CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
GARFIELD COUNTY • CJ-2026-134

Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman v. Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma, LLC d/b/a INTEGRIS Health Enid Hospital d/b/a INTEGRIS Medical Group Enid a/k/a INTEGRIS Women's Health Enid

Filed: Apr 27, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Imagine this: a 24-year-old woman goes in for a routine procedure after a suspicious pregnancy, gets flagged for a rare and dangerous form of cancer, and instead of being monitored like medical protocol demands, she’s basically handed a “see you never” from the healthcare system — only to reappear over a year later with tumors in her lungs, pancreas, and brain, diagnosed with Stage IV cancer at age 27. And the most gut-punching part? This wasn’t some undetectable monster. It was a cancer that is basically curable if caught early — one that, with proper follow-up, should have been wiped out before it ever had a chance to spread. But no one made sure the rules were followed. No one checked. No one cared — or at least, no one acted like they did.

Meet Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman and her husband, Robert. They were just a young couple building a life in Enid, Oklahoma, trying to start a family. In August 2022, Mickaela went to her OB-GYN, Dr. Michael Jackson at INTEGRIS Women’s Health Enid, after a positive pregnancy test. But something was off. An ultrasound showed no baby — just an irregular uterine lining. So, she had a dilation and curettage, a D&C, to clear it out. Routine, right? Except the pathology report came back screaming for attention: possible Gestational Trophoblastic Disease, or GTD — a rare condition that can turn into aggressive cancer if not monitored. The hospital’s own pathologist flagged it as high-risk and even sent it to the Mayo Clinic for a second opinion. The verdict? “Requires close clinical follow-up with serial beta-hCG monitoring until levels normalize.” Translation: We don’t know if this is cancer yet, but we’re not taking chances — test her blood regularly to make sure it’s gone. Dr. Jackson acknowledged this. And then… nothing. No follow-up. No tracking. No calls. Just silence.

Fast-forward ten months. August 2023. Mickaela’s pregnant again — a happy surprise. She returns to Dr. Jackson for prenatal care. And here’s where your jaw should hit the floor: there is zero mention in his notes of her prior cancer scare. No red flags. No referrals to an oncologist. No plan to monitor her hCG levels — the very thing that could have caught a recurrence early. Instead, Dr. Jackson treats her like any other pregnant patient, shrugging off her complaints of vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain as just part of pregnancy. He sees her seven times over the next seven months, delivers her baby in March 2024, and never once connects the dots. Never once asks: Hey, remember that cancer scare we never followed up on?

Then, in August 2024 — four months postpartum — she’s back at the same hospital’s ER with abdominal pain. They do an ultrasound. It shows a vascular uterine mass — not just a random fibroid, but something suspiciously active, blood-flow-rich, the kind of thing that makes oncologists perk up. But nobody orders an hCG test. Nobody calls a specialist. Dr. Shea Pielsticker, the ER doc, writes in his plan that staff should notify Mickaela of the results and set up outpatient gynecology follow-up. But guess what? There’s no proof that ever happened. No call. No referral. No nothing.

And then — and this is the pièce de résistance — in November 2024, INTEGRIS sends her a dismissal letter. They’re dropping her as a patient. Effective in 30 days. No mention of her prior trophoblastic disease. No warning about the uterine mass. No handoff to her next doctor. They just… cut her loose. Like she’s an expired coupon.

By December, she’s in Michigan — visiting family or seeking care, the filing doesn’t say — but now she’s in real trouble. Abdominal pain so bad she ends up in an ER. A CT scan on New Year’s Day 2025 reveals the nightmare: tumors in both lungs, a mass in her pancreas, and a 5.3-centimeter tumor in her uterus. On January 2nd, she has a hysterectomy. The final diagnosis? Stage IV gestational choriocarcinoma — a rare, aggressive cancer that grows from leftover pregnancy tissue. It’s spread. It’s advanced. And at 27 years old, she’s already lost her fertility, her health, and possibly her future.

