CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-770

AUTO ADVANTAGE FINANCE, LLC v. HAILEY NICOLE CLARK

Filed: Jan 13, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: this isn’t just about a $10,000 car loan. No, no — this is about the ghost of a 2014 Nissan Rogue Select, haunting its former owner from beyond repossession, like a metallic, fuel-injected specter with a grudge and a 17.98% interest rate. That’s right — Hailey Nicole Clark thought she was done with her Rogue when it got repossessed. She probably even celebrated. But Auto Advantage Finance LLC? They weren’t about to let her off the hook just because the car was gone. Oh no. They wanted blood — or at least $11,385.49 in principal, interest, and fees.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Auto Advantage Finance, LLC — a name that sounds like a late-night infomercial promising “low payments, no credit checks, drive today!” They’re the kind of lender that specializes in the “we’ll give you a car, but at what cost?” model. Based in Oklahoma, they don’t mess around — they’ve got a whole law firm on speed dial, Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC, which sounds less like a legal team and more like a 1970s detective duo. Their guy on this case? Hugh K. Fudge — yes, Hugh K. Fudge — a man whose name alone suggests he might be making this whole thing up. But no, this is very real. Very serious. Very… Fudge.

On the other side: Hailey Nicole Clark. Just one woman. No attorney listed. No firm backing her up. Just Hailey, presumably sitting in her living room wondering why the car she used to drive is still costing her money. We don’t know her story — not really. Did she lose her job? Get sick? Did the Rogue finally give up the ghost after years of faithful service? Was it cursed? We may never know. But what we do know is that on September 30, 2022, she signed a contract with Express Credit Auto — which, by the way, is not a real bank, but the kind of place that says, “Your credit score? Doesn’t matter!” — to buy a 2014 Nissan Rogue Select. Now, a 2014 Rogue isn’t exactly a luxury vehicle — it’s the automotive equivalent of a slightly used pair of khakis. Reliable? Maybe. Exciting? Not unless you’re really into beige interiors and Bluetooth that cuts out during your true crime podcast.

But Hailey wanted that car. And Express Credit Auto was happy to sell it to her — for a price. And that price, as it turns out, came due. According to the filing, Hailey defaulted on her payments. That means she stopped paying. Maybe she missed one. Maybe she missed several. Either way, the lender had the right — under the contract she signed — to take the car back. And they did. The Rogue was repossessed. Gone. Back in the hands of the finance company, probably resold to someone else who also didn’t care about their credit score.

But here’s where it gets wild: when they sold the car, the sale didn’t cover what Hailey still owed. That’s called a deficiency balance — a fancy legal term for “you still owe us money even though we took the car back.” It happens. Cars depreciate fast. A 2014 Rogue isn’t exactly holding its value like a vintage Rolex. So after the repo and resale, there was still $10,111.76 left on the tab. And now, Auto Advantage Finance — who, by the way, wasn’t even the original lender, but the assignee (meaning someone handed them this debt like a hot potato) — is coming after Hailey for the difference.

Let that sink in: she no longer has the car. But she still owes more than ten grand.

And not just that — they’re tacking on interest. At 17.98% per year. From April 10, 2025, to January 13, 2026, that added up to $1,384.73 in interest alone. That’s not just interest — that’s vengeance with a calculator. And don’t think they’re stopping there. Auto Advantage is also asking for “all costs of this action,” which includes filing fees, process server fees, and who knows what else. Oh, and a “reasonable attorney fee” — because of course they are. Hugh K. Fudge didn’t show up for free. He showed up because someone’s paying — and if Auto Advantage wins, that someone will be Hailey.

So what do they want? $11,385.49 — that’s the total demand. Is that a lot? Well, for a used Nissan Rogue from 2014? Absolutely. You can buy three 2014 Rogues on Craigslist right now for that amount. Maybe four, if you don’t care about the check engine light. But in the world of car loans and subprime financing, $10k isn’t unusual — especially when you factor in high interest rates, late fees, repossession costs, and resale shortfalls. This is how people get trapped. You buy a car to get to work. You lose your job. You can’t pay. They take the car. They sell it for less than you owe. And suddenly, you’re on the hook for more than the car was worth — and you don’t even have the car.

