CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
KAY COUNTY • CS-2026-00242

NAR INC v. GARY JONES

Filed: Apr 6, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s just say you’ve got a $1,328.68 problem. Not a life-or-death problem. Not even a “can’t pay the mortgage” problem. More like a “I really should’ve paid that credit card bill before it got handed off to a collection agency with a law firm and a full legal petition” problem. But here we are, in the hallowed District Court of Kay County, Oklahoma, where one man’s forgotten sandwich charges have somehow escalated into a full-blown civil war — complete with attorneys, notarized documents, and the kind of righteous indignation usually reserved for embezzlement or betrayal by a best friend.

Meet Gary Jones. We don’t know much about him, honestly. Is he a rancher? A retired mechanic? A man who once believed in love but now only trusts cash? The court filing stays maddeningly silent. All we know is that at some point, Merrick Bank — bless their heart — gave him a credit card. Not a platinum concierge card with airport lounge access, probably not even one with rewards points. More likely the kind you get after filling out a form at a gas station kiosk while waiting for your brisket sandwich. But a card nonetheless. And like any good American with a line of credit, Gary used it. We don’t know what he bought — maybe tires, maybe a hot tub, maybe 132 trips to Sonic — but whatever it was, it added up to $1,328.68. Then, somewhere down the line, the payments stopped. The calls started. The statements piled up. And eventually, Merrick Bank said, “You know what? We’re tired of this,” and sold the debt to NAR Inc., which sounds like a medical acronym but is, in fact, a debt collection company with enough legal ambition to file a lawsuit over thirteen hundred bucks. Yes, you read that right. A lawsuit. In court. With a judge. Over the price of a slightly used dirt bike.

Now, let’s pause for a second and appreciate the absurdity. This isn’t a dispute over a house. It’s not a custody battle. It’s not even a case of someone stealing another man’s prized garden gnome collection (though that would be a better story). No, this is a credit card debt. A routine financial blunder, the kind millions of Americans shrug off every year while saying, “Eh, I’ll deal with it later.” But not in Kay County, Oklahoma. Here, “later” has arrived — in the form of a legal petition drafted by not one, not two, but five attorneys from the firm Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC. That’s right. A team of five legal minds — possibly sipping coffee in Oklahoma City — sat down and said, “Yes, we must take a stand. Not for justice. Not for truth. But for $1,328.68.” And to be clear, they’re not just after the original amount. Oh no. They’re also demanding post-judgment interest, which in Oklahoma runs at whatever statutory rate the state has set (probably something low, but still — it’s the principle). They want court costs, because someone had to print that petition and pay the clerk. And they want a reasonable attorney fee, which, given the number of lawyers involved, might end up being more than the actual debt. At this point, Gary Jones might be better off just handing over a signed copy of his life story and saying, “Take my soul and be done with it.”

So what exactly are they suing for? Let’s break it down like we’re explaining it to a confused raccoon. The legal term here is “breach of contract,” though the filing doesn’t use that phrase — it just says Gary didn’t pay what he owed. When you get a credit card, you sign an agreement — usually buried in 47 pages of tiny print — saying you’ll pay back what you spend, plus interest, on time. Gary didn’t do that. So Merrick Bank said, “We’re out,” sold the debt to NAR Inc., and now NAR is stepping in like a debt-collecting superhero, cape fluttering in the Oklahoma wind. They’re asking the court to officially declare that Gary does owe them the money, and to make him pay it. That’s what a “judgment” is — a court stamp saying, “Yes, you owe this.” And once that happens, NAR can start garnishing wages, putting liens on property, or just calling Gary every Tuesday at 6:17 p.m. until he caves.

The amount — $1,328.68 — is where things get deliciously petty. Is it a lot? Well, not really. You can buy a decent used car for that. Or a really nice couch. Or, if you’re Gary, maybe just pay off the damn bill and avoid the drama. But is it nothing? Also no. It’s enough to matter. It’s the kind of sum that lives in the awkward middle ground — too much to ignore, not quite enough to declare bankruptcy over. And yet, here we are, watching a full legal machine crank into motion for less than fifteen hundred bucks. For context, the filing fee to start a civil case in Kay County is around $200. So they’ve already spent a significant chunk of the debt just to get the ball rolling. Which makes you wonder: is NAR Inc. doing this for the money? Or for the principle? Or maybe — just maybe — because their lawyers really, really needed billable hours?

And now, our take: the most absurd part of this case isn’t the dollar amount. It’s the escalation. It’s the fact that in 2026, in rural Oklahoma, a man can be formally sued by a corporation represented by five attorneys over a credit card balance that probably started with a few tankfuls of gas and a Walmart run. It’s the sheer bureaucratic weight brought to bear on a problem that could’ve been solved with a single honest phone call and a Venmo transfer. But no. Instead, we get a notarized petition, a deputy court clerk’s stamp, and the full force of Oklahoma statutory law (see: 12 O.S. § 727.1, for those keeping score at home). It’s like using a flamethrower to light a birthday candle. Effective? Technically. Necessary? Absolutely not.

We’re rooting for Gary, honestly. Not because he’s innocent — he probably isn’t. But because somewhere in this story, there’s a man who just forgot to pay a bill, and now he’s being hunted by a legal hydra. And while we’re entertainers, not lawyers, we can’t help but feel that the system might be overkill here. Maybe NAR Inc. should’ve just sent a strongly worded email. Or a slightly more passive-aggressive postcard. But no. They went full litigation. And so, dear reader, we leave you with this: the next time you see a credit card statement, pay it. Because somewhere in Kay County, a man named Gary Jones is learning the hard way that even small debts can summon big lawyers. And nobody wants that.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Kay County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,329 Monetary
Plaintiffs
  • NAR INC business
    Rep: Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 - Credit card debt

Petition Text

197 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF KAY COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA NAR INC vs. GARY JONES Plaintiff, Defendant. Filed in the DISTRICT COURT Kay County, Oklahoma APR 06 2026 MARILEE THORNTON Court Clerk BY: Hugh H. Fudge DEPUTY No. CS-26- 242 PETITION COMES NOW the plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, and states as follows: 1. Merrick Bank provided a credit card account for the defendant. 2. The defendant purchased goods and/or services with the credit card which resulted in the indebtedness set forth below. 3. The defendant has defaulted in the payments required by the credit card account. 4. The defendant is indebted to plaintiff, as assignee, in the principal amount of $1,328.68. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant as follows: 1. The principal amount of $1,328.68; 2. Post judgment interest at the statutory rate (12 O.S. § 727.1); 3. All costs of this action (12 O.S. § 928); 4. A reasonable attorney fee (12 O.S. § 936); and 5. Such other relief to which plaintiff may be justly entitled. Hugh H. Fudge (OBA# 20487) Dani L. Schinzing (OBA# 32113) Emily R. Remmert (OBA# 22110) Sean A. Nelson (OBA# 30194) Keith A. Daniels (OBA# 19788) Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC P.O.Box 1748, Oklahoma City, OK 73101 (405) 232-6464 | (833) 342-0001 Toll Free [email protected] | (405) 232-6363 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.