She’s transferred to Northwestern Memorial in Chicago, one of the top hospitals in the country, where she’s hit with three different chemo regimens because the cancer keeps coming back. In January 2026 — the same month this lawsuit was filed — she undergoes gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases. She’s still on chemo. Her treatment goal? Not cure. Palliative. That’s doctor-speak for “we’re trying to keep her comfortable, not save her life.”

All of this — the hysterectomy, the brain surgery, the chemo, the metastases, the fear, the relocation to Michigan, the toll on her marriage, her two young kids growing up with a mom who might not survive — traces back to one simple failure: someone should have monitored her hCG levels after that first D&C. That’s it. One blood test, repeated over time, could have caught this when it was still treatable — when, according to the filing, cure rates are “approaching 100%.” Instead, the system treated her like a ghost — a patient who fell through the cracks not because the cancer was sneaky, but because the doctors were asleep at the wheel.

Now, she and Robert are suing — not just Dr. Jackson, but the whole web of entities that failed her: the hospital (INTEGRIS Health Enid), the radiology group (Diagnostic Imaging Associates), the ER staffing company (Emergency Services of Oklahoma), and the individual doctors involved. Their claims? Negligence, obviously — failing to diagnose and treat a known high-risk condition. But also, and this is the spicy part: negligent supervision. They’re arguing that the institutions — the hospital, the clinics, the contracting groups — failed to create systems that would prevent this kind of disaster. No alerts in the electronic record. No mandatory follow-up protocols. No safety net. And then, to pour salt in the wound, they’re going for punitive damages — not just compensation, but punishment. Because this wasn’t a simple mistake. It was a pattern. A series of choices — or lack thereof — that showed a “reckless disregard” for her life.

They’re asking for $150,000 — $75,000 in actual damages for Mickaela’s injuries, and another $75,000 for Robert’s loss of consortium (that’s the legal term for losing the emotional and physical intimacy of marriage due to someone else’s negligence). Is $150,000 a lot? Honestly? In the world of medical malpractice, it’s barely a rounding error. A single round of chemo can cost more than that. Brain surgery? Try six figures per day. So this isn’t about getting rich. It’s about accountability. It’s about saying: You had one job. One. And you didn’t do it.

Here’s the thing we can’t stop thinking about: this wasn’t some rare, unpredictable disease that slipped past the best doctors. This was a textbook scenario where the playbook was clear, the warning signs were flashing, and the system still failed. Not once, not twice, but five times: at the initial follow-up, during pregnancy, in the ER, at dismissal, and in the handoff. It’s like watching a Rube Goldberg machine of medical neglect — each failure triggering the next, until the patient is left holding the detonator.

And the most absurd part? The dismissal letter. You don’t fire a patient with unresolved cancer risks. You don’t ghost them. You don’t pretend the problem doesn’t exist. But that’s exactly what happened. They didn’t just miss the diagnosis — they abandoned her. And now, a young woman who should be raising her kids, not fighting for her life, is stuck in a chemo chair wondering what might have been.

We’re rooting for the Harmans. Not because we want to bankrupt a hospital, but because someone — anyone — needs to be held responsible when the most preventable tragedies are allowed to unfold, one missed blood test at a time. This isn’t just a malpractice case. It’s a wake-up call. And if the jury doesn’t feel a little rage reading this, they’re not paying attention.

We’re entertainers, not lawyers — but even we know this much: medicine isn’t supposed to work like this.

