CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1314

ACH DIH PROPERTIES, LLC v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.

Filed: Feb 19, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be honest: when you hear “Home Depot,” you think of garden hoses, overpriced power tools, and that one guy in aisle 12 who’s been staring at ceiling fans for 45 minutes. You do not think, “Ah yes, the multinational orange retail giant that’s slapping a $130,000 lien on a luxury townhome development in Oklahoma because a rogue subcontractor ghosted their Pro Xtra account.” But here we are. Welcome to CrazyCivilCourt, where the stakes are high, the paperwork is higher, and someone forgot to pay their Home Depot bill—again.

Our story begins, as so many modern tragedies do, with real estate. ACH DIH Properties, LLC—let’s call them ADP, because even their own lawyers seem to have given up on the full name—bought a big ol’ plot of land in Edmond, Oklahoma, in April 2024. The vision? Build “The Oaks at Covell,” a swanky 102-unit townhome complex that promises granite countertops, smart-home features, and, presumably, HOA meetings that last longer than most therapy sessions. ADP brought in their construction partner, ACRE Construction, LLC—basically the project’s general contractor—to make this dream a reality. Think of ACRE as the conductor of this chaotic orchestra of subcontractors, plumbers, electricians, and guys who install things with nail guns.

One of those subcontractors was Xtreme Exteriors Roofing & Siding, LLC—yes, “Xtreme” with an X, because subtlety is for people who don’t wear neon safety vests. Xtreme, according to their own website (we checked, it’s very dramatic), is a “premier home exterior contractor” with “decades of experience.” In November 2024, ACRE signed a contract with Xtreme for $289,445.56 to handle, presumably, the roofing, siding, and other things that keep rain out and property values up. All good so far. Classic construction deal. Handshake, paperwork, dreams of curb appeal.

But here’s where Xtreme’s “Xtreme” work ethic takes a nosedive. Instead of paying for the materials they pulled from Home Depot—using a Pro account designed for contractors who, you know, pay their bills—they just… didn’t. Home Depot, being the world’s largest home improvement store and not a charity, eventually noticed that Xtreme was racking up charges like a college student with their first credit card. And when no payment came, Home Depot did what any self-respecting corporation does: they filed a lien. On January 27, 2026, they slapped a $130,351.56 lien on the property—the very land ADP owns—claiming they were owed for materials used on the project.

Now, normally, a lien is a big deal but not a shocker. Subcontractors and suppliers do it all the time when they’re not paid. But here’s the Xtreme problem: Home Depot filed the lien 207 days after they allegedly last delivered materials. Oklahoma law gives you 90 days to file a lien. Not 207. Not “whenever you get around to it.” Ninety. It’s not exactly a gray area. It’s like showing up to a wedding three months late and still demanding cake.

ADP and ACRE were not amused. They sent a certified letter on February 3, 2026—because nothing says “legal drama” like certified mail with return receipt—demanding Home Depot release the lien, which they called “fraudulent” and a “cloud on title.” Translation: this lien is screwing up their ability to access construction financing. If the property has a lien on it, banks get nervous. And when banks get nervous, they charge more interest or just say no. ACRE is now at risk of missing deadlines, blowing budgets, and possibly having to explain to investors why their luxury townhomes are being held hostage by a Home Depot receipt.

So ADP, the actual property owner, sues Home Depot to quiet title—a legal term that sounds like a meditation app but really means “get this bogus claim off my land.” They want the court to declare, once and for all, that Home Depot has zero rights to their property and that the lien is as valid as a Monopoly deed.

But it’s not just Home Depot in the crosshairs. ACRE is also suing Xtreme, the subcontractor who started this whole mess by failing to pay their Home Depot bill. ACRE claims Xtreme breached their contract—shocker—by not only doing incomplete work but also by leaving ACRE on the hook for a lien they never should’ve faced. So now ACRE wants damages—over $75,000, to start—and is also demanding indemnity, which is legalese for “if I get sued or have to pay because of your mess, you reimburse me.” They’re throwing in “implied indemnity” too, which is basically the legal version of “this is your fault, and I shouldn’t have to clean it up.”

