—including Patrick’s—was sold off to LVNV Funding LLC. It’s like a bulk auction of financial regret.

Now, fast-forward to early 2026. LVNV, armed with a spreadsheet and a notarized affidavit, files a lawsuit in Canadian County District Court. Their argument? Simple: Patrick owes $2,086.44. They have the records. They have the chain of ownership. They even waited more than 30 days after demanding payment—so they’re technically following the rules. The affidavit is signed by one Gina Marie Behlke, who claims to be an “Authorized Representative” for LVNV, and while we don’t know if she’s ever met Patrick or even seen his face, she swears under penalty of perjury that the debt is real, the records are accurate, and the amount is “justly and duly owed.”

And that’s it. No dramatic confrontation. No missed birthdays or broken promises. Just a cold, corporate paper trail leading to a man being hauled into court over less than $2,100.

So why are they in court? Legally, this is a “petition for indebtedness”—a fancy way of saying “we want a judge to order this person to pay us money they owe.” LVNV isn’t accusing Patrick of fraud, theft, or breach of contract. They’re not saying he lied or cheated. They’re just saying: “This debt exists. We own it. He hasn’t paid. Please make him pay.” In legal terms, it’s straightforward. In human terms? It’s kind of wild. We’re talking about a financial transaction that began over six years ago, changed hands multiple times, and is now being litigated by a third-party collector who bought it for a fraction of its value. But in the eyes of the law, that’s enough.

Now, what do they want? $2,086.44—plus interest from the date of judgment, court costs, and a “reasonable attorney’s fee.” Is that a lot? In the grand scheme of civil lawsuits, it’s practically pocket change. You could buy a decent used car for that. Or pay off a year of student loans. Or, if you’re LVNV Funding LLC, cover about three hours of attorney time. But for Patrick Yeary, it might be a month’s rent. Or a car repair. Or the difference between keeping the lights on and getting disconnected. The absurdity isn’t in the amount—it’s in the machinery. A man is being sued over a debt he likely forgot about, by a company that never met him, represented by a law firm with seven attorneys listed on the filing (yes, seven—this is not a typo), all for a sum that wouldn’t even cover the lawyers’ parking for a week in a major city.

And yet, here we are.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t even the lawsuit itself—it’s the sheer bureaucratic audacity of it all. LVNV didn’t lend Patrick a dime. They didn’t shake his hand. They didn’t offer him a grace period or a payment plan. They bought a spreadsheet entry and now they’re treating it like a sacred contract written in blood. Meanwhile, the original lender—Credit One Bank—probably wrote off this loss years ago and is now happily charging 29.99% APR to someone else. Patrick gets sued. LVNV gets to play victim. And the court system? It hums along, processing another debt case like it’s just another Tuesday—which, of course, it is.

We’re not rooting for anyone to dodge their debts. But we are rooting for a system that doesn’t treat human financial hardship like a commodity to be bought, sold, and litigated by faceless entities. We’re rooting for a world where a $2,000 mistake doesn’t follow you for a decade like a curse. And honestly? We’re rooting for Patrick to at least get a good meme out of this.

Because if nothing else, this case proves one thing: in America, no debt is too small, too old, or too forgotten to come back and slap you in the face—especially if there’s a notary involved.

Case Overview

Petition|complaint
Jurisdiction
District Court in and for Canadian County, OK, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$2,086 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 petition for indebtedness collection of debt of $2,086.44

Petition Text

556 words
25-61590-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CANADIAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, vs. ) Patrick Yeary, ) ) Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXX8019. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $2,086.44. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $2,086.44, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR CANADIAN COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC vs. Patrick Yeary Plaintiff Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXXX8019 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Patrick Yeary by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 10/15/2019. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit Asset Sales LLC. Credit Asset Sales LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43322, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 03/21/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $2,086.44 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Gina Marie Behlke January 27, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Tuesday, January 27, 2026. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.