CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
WAGONER COUNTY • CS-2026-00308

LVNV Funding LLC v. David Bruza

Filed: Mar 12, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: a man in Oklahoma is being sued for exactly $1,993.13—yes, down to the penny—because a debt collection company says he owes it, even though the original creditor was a credit card bank, and no one involved appears to be the kind of person who actually met David Bruza and said, “Hey, buddy, pay up.” This is not a mob hit. This is not a love triangle gone wrong. This is a lawsuit so textbook in its financial pettiness that you could teach a semester on modern American capitalism using only this single court filing.

So who are these players in the great American debt circus? On one side, we have David Bruza, a private individual whose entire existence in this case hinges on a 12-digit credit card number ending in 6011 and a default he allegedly committed sometime after September 13, 2023. We don’t know what he bought. We don’t know if it was a last-ditch birthday splurge, a desperate attempt to survive a bad month, or a forgotten Amazon shopping spree during a late-night insomnia spiral. All we know is: he didn’t pay, and now he’s the defendant in Case No. CS - 2026 - 0308.

On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC—a name that sounds less like a real company and more like a villainous tech startup from a Black Mirror episode. Spoiler: it’s a debt buyer. These firms don’t lend money. They don’t issue credit cards. What they do is buy up mountains of delinquent debt—often for pennies on the dollar—from original lenders like Credit One Bank, N.A., then turn around and sue people to collect the full amount. It’s like buying a moldy sandwich for 10 cents and then demanding $10 from the guy who left it in the fridge. But hey, capitalism!

And representing LVNV? A law firm called LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C.—yes, really. And not just one lawyer, but seven listed on the petition, like this was some kind of legal Avengers lineup. William L. Nixon, Jr. takes the lead (bar number 012804, because nothing says “trust me, I’m a professional” like a six-digit code), but seriously—why do you need seven attorneys to file a $2,000 debt claim? Is there a clause in the contract that says “must include at least one dramatic reading of the account history”? Are they rotating shifts? Did someone lose a bet and now has to handle small claims paperwork?

The story, such as it is, unfolds like a financial ghost tale. Sometime in September 2023, David Bruza got a credit card from Credit One Bank. Maybe he needed tires. Maybe it was groceries. Maybe it was one of those “12-month no interest!” fitness equipment deals that turns into a nightmare when you miss a payment. Whatever it was, he stopped paying. The account went south. Credit One, like many banks, didn’t want to deal with the hassle of chasing small balances, so in June 2024, they bundled Bruza’s debt—along with hundreds or thousands of others—into something called “Portfolio 43857” and sold the whole thing to LVNV Funding or one of its predecessors. Think of it like a bulk auction of broken promises.

Fast forward to January 15, 2026. LVNV, now the proud legal owner of Bruza’s forgotten obligation, files a “Petition for Indebtedness” in Wagoner County District Court. No drama. No accusations of fraud. No wild spending sprees. Just a cold, clean assertion: You owe us $1,993.13. Pay up. To prove it, they attach an affidavit from one Moesha Jordan, an “Authorized Representative” of LVNV, who swears under penalty of perjury that—based on business records, computer entries, and the mystical transfer of Portfolio 43857—the debt is real, the ownership is valid, and Bruza hasn’t paid a dime beyond what’s already been credited.

And here’s where the legal machinery kicks in. The claim? “Petition for Indebtedness.” In normal human terms: this is a debt collection lawsuit. It’s not about assault. It’s not about stolen property. It’s not even about a broken lease or a dog bite. It’s about money owed on a credit account that changed hands like a hot potato. The legal theory is simple: if you borrowed money and didn’t pay it back, and the person or company now holding that debt can prove they own it, they can sue you in court to get it. LVNV is arguing that they’ve met that burden with paperwork, affidavits, and the magic of corporate assignment.

What do they want? $1,993.13. Plus interest. Plus court costs. Plus a “reasonable attorney’s fee,” which, given the seven-lawyer roster, might end up being more than the actual debt. Is $2,000 a lot? In the grand scheme of lawsuits, no. You could buy a decent used car for that. Or pay six months of rent in some parts of Oklahoma. But in the context of a debt buyer suing an individual over a credit card balance they bought for maybe $200? It’s a 1,000% markup with a side of court summons.

And yet, here we are. A man is being hauled into civil court—not for violence, not for fraud, not for anything dramatic—just for failing to settle a relatively small balance that’s now been monetized by a third-party firm with a law firm on speed dial. The affidavit even notes that “demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago,” which sounds suspiciously like someone sent a letter, got no response, and immediately reached for the gavel.

Now, let’s talk about the absurdity buffet. First, the name “LVNV Funding LLC” reads like a tax shelter’s stage name. Second, the fact that this case required seven attorneys to initiate is either a sign of extreme caution or a billing scam in progress. Third, the entire premise—that debt can be bought, bundled, and litigated like trading cards—is a uniquely American financial grotesquerie. David Bruza may have made a mistake not paying his bill, sure. But is he really the villain here? Or is the real story the industrialization of debt collection, where human obligations are stripped of context, repackaged, and weaponized by faceless firms with legal firepower?

We’re not rooting for anyone to dodge responsibility. But we are rooting for a system where suing someone over two grand doesn’t require a notarized affidavit, a portfolio number, and a law firm with more partners than a K-pop group. This case isn’t about justice. It’s about process. It’s about paperwork. It’s about the quiet, soulless machinery of modern debt—where your financial misstep becomes someone else’s profit margin, and the court system becomes the collection agency’s best friend.

So here’s to David Bruza, allegedly in debt. Here’s to LVNV Funding, allegedly in business. And here’s to Moesha Jordan, who, with a single signature, declared a man’s financial fate based on a spreadsheet she’s never seen David Bruza touch.

May the record reflect: this is not a crime story. But it sure feels like one.

Case Overview

$1,993 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$1,993 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Petition for Indebtedness Debt collection

Petition Text

562 words
25-60386-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WAGONER COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. David Bruza, ) ) ) ) Defendant. No. CS - 2026 - 0308 PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXX6011. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,993.13. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,993.13, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR WAGONER COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. David Bruza Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXX6011 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to David Bruza by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 09/13/2023. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit One Bank, N.A.. Credit One Bank, N.A. later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43857, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 06/20/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $1,993.13 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. [Signature] Moesha Jordan January 15, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Thursday, January 15, 2026. __________________________________________ (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.