CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
GARFIELD COUNTY • CS-2026-164

LVNV Funding LLC v. Ralph Morris

Filed: Mar 17, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the absurdity: a man in Oklahoma is being sued for just over three grand—$3,048.58, to be exactly petty about it—by a company that doesn’t even pretend to be the original lender, but rather a debt-buying firm with a name so generic it sounds like a rejected cryptocurrency startup. LVNV Funding LLC. Say it out loud. LVNV. Sounds like a typo. Or a WiFi network at a sketchy motel. And yet, here we are, in Garfield County District Court, where this faceless financial entity is demanding judgment over a credit account originally issued by Cross River Bank, later sold to something called Pagaya AI Debt Grantor Trust 2022-6—yes, with the “AI” in the name, as if artificial intelligence decided Ralph Morris was a deadbeat—and now, finally, funneled into the waiting arms of LVNV, who’s showing up to court like, “Surprise! We own your debt now. Pay up or we’ll report you to… ourselves.”

So who are these people? Well, Ralph Morris, the defendant, is presumably just a regular guy who once upon a time applied for a credit line—probably a personal loan or maybe a “buy now, pay later” scheme—through Cross River Bank back in February 2023. Maybe he needed cash for car repairs. Maybe he financed a Peloton he never got off the couch to use. Maybe it was a medical bill he couldn’t front-load. We don’t know, and the filing doesn’t care. What we do know is that at some point, Ralph stopped paying. Defaulted. The account went dark. And in the shadowy afterlife of consumer debt, that’s when the vultures—sorry, debt purchasers—started circling.

Enter LVNV Funding LLC, a company that doesn’t lend money so much as it buys up other people’s bad debts for pennies on the dollar, then sues to collect the full amount. They’re not alone—this is an entire industry. There are firms across the country whose business model is essentially: buy defaulted debt, slap your logo on it, and sue. LVNV, based in Florida but operating nationwide, is one of the bigger players. They don’t know Ralph Morris. They’ve never met him. They didn’t assess his creditworthiness. They didn’t send him a single email or birthday card. But now, through the magic of financial securitization and the wild west of debt trading, they claim he owes them $3,048.58, plus interest, plus court costs, plus attorney fees, because capitalism said so.

The story, as told in the dry, robotic language of the petition, goes like this: Cross River Bank gave Ralph credit. Ralph didn’t pay it back. The account defaulted. The debt was assigned—sold, really—to LVNV, or one of its predecessor shell trusts. Then, on April 8, 2024, Portfolio 43453—which includes Ralph’s account—was transferred to LVNV. That’s right. Your debt isn’t just sold. It’s bundled. Like a Netflix subscription, but for lawsuits. Portfolio 43453. Sounds like a spy mission. Instead, it’s a spreadsheet of people who didn’t pay their bills, now packaged and resold to a third-party collector who’s legally allowed to sue in its own name. And because Oklahoma law allows for “petitions for indebtedness” when the facts are straightforward and documented, LVNV didn’t even need to file a mountain of evidence. Just an affidavit. Just a signature from someone named Dimeshia Hook—authorized representative, not a lawyer, not a banker, just a person at a desk somewhere—who swears under penalty of perjury that, yes, according to the records, Ralph owes this money. And that’s enough to file a lawsuit.

So why are they in court? Because LVNV wants a judgment. And a judgment is powerful. It’s not just a “hey, please pay.” It’s a court order saying, “Yes, this debt is valid, and yes, you owe it.” And once they have that, they can garnish wages, freeze bank accounts, or just haunt Ralph’s credit report like a financial ghost. The legal claim here is called a “Petition for Indebtedness,” which is Oklahoma’s way of saying, “We have the paperwork, the amount is clear, and we want the court to rubber-stamp this so we can start collecting.” No jury. No dramatic courtroom showdown. Just paperwork, a judge, and the quiet machinery of debt enforcement grinding forward.

Now, let’s talk about the money. $3,048.58. Is that a lot? Is it a little? Depends on who you ask. For LVNV, it’s probably a rounding error. They likely paid maybe $300 for this debt. If they win, they collect nearly ten times that. That’s the game. But for Ralph Morris? That’s over three grand. That’s a car transmission. That’s six months of groceries. That’s a plane ticket to anywhere nicer than Garfield County in February. And LVNV isn’t just asking for the principal—they want interest from the date of judgment, court costs, and a reasonable attorney’s fee. Which, by the way, is being handled by the law firm Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C.—a real firm, real attorneys, billing real hours to collect on a debt they had nothing to do with creating. The irony is thick enough to spread on toast: a law firm named “Love” is helping a company called “LVNV” sue a guy named Ralph for a debt that’s changed hands more times than a dollar bill in a strip club.

And here’s the kicker: Ralph may not even know about this. He might not have been properly served. He might not show up to court. And if he doesn’t? Default judgment. Automatic win for LVNV. No defense. No explanation. Just a stamp, a record, and a debt that now carries the full weight of the legal system. This is how the debt collection machine chugs along—quietly, efficiently, and with very little drama. No blood. No crime scene tape. Just a spreadsheet, a signature, and a man potentially on the hook for thousands because, somewhere down the line, he missed a payment.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t even the amount—it’s the chain of custody. We’re talking about a financial instrument so far removed from its origin that the original lender might not even remember issuing it. Cross River Bank made a loan. Then a trust with “AI” in the name bought a portfolio of bad debts. Then LVNV bought that portfolio. And now, a law firm is suing Ralph Morris, not because he wronged them, but because they own a piece of paper that says he owes money to someone who sold it to someone who sold it to them. It’s financial telephone. And at the end of the line? A guy in Oklahoma who might have to pay thousands to a company he’s never heard of, for a debt that’s been resold like a cursed antique.

We’re not saying Ralph didn’t owe the original money. Maybe he did. Maybe he maxed out a credit line and ghosted. But the system? The process? It feels less like justice and more like legalized scavenging. And while we’re not rooting for deadbeats, we’re also not thrilled about a world where your debt can be auctioned off, rebranded, and weaponized by a company that couldn’t pick you out of a lineup. If Ralph shows up in court with a receipt proving he paid it, or a letter showing he was in a coma, or even just a solid “I didn’t sign this,” then good for him. But if he doesn’t? Then this case will be another quiet victory in the trillion-dollar shadow economy of debt collection—where the real crime isn’t missing a payment, but being poor in a system designed to punish you for it.

And hey—next time you see “LVNV Funding LLC” on your credit report, don’t panic. Just remember: they’re not your lender. They’re just the latest guy holding the hot potato.

Case Overview

$3,049 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Garfield County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$3,049 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness

Petition Text

548 words
25-50477-0 ZH1 010 LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Ralph Morris, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GARFIELD COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Cross River Bank, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXX9053. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $3,048.58. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $3,048.58, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR GARFIELD COUNTY, OK. LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Ralph Morris Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXX9053 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Ralph Morris by Cross River Bank on or about 02/06/2023. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Pagaya AI Debt Grantor Trust 2022-6. Pagaya AI Debt Grantor Trust 2022-6 later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43453, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 04/08/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $3,048.58 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. [Signature] Dimeshia Hook November 26, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, November 26, 2025. (Notary Public)
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.