CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
CANADIAN COUNTY • CS-2026-656

LVNV Funding LLC v. Denise Keesee

Filed: Mar 17, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: someone just got sued for $932.64 — yes, three digits and change — over a credit card bill that’s barely three months old. And not by the original bank, not by a collections agent with a grudge, but by a shadowy financial entity called LVNV Funding LLC, which swoops in like a debt vampire, buys up defaulted accounts for pennies on the dollar, and then sues real people in court to collect the full amount. This isn’t just a lawsuit. It’s a modern American horror story dressed up as a legal filing — and it all centers on Denise Keesee of Canadian County, Oklahoma, who now finds herself in the crosshairs of a corporate debt machine over less than a thousand bucks.

So, who is Denise Keesee? We don’t know much about her — no criminal record, no public scandals, no viral TikToks. Just an ordinary person living an ordinary life, presumably paying bills, maybe juggling rent, groceries, and car payments like the rest of us. And then there’s LVNV Funding LLC — a name that sounds like a rejected tech startup or a tax shelter from a Succession episode. In reality, it’s one of dozens of so-called “junk debt buyers” that roam the American financial underworld, purchasing old, delinquent accounts from original creditors (in this case, First Electronic Bank) for a fraction of their face value, then attempting to collect the full amount through aggressive — and often legally questionable — means. LVNV is no stranger to courtrooms; they’ve filed thousands of these small-dollar lawsuits across the country, often in bulk, sometimes without proper documentation. They’re the private equity of petty debt — cold, efficient, and relentless.

Here’s how we got here: back on November 5, 2023, Denise Keesee opened a credit account with First Electronic Bank. The card number? XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX7773 — redacted, of course, because even in court filings, someone remembers privacy exists. At some point, she missed a payment. Then another. By August 30, 2024, the account — now considered delinquent — was bundled up with hundreds of others into something called “Portfolio 44156” and sold off to LVNV Funding LLC, or one of its predecessors. Think of it like a foreclosure auction, but for credit card debt. LVNV didn’t lend Denise a dime. They didn’t assess her creditworthiness. They just bought the right to sue her, like acquiring a ticket to a legal tollbooth. Then, on November 26, 2025 — the same day this lawsuit was filed — a woman named Dimeshia Hook, self-identified as an “Authorized Representative” of LVNV, signed an affidavit swearing that Denise still owes $932.64, “justly and duly,” with no offsets, no disputes, no asterisks. Oh, and they made sure to note that they’d sent a demand letter more than 30 days ago — the legal equivalent of “we gave you a chance.”

Now, why are we in court? Because LVNV wants a judgment. That’s the key word here. They’re not just sending dunning letters or calling Denise at dinnertime. They’ve gone full Law & Order: Civil Division and filed a “Petition for Indebtedness” in the District Court of Canadian County, Oklahoma. Translation: they want a judge to officially declare that Denise legally owes them this money. If they win — and in cases like this, they usually do, especially if the defendant doesn’t show up — the court will issue a judgment allowing LVNV to potentially garnish wages, freeze bank accounts, or place liens on property. And it’s not just the $932.64. They’re also asking for “interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment,” court costs, and “a reasonable attorney’s fee” — meaning Denise could end up on the hook for over a grand, all because of a credit card she may not even remember opening.

And let’s talk about that number: $932.64. Is that a lot? In the grand scheme of lawsuits, it’s practically pocket lint. It’s less than a monthly car payment. It’s two nights at a mid-tier hotel. It’s one iPhone. But for a lot of Americans — especially in Oklahoma, where the median household income is around $60,000 — $900 can be the difference between making rent and getting evicted. It can mean choosing between paying a utility bill or buying groceries. And yet, here we are: a faceless corporation, represented by a law firm that specializes in debt collection (Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. — yes, really), is spending attorney hours, notary stamps, and court filing fees to chase down this sum. The economics only make sense if you’re suing hundreds of people at once — which, spoiler alert, they probably are.

What’s the most absurd part of this whole saga? It’s not that someone owes money. People fall behind on bills. That happens. It’s not even that a company bought the debt — secondary markets exist for everything from concert tickets to airline miles. No, the absurdity lies in the machinery of it all. The cold, robotic efficiency with which a financial entity purchases a defaulted account, files a lawsuit the same day it signs an affidavit, and demands a court enforce payment — all without ever having met the person, assessed their ability to pay, or even tried to work out a payment plan. Denise Keesee isn’t a defendant to them. She’s a data point. A line item. Portfolio 44156, Account 7773. And LVNV isn’t really a creditor. They’re a litigation factory, churning out lawsuits like widgets, hoping for default judgments because most people don’t show up to court — not because they’re guilty, but because they’re scared, confused, or just don’t know how.

We’re rooting for transparency. We’re rooting for the little guy to actually show up. Because if Denise Keesee walks into that courtroom, looks LVNV’s lawyer in the eye, and says, “Prove it,” things get interesting. Can they produce the original contract? The chain of assignment? Proof that the amount is accurate? Because here’s the dirty secret of junk debt lawsuits: sometimes, they can’t. The paper trail gets lost. The records are incomplete. The debt was already paid, discharged, or time-barred. And when that happens — when the machine sputters — justice, however small, wins.

So will Denise fight back? Will she hire a lawyer? Will she file a counterclaim for emotional distress caused by receiving a lawsuit over a bill that could’ve been settled with a single Venmo? We don’t know. But we’re watching. Because in the grand tradition of petty civil court drama, this isn’t just about $932.64. It’s about dignity. It’s about who gets to decide what we owe — and to whom. And it’s a reminder that in America, even your forgotten credit card can come back to haunt you — not as a late fee, but as a court summons.

(We’re entertainers, not lawyers. But if you get sued for less than a thousand bucks by a company that never lent you a dime? Maybe don’t ignore the mail.)

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$933 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 petition for indebtedness collection of debt

Petition Text

555 words
25-50457-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CANADIAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. Denise Keesee, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS No. CS 2026-454 LORY K. DEWEY COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. First Electronic Bank, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX7773. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $932.64. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $932.64, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jennifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR CANADIAN COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Denise Keesee Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX7773 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Denise Keesee by First Electronic Bank on or about 11/05/2023. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Concora Credit Inc.. Concora Credit Inc. later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 44156, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 08/30/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $932.64 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. ______________________________ Dimeshia Hook November 26, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, November 26, 2025. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.