CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-1124

Raymond M. Garcia and Dorothy K. Garcia, Trustees v. DND Central, Inc. & All Occupants

Filed: Mar 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a business in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, allegedly owes its landlords over fifty grand in rent and fees—$50,811.07 to be exactly annoying—and now the whole thing has escalated to the point where lawyers are demanding the courts kick them out like bouncers at a sketchy karaoke bar. This isn’t some squatter situation or a sob story about pandemic hardships—it’s a full-blown commercial lease dumpster fire, and we’re here for every petty, dollar-sign-strewn second of it.

Meet Raymond and Dorothy Garcia, the landlord duo operating as trustees (which basically means they’re managing this property on behalf of a trust, probably because someone once Googled “how to sound fancy and avoid probate” at 2 a.m.). They own a commercial property at 3120 W Kenosha Street in Broken Arrow—uninspiring strip mall real estate, likely home to things like vape shops, nail salons with flickering neon signs, or maybe even a struggling sandwich franchise. The Garcias aren’t trying to be villains here. They’re not sending eviction notices because they woke up one day and decided to ruin someone’s life. No, they’re just trying to collect what they’re owed. And boy, are they owed.

On the other side of this legal slap-fight is DND Central, Inc.—a name that, let’s be honest, sounds like a startup founded by a guy who still uses Comic Sans unironically. The name evokes images of dice tumbling across a table, half-eaten pizza, and the faint smell of Mountain Dew Baja Blast. Is this a gaming café? A hobby shop for people who argue about whether elves should get +2 to dexterity? The court filing doesn’t say, but the address suggests it’s not exactly a Fortune 500 operation. And yet, despite the nerdy name, this is a registered Oklahoma corporation, which means someone filed paperwork, paid fees, and probably thought they were building an empire. Instead, they’re now being sued for failing to pay two months’ rent—February and March of 2026—and racking up a bill that somehow ballooned to over fifty thousand dollars. Let that sink in: two months. Two. Months.

So what happened? Well, according to the Garcias’ attorney, Brian R. Huddleston (who, by the way, has a law office email that’s literally his first name at his last name dot law—bold move, sir), DND Central signed a commercial lease back on July 13, 2022. That’s not yesterday. That’s nearly four years of potential landlord-tenant harmony. But somewhere between campaign sessions and inventory restocks, things went off the rails. The Garcias claim that starting February 1, 2026, DND Central stopped paying rent. Not just base rent, mind you, but also late fees and their share of property taxes—because in commercial leases, tenants often eat those costs like hors d'oeuvres at a sad office party.

Now, commercial leases aren’t like your apartment agreement. There’s no “I’ll pay you next week, I swear” grace period. These are contracts with teeth. And when a business stops paying, the landlord doesn’t just sigh and light a candle. They send notices. They follow legal procedures. And in this case, the Garcias did exactly that. They sent a formal “pay or quit” notice—required under Oklahoma law—via certified mail and posted it on the property like a passive-aggressive eviction poster. It’s the legal equivalent of putting up a “you’re done” sign on your ex’s front door. And DND Central? They didn’t pay. They didn’t leave. They just… stayed. Like a guest who crashes on your couch and starts treating your Netflix password like a permanent benefit of friendship.

That’s when the gloves came off. The Garcias, through their trust and their no-nonsense attorney, filed a lawsuit in Tulsa County District Court. And it’s not just about the money—though, let’s be clear, $50,811.07 is not chump change. That’s enough to buy a new Tesla, fund a very lavish wedding, or, in this case, cover two months of unpaid rent plus fees and taxes on a commercial space that probably wasn’t even that big. But the Garcias aren’t just suing for cash. They’re also demanding immediate possession of the property. Translation: get out. Now. Vacate. Hand over the keys. Stop using our lights, our water, and our property taxes as if you own the place.

The legal claims here are straightforward, even if the dollar amount feels wild. The Garcias are alleging breach of contract—specifically, breach of the lease agreement—because DND Central failed to pay what they owed. That’s lawsuit 101. But they’re also filing for forcible entry and detainer, which sounds like something from a medieval siege but is actually just Oklahoma’s legal term for “you’re trespassing now, buddy.” It’s the court’s way of saying, “You had rights, but you blew them, so scram.” And if the Garcias win, the court can issue an order forcing DND Central to vacate, possibly even with the help of the sheriff. Picture it: employees showing up to work one morning and finding a lock change and a court order taped to the door. Awkward.

What do the Garcias want? Well, first, they want their building back. Second, they want every penny owed: $50,811.07, plus any additional rent that piles up between March 2026 and the trial date (because yes, interest and rent keep accruing even while you’re getting sued). Third, they’re reserving the right to ask for more money later—like repair costs or expenses to re-rent the space—because commercial tenants sometimes leave behind more than just memories. And finally, they want their attorney’s fees and court costs, which is standard in lease agreements and basically the legal version of “you broke it, you bought it… and you’re paying for me to tell you that.”

