CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
OKLAHOMA COUNTY • CJ-2026-2950

LVNV Funding LLC v. Quinton Jones

Filed: Apr 20, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a debt collector is suing a man in Oklahoma for $11,035.32—over a credit account he might not even remember opening, passed through at least three corporate hands like a hot potato, and now being pursued by a company that wasn’t even born when he supposedly racked up the balance. That’s right—this isn’t a crime saga about a stolen diamond or a missing person. This is modern American capitalism at its most deliciously absurd: a ghost of a debt, chasing a man through the corporate ether.

Meet Quinton Jones, an ordinary guy living in Oklahoma, whose name now appears on a court docket not because he robbed a bank or ran a red light into a politician’s limo, but because, somewhere around December 2022, he allegedly opened a credit account with Cross River Bank. You know Cross River? Probably not. They’re one of those fintech lenders that power online credit products—think Affirm, Klarna, or the “Buy Now, Pay Later” button you impulsively click when ordering noise-canceling headphones at 2 a.m. No photos of Quinton have surfaced. No dramatic backstory about a gambling problem or a failed avocado toast empire. Just a name, a Social Security number, and a credit line that went south.

Now, enter the plaintiff: LVNV Funding LLC. Sounds like a tech startup, right? Nope. It’s a debt buyer—a company that specializes in purchasing delinquent accounts for pennies on the dollar and then suing people to collect the full amount. LVNV doesn’t do customer service. It doesn’t do empathy. It does lawsuits. And lots of them. In fact, if you’ve ever been sued for an old credit card debt in the last decade, there’s a solid chance LVNV was the name on the petition. They’re the cockroaches of the debt collection world—ubiquitous, resilient, and always showing up when you least want them.

Here’s how the money trail probably went down: Quinton uses his credit line. He stops paying. Cross River Bank writes it off as a loss—standard procedure. Then, like a foreclosure auction for debt, the account gets bundled into a portfolio—Portfolio 44190, to be exact—and sold to Pagaya AI Debt Grantor Trust 2022-3. Yes, that’s a real name. Yes, it sounds like a cryptocurrency scam dreamed up by a robot. Pagaya—short for “Pagaya Technologies,” a fintech debt marketplace—buys these portfolios, often using algorithms to assess risk and return. Then, in August 2024, they sell Quinton’s debt to LVNV Funding LLC, who now legally owns the right to sue him for every last penny.

Fast-forward to February 17, 2026. A document drops in Oklahoma County District Court. Not a dramatic 911 call. Not a bloody shirt in evidence. Just a Petition for Indebtedness—legalese for “Hey, this guy owes us money.” Attached is an affidavit signed by Dimeshia Hook, an “Authorized Representative” of LVNV, swearing that, based on their business records (which are “regularly and contemporaneously maintained”), Quinton owes $11,035.32. No itemized bill. No text messages begging for payment. No proof Quinton ever saw this debt collector’s name before today. Just a number, a notary stamp, and a law firm—Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C.—ready to litigate.

So why are they in court? Because debt collection in America is less about negotiation and more about paperwork and pressure. LVNV is filing what’s called a “liquidated damages” claim—meaning they’re asking the court for a specific amount of money they say is owed. The legal theory is simple: “You borrowed. You didn’t pay. We own the debt now. Pay up.” No fraud allegations. No breach of contract drama. Just cold, hard math—if the records say $11,035.32, that’s what the court should order.

But here’s the kicker: the court doesn’t care why Quinton defaulted. Did he lose his job? Was there a medical emergency? Did he dispute the charges from day one? None of that matters in this filing. This isn’t Judge Judy. This is the legal equivalent of an automated email: “Your account is overdue. Pay now or we will sue.” And guess what? They did.

Now, about that number: $11,035.32. Is that a lot? Well, it’s not chump change. It’s more than the average American has in their checking account. It’s a used car, a solid chunk of a down payment, or a year’s worth of Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+ subscriptions. But in the grand economy of debt collection, it’s not unusual. LVNV sues for this amount all the time—sometimes more, sometimes less. What is unusual is the silence. No counterclaims. No public response from Quinton Jones. No media circus. Just a man, a number, and a machine-like legal process grinding forward.

And that’s where we, the audience, come in—because while we’re entertainers, not lawyers, we can’t help but side-eye the whole operation. The most absurd part? Not that someone owes money. People do. The absurdity is in the chain of custody. A loan made by one company, sold to a trust with a name that sounds like a rejected Marvel villain, then flipped to a debt buyer who’s never met Quinton Jones, doesn’t know his story, and couldn’t pick him out of a lineup—but feels fully justified dragging him into court anyway.

We’re not rooting for deadbeats. We’re rooting for sense. For a system that doesn’t treat debt like a game of hot potato between faceless corporations while real people get garnished, denied loans, or shamed in court for balances they may not even recognize. We’re rooting for a world where if you’re going to sue someone for eleven grand, you at least try to call them first. Or send a letter that doesn’t look like it was generated by an AI trained on 10,000 collection notices.

But that’s not how this game works. This is the American debt machine: efficient, impersonal, and always profitable—for someone. Maybe Quinton will show up in court with a receipt proving he paid. Maybe he’ll settle for less. Maybe he’ll ignore it, get a default judgment, and wake up to a wage garnishment. We don’t know. What we do know is this: in a country where student loans, medical bills, and credit card debt total over $10 trillion, cases like this aren’t the exception. They’re the norm. And the craziest part? Nobody’s even surprised anymore.

Case Overview

$11,035 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$11,035 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness Debt collection

Petition Text

555 words
26-02165-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. ) ) ) Quinton Jones, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Cross River Bank, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXX5510. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $11,035.32. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $11,035.32, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Quinton Jones Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXX5510 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Quinton Jones by Cross River Bank on or about 12/20/2022. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Pagaya Al Debt Grantor Trust 2022-3. Pagaya Al Debt Grantor Trust 2022-3 later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 44190, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 08/07/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $11,035.32 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Dimeshia Hook February 17, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Tuesday, February 17, 2026. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.