Case Overview

$150,000 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court in and for Garfield County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
$75,000 Punitive
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 negligence allegations of medical negligence against various defendants
2 negligent hiring, training, retention, credentialing and supervision allegations of negligent hiring and supervision against IHEH, IMGЕ, DIA, and ESO
3 loss of consortium allegations of loss of consortium by Robert Harman
4 punitive damages allegations of punitive damages against all defendants

Petition Text

2,709 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR GARFIELD COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA MICKAELA MARIETTA WILEY HARMAN and ROBERT HARMAN, Plaintiffs, v. BAPTIST HEALTHCARE OF OKLAHOMA, LLC d/b/a INTEGRIS Health Enid Hospital d/b/a INTEGRIS Medical Group Enid a/k/a INTEGRIS Women’s Health Enid, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASSOCIATES, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation; EMERGENCY SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA, P.C., an Oklahoma Professional Corporation; DUSTIN W. CHENEY, D.O., an Individual; SHEA PELHAM PIELSTICKER, M.D., an Individual; MICHAEL JACKSON, M.D., an Individual; and DOES 1–20, Defendants. Case No. CJ-2020-134 02 FILED GARFIELD COUNTY OKLA APR 27 2026 SHELLIE KRAFT COURT CLERK BY [signature] DEPUTY COURT CLERK ATTORNEY LIEN CLAIMED PETITION COME NOW Plaintiffs Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman and Robert Harman, by and through their attorneys of record, and for their causes of action against Defendants, allege and state as follows: PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman ("Ms. Harman" or "Plaintiff") is an individual who, at the time of the acts and omissions alleged herein, was a citizen of the State of Oklahoma residing in Garfield County, Oklahoma, and who currently resides in Michigan. 2. Plaintiff Robert Harman ("Mr. Harman") is the lawful spouse of Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman. He brings this action as co-plaintiff for his own damages arising from the injuries sustained by his wife as a result of Defendants’ negligence. 3. Defendant Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma, LLC is an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company that, at all times relevant to this Petition, owned and/or operated INTEGRIS Health Enid Hospital ("IHEH"), a hospital facility located in Enid, Garfield County, Oklahoma. At all times relevant to this Petition, IHEH employed or otherwise provided personnel who rendered hospital-based care to Ms. Harman, including but not limited to its Emergency Department providers, nursing staff, pathology department, and Labor and Delivery unit. 4. Defendant Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma, LLC also owned and/or operated INTEGRIS Medical Group Enid a/k/a INTEGRIS Women’s Health Enid ("IMGE"), a physician clinic practice located in Enid, Garfield County, Oklahoma. At all times relevant to this Petition, IMGE employed or otherwise provided physicians, including Michael Jackson, M.D., who rendered obstetric and gynecologic care to Ms. Harman. 5. Defendant Diagnostic Imaging Associates, Inc. ("DIA") is, upon information and belief, an Oklahoma Corporation with its principal place of business at 4500 S. Garnett Road, Tulsa, Oklahoma, providing contracted radiology reading services at IHEH. At all times relevant to this Petition, DIA employed or otherwise provided radiologists, including Dustin W. Cheney, D.O., who interpreted imaging studies performed on Ms. Harman at IHEH. 6. Defendant Dustin W. Cheney, D.O. ("Dr. Cheney") is, upon information and belief, an individual licensed to practice medicine in the State of Oklahoma who, at all times relevant to this Petition, was employed by and/or acting as an agent of DIA, providing radiology reading services at and/or for IHEH. 7. Defendant Emergency Services of Oklahoma, P.C. ("ESO") is, upon information and belief, an Oklahoma Professional Corporation providing contracted emergency medicine physician services at IHEH. At all times relevant to this Petition, ESO employed or otherwise provided physicians, including Shea Pelham Pielsticker, M.D., who rendered emergency medicine care to Ms. Harman at IHEH. 8. Defendant Shea Pelham Pielsticker, M.D. ("Dr. Pielsticker") is, upon information and belief, an individual licensed to practice medicine in the State of Oklahoma who, at all times relevant to this Petition, was employed by and/or acting as an agent of ESO, providing emergency medicine services at IHEH. 9. Defendant Michael Jackson, M.D. ("Dr. Jackson") is, upon information and belief, an individual residing in Oklahoma who, at all times relevant to this Petition, was licensed to practice medicine in the State of Oklahoma and was employed by and/or acting as an agent of IMGE, practicing obstetrics and gynecology at INTEGRIS Women's Health Enid in Enid, Garfield County, Oklahoma. 