CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CHOCTAW COUNTY • CS-2026-00058

Crown Asset Management, LLC v. Jared Bell

Filed: Mar 16, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: this is not the kind of case you expect to see in court. We’re not talking about stolen heirlooms, secret affairs, or a backyard wrestling ring that collapsed and took out a neighbor’s prize-winning azaleas. No. This is a grown law firm, RAUSCH STURM LLP — yes, with a mailing address in Wisconsin — filing a lawsuit in Oklahoma over $3,462.87. That’s not even enough to cover a down payment on a used Subaru. And yet, here we are. A debt collector has hauled an ordinary guy named Jared Bell into court for less than four grand, armed with legal citations, a verified statement, and the full weight of the Choctaw County District Court system. All because someone didn’t pay their credit card bill. Buckle up, folks — this is civil court at its most gloriously petty.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Crown Asset Management, LLC — a name that sounds like a shady hedge fund from a 2008 financial crisis documentary, but in reality is just another in a long line of debt buyers. These companies don’t lend money; they buy up old, delinquent debts for pennies on the dollar from banks and then try to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the financial world — not the ones that attack living prey, but the ones that circle quietly, waiting for someone to miss a payment so they can swoop in and say, “Hey, remember that thing you forgot about? Pay us.” In this case, Crown bought a defaulted credit account from Synchrony Bank — the same folks who issue store cards for places like Amazon, Lowe’s, and Old Navy. So somewhere, somehow, Jared Bell probably opened a credit line, bought some stuff, and then stopped paying. That’s about as dramatic as it gets.

And then there’s Jared Bell. We don’t know much about him — not his age, not his job, not whether he drives a pickup truck or owns a dog named Buddy. But we do know he lives in Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and at some point in early 2022, he signed up for a Synchrony Bank credit account. He used it. He made payments. In fact, his last payment was on August 7, 2023 — not ancient history, but not exactly recent either. Then, silence. No more payments. The account went belly-up. On March 13, 2024, Synchrony officially closed it and charged it off — meaning they wrote it off as a loss. But that doesn’t mean the debt vanished. Nope. It got sold. To Crown. And now Crown wants its money — or at least, wants the court to say Jared owes it.

Here’s how we got to this point: Crown, armed with its newly acquired debt and a sense of corporate purpose, decided to sue. Not send a letter. Not make a few calls. Nope — full-on litigation. They hired Michael J. Kidman, a lawyer licensed in Oklahoma but based in Tulsa while working for a Wisconsin law firm (yes, really), to file a petition in Choctaw County District Court. The argument? Jared Bell owes $3,462.87. That’s it. That’s the whole case. There’s no dispute over who did what, no claims of fraud or identity theft, no wild allegations of hidden payments or forged signatures. Just a straightforward “you borrowed, you didn’t pay, now we want the cash.” And get this — Crown didn’t just ask for the money. They also want the court to force the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to hand over Jared’s employment history. Why? Probably to figure out if he has a job and can be garnished. Which feels… a little intense for a $3,500 debt. It’s like bringing a SWAT team to collect a library fine.

Now, let’s talk about what’s actually happening legally here. Crown is suing under a “debt collection” claim — which, in plain English, means they’re trying to get a court judgment that says Jared legally owes them money. If they win, the court can order Jared to pay, and then Crown can use that judgment to potentially garnish his wages, freeze his bank account, or put a lien on property. But none of that happens automatically. Jared could fight it. He could say, “Hey, I already paid,” or “That’s not my account,” or “I was never properly notified.” But based on the filing, he hasn’t done that — yet. This is just the petition, the opening move. It’s Crown throwing down the gauntlet and saying, “Pay up or show up.” And honestly, for a debt this small, most people wouldn’t bother fighting. They’d either pay or ignore it and hope it goes away. But ignoring it is dangerous — because if Jared doesn’t respond, Crown could win by default, and then the real collection machinery kicks in.

