CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
KINGFISHER COUNTY • CJ-2026-00034

Capital One, N.A. v. Caden Frazee

Filed: Apr 16, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s be real: someone got sued for $13,316 over a credit card bill — and not even their own credit card, but one tied to a different bank that got swallowed in a corporate merger like something out of The Office’s Griefbird episode. Welcome to Crazy Civil Court, where the drama isn’t murder or betrayal, but the slow, soul-crushing grind of late fees, defaulted payments, and the cold, unblinking eye of the American debt collection machine.

So who are we talking about here? On one side: Capital One, N.A., a financial behemoth so large it probably doesn’t even remember your face, your name, or the time you called customer service at 2 a.m. crying about medical bills. But make no mistake — this bank remembers numbers. And on the other side: Caden Frazee. Just one guy, presumably living his life in Oklahoma, probably wondering why his credit score dipped and then — boom — a lawsuit lands like a brick through the window of his peace of mind. We don’t know if Caden is a thrill-seeking skydiver, a quiet librarian, or a guy who once tried to pay for gas with a bag of marbles. But we do know he once signed up for a Discover card — back when Discover was still Discover — and now, years later, the ghost of that decision has been legally resurrected by Capital One, which, according to the filing, is “successor by merger” to Discover Bank. Translation: Discover got bought, absorbed, and rebranded like a retail store during a corporate reshuffle, and now Capital One owns the debt. It’s financial evolution, baby.

Here’s how we got here. At some point — the filing doesn’t say when, but let’s assume it was during one of those “0% APR for 18 months!” fever dreams — Caden Frazee signed a Discover Cardmember Agreement. That’s the fine print no one reads, the 40-page novel buried in tiny font that says, “Yes, I promise to pay you back, even if I buy a hot tub I can’t afford and later regret while listening to sad indie music.” The agreement gave Caden access to a revolving line of credit — banker speak for “spend now, pay later (and probably more).” He used it. He spent. He made some payments. But at some point — likely after too many minimum payments, late fees, interest stacking like Jenga blocks — he stopped. Defaulted. That’s the legal term for “I am not paying anymore, and also please stop calling me.”

Now, fast-forward to today. Capital One, dutifully tracking delinquent accounts like a hawk circling a field mouse, decided it was time to stop sending reminders and start sending lawyers. Enter Stephen L. Bruce and a small army of attorneys — six of them, to be exact — all representing a single debt claim. That’s right: six licensed attorneys, multiple OBA numbers, and a full legal petition just to collect $13,316.07. That’s not a typo. The amount owed is thirteen thousand, three hundred sixteen dollars and seven cents. Seven. Cents. Someone at Capital One’s accounting department was very precise.

The lawsuit, filed in the District Court of Kingfisher County — which, for the record, is not a fictional town from a Coen Brothers movie but an actual county in Oklahoma with cornfields and county fairs — lays out the bare minimum required by law: Caden had a card, he agreed to pay, he didn’t, now he owes. No dramatic betrayal. No embezzlement. No secret offshore accounts. Just a credit card gone sideways, like a college student’s budget after spring break. The petition doesn’t accuse Caden of fraud, identity theft, or using the card to fund a llama farm in Belize. Nope. Just a straightforward “you didn’t pay, so now we’re suing.” The only twist? Capital One also wants the court to order the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission — yes, the state agency that handles unemployment — to hand over Caden’s employment information. Why? Because if they win, they’ll want to know where he works so they can potentially garnish wages. It’s not personal. It’s just business. Very, very bureaucratic business.

So what does Capital One actually want? $13,316.07. Plus interest — the “statutory rate,” which in Oklahoma is generally 5% per year unless otherwise specified. They also want the “costs of this action,” which likely includes filing fees, service of process, and the hourly rates of those six attorneys (though only Stephen L. Bruce signed the petition, the others are listed as co-counsel, presumably because someone once said, “We need backup for a debt case — get the whole squad.”). And again, they want Caden’s job info. Not for a reunion. Not for a LinkedIn connection. But so they can figure out how to get paid — possibly by taking a chunk of his paycheck every month like a reverse vampire.

