CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
KIOWA COUNTY • CS-2026-00033

Resurgent Secured Assets LLC v. Waitus D Corn

Filed: Apr 27, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: in the grand tradition of American petty drama, few things are more gloriously mundane than a man in rural Oklahoma being sued for $7,123.76 over a credit card he definitely used but probably forgot about—because who doesn’t lose sleep over Navy Federal Credit Union account number ending in 1888?

Enter Resurgent Secured Assets LLC, a name so generic it sounds like a rejected villain from a Mission: Impossible spin-off, versus Waitus D. Corn, who—bless his heart—has a name that reads like a forgotten outlaw from the Wild West or a character option in Red Dead Redemption 2. This isn’t a showdown with six-shooters or saloon brawls. No, this is 21st-century frontier justice: a debt collection lawsuit filed in Kiowa County, Oklahoma, population barely enough to fill a high school gym. The stakes? Just over seven grand, some interest, and the crushing weight of capitalism’s paper trail.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Resurgent Secured Assets LLC—a debt buyer, which is a fancy way of saying they don’t create anything, sell anything, or lend money to friends in need. Instead, they buy up other people’s bad debts for pennies on the dollar and then sue to collect the full amount. Think of them as financial vultures with law degrees and a P.O. box in Oklahoma City. Their legal team? A full cavalry of attorneys from Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C.—yes, Love—because nothing says “ruthless collections” like a law firm named after a rom-com. William L. Nixon, Jr. himself signed this petition, like a gunslinger etching his name in the courthouse dust.

On the other side: Waitus D. Corn. We don’t know much about him—no criminal record cited, no wild backstory, no evidence he’s a fugitive or a TikTok star. Just a guy, presumably living his life in Kiowa County, where the nearest Starbucks is probably a two-hour drive and the biggest scandal is someone letting their cows loose on Highway 62. At some point in 2019—specifically May 24, because someone at Resurgent really likes paperwork—Waitus opened a credit account with Navy Federal Credit Union. That’s the military’s credit union, by the way, so unless Waitus was in uniform or married to someone who was, this card was his golden ticket to consumerism. Maybe he bought tires. Maybe he financed a hunting rifle. Maybe it was a string of fast-food runs after a long week of ranch work. We’ll never know. But we do know he stopped paying.

And here’s where the financial conveyor belt kicks in. Navy Federal, like most lenders, doesn’t sit around waiting for people to come back with their wallets. They sell the deadbeat accounts—sorry, “non-performing receivables”—to companies like Resurgent. It’s like a used car auction, but for debt. On September 16, 2024, Resurgent or one of its shadowy predecessors bought a whole portfolio—Portfolio 44451, if you’re taking notes—containing Waitus’s account, along with who knows how many others. At that moment, the debt didn’t disappear. It just changed hands, like a hot potato wrapped in legal jargon.

Fast forward to February 17, 2026—just your average Tuesday in Kiowa County—and Resurgent files this lawsuit. The paperwork is clean, almost too clean. They’ve got an affidavit signed by one John Wright, self-described “Authorized Representative” (a title so vague it could mean anything from CEO to guy-who-answered-the-phone-once). He swears under oath that yes, the records show Waitus owes $7,123.76, and yes, they’ve already asked for payment and waited the full 30 days because even debt collectors have to follow the rules when they want a judge on their side.

Now, let’s talk about what’s actually happening in court. The legal claim? “Indebtedness.” That’s legalese for “you owe us money, and we have the receipts.” No fraud, no breach of contract drama, no he-said-she-said over a broken promise. Just cold, hard math: $7,123.76, plus interest from the date of judgment, plus court costs, plus a “reasonable attorney’s fee,” which is code for “please let us bill by the hour.” This isn’t a jury trial—no dramatic cross-examinations or surprise witnesses. It’s a default judgment waiting to happen, assuming Waitus doesn’t show up. And honestly? The odds are not in his favor. In small-town debt cases like this, if the defendant doesn’t file a response, the plaintiff wins by default. It’s less Law & Order, more Judge Judy on a budget.

So what does Resurgent want? $7,123.76. Is that a lot? In New York or San Francisco, maybe not. But in Kiowa County, where the median household income hovers around $40,000 and the idea of “disposable income” is more myth than reality, $7,000 is a used truck, a year’s worth of vet bills for livestock, or a down payment on a trailer that doesn’t leak when it rains. For Resurgent, though? That’s a rounding error. They probably bought Waitus’s debt for less than $2,000. So even if they only collect half, they’re still in the black. That’s the machine: buy low, sue high, profit.

And here’s our take: the most absurd part isn’t that a man named Waitus D. Corn is being sued. It’s not even that a corporation with “Secured Assets” in its name is acting like it’s done something noble by purchasing someone’s credit card debt. No, the absurdity is in the scale of it all. A multi-attorney law firm, a notarized affidavit, a district court filing, all triggered by less than eight grand. There’s something almost Shakespearean in the tragedy of it—except instead of star-crossed lovers, it’s a credit union, a debt buyer, and a man whose biggest crime might’ve been forgetting to cancel a card after a life change. Did Waitus lose his job? Move? Get sick? We don’t know. The filing doesn’t care. It only sees a number.

We’re not rooting for the debt collectors. We’re not even sure we’re rooting for Waitus—though we’d like to. We’re rooting for the idea that not every financial stumble deserves a court summons. That maybe, just maybe, in a country where people are one medical bill away from ruin, we could have a system that doesn’t treat $7,000 like a capital offense.

But hey—that’s just us. Over at Love, Beal & Nixon? They’re already drafting the next petition. Portfolio 44452 is waiting. And somewhere, another John Wright is signing another affidavit.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if this were a TV show, we’d call it Small Claims, Big Feelings.

Case Overview

$7,124 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
DISTRICT COURT OF KIOWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$7,124 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 INDEBTEDNESS Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendant for $7,123.76

Petition Text

559 words
26-01863-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF KIOWA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Resurgent Secured Assets LLC, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. Waitus D Corn, ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Navy Federal Credit Union, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXX1888. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $7,123.76. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $7,123.76, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR KIOWA COUNTY, OK Resurgent Secured Assets LLC Plaintiff vs. Waitus D Corn Defendant(s) _______________________________ PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for Resurgent Secured Assets LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXX1888 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Waitus D Corn by Navy Federal Credit Union on or about 05/24/2019. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Navy Federal Credit Union. Navy Federal Credit Union later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 44451, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 09/16/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $7,123.76 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. __________________________________________ John Wright February 17, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Tuesday, February 17, 2026. __________________________________________ (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.