CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-898

Mary Vanbeber v. RISHI HOTEL, LLC d/b/a Rodeway Inn and Suites, Baymont by Wyndham and/or Spark by Hilton

Filed: Feb 26, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: most of us have had a hotel stay go sideways—thin walls, sketchy minibar prices, or an AC unit that sounds like a dying T-Rex. But Mary Vanbeber didn’t just get a bad room. She got slammed by one. In a move straight out of a slapstick nightmare, Vanbeber claims she was minding her own business, trying to enter an elevator at a Spark by Hilton in Catoosa, Oklahoma, when the doors suddenly snapped shut on her like something out of a horror movie—knocking her down, knocking her out of commission, and knocking the hotel’s reputation for basic safety right into next week. This wasn’t just a “door closed too fast” situation. According to the lawsuit, it was a full-on mechanical ambush. And now, she’s suing for $75,000. Let’s unpack this ride.

Mary Vanbeber, a Tulsa resident, was staying overnight at the Spark by Hilton on East Admiral Place in February 2025—just one year before she filed this lawsuit, which, let’s note, she did on the anniversary of the incident. Poetic? Or just good calendar management? Either way, she wasn’t there to make friends with the furniture. She was a guest, which legally makes her an “invitee”—a fancy way of saying the hotel owes her a duty of care. And that duty, as we’re about to see, may have been as broken as the elevator.

The hotel itself is operated by two LLCs—Rishi Hotel, LLC and Laxmi Inn, LLC—both of which are named as defendants. They’re the ones running the show, managing the property, and, allegedly, failing to manage the elevator. But here’s where it gets spicy: they’re not the only ones in the hot seat. Oh no. Also dragged into this mess are Otis Elevator Company, Otis Worldwide Corporation, and Otis Americas—the big dogs of vertical transportation, the titans of lift engineering, the people who probably built the elevators in half the skyscrapers you’ve ever been in. If you’ve ever pressed a button and trusted the doors to open, you’ve indirectly trusted Otis. And now? Mary Vanbeber says that trust was violently betrayed.

According to the petition, Vanbeber was attempting to enter the elevator when—bam—the doors closed on her while she was still walking in. Not after. Not when she hesitated. But during. The force of the impact knocked her to the ground. She fell. She got hurt. And, per the filing, she’s been dealing with the fallout ever since: medical bills, pain, mental anguish, and what the lawsuit calls “permanent physical conditions.” That last part is key—this isn’t about a bruised ego or a sore back for a week. The claim suggests lasting damage, the kind that doesn’t just heal with ibuprofen and a Netflix binge.

Now, here’s the kicker: the elevator, the filing says, was “in disrepair,” “malfunctioned,” and posed a “hidden danger.” No warning signs. No caution tape. No “elevator acting up, enter at your own risk” Post-it note slapped on the wall. Just a death trap in plain sight. And Vanbeber’s lawyers argue that the hotel owners should have known—either because they’d been told, or because a reasonable person would’ve noticed something was off. Maybe the doors were twitchy. Maybe other guests complained. Maybe the elevator had a history of playing rough. We don’t know. But the suit says they didn’t fix it. They didn’t warn anyone. And now someone got hurt.

Enter Otis. The lawsuit doesn’t just blame the hotel for poor maintenance—it goes upstream, pointing fingers at the very people who designed, built, and possibly serviced this elevator. Was it a manufacturing defect? A flaw in the sensors? Did the safety mechanisms fail to detect a human body in the doorway? The petition doesn’t spell it out, but it does allege that Otis was negligent in its role—whether in design, installation, or inspection. And in the world of personal injury law, that’s how you spread the blame: make everyone pay attention, because everyone had a hand in the machine.

So why are we here, in Tulsa County District Court, with a jury trial demanded and legal teams sharpening their pencils? Because Vanbeber wants $75,000. Not a million. Not a slap-on-the-wrist $5,000. Seventy-five grand. Is that a lot? For a hotel elevator incident? Depends. If we’re talking about a minor bump and a doctor’s visit, no. But if we’re talking about ongoing medical treatment, lost wages, chronic pain, and long-term disability, then suddenly $75,000 starts to look… reasonable. Especially when you factor in that the lawsuit is asking for past, present, and future medical expenses, plus pain and suffering. This isn’t just about the fall—it’s about what comes after. And in Oklahoma, where jury trials are still a thing in civil cases, that number could go higher if a jury feels the hotel and Otis were truly reckless.

Now, let’s talk about the absurdity. Because yes, there’s absurdity here. We’re not talking about a guest jumping on a bed and breaking a leg. We’re not talking about someone suing because the pool was too cold. This is a functional piece of building infrastructure—an elevator, a machine designed with multiple safety redundancies—allegedly failing in a way that physically assaults a person. And not just failing, but doing so without warning, without accountability, and without immediate correction. That’s not just negligence. That’s a systemic breakdown. And yet, the response? A lawsuit. Because apparently, the only way to get a hotel or a multinational elevator corporation to care is to threaten their wallet.

Here’s what we’re rooting for: transparency. Did this elevator have a history of issues? Were there prior complaints? Did Otis know about a design flaw and stay quiet? Did the hotel ignore maintenance logs because, hey, nobody died yet? We may never get those answers—this could settle quietly, like so many personal injury cases do. But the fact that it’s gone this far, with multiple defendants and a jury demand, suggests Vanbeber and her lawyers aren’t looking for a quick check. They want accountability. And honestly? Good. Because if we can’t trust an elevator door not to assault us in a hotel hallway, what can we trust? The coffee maker? The “do not disturb” sign?