10. Does 1–10 represent agents, employees, contractors, and/or servants, and all other medical providers who provided negligent care and treatment to Ms. Harman, and Does 11–20 represent employers, contracting agencies, organizations, and/or corporate entities that employed, contracted with, and/or acted as an agency for the named Defendants and/or Does 1–10, which are currently unknown and/or unconfirmed to Plaintiffs. Upon information and belief that will be confirmed through discovery, each of these Defendants is in some way liable for the acts and/or omissions referred to herein and caused damage to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs will amend this Petition and insert the correct names and capacities of those Defendants when they are discovered. 11. The injuries that are the subject of this dispute occurred in Garfield County, Oklahoma. 12. This Court has jurisdiction and venue is proper in Garfield County, Oklahoma. STATEMENT OF FACTS 13. Paragraphs 1 through 12 above are incorporated herein by reference. 14. In August 2022, Ms. Harman, then age 24, presented to Dr. Jackson at IMGE with a positive pregnancy test. A transvaginal ultrasound revealed no intrauterine pregnancy and an irregular endometrium. 15. On August 17, 2022, Dr. Jackson admitted Ms. Harman to IHEH and performed a suction dilation and curettage ("D&C"). The IHEH pathologist issued a critical addendum flagging the possibility of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease ("GTD") and requested a Mayo Clinic second opinion. The Mayo Clinic pathologist returned a diagnosis requiring close clinical follow-up with serial beta-hCG monitoring to confirmed normalization. Dr. Jackson acknowledged this requirement. There is no documentation in the records of Defendants that serial hCG was ever confirmed to normalize. 16. GTD and its malignant forms, collectively known as Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia ("GTN"), are among the most chemosensitive malignancies in oncology and are considered essentially curable when identified and treated at an early stage, with cure rates approaching 100%. The standard of care required serial hCG surveillance to zero following the August 2022 D&C pathology. That surveillance was never completed. 17. On August 1, 2023 – approximately ten months later – Ms. Harman returned to IMGE for prenatal care for a new pregnancy. Dr. Jackson's progress note for that visit contains no reference to the 2022 D&C pathology, no notation of the unresolved GTD surveillance requirement, and no plan for hCG monitoring or GYN oncology consultation in the context of the prior pathology and her prior trophoblastic disease history. 18. Dr. Jackson managed Ms. Harman through seven prenatal visits between August 2023 and February 2024, and through delivery of her son at IHEH in March 2024, without revisiting the 2022 trophoblastic pathology, without obtaining GYN oncology consultation, and without initiating hCG surveillance appropriate to a patient with a prior trophoblastic disease history. Throughout the pregnancy, Ms. Harman reported vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain on multiple occasions. No investigation of these symptoms was undertaken in the context of the prior pathology and her prior trophoblastic disease history. 19. On August 5, 2024, approximately four and a half months postpartum, Ms. Harman presented to the IHEH Emergency Department with abdominal pain. A transvaginal ultrasound identified a vascular uterine lesion with prominent parenchymal vasculature, which was labeled a fibroid. No serum hCG was obtained and no GYN oncology referral was initiated. 20. Ms. Harman left before the formal ultrasound read, requesting to be contacted with the results. Dr. Pielsticker documented a plan directing ED staff to notify Ms. Harman of the findings and arrange outpatient GYN follow-up. There is no documentation that notification was ever made or that a referral was ever arranged. 21. On November 22, 2024, IMGE sent Ms. Harman a formal patient dismissal letter terminating Dr. Jackson's care of her effective 30 days from that date. The letter contains no reference to her trophoblastic disease history, the unresolved 2022 pathology, or the August 2024 uterine mass. There is no documentation that her incoming provider was informed of any of these matters. 22. In December 2024, Ms. Harman presented to emergency facilities in Michigan with abdominal and pelvic pain. A CT on January 1, 2025 revealed bilateral pulmonary metastases, a pancreatic mass, and a 5.3 centimeter uterine mass. On January 2, 2025, she underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy at a Michigan facility. She was 27 years old. Final pathology confirmed Stage IV gestational choriocarcinoma and a subsequent biopsy confirmed pancreatic metastasis. 