Which brings us to the million-dollar question: is $3,462.87 a lot? In the grand scheme of debt, no. It’s not a mortgage. It’s not student loans. It’s not even a full year of car payments. But for an average person in Oklahoma, it’s not nothing. Median household income in Choctaw County is around $60,000. So we’re talking about roughly 6% of a year’s income — or two months’ rent in a modest apartment. It’s the kind of sum that could cover a major car repair, a medical deductible, or a surprise funeral. And now, because it wasn’t paid on time, it’s being pursued by a third-party debt collector with a law firm on speed dial. What’s wild is that Crown probably paid way less than $3,462.87 to buy this debt. Maybe $500. Maybe $800. So even if they collect half, they’re still making a profit. This isn’t about justice. This is about volume. They’re playing the odds — sue enough people, win enough judgments, and the small wins add up.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t that someone owes money. People do. The absurd part is that a law firm in Wisconsin is suing a guy in Oklahoma over a debt that likely cost pennies to acquire — and doing it with all the seriousness of a murder trial. They want employment records. They’ve got verified statements. They’re citing Oklahoma statutes like they’re arguing constitutional law. All for a debt that probably started with someone buying a mattress or a vacuum cleaner on credit. And let’s be real — if Jared Bell had $3,500 lying around, he probably would’ve just paid it to avoid this whole mess. But now he’s got to either come up with the cash or hire a lawyer to fight a company that does this for a living. It’s David vs. Goliath, if Goliath were a slightly overzealous collections agency with a really good filing system.

Do we root for Jared? Sure. Not because he’s innocent — we don’t know that — but because the whole system feels tilted. A guy misses a payment, the bank sells his debt to a stranger, and suddenly he’s in court with a Wisconsin-based law firm demanding his work history. That’s not justice. That’s bureaucracy weaponized. And while we’re not saying people should dodge their bills, we are saying that suing someone for less than the cost of a decent used car feels… excessive. Like using a flamethrower to light a birthday candle.

So here’s hoping Jared shows up. Here’s hoping he fights back. And here’s hoping, just maybe, he makes Crown Asset Management explain why they’re spending more on postage and paralegal time than they’ll ever see in return. Because in the grand circus of civil court, sometimes the smallest cases tell the loudest stories. And this one? It’s screaming, “Can’t we just talk about this like adults?”

Case Overview

$3,463 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$3,463 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Debt Collection Collection of debt from credit account

Petition Text

389 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHOCTAW COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC ASSIGNEE OF ) Synchroyn Bank (Sync Bank Sport) ) PLAINTIFF, vs. ) ) JARED BELL ) DEFENDANT(S). PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, RAUSCH STURM LLP, and for cause, of action against the Defendant alleges and states the following: 1. Plaintiff is duly and legally organized and is authorized to transact business in the State of Oklahoma. 2. On or about January 23, 2022, Defendant(s) opened a credit account with SYNCHRONY BANK ("Original Creditor"). 3. Defendant(s) used the account and thereby became obligated to pay the balance accrued. Defendant’s(s’) last payment towards the balance occurred on or about August 7, 2023. Defendants(s) thereafter defaulted on Defendant’s(s’) obligation. 4. On or about March 13, 2024, based on Defendant's failure to pay, Defendant's account, then numbered ************2647, was closed and/or charged. The account balance remained due and owing by Defendant. 5. The Original Creditor assigned its rights in Defendant’s account to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current holder of Defendant’s account, and is the sole proper party in interest to bring this lawsuit and to whom the debt is owed. 6. The balance remaining on the credit account, $3,462.87, is presently due and payable in full to Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant(s) in the sum of $3,462.87, plus costs, post-judgment interest, and for all subsequent costs; that the Court order the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC) to produce in writing the employment history for the Defendant for the period specified in Plaintiff’s request; and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem equitable, just, and proper. RAUSCH STURM LLP ATTORNEYS IN THE PRACTICE OF DEBT COLLECTION By: ____________________________ Michael J. Kidman, OBA # 35912 Mailing Address: 300 N. Executive Drive, Suite 200 Brookfield WI 53005 (877) 215-2552 TTY: 711 Fax: (855) 272-3575 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VERIFIED STATEMENT OF COUNSEL I, the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff, pursuant to Oklahoma Statutes Title 12, section 426, state under penalty of perjury under the laws of Oklahoma that the statements made in the foregoing Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed 03/10/2026 , in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Michael J. Kidman, OBA # 35912 This is a communication from a debt collector. This communication is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained from this communication will be used for that purpose. Our File No. 5420638
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.