Ashley Owings v. Madison Ambler
What's This Case About?
Let’s cut right to the chase: someone tried to make a left turn on a red light—yes, that illegal, universally despised, “I swear I can make it” move—and instead of squeezing through like a rogue shopping cart in a Walmart parking lot, she plowed straight into a family SUV, sending two women and a child to who-knows-what kind of medical purgatory. And now? We’re looking at a $150,000 lawsuit, a jury trial demand, and the kind of traffic-law drama usually reserved for DMV nightmares. Welcome to CrazyCivilCourt, where the stakes are high, the driving is worse, and the only thing more reckless than the defendant might be the legal strategy.
So who are we even talking about here? On one side: Ashley Owings, a mom from Broken Arrow (which, for the record, is basically Tulsa’s slightly more suburban cousin), driving her midsized SUV like a responsible adult—seatbelts fastened, radio probably playing something between country and soft rock, kid in the back. Riding shotgun? Her mother, Louann Owings, because apparently this was a mother-daughter errand run with bonus generational bonding. Also along for the ride: C.C., a minor whose full name isn’t disclosed because, hello, child privacy laws. They’re just minding their business, westbound on Kenosha Street, minding traffic signals, obeying the rules of the road—basically the human embodiment of “defensive driving.”
Then there’s Madison Ambler. She hails from Muskogee, which, again, no shade, but this is not exactly a cross-town commute. She’s eastbound on Kenosha, sees the red light at Aspen Avenue, and instead of stopping like the law—and basic survival—dictates, decides, “Nah, I’m gonna swing a left.” Northbound on Aspen. On a red. In Oklahoma. Where that’s not allowed. Unless you’re turning right, you’re supposed to sit there, drumming your fingers on the wheel, contemplating your life choices until the light turns green. But not Madison. Oh no. She’s got places to be. Or maybe she just really hates waiting. Either way, she rolls into that intersection like she’s in a Fast & Furious spinoff titled “Left Turn: Reckless Edition.” And then—crunch—she T-bones Ashley Owings’ SUV. Not a fender bender. Not a “let’s exchange insurance” bump. We’re talking full-on collision. Glass shattering, airbags possibly deploying, someone screaming, “WHAT JUST HAPPENED?!” energy.
Now, from a legal standpoint, this isn’t exactly complicated. The plaintiffs—Ashley, Louann, and little C.C.—are saying, “Hey, we were following the rules. You didn’t. You broke the law. We got hurt. Pay up.” And they’re not just throwing darts at a liability board. They’ve got two solid claims. First: negligence. That’s legalese for “you didn’t act like a reasonable person with a driver’s license should.” You know, like, not turning left on red when it’s illegal. Not barreling into an intersection where cross-traffic has the green. That kind of thing. They’re saying Madison failed to yield, failed to check, failed to not cause a crash, and as a result, they suffered injuries, medical bills, pain, suffering, and a general “our lives kind of sucked after that day” vibe.
But wait—there’s more! They’re also claiming negligence per se. Now, that sounds like something a Latin teacher would yell at a rowdy classroom, but in court, it means: “You broke the law, the law exists to prevent exactly this kind of harm, and we’re exactly the kind of people the law was supposed to protect—so you’re automatically negligent.” It’s like a legal shortcut. Instead of arguing whether Madison should have known better, they’re saying, “She violated Oklahoma Statute 47-11-202 and 402, which spell out traffic signal rules and left-turn laws—so game over. She’s on the hook.” It’s the legal equivalent of getting caught red-handed with the cookie jar: no debate, no wiggle room. You broke the rule. You caused damage. Pay the piper.
And oh, do they want to be paid. They’re suing for over $75,000 each—so $150,000 total, not including punitive damages, attorney fees, or interest. Is that a lot? Well, let’s put it this way: $75k isn’t “I need a new bumper” money. That’s “I have ongoing medical treatment, therapy, lost wages, emotional distress, and possibly long-term consequences” money. If Louann missed weeks of work, or Ashley needed physical therapy, or C.C. is dealing with trauma from the crash, that number starts to make sense. And let’s be real—ambulance rides in America cost more than a used car. One ER visit? Could be $20k easy. So while $150k might sound like a lot for a car crash, in the grand scheme of bodily harm and medical debt, it’s not outrageous. It’s just… expensive life.
But here’s what makes this whole thing chef’s kiss absurd: the sheer audacity of turning left on red in the first place. Because let’s be honest—everyone’s done it. We’ve all seen that empty intersection at 2 a.m., thought, “No one’s coming,” and rolled through. And sure, technically illegal, but… whatever, right? Except when it goes wrong. And when it goes wrong this wrong—when you T-bone a car with a mom, her mom, and a kid—it stops being a “we’ve all been there” moment and becomes a “how did you think this was a good idea?” moment. Madison Ambler didn’t just break a rule—she broke a very specific, very well-known rule that exists because people die doing this exact thing. And now two women and a child are walking around with injuries, medical bills, and the emotional toll of a violent collision—all because someone couldn’t wait 45 seconds for a green light.
Our take? Look, we’re not here to crucify Madison Ambler. Maybe she was distracted. Maybe she misjudged the distance. Maybe she thought Ashley was slowing down. But the facts, as alleged, paint a picture of someone who prioritized convenience over safety, broke the law, and caused real harm. And now, she’s facing a jury trial—meaning real people, probably with their own horror stories of bad drivers, will decide if she owes $150,000. That’s the kind of pressure that could make a person reconsider their entire driving philosophy.
Are we rooting for justice? Absolutely. Are we rooting for Ashley and Louann to get the compensation they need to heal? You bet. Are we rooting for every driver in America to think twice before attempting a left on red? Oh, 100%. Because this isn’t just a lawsuit. It’s a public service announcement on wheels. And the moral of the story? If the light’s red, stop. Even if you’re sure you can make it. Even if no one’s coming. Even if you’re late. Because the only thing worse than waiting for a green light? Facing a judge after you’ve turned someone’s family trip into a trauma case.
And remember, folks—we’re entertainers, not lawyers. But even we know this one: when the light says “stop,” you stop. Or next time, it might not just be your insurance premiums going up. It could be your entire bank account.
Case Overview
-
Ashley Owings
individual
Rep: Richardson Richardson Boudreaux, PLLC
-
Louann Owings
individual
Rep: Richardson Richardson Boudreaux, PLLC
- Madison Ambler individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | negligence | Plaintiffs were involved in a motor vehicle collision with Defendant, who was attempting to make a left turn on a red light, causing personal injuries and financial damages. |
| 2 | negligence per se | Defendant was in violation of Oklahoma Statutes and city traffic laws, causing injuries and damages to Plaintiffs. |