CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
GARVIN COUNTY • CJ-2026-00050

HONEY BADGER FINANCIAL, LLC v. KEVIN DEWAYNE RUSH

Filed: Mar 13, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut right to the chase: someone is suing a man for $18,900 over a 2006 Chevy Silverado 2500HD — a truck so old it probably still has a CD player that eats discs and a glove compartment that smells faintly of regret and stale beef jerky. But here’s the kicker — the interest on that loan is racking up at 16.99% per year, which is the kind of rate usually reserved for credit cards wielded by people who’ve clearly never read the fine print. And no, the plaintiff isn’t some big bank with a soul colder than a freezer in a morgue. It’s a company called Honey Badger Financial, LLC — yes, named after the animal that famously don’t care — and they’re coming for their money, teeth bared and claws out.

Now, who even are these people? On one side, we’ve got Honey Badger Financial, LLC — a business with a name that sounds like a rejected energy drink or a podcast hosted by a guy who does CrossFit and owns a taser. They’re represented by a law firm with more partners than a speed-dating event, Robinson, Hoover & Fudge (yes, Fudge — we promise we didn’t make that up), and their mission here is clear: get paid. On the other side is Kevin Dewayne Rush, an individual whose only known crime, according to this filing, is failing to keep up with payments on a truck that predates the iPhone, Uber, and the concept of “quiet luxury.” There’s no mention of bad blood, no dramatic betrayal, no roadside fistfight over a faulty transmission — just a contract, a default, and a growing pile of interest that’s now nearly half the original loan amount.

So what actually happened? Let’s time-travel back to April 23, 2022 — a simpler time, when people were still arguing about mask mandates and gas was only slightly less expensive than a kidney. That’s when Kevin Rush signed a contract with Seth Wadley Auto Connection to buy that 2006 Silverado. Now, we don’t know how much he paid upfront or what kind of down payment he made — the filing doesn’t say — but we do know two critical things: first, the loan came with a security interest, meaning if Rush stopped paying, the lender could repossess the truck. Second — and this is where things get interesting — Honey Badger Financial says they never got the truck back. So somewhere between 2022 and now, Rush either stopped making payments and kept driving the vehicle, or the repo guys showed up and found it already buried under a tarp in a field behind a defunct Sonic.

But wait — how did Honey Badger Financial end up in this mess if the original contract was with Seth Wadley Auto Connection? Ah, welcome to the wild world of assignment, where debts are bought, sold, and traded like fantasy football players. At some point, Seth Wadley Auto Connection decided they didn’t want to deal with the headache of collecting from Rush anymore and handed the debt over to Honey Badger Financial, who apparently specializes in stepping into other people’s financial drama with a clipboard and a scowl. Now, Honey Badger is the one holding the bag — or rather, the one holding the promissory note and the right to sue.

The lawsuit claims Rush defaulted on his payment obligations — a polite way of saying he stopped paying. And now, Honey Badger wants their money: $18,900 in principal, plus $9,791.67 in interest that accrued from February 15, 2023, to March 4, 2026. Let that sink in — they’re asking for interest on money they expect to be owed in the future. That’s like charging someone for the popcorn they might buy at a movie they haven’t decided to go see yet. But legally? It’s not unheard of. Courts often allow plaintiffs to project interest through the trial date or a reasonable future point, especially when the rate is baked into the contract. And 16.99%? That’s not illegal — just aggressively high. For context, the average auto loan interest rate in 2022 was around 4-5% for prime borrowers. Rush was paying nearly four times that. Was he a high-risk buyer? Did he have a history of vanishing with financed vehicles? The filing doesn’t say, but that rate suggests the lender thought he might ghost the payments — and, well, here we are.

Now, why are they in court? The legal claim is straightforward: breach of contract. In plain English, Honey Badger is saying, “You signed a piece of paper promising to pay this amount under these terms. You didn’t. Now we want a judge to make you pay — or at least acknowledge that you owe it.” They’re also asking for attorney’s fees, court costs, and — crucially — to keep their security interest in the truck. That last part is important: it means that even if Rush pays up, they still have a legal claim on the vehicle until the debt is fully satisfied. And if he doesn’t pay? They could theoretically still come after the truck — assuming it hasn’t been turned into a planter at a rural flea market or claimed by rust.

