Sun Loan v. Richard Swiontek
What's This Case About?
Loan shark showdown: Sun Loan vs. Richard Swiontek — a high-stakes, pulse-pounding legal thriller that will have you gripping your popcorn and whispering, “Wait, how much?” Because yes, this is a case where a company is suing a man for just over $1,600… and brought an attorney. To small claims court. Where you can technically represent yourself with a sandwich board and a dream.
Let’s meet our players. On one side, we’ve got Sun Loan — not a solar energy startup, not a sun-drenched financial utopia, but a payday lender based in Poteau, Oklahoma, with an address that screams “I share a strip mall with a nail salon and a bail bondsman.” They specialize in short-term, high-interest loans to people who need cash fast — the kind of loans that come with more fees than a gym membership and a divorce. On the other side: Richard Swiontek, a man who lives on Green Road in Cameron, Oklahoma — a town so small the biggest drama might be someone mowing their lawn on a Sunday. Richard is not a known criminal mastermind, nor a fugitive from the law. He’s just a guy who borrowed money and, according to Sun Loan, didn’t pay it back. That’s it. That’s the whole crime. But in the world of small claims court, that’s enough for subpoenas, sworn affidavits, and a court appearance scheduled for 9 PM — yes, nine at night, because nothing says “access to justice” like forcing working people to show up after a double shift at the factory.
So what happened? Well, according to the filing — which is less a dramatic courtroom confession and more a dry, notarized grocery list of financial disappointment — Richard took out a loan from Sun Loan for $1,595.38. That’s oddly specific, isn’t it? Not $1,600. Not even $1,595 flat. No, it’s $1,595.38. Which means someone at Sun Loan was very precise about the interest, the fees, the late charges, the “we-kept-your-check-in-a-drawer-for-three-days” surcharge. Whatever the breakdown, Richard was supposed to pay it back. He didn’t. Sun Loan sent a demand. He didn’t pay then, either. And so, like a financial vampire sensing weakness, they filed a small claims affidavit — the legal equivalent of sliding into your DMs with a court summons.
Now, let’s talk about what “defaulted loan contract” actually means, because legal jargon is just English with a superiority complex. In plain terms: Richard borrowed money under a written agreement, probably signed a bunch of forms with tiny print that said “you will owe us your firstborn if you’re one day late,” and then failed to make the payments. That’s the claim. That’s the whole ballgame. Sun Loan isn’t accusing him of fraud, identity theft, or stealing their mascot (though honestly, that would’ve been more fun). They’re saying, “He borrowed money. He didn’t pay. We want it back.” And while that sounds straightforward, let’s not ignore the theatrical flair: they’re suing for $1,595.38 in principal and fees, plus $123 in court costs — bringing the grand total to $1,618.38. That’s right. They’ve calculated this down to the penny, like they’re balancing a church collection plate, not chasing a debt.
And get this — Sun Loan didn’t just mail a form. They brought legal representation. Enter Danella Gaus Fa, attorney at law, who signed the affidavit on behalf of the plaintiff. Let’s pause for a moment and appreciate the absurdity: a payday lender hires a lawyer to collect under $1,700. How much do you think Danella billed for the 20 minutes it took to fill out this form? If her hourly rate is even $150, Sun Loan is already losing money on this case. It’s like sending a SWAT team to recover a stolen candy bar. And yet, here we are. The wheels of justice grind slow — and sometimes, they’re powered by caffeine and overdue invoices.
Now, what do they want? Sun Loan is asking for $1,618.38 — $1,595.38 for the loan, $123 for costs. Is that a lot? In the grand scheme of civil lawsuits, no. You could buy a slightly used Honda Civic for that. Or, if you’re Richard Swiontek, you could pay six months of car insurance. But in the context of small claims court — where people sue over dog bites, broken lawnmowers, and stolen chickens — $1,600 is actually a solid chunk of change. It’s not “I lost a bet” money. It’s “I need to sell my Xbox” money. And let’s be real: if Sun Loan is suing, it’s probably because Richard can’t pay — not that he won’t. That’s usually how these things go. The loan was likely meant to cover an emergency — a car repair, a medical bill, a surprise pet iguana surgery (Oklahoma’s full of surprises). And now, instead of fixing the problem, it’s just added another layer of stress, another bill, another court date at 9 PM on a weekday.
Which brings us to the most baffling part of this whole saga: the court appearance is set for 9 PM. Let that sink in. The LeFlore County Small Claims Court is scheduling hearings at night, like it’s a community theater production of People v. Unpaid Balance. Who shows up to court at 9 PM? Shift workers? Insomniacs? People who enjoy litigation as a form of light entertainment? And what happens if Richard can’t make it? The order says if he doesn’t appear, judgment will be entered against him — automatically. No debate. No “but your honor, my dog ate the check.” Just boom: you lose. That’s how the system works when you’re on the wrong side of a corporate debt machine.
So what’s our take? Look, we’re not here to defend loan sharking, and we’re definitely not saying payday lenders are the heroes of this story. But come on — suing someone for $1,600 with a lawyer in tow, demanding they show up at night like it’s a secret tribunal? That’s not justice. That’s harassment with a notary stamp. The most absurd part isn’t that Richard defaulted. It’s that a company with lawyers and offices and probably a coffee machine is treating this like a felony-level betrayal. Meanwhile, Richard is just trying to survive in rural Oklahoma, where the nearest Walmart is 30 minutes away and the Wi-Fi cuts out during thunderstorms.
We’re rooting for Richard — not because he’s innocent, but because the system is rigged. Because no one should have to choose between paying a loan and showing up to court at 9 PM after working a 12-hour shift. And because if we don’t stand up for the little guy in cases like this, soon the only people who’ll show up to small claims court are corporations with legal teams and a vendetta over pocket change.
So tune in next time, when Sun Loan sues someone for $2.50 in late fees and demands a jury trial. Until then, remember: in America, you’re innocent until proven guilty — but apparently, you’re broke until proven solvent.
Case Overview
-
Sun Loan
business
Rep: Danella Gaus Fa
- Richard Swiontek individual
| # | Cause of Action | Description |
|---|---|---|
| - | - | defaulted loan contract |