CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CRAIG COUNTY • CS-2026-00042

LVNV Funding LLC v. Anna McMillan

Filed: Mar 19, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: Anna McMillan, a woman living her life in Craig County, Oklahoma—probably minding her own business, maybe feeding chickens or debating whether the Dollar General has her favorite flavor of dip—woke up to find out she’s being sued… for $1,062.60. Yes, that’s one thousand sixty-two dollars and sixty cents. Not a typo. And the plaintiff? Not a bank, not a credit union, not even a guy named Gary from collections. Nope. It’s LVNV Funding LLC, a debt-buying company you’ve never heard of, represented by a law firm whose name sounds like a 1980s detective duo—Love, Beal & Nixon. This isn’t just a lawsuit. It’s a full-blown financial ghost story, where someone’s old credit card debt rose from the grave, changed hands like a hot potato, and is now haunting Anna with a court filing that costs more to process than the actual debt is worth.

So who are these people? On one side, we’ve got Anna McMillan—real name, real person, presumably real life. She’s not a celebrity, not a politician, not someone who embezzled from a church bake sale. Just a regular Oklahoman who, at some point in 2018, got a line of credit from WebBank. WebBank, by the way, isn’t some local credit union with a friendly teller who knows your dog’s name. It’s a fintech-friendly bank that partners with online lenders so people can get loans fast—usually the kind of loans that come with fine print thicker than a steak at Cattlemen’s. In Anna’s case, that credit line was likely tied to Avant, a now-infamous online lender known for flashy ads and APRs that could make your eyes water. So Anna borrowed, presumably spent, and then… life happened. Maybe she lost a job. Maybe her truck broke down. Maybe she just plain forgot. Whatever the reason, she stopped paying. Defaulted. Case closed? Not even close.

Because in the shadowy world of consumer debt, when you stop paying, your debt doesn’t vanish—it gets sold. Like a collectible action figure in mint condition, your unpaid balance is packaged up, tossed into a portfolio (yes, that’s the actual term—Portfolio 45048, to be exact), and auctioned off to the highest bidder. And in this case, the winner was LVNV Funding LLC. Now, LVNV sounds like a villain from a sci-fi movie, but it’s actually a debt buyer based in Nevada that specializes in purchasing defaulted accounts for pennies on the dollar and then suing people to collect the full amount. They don’t care about your sob story. They don’t care if you paid $800 of the original balance. They bought your debt for maybe $100, and now they’re gunning for every penny they can legally squeeze out of you—with interest, court costs, and attorney fees as the cherry on top.

So here we are in November 2025—seven years after Anna first got that credit line—and LVNV, via their legal muscle at Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., files a petition in Craig County District Court. The claim? Indebtedness. The amount? $1,062.60. That’s it. No fraud. No breach of contract drama. No emotional distress from being ghosted by a lender. Just cold, hard math: you owe us this, we want it, and we’re using the full power of the judicial system to get it. And to prove it, they’ve attached an affidavit from one Andy Valdez (title: “Authorized Representative”), who swears under penalty of perjury that, yes, the records show Anna owes this money, and yes, LVNV legally owns the debt, and yes, they’ve already sent a demand letter more than 30 days ago (which Anna may or may not have seen, opened, or remembered to care about while, again, possibly dealing with actual life stuff like groceries or a sick relative).

Now, let’s talk about what LVNV actually wants. $1,062.60 in principal. Plus interest—statutory, so whatever Oklahoma law allows (currently 5% over the Fed rate, if you’re into that). Plus court costs. Plus a “reasonable attorney’s fee,” which, given that this is a cookie-cutter debt collection case, is probably baked into the contract and likely not more than a few hundred bucks. But here’s the kicker: is this amount a lot? In the grand scheme of lawsuits, no. You could buy a decent used car for less than ten times this. You could cover a month’s rent in Tulsa. But for someone living paycheck to paycheck in Craig County—a rural area where the median household income hovers around $45,000—over a thousand bucks is not nothing. It’s two months of groceries. It’s a car repair. It’s a security deposit on a new apartment. And now, because Anna didn’t pay it years ago, she’s facing a judgment that could lead to wage garnishment, bank levies, or a ding on her credit that’ll follow her like a bad reputation.

And yet, the most absurd part of this whole saga isn’t even the amount. It’s the machine behind it. Think about it: WebBank issued the credit. Avant operated the lending platform. Then, years later, the debt was bundled with hundreds of others and sold off to LVNV. Now, a law firm in Oklahoma City—Love, Beal & Nixon—is filing nearly identical petitions every single day, like legal assembly-line workers churning out debt lawsuits while sipping lukewarm coffee. Andy Valdez didn’t meet Anna. He’s never seen her account activity in real time. He’s signing affidavits based on records provided by the original creditor, which means he’s one degree removed from the actual transaction. And yet, his signature carries the weight of truth in a court of law. That’s the modern debt collection industrial complex: automated, impersonal, and utterly relentless.

So what are we rooting for? Honestly? We’re rooting for the system to stop treating $1,062 like it’s a federal offense. We’re rooting for Anna to show up in court with a receipt, a payment history, or even just a solid “I didn’t know” defense. We’re rooting for judges to start asking harder questions about who really owns these debts and whether a company that bought it for scrap value should be allowed to collect the full amount plus fees. And we’re definitely rooting for the day when someone sues LVNV back for emotional distress caused by receiving a lawsuit over a debt smaller than their car insurance deductible.

Because here’s the truth: cases like this aren’t rare. They’re epidemic. Thousands of Americans are sued every year for tiny debts, often without proper proof, often without ever being properly notified. And while $1,062.60 might not sound like much to a debt-buying LLC, to Anna McMillan, it might as well be a million. So while this case may not have blood, it’s got stakes. And in the petty civil court circus, sometimes the smallest claims make the loudest statement: the system is broken, and it’s coming after your wallet—one dollar at a time.

Case Overview

$1,063 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Craig County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,063 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 indecency Petition for Indebtedness on a debt of $1,062.60

Petition Text

535 words
25-50481-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAIG COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Anna McMillan, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. WebBank, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXX4899. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,062.60. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,062.60, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR CRAIG COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Anna McMillan Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXX4899 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Anna McMillan by WebBank on or about 10/11/2018. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Avant, LLC. Avant, LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 45048, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 01/30/2025. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $1,062.60 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Andy Valdez November 25, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Tuesday, November 25, 2025. (Notary Public)
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.