CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2025-8858

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX. REL. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION v. TIMOTHY M ABELL

Filed: Dec 2, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: the Oklahoma Tax Commission just dropped a $32,000 tax bomb on a man who, by all appearances, just wanted to serve burgers and keep the lights on at his restaurant. No murder, no scandal, no secret affair with a llama—just a stack of unpaid sales taxes so large it could buy a brand-new pickup truck, two fryers, and still leave enough change for a lifetime supply of pickles. This isn’t Breaking Bad, folks. This is Breaking Even—and Timothy M. Abell, owner of Burger Pig LLC, is apparently failing.

So who is Timothy M. Abell? Well, he’s not a shadowy offshore billionaire hiding yachts in the Cayman Islands. He’s not even a guy with a suspiciously large collection of rare orchids funded by unreported fry sales. He’s a small business owner in Oklahoma City, trying to run a burger joint—Burger Pig LLC, which sounds like a place where the menu is 80% bacon and 20% regret. And while we don’t know if the Pig serves truffle fries or just really good grease, we do know this: at some point between flipping patties and balancing receipts, something went sideways. Very sideways. Because now, the full weight of the Oklahoma Tax Commission is bearing down on him like a fry basket full of legal consequences.

Here’s how we got here. In December 2019—yes, that’s six years ago, back when we still thought “supply chain issues” were just a weird phrase from the news—Abell’s business failed to pay its sales tax for that month. Specifically, $8,337 in actual tax went unpaid. That’s not chump change when you’re running a small grill, but it’s also not Fortune 500 level. But here’s where the math starts to spiral like a curly fry on a conveyor belt. The state didn’t just shrug and say, “Eh, maybe next month.” Oh no. They waited, penalties accrued, interest piled on, and by April 2023—over three years later—the bill had ballooned to $13,205. That’s $3,998 in interest, $869 in penalties, $200 in tax warrant penalties, and a cool $36 filing fee, because bureaucracy always finds a way to charge you for the paper it prints your doom on.

Then, the Tax Commission did what tax commissions do best: they turned the debt into a legal weapon. They filed a tax warrant—basically a court-recognized IOU with teeth—and told the county clerk to treat it like a judgment. That means they can now go after Abell’s bank accounts, wages, or even his business equipment if they want. It’s like the IRS, but with more cowboy boots and fewer helicopters. And fast-forward to November 2025—because yes, this thing has been simmering for two more years—and the total unpaid balance has now climbed to $20,531.52. Wait, you thought we were at $13,000? Nope. The interest train never stops, and the Tax Commission is the conductor with a permanent scowl.

But hold on—because the total demand in this case is $32,052.52. Where’d the extra $11,500 come from? The filing doesn’t say. And that’s… weird. The math doesn’t quite add up. Did they include future penalties? Legal fees? A surcharge for “excessive pork consumption”? We don’t know. The petition mentions $20,531.52 as the current unpaid balance, but the relief sought is over $32,000. Either someone’s rounding aggressively, or the state is playing the long game, banking on interest to keep compounding until Abell sells his grill for scrap. Either way, it’s the financial equivalent of a slow cooker: low heat, long time, and eventually, everything’s overdone.

So why are we in court? Because the Oklahoma Tax Commission isn’t just sending polite reminder emails. They’re invoking Title 68 O.S. §231 to §255, which sounds like a secret government code but is actually the state’s legal playbook for collecting tax debts. This lets them treat the tax warrant like a court judgment—meaning they can garnish wages, seize assets, or force Abell to sit in a room and explain, under oath, exactly where all the money went. (Spoiler: probably into buns, beef, and ketchup.) The state isn’t asking for a trial by jury. They’re not demanding punitive damages. They just want their money, plus fees, plus interest, plus penalties, plus whatever else they can legally squeeze out of the situation. It’s not personal. It’s just tax law.

Now, let’s talk about that $32,000. Is it a lot? For a guy running a burger shop in Oklahoma City, absolutely. That’s not just a bad month—it’s a year of bad months. It’s two employees’ salaries. It’s the cost of upgrading your entire kitchen. It’s the difference between staying open and turning the sign to “Closed Forever.” But is it a lot for the state? Not even close. The Oklahoma Tax Commission collects billions in revenue every year. This case is a rounding error in their budget. So why go after one small business owner with the legal fury of a thousand auditors? Maybe because they have to. Maybe because if they don’t chase every dollar, the system collapses. Or maybe—just maybe—because someone in an office in Oklahoma City looked at a spreadsheet and said, “Hey, this guy’s six years late. Time to send in the dogs.”