And ADP? They’re suing Xtreme for negligence—yes, negligence for not paying a Home Depot account. The argument is simple: Xtreme had a duty to pay their suppliers, they didn’t, and now ADP is stuck in legal limbo. It’s like if your roommate doesn’t pay the electric bill, the power company shuts off the lights, and then you get sued because the landlord says the apartment’s uninhabitable. Only here, the roommate is a roofing company, and the electric bill is $130K in siding materials.

Now, let’s talk money. $130,000 sounds like a lot—and it is, especially if you’re a homeowner. But in the world of commercial construction? That’s a rounding error. We’re talking about a 102-unit development. Even a modest $300K per unit puts the total project value north of $30 million. So $130K is less than half a percent of the total. But here’s the thing: in construction, timing is everything. A lien—even a wrongful one—can delay financing, trigger penalty clauses, and scare off buyers. So while the dollar amount might not break the bank, the disruption could cost way more.

So what do these plaintiffs actually want? ADP wants the lien wiped off the property like a bad Yelp review. They want the court to declare Home Depot has no claim, no interest, no business being on their land. They also want to be reimbursed for legal fees and, under Oklahoma’s anti-slander-of-title law, triple damages—which could mean up to nearly $400K if they win. ACRE wants Xtreme to pay for the breach, cover any liability from the lien, and reimburse them for every legal dollar spent playing defense in a fight they didn’t start.

Now, our take? The most absurd part isn’t even that Home Depot filed a lien 117 days late. It’s that no one seems to have communicated. Xtreme vanishes into the ether, Home Depot assumes someone else will pay, ACRE assumes Xtreme paid, and ADP assumes the property is lien-free. It’s a classic game of “not my problem” that only ends when the lawyers show up. And let’s be real—Home Depot? The company that employs 475,000 people? They have a whole department for contractor accounts. Did no one notice Xtreme was months behind? Did no one send a single reminder? Or was it just easier to file a lien and hope someone else figures it out?

We’re rooting for ADP and ACRE—not because they’re innocent angels, but because they’re the ones trying to build something. Xtreme acted like a contractor on a reality TV show where the goal is to cause maximum chaos. And Home Depot? For a company that prides itself on “dedicated support for Pro-level customers,” they sure handled this like a DIY disaster. If you’re going to flex your corporate muscle with a lien, at least do it legally. Otherwise, you’re not a creditor—you’re just a very orange nuisance.

So next time you’re in Home Depot, browsing the mulch section or arguing with an associate about whether duct tape counts as a structural adhesive, remember: somewhere in Oklahoma, a luxury townhome project is being held up because someone didn’t pay for a few pallets of siding. And that, folks, is the American dream—litigated one lien at a time.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
Plaintiffs
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Quiet Title ADP seeks to quiet title in its favor against Home Depot's wrongful lien
2 Breach of Contract ACRE sues Xtreme for breach of contract for failing to provide services as agreed upon
3 Indemnity ACRE seeks indemnification from Xtreme for any liability incurred due to Xtreme's actions
4 Implied Indemnity ACRE seeks implied indemnity from Xtreme for any liability incurred due to Xtreme's actions
5 Negligence ADP sues Xtreme for negligence for failing to pay Home Depot on Xtreme's open account

