CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-794

LVNV Funding LLC v. William Cleveland

Filed: Dec 15, 2025
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a man in Tulsa, Oklahoma, just got sued for $14,442.95—yes, down to the nickel—by a company that definitely wasn’t the one who originally gave him the money. And no, this isn’t a scam email or a sketchy Facebook ad. This is a real, live court filing, served up with all the drama of a true crime saga, except instead of a murder weapon, the smoking gun is a spreadsheet and a chain of corporate handoffs that would make a game of “Hot Potato” look tame.

So who are we even talking about here? On one side, we’ve got William Cleveland—a regular guy, presumably with a job, a Netflix account, and maybe a dog named Buddy. He’s the defendant, which means he’s the one the court papers say owes money. On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC. Sounds like a tech startup or maybe a hedge fund that specializes in funding people named Lvnv. But no. LVNV is a debt buyer—a company that makes its living scooping up old, delinquent debts from original lenders, often for pennies on the dollar, then turning around and suing people to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the financial world—except legally sanctioned and way better at paperwork.

Now, here’s how we got to this very serious, very expensive moment. Back in August 2021, William Cleveland took out some kind of loan—likely through an online lending platform—originated by Cross River Bank. These are the folks who actually said, “Sure, William, here’s your money.” The account number? XXXX7165. The exact nature of the loan isn’t spelled out, but given the involvement of Upstart (a fintech lender), it was probably a personal loan, maybe for debt consolidation, a car repair, or that ill-advised hot tub purchase we all pretend we didn’t make. Whatever it was for, William stopped paying at some point. That’s the “default” mentioned in the filing—fancy legal speak for “oops, I didn’t send in the check.”

Now, here’s where it gets deliciously corporate. Cross River Bank didn’t stick around to collect. Instead, they sold the debt—along with thousands of others—to a trust called Upstart Pass-Through Trust, Series 2021-ST8. Yes, that’s a real name. No, we don’t know what “ST8” stands for, but we’re guessing it’s “Series That Smells Like Money.” This trust bundled up a whole portfolio of unpaid loans (Portfolio 43135, if you’re taking notes) and then, in February 2024, sold the whole shebang to LVNV Funding LLC—or at least to one of their predecessor companies. By December 2025, LVNV had full legal ownership of William’s debt and, more importantly, the right to sue him for it.

And sue him they did. On December 15, 2025—coincidentally, the same day the affidavit was signed—LVNV, represented by the law firm Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. (yes, really), filed a Petition for Indebtedness in the District Court of Tulsa County. The claim? William owes $14,442.95. Not $14,443. Not “about fourteen grand.” No, it’s $14,442 and 95 cents, because when you’re in the business of collecting debt, pennies matter. Especially when you bought that debt for, let’s say, $3,000. Suddenly, that 95 cents starts looking like pure profit.

So what exactly are they asking the court to do? In legal terms, it’s a “Petition for Indebtedness,” which is a fancy way of saying, “Your Honor, this person owes us money, and we want you to make them pay.” LVNV isn’t asking for punitive damages, they’re not demanding an injunction, and they’re not seeking a jury trial (probably because juries tend to side with regular people over debt collectors). Instead, they want a judgment—a court order saying, yes, William Cleveland owes this money. From there, LVNV could potentially garnish wages, freeze bank accounts, or just keep calling until the check clears.

And what about that $14,442.95? Is that a lot? Well, in the world of personal debt, yes—especially if you’re living paycheck to paycheck. That’s a car down payment, a year of daycare, or six months of rent in parts of Tulsa. But in the grand scheme of debt collection lawsuits? It’s mid-tier. Not chump change, but not exactly a Wall Street-level sum either. The real kicker? LVNV also wants “interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment,” court costs, and a “reasonable attorney’s fee.” So if William loses, he could end up paying way more than $14,442.95—especially if the court awards legal fees on top.

Now, let’s talk about the most absurd part of this whole thing: the affidavit. It’s signed by one Lakia Talley, who claims to be an “Authorized Representative” of LVNV Funding LLC. She swears—under penalty of perjury—that the debt is valid, that the records are accurate, and that William owes every last cent. But here’s the thing: Lakia Talley has never met William Cleveland. She wasn’t there when the loan was issued. She didn’t process the payments. She’s not a witness to any agreement. She’s just… reading a database. And yet, her word—backed by notarized paperwork—is enough to drag someone into court and potentially ruin their credit, their finances, and their peace of mind.

That’s the quiet horror of the modern debt collection machine: a person can fall behind on a loan, that debt gets sold, resold, bundled, and repackaged like a financial piñata, and eventually, some stranger in an office building signs a document saying, “Yep, this guy owes money,” and boom—lawsuit. No negotiation. No second chance. Just a demand for $14,442.95, plus interest, plus fees, plus stress.

Are we rooting for William Cleveland? Honestly, yes. Not because we think he didn’t borrow the money—he probably did. But because the system feels rigged. Because it’s wild that a company that didn’t lend you a dime can sue you for the full amount. Because the whole thing hinges on a chain of corporate transactions that would make a tax attorney dizzy. And because if we’re being honest, most of us have been one missed paycheck away from a debt spiral. The difference is, most of us haven’t had a company called LVNV Funding LLC come after us with a notarized affidavit and a law firm named Love, Beal & Nixon.

So here’s to William Cleveland—the man, the myth, the $14,442.95. May his defense be strong, his credit score survive, and may he never, ever co-sign a loan for a friend again. And to LVNV? Well, good luck. Just remember: karma’s not a debt buyer, but it does collect.

Case Overview

$14,443 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, OK, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$14,443 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness Seeking judgment against defendant for debt of $14,442.95

Petition Text

539 words
25-53448-0 ZH5 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM CLEVELAND, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Cross River Bank, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXX7165. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $14,442.95. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $14,442.95, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Alexander M. Hall, #33900 Jenifer A Gani, #021876 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405/720-0565 Fax: 405/720-9570 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. William Cleveland Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXX7165 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to William Cleveland by Cross River Bank on or about 08/10/2021. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Upstart Pass-Through Trust, Series 2021-ST8. Upstart Pass-Through Trust, Series 2021-ST8 later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43135, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 02/28/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $14,442.95 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Lakia Talley December 15, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Monday, December 15, 2025. O. Humbert (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.