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t the amount. It’s the timeline. Six years between the original tax period and this lawsuit? Six years of compounding interest, penalties, and legal paperwork, all because $8,337 wasn’t paid in December 2019? That’s not justice. That’s financial alchemy—turning a late payment into a small fortune in debt. And while we’re not saying Abell didn’t owe the money, we are saying that letting a tax bill fester like a forgotten onion ring in a to-go box until it’s worth 400% more? That’s not enforcement. That’s overkill.

We’re rooting for transparency. We’re rooting for a system that doesn’t bury small businesses under bureaucratic interest. And honestly? We’re rooting for the guy who just wanted to run a burger place. Because if Burger Pig closes because of a tax spiral that could’ve been fixed with a phone call in 2020, then we’ve all lost something. Namely, a chance at a really good pig-themed cheeseburger. And in Oklahoma, that’s a tragedy worth litigating.

Case Overview

$32,053 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$32,053 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Collection on outstanding taxes Plaintiff seeks to collect unpaid taxes from Defendant

Petition Text

586 words
In the District Court of Oklahoma County STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX. REL. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY M ABELL SSN XXX-XX-8423 Defendant(s) State of Oklahoma FILED DISTRICT COURT OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA December 2, 2025 1:46 PM RICK WARREN, COURT CLERK Case No. ___Case Number CJ-2025-8858 (To be entered by Court Clerk) Application for State Tax Enforcement COMES NOW the Plaintiff herein and alleges and states as follows: 1. That the Tax Warrant attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference incorporated herein as if set out in full was filed in the County Clerk’s Office, as reflected, by the Plaintiff against the real and personal property of the above-named defendant(s). 2. That the total indebtedness as of the date of said tax warrant(s) was $13,205.00, such indebtedness arising as a result of the Defendant’s failure to pay taxes for the following tax types and periods: Tax Warrant 1045950464 <table> <tr> <th>Tax Type</th> <th>Periods</th> </tr> <tr> <td>SALES</td> <td>2019</td> </tr> </table> 3. That a total indebtedness in the amount of $20,531.52 as of 11-20-25 remains unpaid. 4. That the above-referenced tax warrant(s) have been filed as provided by law and the Oklahoma Tax Commission therefore has all of the remedies and may take all of the proceedings thereon for collection thereof which may be had or taken upon a judgment of the District Court per Title 68 O.S. §231 - §255. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant(s) be ordered to appear at a hearing on assets; that such garnishment action or actions be maintained, or any other actions as are needed against said Defendant(s) in order to collect the full amount of indebtedness, together with interest, penalty, and fees as provided by Title 68 O.S. §217 or other laws, and for the costs of this action. DATED this date: 11-20-25 OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, Plaintiff BY: Scott McGlasson, OBA#20591 Elizabeth Paul, OBA#32714 Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP P.O. Box 950391 Oklahoma City, OK 73195-0391 877-304-6848 / 877-304-6847 (fax) [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Oklahoma Tax Commission 2501 N. Lincoln Blvd. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73194 Oklahoma County FEIN/SSN: ***-**-8423, ****-**-6501 Taxpayer: TIMOTHY M ABELL OF BURGER PIG LLC Tax Warrant: 1045950464 Date Assessed: April 12, 2023 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO: The County Clerk of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Whereas, the above named taxpayer(s) is indebted to the State of Oklahoma for Sales with penalties and interest thereon computed to date, for the period(s) and in the amount(s) as follows: STS-15350026-05 12/01/2019 - 12/31/2019 <table> <tr> <th>Total Tax:</th> <td>$ 8337</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Interest to date of issuance:</th> <td>$ 3998</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Penalties to date of issuance:</th> <td>$ 869</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Tax warrant penalty:</th> <td>$ 200</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Filing Fee:</th> <td>$ 36</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Total Amount Due:</th> <td>$ 13205</td> </tr> </table> Interest continues to accrue on the total tax until paid, and additional penalties may accrue as authorized by Oklahoma Law. Now therefore, you are directed to record and index this warrant in the same manner as a judgement, using the name(s) of the delinquent taxpayer(s) shown above, name of the tax, the amount of the tax, interest and penalties for which the warrant is issued, and the date and time when filed. In witness whereof, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has caused this writ to be subscribed and duly attested, with the seal of said commission affixed this April 14, 2023 EXHIBIT A Oklahoma Tax Commission: [signature] Assistant Secretary County Clerk Retains
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.