Now, is $13,316 a lot? Let’s put this in perspective. It’s not a million dollars. It’s not even enough to buy a decent used Tesla. But it is more than the average American has in savings — many people live paycheck to paycheck, and thirteen grand could cover rent for a year in some cities, or pay off a car, or fund a really excellent wedding. For someone already in financial distress — which Caden likely is, given the default — this amount is not just painful. It’s catastrophic. On the flip side, for a bank like Capital One, $13k is basically pocket lint. Their quarterly reports are measured in billions. So why sue? Because they can. And because the system rewards it. Every judgment they win strengthens their position in collections, helps their credit reporting, and possibly gets them a little closer to that end-of-year bonus for “portfolio recovery performance.” (Yes, that’s a real job title somewhere.)

And now, our take: what’s the most absurd part of all this? Is it that six lawyers are handling a case over a credit card balance? Is it that the state unemployment agency is being asked to help a bank track down a debtor’s job? Is it that we live in a world where a few late payments can spiral into a formal court action with docket numbers and legal petitions? Yes. All of it. But the real kicker? The seven cents. $13,316.07. Not $13,316. Not $13,320. But seven cents. That’s the kind of precision that suggests an algorithm, not a human. It’s the financial equivalent of “I’m not mad, I’m just disappointed — and also, you owe me seven cents.” It’s petty. It’s cold. It’s so American.

We’re not rooting for the bank. We’re not rooting for Caden, either — not because he doesn’t deserve empathy, but because this whole system is rigged to make everyone lose except the lawyers and the spreadsheet jockeys at headquarters. We’re rooting for the idea that maybe, just maybe, a society this wealthy shouldn’t be suing its own citizens over credit card debt like it’s a high-stakes game of Wheel of Fortune where the prize is wage garnishment. But hey — that’s not how the game works. And until it does, we’ll be here, covering the courtroom drama of ordinary people caught in the gears of late fees, interest rates, and the relentless march of capital. Stay petty. Stay vigilant. And for the love of all that is holy, pay your credit card bill.

Case Overview

$13,316 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Kingfisher County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$13,316 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • Capital One, N.A. business
    Rep: Stephen L. Bruce, Everette C. Altdoerffer, Leah K. Clark, Clay P. Booth, Roger M. Coil, Adam W. Sullivan, Katelyn M. Conner
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1

Petition Text

263 words
THE DISTRICT COURT OF KINGFISHER COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CAPITAL ONE, N.A. Successor by merger to Discover Bank Plaintiff, vs. CADEN FRAZEE Defendant Case No CJ-2024-34 PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Capital One, N.A., successor by merger to Discover Bank, and for its cause of action against the Defendant CADEN FRAZEE (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) alleges and states as follows: 1. That the Defendant entered into an agreement referred to as a “Discover Cardmember Agreement” with the Plaintiff whereby the Plaintiff agreed to extend a revolving line of credit to the Defendant for cash advances or the purchase of goods and services. 2. The Defendant agreed to pay the account balance plus finance charges and other charges and fees in monthly installments according to the terms of the above referenced agreement. 3. The Defendant defaulted under the terms of the agreement referred to in paragraph 1 above. 4. The Defendant is currently indebted to Plaintiff for charges made under the above referenced agreement in the sum of $13316.07. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $13316.07, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment until paid, and costs of this action. Plaintiff further requests an order directing the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to produce employment information of the judgment debtor(s) pursuant to 40 O.S. § 4-508(D). Stephen L. Bruce Everette C. Altdoerffer, OBA #30006 Leah K. Clark, OBA #31819 Clay P. Booth, OBA #11767 Roger M. Coil, OBA #17002 Adam W. Sullivan, OBA #35748 Katelyn M. Conner, OBA #366601 Attorneys for Plaintiff P.O. Box 808 Edmond, Oklahoma 73083-0808 (405) 330-4110 | [email protected]
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.