Docket Events

26 entries
  • 02/19/2026
    SSFCHSCPC
    SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
    10.00
  • 02/19/2026
    OCJC
    OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
    1.55
  • 02/19/2026
    DCADMIN10
    DISTRICT COURT ADMIN FEE FOR $10 COLLECTION
    1.50
  • 02/19/2026
    CONTRACT
    BREACH OF AGREEMENT - CONTRACT
  • 02/19/2026
    PFE1
    PETITION
    163.00
  • 02/19/2026
    SMF
    HOME DEPOT USA, INC. SUMMONS
    📄 View Document
    10.00
  • 02/19/2026
    DCADMINCSF
    DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
    1.50
  • 02/19/2026
    TEXT
    CIVIL RELIEF MORE THAN $10,000 INITIAL FILING.
  • 02/19/2026
    DCADMIN155
    DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
    0.23
  • 02/19/2026
    OCASA
    OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
    10.00
  • 02/19/2026
    SJFIS
    STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
    0.45
  • 02/19/2026
    TEXT
    OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE DISHMAN, C. BRENT TO THIS CASE.
  • 02/19/2026
    CCADMIN10
    COURT CLERK ADMIN FEE FOR $10 COLLECTION
    1.00
  • 02/19/2026
    P
    VERIFIED PETITON TO QUIET TITLE
    📄 View Document
  • 02/19/2026
    ADJUST
    ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
    6.71
  • 02/19/2026
    CCADMIN0155
    COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
    0.16
  • 02/19/2026
    DMFE
    DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
    7.00
  • 02/19/2026
    SMF
    XTREME EXTERIORS ROOFING & SIDING, LLC SUMMONS
    📄 View Document
    10.00
  • 02/19/2026
    SMIMA
    SUMMONS ISSUED - MAILED BY ATTORNEY
  • 02/19/2026
    CCRMPF
    COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
    10.00
  • 02/19/2026
    CCADMINCSF
    COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
    1.00
  • 02/19/2026
    LTF
    LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
    10.00
  • 02/19/2026
    OCISR
    OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
    25.00
  • 02/19/2026
    ACCOUNT
  • 02/19/2026
    PFE7
    LAW LIBRARY FEE
    6.00
  • 02/24/2026
    SMS
    XTREME EXTERIORS ROOFING & SIDING, LLC SUMMONS RETURN, SERVED
    📄 View Document