23. Ms. Harman was transferred to Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago for GYN oncology management. Ms. Harman has required three distinct chemotherapy regimens following disease recurrence and chemoresistance, developed brain metastases requiring gamma knife radiosurgery in January 2026, and as of the date of this Petition remains on active chemotherapy with a palliative treatment goal. She is 28 years old. 24. Mr. Harman has been present at his wife's side throughout her diagnosis and treatment. The family relocated from Oklahoma to Michigan following Ms. Harman's diagnosis in January 2025 to be near family support during treatment. Mr. Harman has attended each inpatient chemotherapy admission while simultaneously caring for their two young children. Ms. Harman's permanent loss of fertility, ongoing chemotherapy, brain metastases, palliative prognosis, and the uncertainty of her survival have fundamentally and permanently altered the nature of the Harmans' marriage and family life. 25. As a direct and proximate result of the combined negligence of Defendants and their agents, employees, contractors, and/or servants, Ms. Harman suffered severe and permanent injuries, impairments, and deformities, including but not limited to: a. gestational choriocarcinoma, Stage IV, FIGO score 13, with metastases to the lungs, pancreas, and brain, b. total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy at age 27, c. permanent loss of fertility and inability to bear further children, d. brain metastases requiring gamma knife radiosurgery, e. chemoresistance requiring three distinct chemotherapy regimens over fifteen or more months, f. two Mediport placements, g. cardiology workup for chemotherapy-associated chest pain, h. chemotherapy-associated anemia requiring transfusion, i. adjustment disorder with depressed mood, j. chronic nausea, fatigue, pain, and physical suffering, k. palliative care involvement with treatment goal documented as palliative, and l. severe emotional distress and mental anguish, including the loss of the opportunity to raise her children and the necessity of preparing for the possibility that she will not survive. 26. As a result of the combined negligence of Defendants, their agents, employees, contractors, and/or servants, Ms. Harman suffered actual damages including, but not limited to, personal injury, permanent loss of fertility, loss of the chance of cure, permanent impairment, shortened life expectancy, past and future medical expenses, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other actual damages in excess of $75,000.00, and Mr. Harman and Plaintiffs’ children have suffered actual damages including loss of consortium, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other actual damages in excess of $75,000.00. CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT I NEGLIGENCE (AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS) 27. Paragraphs 1 through 26 above are incorporated herein by reference. 28. Defendants, and their agents and employees, owed a duty to Ms. Harman to provide reasonable medical care and treatment, using the best judgment and applying, with ordinary care and diligence, the knowledge and skill possessed by other similarly situated individuals in the medical community. 29. Defendants, and their agents and employees, failed to exercise ordinary, reasonable, and proper care in providing medical treatment to Ms. Harman. 30. The injuries of Ms. Harman are a direct and proximate result of Defendants’, and their employees’, contractors’, servants’ and agents’, breach of this duty. 31. Defendants are vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees, contractors, servants, and agents, including but not limited to Dr. Jackson, Dr. Cheney, Dr. Pielsticker, mid-level providers, nursing staff, and DOES 1–10, pursuant to the legal doctrines of respondeat superior and/or ostensible agency. 32. As a result of the combined negligence of Defendants, their agents, employees, contractors, and/or servants, Ms. Harman suffered actual damages including, but not limited to, personal injury, permanent loss of fertility, loss of the chance of cure, permanent impairment, shortened life expectancy, past and future medical expenses, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other actual damages in excess of $75,000.00 and Mr. Harman and Plaintiffs’ children have suffered actual damages including loss of consortium, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other actual damages in excess of $75,000.00. COUNT II NEGLIGENT HIRING, TRAINING, RETENTION, CREDENTIALING AND SUPERVISION (AS TO IHEH, IMGЕ, DIA, DOES 11-20, AND ESO) 33. Paragraphs 1 through 32 above are incorporated herein by reference. 