CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-640

Tristan Kavanaugh v. Creek County Emergency Ambulance Service District

Filed: Feb 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: this isn’t your run-of-the-mill fender-bender drama. We’re not talking about a dented bumper and an awkward insurance call. No, this is a full-blown legal cage match over who gets to keep the money from a car crash settlement — and there are nine defendants, including an ambulance service, a medical center, four different medical billing entities, and two mystery players literally named “John Doe” and “Jane Doe,” which sounds less like a court case and more like the opening scene of a bad noir thriller. Welcome to the Tulsa County Civil War, where the battlefield is a settlement fund and the weapons are liens, legalese, and the quiet desperation of medical bill collectors.

Meet Tristan Kavanaugh — our plaintiff, our protagonist, the poor soul who, on July 30, 2025, found himself in a motor vehicle collision that was apparently serious enough to involve not just one, but multiple medical providers across the Creek and Tulsa County area. We don’t know the details of the crash — whether he T-boned a minivan, got rear-ended by a distracted Tesla owner, or was sideswiped by someone filming a TikTok — but we do know this: someone was at fault (the “tortfeasor,” as the filing so elegantly puts it), and that someone — or their insurance company — coughed up a settlement. That’s usually the happy ending. But not here. Oh no. In this story, the happy ending got lawyered to death.

Because while Tristan was probably just hoping to recover from his injuries and move on, the medical industrial complex had other plans. Enter: the defendants. And what a lineup it is. First, Creek County Emergency Ambulance Service District — yes, a government ambulance service — which likely showed up, stabilized him, and then quietly sent a bill that could probably buy a small island. Then there’s Advanced Orthopedics of Oklahoma, PLLC — the kind of place where you go when your spine looks like a pretzel after impact. Emergency Medicine Physicians of Tulsa County? That’s your ER doc crew, the ones who stitched you up at 3 a.m. while muttering about their student loans. Ascension St. John Medical Center, Inc. — a full-blown hospital, which means someone got admitted, scanned, poked, prodded, and possibly billed for the oxygen they breathed. Envision Imaging of Tulsa? That’s your MRI, your CT scan, the glowing images of your internal trauma. The Phia Group, LLC? Sounds like a wellness startup, but in reality, they’re a third-party claims administrator — the shadowy middlemen who handle medical billing disputes. 90 Degree Benefits? Another insurance-adjacent entity, possibly a health benefits manager. And then, just to keep things spicy, we have John Doe (an individual) and Jane Doe (a business), because apparently, even the plaintiff’s lawyer wasn’t sure who else might try to claim a piece of this pie. It’s like the medical billing version of Clue: “It was Colonel Mustard, in the ambulance, with the lien!”

So what happened? Well, Tristan settled with the at-fault driver’s insurance. That means money changed hands — not a fortune, but enough to matter: under $75,000, according to the petition. But instead of that money going straight to him, a parade of providers came forward saying, “Hold up — we patched him up, we get paid.” And in Oklahoma, that’s actually a thing. Medical providers can assert liens on settlement funds, meaning they can legally claim a portion of any payout you get from a car accident if they treated you for injuries related to it. It’s meant to ensure they don’t get stiffed when patients settle without paying their medical bills. But here’s the twist: Tristan’s lawyer is arguing that his lien — the attorney’s lien — is superior to the hospitals’ and doctors’ liens. That’s right. The lawyer is saying, “I helped get this money. Without me, there is no settlement. So my cut comes first.”

And that’s why we’re here. This isn’t a lawsuit about who caused the crash. It’s not even really about whether Tristan got hurt. It’s a declaratory judgment action — a fancy legal way of saying, “Your Honor, please tell us who gets what, because everyone’s fighting like raccoons in a dumpster.” The court is being asked to step in and allocate the settlement funds “justly and equitably” — which in real human terms means: who walks away with cash, and who gets left holding an unpaid invoice?

Now, let’s talk about that number: under $75,000. Is that a lot? In the grand scheme of personal injury settlements, it’s not exactly life-changing. For context, a single night in the ICU can cost more than $20,000. An MRI? Couple grand. Orthopedic surgery? We’re talking tens of thousands. So if Tristan racked up serious medical treatment, that $75k might evaporate faster than cheap perfume in July. But here’s the thing — he’s not asking for damages from the defendants. He’s asking the court to protect what’s left of his settlement from being vacuumed up by medical liens. He wants a declaration that his attorney’s lien takes priority. And if the court agrees, it could mean the difference between him keeping a few thousand dollars — maybe enough to fix his car, pay rent, or just breathe easy for a minute — and walking away with nothing after the bills are paid.