Petition Text

2,823 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA ACH DIH PROPERTIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ACRE CONSTRUCTION, II, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, Plaintiffs, vs. HOME DEPOT USA, INC., a Georgia company, And XTREME EXTERIORS ROOFING & SIDING, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, Defendants. Filed DISTRICT COURT OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA February 19, 2026 11:45 AM RICK WARREN, COURT CLERK Case No.: Case Number CJ-2026-1314 Judge: VERIFIED PETITION TO QUIET TITLE Plaintiffs ACH DIH Properties, LLC ("ADP") and ACRE Construction, LLC ("ACRE") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") hereby submit its Verified Petition to Quiet Title against Defendant, Home Depot USA, Inc. ("Home Depot") pursuant to Okla. Stat. tit. 12 § 1141 et seq., and for its causes of actions against Defendant Xtreme Exteriors Roofing & Siding, LLC ("Xtreme") (collectively, "Defendants"), and further states as follows: The Parties 1. Plaintiff ADP is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business located at 4400 Westway Ave., Dallas, TX 75205. 2. Plaintiff ACRE is an Oklahoma limited liability company with its principal place of business located in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. 3. Defendant Home Depo is an Atlanta based company incorporated within the State of Georgia. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Xtreme is a Missouri limited liability company with its principal place of business located in Christian County, State of Missouri. 5. The property at issue in this case is located at 3100 N. Sooner, Rd., Edmond, Oklahoma 73034, Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, more particularly described as follows: The West Half(W/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) and the West 10Acres of the East Half (E/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section Sixteen (16), Township Fourteen(14)North, Range Two (2) West of the Indian Meridian, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof; sometimes described as the West 90 Acres of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section Sixteen (16), Township Fourteen(14)North, Range Two(2) West of the Indian Meridian, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof. LESS AND EXCEPT those lands taken by the State of Oklahoma, ex rel Department of Highways of the State of Oklahoma as shown in Report of Commissioners recorded in Book 2201, Page371 and Journal Entry recorded in Book 2306, Page 92; and LESS AND EXCEPT those lands conveyed to Oklahoma County in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 296,Page 435; and LESS ANDEXCEPT apart of the Southwest Quarter(SW/4) of Section 16, Township 14N, Range 2 West of the Indian Meridian in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 100.00 feet North and 50.00 feet East of the Southwest corner (SW/C) of said Southwest Quarter(SW/4), point being the intersection of existing Right-of-Way for public roads; thence N89°47'45"E along said Right-of-Way a distance of 60.00 feet; thenceN00°39'31*W and parallel to the West Section line of said Southwest Quarter (SW/4) a distance of 350.82 feet; thenceN11°53°45*W a distance of 179.61 feet; thence N00°39'31"W and parallel to the West Section line of said Southwest Quarter (SW/4)a distance of 437.03 feet; thence $89°20'29*W a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on existing Right-of-Way for public road; thence $00°39'31"E along said Right-of-Way a distance of 963.54 feet to the Point of Beginning; and LESS AND EXCEPT Beginning at a point 50.00 feet East of the Northwest Corner (NW/C)of said Southwest Quarter (SW/4), point being on existing Right-of-Way for public road; thence $00°39'31"E along said Right-of-Way a distance of 473.03 feet; thence N17°48°40"E a distance of 141.49 feet; thence N02°12'14"E a distance of 339.26 feet to a point on the North line of said Southwest Quarter (SW/4); thence $89°20*29*W along said North line a distance of61.77 feet to the Point of Beginning. And being more particularly described as follows: Part of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section Sixteen (16), Township Fourteen (14) North, Range Two (2) West of the Indian Meridian, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma; COMMENCING at the SW corner of said SW/4; THENCE N00°39'25"W along the West line of said SW/4 for a distance of 100.00 feet; THENCE N89°20'17"E and parallel with the South line of said SW/4 for a distance of 110.00 feet to the Point or Place of Beginning; THENCE N00°39*25*W and parallel with the West line of said SW/4 for a distance of 350.82 feet; THENCE N11°55'26*W for a distance of 179.14 feet; THENCEN00°39'25"W and parallel with said West line of SW/4 for a distance of 437.03 feet; THENCE S89°20°35*W for a distance of 25.00 feet to a point being 50.00 feet East of the West line of said SW/4; THENCE N00°39°25"W and parallel with said West line SW/4 for a distance of1097.75 feet; THENCEN17°48°46"E for a distance of 141.49feet: THENCEN02°2°20°E for a distance of 339.30 feet to a point on the North line of said SW/4 said point being 111.77 feet East of the NW corner of said SW/4;THENCE N89°17'50"E along the North line of said SW/4 for a distance of 1374.86 feet to the NE corner of said West 90 acres SW/4; THENCE $00°37°34"E along the East line of said West 90 acres for a distance of 2532.06 feet to a point being 103.28 feet North of the SE comer of said West 90 acres; THENCE S86°28'33*W for a distance of 65.78 feet to a point being100.00feet North line of said SW/4; THENCES89°20°17"W and parallel with said South line SW/4 for a distance of 1309.57 feet to the Point or Place of Beginning. ("Property"). Jurisdiction and Venue 6. The actions giving rise to this suit occurred in Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma. 7. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims alleged herein and may properly exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendants. 