Midland Credit Management, Inc. v. Caleb Jackson
What's This Case About?
Let’s be real: the most gladiator-in-the-courts moment in this case is not a dramatic courtroom showdown, a surprise witness, or even a single appearance by Caleb Jackson. No, the most insane thing here is that a debt collector in Minnesota is swearing under penalty of perjury—like, actual legal oath stuff—that a man in Oklahoma owes $5,800… and the whole case hinges on a guy named Jacob Biard reading a spreadsheet and saying, “Yep, the computer says he didn’t pay.” That’s it. That’s the trial. A man, a monitor, and a notary.
So who are we even talking about? On one side, you’ve got Midland Credit Management, Inc.—a debt buyer, which is basically the vulture of the financial world. These companies don’t lend money. They don’t issue credit cards. What they do is swoop in after banks have given up on collecting, buy those deadbeat accounts for pennies on the dollar, and then try to collect the full amount like nothing ever happened. Think of them as the guys who buy expired coupons at a discount and then try to use them at the grocery store with a straight face. Only here, instead of expired yogurt, it’s expired debt.
On the other side: Caleb Jackson of Lincoln County, Oklahoma. That’s about all we know. No criminal record cited, no dramatic backstory, no indication he’s a serial credit card ghoster. He’s just… a guy. A guy who, at some point, opened two store-branded credit cards—probably one at a Petland (yes, like the pet store) and another through Credit One Bank, which is the financial equivalent of that sketchy guy who offers you a credit card in the mall kiosk while you’re just trying to buy socks. He used them, made some payments, and then—somewhere between 2024 and 2026—stopped. And now, years later, a legal specialist in St. Cloud, Minnesota, is filing sworn testimony about Caleb’s financial life like he’s testifying at a Senate hearing.
Here’s how it went down, according to the paperwork: Caleb opened the Comenity Capital Bank/Petland card back on August 26, 2022. Maybe he got a puppy. Maybe he just really needed a hamster cage. Who knows. He made his last payment on March 11, 2024. Then radio silence. The account was “charged off” on October 31, 2024—bank-speak for “we’ve given up, this is a loss.” Around November 22, 2024, Midland bought the rights to that debt and became the new owner of Caleb’s unpaid $4,877.82. That’s four thousand, eight hundred, seventy-seven dollars and eighty-two cents… allegedly for whatever pet-related purchases he made nearly two years ago.
Then there’s the second account: Credit One Bank, N.A., opened December 9, 2022. Last payment? January 24, 2024. Charged off July 29, 2024. Midland picked up the rights on August 20, 2024. Balance: $926.23. Total owed? $5,804.05. And how do we know all this? Because Jacob Biard, Legal Specialist at Midland, sat at his desk, pulled up the digital file, and swore—under penalty of perjury—that the numbers add up. He didn’t talk to Caleb. He didn’t see a receipt. He didn’t witness a single transaction. But he does have access to records, and that, in the eyes of the law, is enough—for now.
So why are we in court? Because Midland wants a judgment. A judgment is like the legal version of a gold star: it officially says, “Yes, Caleb Jackson owes this money.” And once they have that, they can start garnishing wages, freezing bank accounts, or just haunting his credit report like a financial poltergeist. The claims? Two counts of “petition for indebtedness”—which sounds way fancier than “we bought some debt and now we want it paid.” But that’s it. No fraud. No breach of contract. No wild accusations of identity theft or forged signatures. Just: “He didn’t pay. We own the debt. Give us the money.”
And what do they want? $5,804.05. Plus interest. Plus court costs. Is that a lot? Well, for a debt collector, it’s a payday. For the average Oklahoman, it’s nearly two months’ rent in a modest apartment. It’s a used car down payment. It’s a full year of Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, and every other streaming service, with money left over for popcorn. It’s not life-changing money, but it’s not nothing. And let’s not forget—Midland probably paid way less than $5,800 for these two accounts. Some debt buyers pay as little as 4 cents on the dollar. If that’s the case here, they might’ve paid under $300 to acquire $5,800 in potential revenue. That’s a 1,800% markup—if they win.
Now, here’s our take: the most absurd part of this whole thing isn’t that a company is suing over a few thousand bucks. It’s not even that the evidence is a guy in Minnesota swearing that a database is accurate. It’s that this is normal. This is how debt collection works in America. A chain of financial handoffs: bank → charge-off → debt buyer → lawsuit. The original lender doesn’t care anymore. They’ve already written it off. But Midland? They’re playing financial whack-a-mole, suing hundreds or thousands of people like Caleb Jackson across the country, hoping most won’t show up to court so they can get default judgments and start collecting. And often, they win—because who has time to fight a $5,800 lawsuit in rural Oklahoma while working two jobs and raising kids?
Are we rooting for Caleb? Honestly, we don’t know if he’s a deadbeat or a guy who got buried under medical bills or just forgot about an old card. But we are rooting for the idea that you shouldn’t get sued by a company that wasn’t even the one who lent you the money, based solely on a spreadsheet and a notarized PDF. We’re rooting for a system where debt doesn’t just get traded like baseball cards and then weaponized years later. And we’re definitely rooting for the day when Jacob Biard gets a hobby that doesn’t involve swearing under oath about strangers’ credit histories.
But until then? Welcome to American debt court. Where the stakes are real, the paperwork is endless, and the drama is… well, let’s just say we won’t be making a Netflix docuseries. But we might make a bingo card.
Case Overview
-
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
business
Rep: LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C.
- Caleb Jackson individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | petition for indebtedness | allegations of debt |
| 2 | petition for indebtedness | allegations of debt |