Which brings us to the real question: who do we root for? On one hand, medical providers deserve to be paid. They showed up. They treated him. They kept him alive. But on the other hand, this feels like the legal version of vultures circling a single chicken wing. We’ve got a government ambulance district, a hospital, imaging centers, billing middlemen — all scrambling for a cut of a modest settlement from a guy who just got in a car wreck. And let’s not forget: the insurance company that caused the crash? The one that paid the settlement? They’re not here. They’re long gone, check cashed, risk mitigated. Meanwhile, Tristan is stuck in court, fighting not against the person who hit him, but against the very people who were supposed to help him heal.

The most absurd part? That “John Doe” and “Jane Doe” are still in the case. Like, did someone forget to file the right paperwork? Is this just a legal placeholder in case another phantom biller emerges from the shadows next year? It’s like the lawsuit equivalent of “To Whom It May Concern.” And yet, here we are, in a Tulsa County courtroom, potentially resolving a dispute that hinges on liens, statutes, and the pecking order of who gets paid first when the money runs out.

Look, we’re not saying Tristan shouldn’t pay his medical bills. But this case reeks of a system that punishes the injured twice — once in the crash, and again in the paperwork. The ambulance shows up, saves your life, then sues you for the privilege. The hospital stitches you back together, then fights your lawyer over who gets the last dollar. And the guy in the middle? He just wanted to walk without pain again.

So here’s our take: if this case teaches us anything, it’s that getting hit by a car is only the beginning. The real accident happens when the bills start arriving. And in Oklahoma, apparently, you don’t just need a doctor after a crash. You need a war chest.

Case Overview

$74,999 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$74,999 Monetary
Declaratory Relief
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Declaratory Judgment Allocation of settlement funds

Petition Text

331 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA TRISTAN KAVANAUGH, Plaintiff v. 1. CREEK COUNTY EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE DISTRICT, a Domestic Trade Name Entity; 2. ADVANCED ORTHOPEDICS OF OKLAHOMA, PLLC, a Domestic Limited Liability Company Professional, a Domestic Trade Name Entity; 3. EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIANS OF TULSA COUNTY, LLC, a/k/a and/or d/b/a EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIANS OF TULSA COUNTY, PLLC, a/k/a and/or d/b/a EMP OF TULSA COUNTY, a Domestic Limited Liability Company; 4. ASCENSION ST. JOHN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a/k/a and/or d/b/a ST. JOHN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a Domestic Not for Profit Corporation 5. ENVISION IMAGING OF TULSA a/k/a and/or d/b/a IMAGING PARTNERS OF TULSA, LLC, a Domestic Limited Liability Company; 6. THE PHIA GROUP, LLC, a/k/a and/or d/b/a THE PHIA GROUP, a/k/a and/or d/b/a PHIA, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; 7. 90 DEGREE BENEFITS, an Insurance Company; 8. JOHN DOE, an individual, and 9. JANE DOE, a business entity, Defendants. Case No. CJ-2026- The Honorable PETITION 1. Plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle collision on July 30, 2025. 2. Plaintiff reached a settlement with the tortfeasor and the tortfeasor insurance company. 3. Defendants allege and/or may allege an interest in the settlement funds. 4. Pursuant to Oklahoma law including 12 O.S. § 1651, et seg., this Court has jurisdiction to allocate the recovery between Plaintiff and Defendants. 5. Plaintiff properly asserts liens for fees and costs per Oklahoma law, including but not limited to 5 O.S. Sec. 6 et seq. 6. Plaintiff's attorney lien is superior to a hospital and/or medical provider lien per Oklahoma law. 7. Plaintiff requests that this Court enter a declaratory judgment and for a just and equitable allocation of the settlement funds. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendants for the sum of under $75,000, interests, fees, and costs. Respectfully submitted, [Signature] John Paul Truskett, OBA #20550 Truskett Law Firm, PLLC 2921 E. 91st Street S., Ste. 100 Tulsa, OK 74137 (918) 392-5444 Fax: (918) 856-3676 [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.