So next time you step into a hotel elevator, take a second. Watch the doors. Make sure they’re not twitching. Because in Catoosa, Oklahoma, one woman learned the hard way that sometimes, the most dangerous part of your trip isn’t the flight, the drive, or even the room service prices. It’s the ride up to the third floor. And if that elevator’s made by Otis? Maybe just take the stairs.

Case Overview

$75,000 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 negligence Injuries sustained due to malfunctioning elevator

Petition Text

794 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA MARY VANBEBER, Plaintiff, v. RISHI HOTEL, LLC, d/b/a RODEWAY INN AND SUITES, BAYMONT BY WYNDHAM and/or SPARK BY HILTON; LAXMI INN, LLC d/b/a SPARK BY HILTON; OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY; OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION; and OTIS AMERICAS, Defendants. DISTRICT COURT Filed FEB 26 2026 DON NEWBERRY, Court Clerk STATE OF OKLA. TULSA COUNTY Case No. CJ-2026-00898 ATTORNEY LIEN CLAIMED REBECCA NIGHTINGALE JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Mary Vanbeber, and for her cause of action against the Defendants, RISHI HOTEL, LLC, d/b/a Rodeway Inn and Suites, Baymont by Wyndham and/or Spark by Hilton, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Rishi Hotel"); Laxmi Inn, LLC d/b/a Spark by Hilton (hereinafter "Laxmi/Spark"); Otis Elevator Company, Otis Worldwide Corporation and Otis Americas (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Otis"), alleges and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff Mary Vanbeber is a resident of Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. 2. Defendant Rishi Hotel is a limited liability company doing business in the State of Oklahoma, with an office located at 11604 E. 76th St. N., Owasso, Oklahoma 74055. 3. Defendant Laxmi Inn, LLC d/b/a Spark by Hilton is a limited liability company doing business in the State of Oklahoma, with an office located at 3048 N. Grand Blvd., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107. 4. Defendant Otis is a foreign for-profit corporation doing business in the State of Oklahoma, with its principal office located at One Carrier Place, Farmington, Connecticut 06032. 5. Plaintiff alleges injuries sustained as a result of the subject incident that occurred in Catoosa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, giving this Court proper jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter. 6. Venue is proper with this Court. 7. At all relevant times, Defendant Rishi Hotel and/or Laxmi/Spark owned and operated the “Spark by Hilton” hotel located at 18725 E. Admiral Pl., Catoosa, Oklahoma 74015 (hereinafter, the “Hotel”). 8. On or about February 26, 2025, Plaintiff was an invitee and overnight guest at the Hotel. The Hotel was under the exclusive possession and control of Defendant Rishi Hotel and/or Laxmi/Spark. 9. Within the Hotel was an elevator system that was a fixture and part of the functional design of the hotel building. Defendant Rishi Hotel and/or Laxmi/Spark were responsible for the lawful operation, maintenance, and use of said elevator by those lawfully in the Hotel, including Plaintiff. 10. Defendant Otis participated in the design, engineering, manufacturing, construction, maintenance, inspection and/or installation of the elevator located within the Hotel premises. 11. On the date set forth above, Plaintiff attempted to enter the elevator car. As she was doing so, the elevator door suddenly and unexpectedly closed on Plaintiff and contacted her body, causing her to fall to the ground and become injured. 12. Unbeknownst to Plaintiff, the elevator in question was in disrepair, malfunctioned, and posed a hidden danger to Plaintiff and all foreseeable passengers. 13. There were no warnings placed on or near the malfunctioning elevator. 14. Defendant Rishi Hotel and/or Laxmi/Spark knew or should have reasonably known of the existence of the malfunctioning elevator within its premises and taken steps to eliminate the hazard and/or warn foreseeable users of the hazard but negligently failed to remedy the hazard or warn of the same. 15. Defendant Rishi Hotel and/or Laxmi/Spark breached its duty to Plaintiff to use ordinary care to keep its premises in a reasonably safe condition. 16. Defendant Rishi Hotel and/or Laxmi/Spark further breached its duty when it and/or its employees and/or agents knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, of the hazardous condition and failed to take steps to eliminate the hazard and/or warn foreseeable occupants of the dangerous condition. 17. Defendant Otis was negligent in its supervision of the design, engineering, manufacturing, construction, maintenance, inspection and/or installation of the elevator located within the Hotel’s premises. 18. Defendant Otis’ negligent acts, in whole or combination with other’s negligent acts, directly caused serious and permanent injury to Plaintiff. 19. As a result of the negligence of the Defendants, Plaintiff suffered legal damages including, but not limited to, medical expenses past, present, and future, disability, physical pain and mental anguish, and permanent physical conditions, all in an amount in excess of $75,000. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants in an amount in excess of the amount required for diversity jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1332 of Title 28 of the United States Code, in addition to judgment interest, costs, attorney fees, and all other relief available to Plaintiffs or otherwise deemed just and equitable by this Court. Respectfully submitted, [signature] Michael J. O’Rear, OBA No. 31178 Michael P. Martin, OBA No. 22225 MARTIN JEAN JACKSON MARTIN & PEACH P.O. Box 1089 Stillwater, OK 74076 405/377-5000 Telephone 405/377-5011 Facsimile [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.