And here’s the kicker: Auto Advantage isn’t asking for a jury trial. They don’t want twelve of Hailey’s peers deliberating on whether this is fair. They want a judge to quietly sign off on this debt like it’s a routine paperwork shuffle. Because to them, it probably is. This isn’t personal. It’s business. They buy bad loans, repossess cars, sue people, collect money. It’s a machine. Hailey is just another cog — or more accurately, another line item.

But here’s our take: the most absurd part of this whole saga isn’t the 17.98% interest rate (though, wow). It’s not even the fact that Hailey owes more than ten grand for a car she doesn’t have. It’s that none of this surprises us. This is how the subprime auto loan industry works. They target people who need cars — people with spotty credit, low income, limited options — sell them overpriced, unreliable vehicles at sky-high interest, and then when life inevitably happens (job loss, medical emergency, flat tire they can’t afford to fix), they take the car and still demand the money. It’s like paying for a hotel room, getting evicted in the middle of the night, and then getting billed for the rest of the week.

And yet — we’re not rooting for Hailey because she’s innocent. We don’t know if she is. Maybe she drove the Rogue into a lake. Maybe she stopped paying because she won the lottery. But we’re rooting for her because the system is rigged. Because a 2014 Nissan Rogue should not be the anchor that drags someone into thousands of dollars of debt years after they’ve lost it. Because interest rates that high belong in loan shark movies, not in state court filings. And because if Hugh K. Fudge is getting paid to chase down ten grand for a beige SUV that probably had a CD player stuck on “Baby Shark,” then the whole thing feels less like justice and more like legalized revenge.

So will Hailey show up to court? Will she fight back? Will she countersue for emotional distress caused by relentless debt collection over a car that smelled faintly of old fries? We don’t know. But one thing’s for sure: the Rogue may be gone, but the drama? That’s just getting started.

(We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if we were Hailey’s lawyer, we’d at least try to argue the car owed her money for emotional support during the pandemic.)

Case Overview

$11,385 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$10,112 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 breach of contract defaulted on car loan

Petition Text

224 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA AUTO ADVANTAGE FINANCE, LLC Plaintiff, vs. HAILEY NICOLE CLARK Defendant. CJ-2026-00770 No. DAMAN CANTRELL PETITION COMES NOW the plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, and states as follows: 1. Express Credit Auto and the defendant executed a contract on September 30, 2022 whereby the defendant purchased a 2014 NISSAN ROGUE SELECT ("motor vehicle"). 2. The defendant has defaulted in the obligations required under the contract. 3. The motor vehicle was recovered and sold. After the proceeds of the sale were applied to the indebtedness owed by the defendant, there remains a deficiency balance owed under the contract. 4. The defendant is indebted to plaintiff, as assignee, in the principal amount of $10,111.76, with interest at the contractual rate of 17.98 % per annum from April 10, 2025 through January 13, 2026 in the amount of $1,384.73. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant as follows: 1. The principal amount of $10,111.76; 2. Prejudgment and post judgment interest at the contractual rate (12 O.S. § 727.1); 3. All costs of this action (12 O.S. § 928); 4. A reasonable attorney fee (12 O.S. § 936); and 5. Such other relief to which plaintiff may be justly entitled. Hugh K. Fudge (OBA# 20487) Dani L. Schinzing (OBA# 32113) Emily R. Remmerl (OBA# 22110) Sean A. Nelson (OBA# 30194) Keith A. Daniels (OBA# 19788) Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC P.O.Box 1748, Oklahoma City, OK 73101 (405) 232-6464 | (833) 342-0001 Toll Free [email protected] | (405) 232-6363 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.