34. Defendants IHEH, IMGЕ, DIA, DOES 11-20, and ESO each owed a direct duty to Ms. Harman to appropriately credential, hire, train, and supervise their physician, nursing, and mid-level provider agents, employees, and contractors such that those individuals would not cause injury or harm to Ms. Harman or any other persons in the community. 35. Defendants IHEH, IMGTE, DIA, DOES 11-20, and ESO breached that duty, including but not limited to: failing to establish and enforce protocols for the surveillance and follow-up of patients whose D&C pathology raises the possibility of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease; failing to ensure that physician-directed critical follow-up plans were executed and confirmed; failing to ensure that the electronic medical record system was utilized to flag and track high-risk findings across care encounters; and failing to supervise the clinical decision-making of Dr. Jackson and the Emergency Department providers whose care gave rise to the injuries alleged herein. 36. These breaches were actual and proximate causes of Ms. Harman’s injuries. 37. As a result of the combined negligence of Defendants, their agents, employees, contractors, and/or servants, Ms. Harman suffered actual damages including, but not limited to, personal injury, permanent loss of fertility, loss of the chance of cure, permanent impairment, shortened life expectancy, past and future medical expenses, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other actual damages in excess of $75,000.00 and Mr. Harman and Plaintiffs’ children have suffered actual damages including loss of consortium, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other actual damages in excess of $75,000.00. COUNT III LOSS OF CONSORTIUM (AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS, ON BEHALF OF ROBERT HARMAN) 38. Paragraphs 1 through 37 above are incorporated herein by reference. 39. At all times relevant to this Petition, Robert Harman was and remains the lawful spouse of Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman. 40. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendants and their agents and employees, and the catastrophic injuries sustained by his wife, Mr. Harman has suffered and continues to suffer loss of his wife's consortium, companionship, services, society, and support, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life, including but not limited to the loss of the ordinary intimacy, shared future, and family life that characterize a marriage between two spouses of their age. 41. As a result of the combined negligence of Defendants, their agents, employees, contractors, and/or servants, Mr. Harman suffered actual damages including, but not limited to, loss of consortium, loss of companionship, loss of services, loss of society, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life, and other actual damages in excess of $75,000.00. COUNT IV PUNITIVE DAMAGES (AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS) 42. Paragraphs 1 through 41 above are incorporated herein by reference. 43. The intentional, wanton, and reckless conduct of the Defendants, and their employees and agents, was carried out in disregard of the health, safety, and life of Plaintiff Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman. 44. Defendants’ conduct in abandoning a documented GTD surveillance obligation, failing to revisit that obligation when Ms. Harman returned for prenatal care in August 2023, identifying a vascular uterine mass with documented trophoblastic history in the same electronic record and failing to investigate it, and dismissing Ms. Harman from care without any oncologic handoff in the weeks immediately preceding a Stage IV cancer diagnosis, constituted reckless disregard for Ms. Harman’s health, safety, and life. 45. The acts of Defendants, and their agents and employees, were wrongful, culpable, and so egregious that punitive damages in a sum that exceeds Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00) should be awarded against Defendants to set an example to others similarly situated that such inexcusable conduct will not be tolerated in our community. WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs Mickaela Marietta Wiley Harman and Robert Harman pray that this Court grant them the relief sought, including but not limited to actual damages in excess of $75,000.00, punitive damages in excess of $75,000.00, costs, attorney fees, and such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable. Respectfully submitted, SMOLEN | LAW, PLLC ______________________________ Donald E. Smolen, II, OBA #19944 Lance Freije, OBA #18559 611 S. Detroit Ave. Tulsa, OK 74120 P: (918) 777-4LAW (4529) F: (918) 890-4529 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.