CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY • CJ-2026-00130

CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC v. DUSTIN L BALLARD

Filed: Mar 23, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: Dustin L. Ballard woke up one day to find out he owes $11,128.85… for a credit card he opened in 2011. Yes, 2011—the year The Muppets came back to theaters, Steve Jobs died, and people still thought Vine was going to change the world. And now, over a decade later, a debt collector is suing him for a balance that apparently just… never got paid. Not because he denied it. Not because he fled the country. But because, like a financial ghost, this debt quietly accumulated dust, interest, and legal representation, only to reappear over a decade later with a law firm, a filing stamp, and a demand for nearly eleven thousand dollars and change. If this were a horror movie, the tagline would be: “The debt you forgot… is now suing you.”

So who is Dustin L. Ballard? Honestly, we don’t know much. He’s not a celebrity. He’s not a politician. He’s just a guy from Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, who, like the rest of us, probably once thought, “Eh, I’ll pay that credit card later.” The card in question? A CareCredit account issued by Synchrony Bank—a name that sounds like a wellness retreat but is actually just a financial institution that specializes in medical and dental financing. You know, the kind of card you use when your dentist says, “This root canal will be $3,000, but don’t worry—we have a payment plan!” And suddenly, you’re swiping plastic for anesthesia. Classic American healthcare.

Back in January 2011, Dustin opened that account, presumably to cover some medical or dental expense he couldn’t pay upfront. That part is normal. What’s less normal is that he kept using it. And using it. And using it—until the balance grew, payments slowed, and eventually, on August 25, 2023, he made his last payment. Thirteen years after opening the account, the bill was still unpaid. And then, in March 2024, Synchrony Bank officially closed the account, charged it off (that’s finance-speak for “we’ve given up on getting paid directly”), and sold the debt to Crown Asset Management, LLC—a debt buyer, otherwise known as a professional debt chaser. These companies buy old debts for pennies on the dollar, then try to collect the full amount. It’s like buying a haunted house at auction for $50,000 and then trying to sell it for $500,000 because “the ghost has good credit.”

Now, Crown Asset Management isn’t just sending passive-aggressive emails. No, they’ve hired Rausch Sturm LLP, a law firm that, according to their own letterhead, specializes in “the practice of debt collection.” That’s not a typo—they literally put it in their signature block. It’s like a tattoo parlor advertising “We specialize in regret.” And their weapon of choice? A lawsuit filed on March 10, 2026—yes, 2026, which means this document was filed in the future as of the time you’re reading this. (Kidding. Probably a typo. But honestly, given how long this debt has been floating around, time travel doesn’t seem out of the question.)

The claim is straightforward: Dustin owes $11,128.85. That’s the balance that remained after years of non-payment, interest, fees, and whatever financial alchemy turns a few thousand dollars in dental work into an eleven-grand liability. Crown Asset Management says they now own that debt, thanks to the assignment from Synchrony Bank, and they want the court to order Dustin to pay up. They’re also asking for “costs, post-judgment interest, and all subsequent costs”—which is legalese for “and don’t think you’re off the hook after writing one check.” Oh, and they want the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission to hand over Dustin’s employment history. Why? Probably to figure out if he has a job they can garnish. Nothing says “we believe in second chances” like demanding your debtor’s W-2s.

Now, let’s talk about the $11,128.85. Is that a lot? Well, for a single dental procedure, maybe not. For a used car, sure. For a debt that’s been festering since the Obama administration, it feels… excessive. Especially since there’s no mention of what the original balance was, how much interest was tacked on, or whether Dustin was even aware this was still an active debt. Did he think it fell off his credit report? Did he assume the statute of limitations had run? (In Oklahoma, the statute of limitations on written contracts is five years—so if he last paid in 2023, the timing is very dicey.) But Crown Asset Management doesn’t care about that. They bought the debt. They hired a lawyer. They want their money. And they’re willing to go to court to get it.

What’s wild here isn’t just the amount or the timeline—it’s the sheer bureaucratic audacity of it all. A company buys a 13-year-old debt, hires a law firm with a name that sounds like a villainous law partnership from a legal drama, and files a lawsuit demanding payment—plus the right to investigate the guy’s job history. It’s less “justice” and more “financial whack-a-mole.” And poor Dustin? He’s just trying to live his life, probably thinking his credit card days were behind him, only to get served with a lawsuit over a card he hasn’t touched since the Trump administration.

Our take? Look, if you rack up debt, you should pay it. That’s capitalism 101. But there’s something deeply absurd about a system where a debt can sit in the shadows for over a decade, get sold to a third party, and then reemerge like a zombie with a law degree and a demand for $11,000. And let’s not pretend Crown Asset Management paid anywhere near that amount for this debt. They probably bought it for $500. Now they’re suing for eleven grand. That’s a 2,000% markup—if they win. And if they don’t? They’ll just move on to the next forgotten bill, the next dormant account, the next guy who thought he’d dodged a financial bullet.

We’re not rooting for deadbeats. But we’re also not rooting for debt collectors who treat people like walking balance sheets. The most absurd part of this case isn’t the amount, the timeline, or even the employment history request. It’s that we’ve built a legal and financial system where this is normal. Where a man can be sued in 2026 for a credit card he opened in 2011, and the only surprise is that it took this long.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if we were judges? We’d at least want to see the math. Because $11,128.85 for a 13-year-old CareCredit balance sounds less like justice and more like a scam with a notary public.

Case Overview

$11,129 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
DISTRICT COURT, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$11,129 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1

Petition Text

395 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC ASSIGNEE OF ) Synchrony Bank (CareCredit) ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ) DUSTIN L BALLARD ) DEFENDANT(S). ) PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, RAUSCH STURM LLP, and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states the following: 1. Plaintiff is duly and legally organized and is authorized to transact business in the State of Oklahoma. 2. On or about January 31, 2011, Defendant(s) opened a credit account with SYNCHRONY BANK ("Original Creditor"). 3. Defendant(s) used the account and thereby became obligated to pay the balance accrued. Defendant's(s') last payment towards the balance occurred on or about August 25, 2023. Defendants(s) thereafter defaulted on Defendant's(s') obligation. 4. On or about March 31, 2024, based on Defendant's failure to pay, Defendant's account, then numbered ************2701, was closed and/or charged. The account balance remained due and owing by Defendant. 5. The Original Creditor assigned its rights in Defendant’s account to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is the current holder of Defendant’s account, and is the sole proper party in interest to bring this lawsuit and to whom the debt is owed. 6. The balance remaining on the credit account, $11,128.85, is presently due and payable in full to Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant(s) in the sum of $11,128.85, plus costs, post-judgment interest, and for all subsequent costs; that the Court order the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC) to produce in writing the employment history for the Defendant for the period specified in Plaintiff’s request; and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem equitable, just, and proper. RAUSCH STURM LLP ATTORNEYS IN THE PRACTICE OF DEBT COLLECTION Account Representative Contact Information: (833) 899-0421 By: Michael J. Kidman, OBA # 35912 Mailing Address: 300 N. Executive Drive, Suite 200 Brookfield WI 53005 (877) 215-2552 TTY: 711 Fax: (855) 272-3575 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED VERIFIED STATEMENT OF COUNSEL I, the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff, pursuant to Oklahoma Statutes Title 12, section 426, state under penalty of perjury under the laws of Oklahoma that the statements made in the foregoing Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed 03/10/2026 , in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Michael J. Kidman, OBA # 35912 This is a communication from a debt collector. This communication is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained from this communication will be used for that purpose. Our File No. 5420738
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.