CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CANADIAN COUNTY • CS-2026-651

LVNV Funding LLC v. Austin Wolf

Filed: Mar 17, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a debt collector is suing a man named Austin Wolf—yes, that’s his real name—for $1,770.38. That’s not a typo. The decimal matters. This is not a typo. This is not a prank. This is Oklahoma civil court, where the legal system has been weaponized not for justice, but for rounding up loose change from forgotten credit card bills like some kind of financial Pac-Man chomping on expired plastic.

Now, who are these people? On one side, we’ve got LVNV Funding LLC, which sounds like a shadowy offshore investment firm from a John Grisham novel, but in reality is just another in a long line of debt buyers—companies that purchase defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then sue to collect the full amount. They don’t care about your story, your hardship, or the fact that you once cried while paying off your Best Buy credit card. They care about balance sheets. LVNV is represented by the law firm Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., which, let’s be honest, sounds like a trio of 1980s Miami detectives who moonlight as repo men. Their attorney on file? William L. Nixon, Jr.—a man whose name alone suggests he was born to send collection letters and depose people about late payments.

On the other side: Austin Wolf. Just Austin. Just Wolf. No middle name dropped in the filing, no title, no backstory—just a guy who, at some point in 2022, got a credit card from Credit One Bank, N.A., presumably to buy something mildly irresponsible (a Peloton? A gaming console? A very expensive dog?), and then stopped paying it. Now, nearly four years later, he’s being hunted—not by the original bank, not by a person he ever met, not even by someone who reviewed his file with human eyes—but by a corporate vampire that bought his debt in a bulk portfolio called “Portfolio 44878,” which sounds less like a financial asset and more like a secret government experiment.

So what happened? Well, nothing dramatic. No betrayal. No embezzlement. No dramatic courtroom confessions. Just the slow, soul-crushing machinery of American consumer debt grinding forward. Austin Wolf opened a credit card. He used it. He stopped paying. The bank tried to collect. He didn’t pay. They charged it off—meaning they wrote it off as a loss for tax purposes—and then, like tossing a rotten apple into a compost bin, they sold the debt to another company, Credit Asset Sales LLC. That company, in turn, bundled it with hundreds or thousands of other deadbeat accounts (we assume they don’t call them that, but come on) and sold the whole messy pile to LVNV Funding LLC on December 17, 2024. And now, LVNV—armed with an affidavit, a spreadsheet, and the full power of the Canadian County District Court—wants its money. Or at least, it wants to pretend it’s going to get its money, because let’s be real: these cases are often won by default when the defendant doesn’t show up.

Why are they in court? Because LVNV filed a “Petition for Indebtedness,” which is legalese for “We bought this debt, we think it’s valid, and we want a judge to order this guy to pay up.” In plain English: they’re asking the court to officially declare that Austin Wolf owes them $1,770.38, plus interest from the date of judgment, plus court costs, plus a “reasonable attorney’s fee.” That last part is the real kicker—Austin might end up owing more than $1,770.38 just because he made the mistake of being sued. The legal system doesn’t just punish non-payment; it profits from it.

And what do they want? $1,770.38. Let’s put that in perspective. That’s not life-changing money. It’s not even a full month’s rent in most cities. It’s about three months of Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+ subscriptions. It’s one slightly overpriced smartphone. It’s two economy flights to Florida. It’s a lot of gas, if you drive an SUV. But in the grand scheme of lawsuits, this is pocket lint. This is the kind of amount that makes you wonder: is this worth the paper it’s printed on? The filing fee alone probably cost more than LVNV makes on half these cases. But here we are. Because in the debt collection game, volume is everything. Sue 10,000 people for under $2,000, win 60% by default, and suddenly you’re pulling in millions. It’s not personal. It’s just math.

Now, here’s the most absurd part: the affidavit. It’s signed by one Rebekah Odaniel, who claims to be an “Authorized Representative” for LVNV Funding LLC. She didn’t meet Austin Wolf. She’s never seen his credit card. She didn’t review his application or his payment history. She’s just signing a form saying, “Based on our records, he owes this.” And that’s enough for court. That’s the foundation of the entire case—a document generated by a machine, signed by someone who’s never spoken to the plaintiff or the defendant, asserting ownership of a debt that changed hands multiple times, like a cursed casino chip passed from gambler to gambler until it ends up in the hands of a guy in a suit in Oklahoma City.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers, but let’s ask the real question: where’s the humanity in this? Austin Wolf might be a deadbeat. Or he might be a guy who lost his job, got sick, forgot about the bill, moved, changed his number, and now—bam—he’s in court over $1,770. Maybe he doesn’t even know he’s being sued. These cases often go unnoticed until the wage garnishment hits. And LVNV? They’re not evil. They’re not even people, really. They’re a process. A pipeline. A debt robot.

So what are we rooting for? Honestly? We’re rooting for Austin Wolf to show up. Not because he deserves to dodge the bill, but because we want to see the machine stutter. We want to see a human being stand up in court and say, “Hey, I never got the notice,” or “This isn’t my account,” or “I paid that!” and watch the debt collector’s lawyer shuffle through a folder like, “Uh… Rebekah, can you resend the affidavit?” We want one tiny glitch in the algorithm. One moment where the system remembers it’s supposed to be about people, not portfolios.

Because if not? Then we’re all just Account XXXXXXXXXXXXX3421—waiting to be bundled, sold, and sued over the financial equivalent of loose change.

Case Overview

$1,770 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,770 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness

Petition Text

555 words
25-61577-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CANADIAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Austin Wolf, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXX3421. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,770.38. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,770.38, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR CANADIAN COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Austin Wolf Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXXX3421 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Austin Wolf by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 07/10/2022. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit Asset Sales LLC. Credit Asset Sales LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 44878, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 12/17/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $1,770.38 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Rebekah Odaniel January 22, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Thursday, January 22, 2026. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.