So what do they want? $18,900 in principal, nearly $10,000 in interest, plus fees and costs. Is that a lot for a 2006 Silverado? Let’s do some math. A quick glance at current market listings shows that a 2006 Silverado 2500HD in decent shape might fetch between $8,000 and $15,000 — depending on mileage, condition, and whether it still runs when the temperature drops below 40. So Honey Badger is suing for more than the truck is likely worth today. That doesn’t mean they’re wrong — loans often exceed a vehicle’s market value, especially with high interest and slow repayment. But it does highlight the absurdity: they’re demanding money for a depreciating asset that may now be worth less than the debt secured by it. It’s like suing someone for $50,000 on a timeshare they never wanted in the first place.

And here’s what really makes this case peak petty civil court: the name. Honey Badger Financial. It’s a name that evokes zero fear, zero gravitas. It sounds like a side hustle run out of a garage by a guy who watches too much Animal Planet and believes in manifesting wealth through sheer audacity. “Honey Badger don’t care if you can’t pay — pay up anyway.” There’s something almost poetic about a company with that name coming after someone for thousands of dollars over a truck older than some high school seniors. Is this a serious financial institution? Or a branding exercise gone off the rails?

Our take? We’re equal parts impressed and baffled. On one hand, Honey Badger is playing by the rules — they bought a debt, they’re enforcing it, and they’re doing it through proper legal channels. No repo ambushes, no shady collections tactics (at least, none alleged here). On the other hand, suing for nearly $30,000 over a 17-year-old truck at 16.99% interest feels less like business and more like financial vengeance. And where’s Kevin Rush in all this? Is he driving that Silverado with a “Life’s a mess, who’s with me?” bumper sticker, blissfully unaware of the legal storm brewing? Or is he sitting on a broken-down hunk of metal that won’t start, wondering how he got here?

We’re not rooting for the debt collector with the ridiculous name. We’re not rooting for the guy who may have bought a truck he couldn’t afford at loan-shark rates. But we are rooting for the truth: did this truck vanish? Was it sold? Is it sitting in a field with a “For Sale: Best Offer” sign that hasn’t had an offer since 2019? The real story isn’t in the filing — it’s under that tarp, buried somewhere between Garvin County and financial regret. And until someone pulls it out, we’ll just have to wonder: who’s the real honey badger here?

Case Overview

$18,890 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
DISTRICT COURT, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$18,890 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 CONTRACT

Petition Text

216 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GARVIN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA HONEY BADGER FINANCIAL, LLC vs. KEVIN DEWAYNE RUSH PETITION COMES NOW the plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, and states as follows: 1. SETH WADLEY AUTO CONNECTION and the defendant executed a contract on April 23, 2022 whereby the defendant purchased a 2006 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500HD ("motor vehicle"). 2. The contract includes a security interest in the motor vehicle; however, plaintiff has never recovered the motor vehicle. 3. The defendant has defaulted in the payment obligations required under the contract. 4. The defendant is indebted to plaintiff, as assignee, in the principal amount of $18,900.00, with interest at the contractual rate of 16.99 % per annum from February 15, 2023 through March 04, 2026 in the amount of $9,791.67. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant as follows: 1. The principal amount of $18,900.00; 2. Prejudgment and post judgment interest at the contractual rate (12 O.S. § 727.1); 3. All costs of this action (12 O.S. § 928); 4. A reasonable attorney fee (12 O.S. § 936); 5. Plaintiff retains its contractual security interest in the motor vehicle; and 6. Such other relief to which plaintiff may be justly entitled. Hugh H. Fudge (OBA# 20487) Dani L. Schinzing (OBA# 32113) Emily R. Remmert (OBA# 22110) Sean A. Nelson (OBA# 30194) Keith A. Daniels (OBA# 19788) Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLC P.O. Box 1748, Oklahoma City, OK 73101 (405) 232-6464 | (833) 342-0001 Toll Free [email protected] | (405) 232-6363 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.