CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
GARFIELD COUNTY • CJ-2026-83

LVNV Funding LLC v. Salomon Ortiz

Filed: Mar 17, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the drama: a man in Oklahoma owes $19,255.71 — not for a sports car, not for a timeshare in Cabo, not even for a failed avocado toast startup — but for a personal loan he took out from LendingClub Bank in January 2022… and now, three years later, a debt collection company is dragging him into court like he stole the Federal Reserve. This isn’t a heist. It’s not even a scandal. It’s just one guy, one loan, and one very persistent paper trail that’s now worth nearly twenty grand in the eyes of the law.

Meet Salomon Ortiz. That’s it. That’s the whole bio. We don’t know if he’s a welder, a teacher, or someone who once won third place in a chili cook-off. All we know is that on January 4, 2022, he borrowed money from LendingClub Bank — a fintech lender that sounds like a wellness retreat for over-qualified millennials. He was given a loan, account number ending in 2468 (which, let’s be honest, sounds like a combo lock you’d find in a spy movie), and presumably used the funds to do whatever people do with personal loans: pay off other debt, fix a car, buy a ring, or maybe finally upgrade from ramen to frozen burritos. Whatever the reason, things went sideways. He stopped making payments. He defaulted. And in the cold, mechanical world of consumer finance, that’s when the real players enter the game.

Enter LVNV Funding LLC — a name so generic it could be a tax bracket or a software update. LVNV is not a bank. It’s not even a “lending” company in the traditional sense. It’s a debt buyer. These folks don’t hand out cash; they buy up other people’s bad debts — the financial equivalent of scavenging leftovers at a buffet after the party’s over. For pennies on the dollar, they acquire portfolios of defaulted loans, then sue to collect the full amount (plus interest, fees, and court costs, because capitalism never sleeps). In this case, LVNV purchased a whole bundle of delinquent accounts — Portfolio 45391, if you’re into spy-novel-level intrigue — which included Salomon Ortiz’s loan. The transfer happened on March 11, 2025. By November 25 — the same day they filed this lawsuit — LVNV was ready to play hardball.

So what actually happened? Well, nothing particularly dramatic. No betrayal. No missing persons. No secret offshore accounts. Just a loan gone sour, a quiet default, and a corporate machine kicking into gear. LVNV, now the proud owner of Salomon Ortiz’s debt, says he still owes $19,255.71. That number isn’t random — it’s the balance after “all just and lawful offsets, payments, and credits” have been applied, according to their records. They even had someone named Andy Valdez sign an affidavit swearing this is all true, with a notary stamp for that extra flavor of legal legitimacy. Thirty days before filing, they claim, they sent a demand letter. No payment came. So now, they’re asking the District Court of Garfield County — which, for the record, is in north-central Oklahoma, home to Enid, wheat fields, and apparently a booming debt collection industry — to step in and make Salomon pay up.

And what, exactly, are they asking for? A judgment. That’s the legal term for “the court says you owe this money.” Specifically, LVNV wants $19,255.71, plus interest at the statutory rate (which in Oklahoma is 5% per year if not specified in the contract), court costs, and “a reasonable attorney’s fee.” That last part is key — they’re not just suing to get their money back. They’re suing to get their money back and get paid for the privilege of suing. Their lawyer, William L. Nixon, Jr., of the firm LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. — yes, that’s really the name, and no, we don’t know if they specialize in romance law — is on the clock, and someone’s footing the bill. If LVNV wins, Salomon could end up owing even more than $19k when all is said and done.

Now, is $19,255.71 a lot of money? Let’s put it in perspective. That’s enough to buy a used Toyota Camry. It’s more than the average American has in savings. It’s about three months of rent in most parts of Oklahoma. It’s not life-changing wealth, but it’s not pocket change either. For a debt buyer, it’s a solid return on investment — especially if they paid, say, $5,000 for the entire portfolio. But for Salomon Ortiz? It could be devastating. Maybe he lost his job. Maybe he got sick. Maybe he just miscalculated. We don’t know. The filing doesn’t care. The court doesn’t care. All that matters is the number on the page and whether the paperwork checks out.

Here’s the absurd part: this entire case hinges on documents, not drama. There’s no witness testimony. No surveillance footage. No smoking gun. Just an affidavit, a contract (attached but not shown), and a chain of ownership that goes from LendingClub Bank to LVNV like a game of financial hot potato. And yet, this is how thousands of debt cases play out every year across America — not in dramatic courtroom showdowns, but in quiet, robotic filings where people are reduced to account numbers and balances. Salomon Ortiz isn’t a person in this story. He’s a debtor. A line item. A balance sheet with a pulse.

And honestly? We’re rooting for transparency. Not for LVNV. Not necessarily for Salomon. But for the system to at least pretend this isn’t just a paperwork slaughter. Did the original loan have fair terms? Was the interest rate predatory? Was the assignment of debt done properly? Did Salomon even know his debt was sold? These questions don’t matter in this filing — but they should. Because behind every $19,255.71 is a human story: a decision, a mistake, a cascade of consequences. And while LVNV may win this case on technicalities, the real verdict is already in — the debt collection machine rolls on, one affidavit at a time, chewing up lives and spitting out judgments like it’s nothing. And in Garfield County, Oklahoma, on November 25, 2025, Salomon Ortiz became its latest meal.

(We’re entertainers, not lawyers. This is based on public filing data. No actual chili cook-offs were harmed in the making of this summary.)

Case Overview

$19,256 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Garfield County, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$19,256 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1

Petition Text

545 words
25-50501-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GARFIELD COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Salomon Ortiz, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. LendingClub Bank, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXXX2468. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $19,255.71. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $19,255.71, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR GARFIELD COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Salomon Ortiz Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXX2468 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Salomon Ortiz by LendingClub Bank on or about 01/04/2022. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by LendingClub Bank. LendingClub Bank later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 45391, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 03/11/2025. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $19,255.71 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. Andy Valdez November 25, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Tuesday, November 25, 2025. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.