8. Venue is proper in Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma. Factual Background 9. ACRE is a trusted leader in construction management, specializing in delivering luxury, single and multifamily rental communities. 10. According to its website, Home Depot is the world's largest home improvement retailer with approximately 475,000 orange-blooded associates and more than 2,300 stores in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The typical store today averages 105,000 square feet of indoor retail space, interconnected with an e-commerce business that offers more than one million products for the DIY customer, professional contractors, and the industry's largest installation business for the Do-It-For-Me customer. 11. Xtreme holds itself out as premier home exterior contractors with decades of siding installation experience and expertise across roofing, decking, windows, doors and more. 12. By Special Warranty Deed dated April 4, 2024, ADP, purchased the Property in order to contract and have constructed one-hundred and two (102) townhomes called, “The Oaks at Covell” (the “Project”). 13. On November 13, 2024, in order to construct the Project, ACRE entered into a contract with Xtreme to serve as a subcontractor on its behalf and provide various labor, materials, and services in exchange for monetary payments in the amount of $289,445.56 (the “Contract”). 14. In order to provide ACRE with its labor, materials, and services, Xtreme maintained an open account with Home Depot, wherein Extreme was able to streamline business operations, offering perks in like bulk volume pricing, purchase tracking for tax preparation, and dedicated support for large, Pro-level material orders. 15. Despite being paid by ACRE and obtaining various materials from Home Depot, Xtreme wholly failed to reimburse Home Depot pursuant to the terms of its open account for said materials and, pursuant to its Contract with ACRE. 16. As a result, on January 27, 2026, Home Depot prepared and recorded with the Oklahoma County Clerk the Lien, which is identified as Doc #: 2026012201010757 B: 16358 P: 729 in the amount of $130,351.56 (the “Lien”). 17. However, the Lien is entirely wrongful and seeks to perjure this Court based on intentional misrepresentations. 18. Specifically, the Lien provides in relevant part as follows: [Home Depot] began providing the “Work or Materials for Property Improved” for the improvement of the “Property” on or about 05-29-2025, and last furnished the “Work or Materials for Property Improved” on or about 07-04-2025. This statement of lien being filed with the County Clerk with four (4) months of said date. (emphasis added). 19. The Lien was filed January 27, 2026, approximately two-hundred and seven (207) days, after it admittedly last furnished the “Work or Materials for Property Improved,” on July 4, 2025 (nearly 7 months after providing the last work or materials for the Project). 20. Pursuant to 42 Okl.St.Ann § 143, "any person furnishing material or equipment used on said land to, such subcontractor may obtain a lien upon such land, or improvements, or both, for the same time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as the subcontractor, for the amount due for such material, equipment used on said land and labor, as well as any applicable profit and overhead costs due to the person, by filing with the county clerk of the county in which the land is situated, within ninety (90) days after the date upon which material or equipment used on said land was last furnished or labor last performed under such subcontract, a statement, verified by affidavit." 21. Clearly, Home Depot is well outside its right to file a Lien against the Property. 22. On February 3, 2026, pursuant to 12 O.S. § 1141.3, counsel for Plaintiffs provided a proper notice (“Notice”), by certified mail, to Home Depot that their fraudulent Lien is a cloud on title of the subject Property, and requested that it execute a lien release, an acceptable form of which was included with the request (“Lien Release”). 23. However, as of the date of the filing of this Petition, Home Depot has not signed and filed the Lien Release. 24. As a result of Home Depot’s failure to execute the Lien Release, ACRE is at risk of being unable to drawdown on its construction loan ("Drawdown"). 25. As a result of being unable to Drawdown, ACRE is at risk of incurring additional interest rates at a higher value and, being able to complete the Project pursuant to contractual terms. 26. Defendants may claim some right, title or interest in the Property by virtue of Xtreme’s failure to pay Home Depot pursuant to its open account, which is adverse to the right, title, and interest claimed by Plaintiffs. 27. Defendants have no right, title, or interest in the Property contrary to the ownership of Plaintiff, and such claims, if any, are without foundation and the Property is owned by ADP in fee simple absolute, and its title there to should be quieted and confirmed. 28. This is an action to judicially determine any right, title, or interest of Defendants, if any, to exclude Defendants from any right, title, or interest of ADP’s ownership in the Property, and to quiet title in favor of ADP. 29. Defendants should be required to come forward and assert whatever rights, title, or interest they claim in the Property, if any. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION QUIET TITLE – (ADP v. HOME DEPOT) 30. ADP realleges and reasserts paragraphs No.’s 1-29 as if fully restated herein. 31. On January 27, 2026, Home Depot prepared and recorded with the Oklahoma County Clerk the Lien, which is identified as Doc #: 2026012201010757 B: 16358 P: 729 in the amount of $130,351.56. 32. The purpose of this Lien was to slander title to the subject Property to coerce Plaintiff to pay Home Depot more money and accept substandard, non-conforming, and incomplete work by Xtreme. 