Now, is $50,811.07 a lot for two months of rent? Depends. If this was a 10,000-square-foot warehouse in a prime location, maybe not. But if it’s a 1,200-square-foot storefront in a fading strip mall, that’s… a lot. Like, “did they charge rent by the square foot or by the dragon slain?” levels of a lot. That kind of number suggests either an extremely expensive lease, massive late fees piling up, or property tax obligations that got dumped on the tenant and went unpaid for a while. Or maybe—just maybe—DND Central stopped paying months before February and this is the accumulated total. The petition only specifies the Feb-March 2026 period, but that doesn’t mean it’s the only period. The Garcias might be starting their claim there for legal reasons, but the full debt could be older, deeper, and messier.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t the amount, the name, or even the fact that a business called DND Central couldn’t keep up with rent. It’s the sheer audacity of just… staying. Not paying, not communicating, not negotiating—just ghosting the landlord and treating the property like it’s theirs forever. In any adult relationship—romantic, business, or tenant-landlord—there’s a basic rule: if you can’t pay, you talk. You explain. You try to work something out. You don’t just vanish and hope the problem goes away. And now, DND Central isn’t just on the hook for rent—they’re facing a public lawsuit, potential eviction, and a giant legal bill. All because they apparently thought “no news is good news” applied to commercial real estate.

We’re not rooting for blood. We’re not hoping the owners get dragged out in handcuffs or that someone loses their life savings. But we are rooting for accountability. For basic adulting. For the idea that when you sign a contract—especially one with a name like “Commercial Lease Agreement”—you actually intend to, you know, follow it. Because if DND Central can just ignore their obligations and camp out indefinitely, what’s to stop every other tenant from doing the same? Next thing you know, we’ll have yoga studios squatting in bank vaults and food trucks claiming eminent domain on parking lots.

So here’s to the Garcias, fighting the good fight for property rights and timely payments. And here’s to DND Central, Inc.—may your next campaign roll be a natural 20… because you’re gonna need it.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$50,811 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Breach of Lease Agreement and Forcible Entry and Detainer Tenant failed to pay rent and late fees, leading to breach of lease agreement and forcible entry and detainer

Petition Text

530 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA RAYMOND M. GARCIA AND DOROTHY K. GARCIA, TRUSTEES, Plaintiff, vs. DND CENTRAL, INC., & All Occupants, Defendant. PETITION FOR BREACH OF LEASE AGREEMENT AND FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, RAYMOND M. GARCIA AND DOROTHY K. GARCIA, TRUSTEES ("Landlord") and for its cause of action against the Defendant, DND CENTRAL, INC., and all occupants of the premises, alleges and states as follows: 1. Plaintiffs own the leased premises and are doing business in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 2. This is an action to recover money due under a Commercial Lease in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. 3. DND CENTRAL, INC., is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Oklahoma, and doing business in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and is the Tenant leasing real property at 3120 W Kenosha St, Broken Arrow, OK 74012 (hereinafter referred to as the "Property") under a commercial Lease Agreement, dated July 13, 2022 (the "Lease"). 4. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter herein. 5. For the period February 1, 2026, through March 31, 2026, Tenant has failed to pay the Base Rent, Late Fees, and Property Taxes in the total amount of $50,811.07 as provided for in the Lease and such failure is ongoing. 6. Tenant, having wrongfully failed and refused to pay the Rent and late fees due and owing without demand, is therefore in default. 7. Plaintiff will also be damaged by unpaid rent accrued and accruing through to the date of trial, and the cost to relet the Property, and reserves the right to amend the petition to make a claim for repair and reletting costs should there be any after possession is obtained. 8. The defendants are wrongfully in possession of the Property, and Plaintiff is entitled to possession thereof and has made demand on the defendants to vacate the premises, but the defendants have refused to do so. 9. Pursuant to 41 O.S. §§ 6 & 9 of the OKLAHOMA LANDLORD TENANT ACT, Landlord sent Tenant, via certified mail, and posted at a conspicuous place on said premises, a notice to pay rent or quit, but Tenant has refused to do either and is wrongfully in possession and holding over after Landlord’s termination of the lease. 10. Landlord is entitled to its costs, which include a reasonable attorney fee. WHEREFORE, upon trial of this cause, Plaintiffs, RAYMOND M. GARCIA AND DOROTHY K. GARCIA, TRUSTEES, demand judgment in their favor and against Defendant, DND CENTRAL, INC., and all occupants, for: A. Immediate possession of the real property at 3120 W Kenosha St, Broken Arrow, OK 74012; B. Actual damages for past due rent and late fees in the amount of $50,811.07, plus accrued and accruing rent and late fees through to the date of trial; C. Damages for past and future rent for the remainder of the term of the Lease in a total amount to be proven at trial; D. Damages for repairs and re-leasing expenses to be proven at trial; E. Plus costs, interest, and a reasonable attorney fee, plus any other relief the Court deems just and reasonable. DATED this 11th day of March 2026. Respectfully submitted, [signature] Brian R. Huddleston, OBA 13295 Huddleston Law Offices, PLLC 4527 East 91st Street Tulsa, OK 74137 918-237-3857 [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.