33. On February 3, 2026, pursuant to 12 O.S. § 1141.3, counsel for Plaintiffs provided a proper notice ("Notice"), by certified mail, to Home Depot that their fraudulent Lien is a cloud on title of the subject Property, and requested that it execute a lien release, an acceptable form of which was included with the request. 34. Home Depot did not respond to the Notice or file a lien release. 35. ADP is entitled to recover damages against Home Depot equal to the actual expenses incurred in identifying the curative instrument and preparing the Notice, together with the expenses of litigation directly related to obtaining a judgment quieting title in this action pursuant to 12 O.S. § 1141.5(4). 36. Pursuant to 16 O.S. § 79(A) and the allegations of paragraph 25, ADP should be awarded three times their damages resulting from the Lien on the subject Property. WHEREFORE, ADP respectfully requests that this Court: (i) find that Home Depot has no right, title, or interest in the Property; (ii) quiet title in the Property in ADP’s favor; and (iii) award ADP any and all other relief to which it may show itself entitled. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF CONTRACT – (ACRE v. XTREME) 37. ACRE realleges and reasserts paragraphs No.’s 1-36 as if fully restated herein. 38. ACRE and Xtreme entered into a Contract wherein, Xtreme agreed to provide services on behalf of ACRE in exchange for monetary payments. 39. Xtreme breached its Contract with ACRE by failing to comply with the terms and provisions provided therein. 40. As a result of Xtreme’s breach, ACRE has suffered damages in an amount to be determined at the trial of this matter. WHEREFORE, ACRE respectfully requests that this Court: (i) enter a judgment against Xtreme for breach of Contract in an amount in excess of $75,000.00; (ii) award ACRE pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; (iii) award ACRE costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this matter; and, (iv) award ACRE any and all other relief to which ACRE may show itself entitled. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION INDEMNITY – (ACRE v. XTREME) 41. ACRE realleges and reasserts paragraphs No.’s 1- 40 as if fully restated herein. 42. An actual controversy exists between ADP and Xtreme, in that ACRE alleges that if any liability or responsibility is imposed upon it, said liability or responsibility, if any, rests upon Xtreme. 43. ACRE contends that if it is found to be liable to Home Depot as a result of any act or omission in this matter, any liability will be the direct and proximate result of the acts, omissions, breaches of contract, negligence, or other conduct of Xtreme. 44. Therefore, ACRE is entitled as a matter of law to a judicial determination apportioning and fixing the comparative fault of Xtreme for any damages awarded to Plaintiffs in this action. WHEREFORE, ACRE prays this Court: i.) enter judgment against Xtreme for indemnification as set forth above in Plaintiffs’ Third Cause of Action against Xtreme; (ii) award ACRE pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; (iii) award ACRE costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this matter; and, (iv) award ACRE any and all other relief to which ACRE may show itself entitled. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION IMPLIED INDEMNITY (ACRE v. Xtreme) 45. ACRE realleges and reasserts paragraphs No.’s 1-44 as if fully restated herein. 46. At all times herein mentioned, Xtreme was negligent, or otherwise responsible in total, or in part, for the injuries, losses and/or damages complained of, by Home Depot. 47. Any liability that ADP may incur as a result of the allegations of Home Depot will be the result of the active and primary negligence and/or fault, or misconduct of Xtreme. 48. In equity and good conscience, if Home Depot recovers against ACRE, then ACRE is entitled to equitable indemnity, apportionment of liability, and contribution for any and all liability among and from Xtreme, according to their respective fault, for the injuries and damages allegedly sustained by Home Depot, by way of sums paid in settlement, or judgment rendered against ACRE in the action based on the allegations Home Depot alleges in the Lien. Such indemnification and/or contribution shall include any and all attorneys’ fees and court costs incurred by ACRE in the defense of Home Depot’s Lien. The service of this Petition shall serve as a tender of such defense and indemnification from Xtreme, to the extent that such a tender has not been made previously. WHEREFORE, ACRE prays this Court: i.) enter judgment against Xtreme for implied indemnification as set forth above in Plaintiffs’ Fourth Cause of Action against Xtreme; (ii) award ACRE pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; (iii) award ACRE costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this matter; and, (iv) award ACRE any and all other relief to which ACRE may show itself entitled. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION NEGLIGENCE (ADP v. Xtreme) 49. ADP realleges and reasserts paragraphs No.’s 1-48 as if fully restated herein. 50. At all times relevant hereto, Xtreme owed a duty to ADP to pay Home Depot on Xtreme’s open account. 51. Xtreme breached its duty to ADP by failing to pay Home Depot on Xtreme’s open account. 52. Xtreme’s breach of its duty to ADP is the direct and proximate cause of the damages ADP suffered as a result of Xtreme’s failure to pay Home Depot on Xtreme’s open account. 53. As a result of Xtreme’s negligence, ADP has been damaged in an amount to be determined at the trial of this matter. WHEREFORE, ADP respectfully requests that this Court: (i) enter a judgment against Xtreme for negligence in an amount in excess of $75,000.00; (ii) award ADP pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; (iii) award ADP costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this matter; and, (iv) award ADP any and all other relief to which ADP may show itself entitled. Respectfully submitted, [signature] Brian L. Mitchell, OBA No. 19529 Daniel R. Wilson, OBA #32284 Mitchell Legal PLLC 203 E. Hobson Ave. Sapulpa, OK 74066 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.