CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
GRADY COUNTY • CJ-2026-00091

Steve McCarty v. Courtney A. Adamson

Filed: Mar 20, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: one moment, Steve McCarty was just driving—minding his own business, probably humming along to classic rock or silently judging someone’s bumper sticker—and the next, he was catapulted into what sounds like a low-budget action movie where the stunt coordinator clearly didn’t show up. A woman named Courtney A. Adamson allegedly plowed into him with such disregard for basic traffic laws and human safety that McCarty is now staring down $75,000 in damages, a mountain of medical bills, and what the court filing delicately calls “permanent, disabling injuries.” And no, we’re not talking about emotional scarring from realizing he shares a state with people who drive like they’re in a demolition derby. This is real, painful, life-altering stuff. Welcome to Grady County, Oklahoma, where the cornfields are tall, the legal claims are taller, and someone definitely wasn’t paying attention behind the wheel.

So who are these folks? On one side, we’ve got Steve McCarty—a regular guy from McClain County who, until April 29, 2024, probably thought his biggest risk on the road was aggressive deer. He’s represented by John P. Melot, a lawyer whose firm has seen enough car wrecks to know when someone wasn’t just clumsy but outright reckless. On the other side? Courtney A. Adamson, also reportedly from McClain County, who allegedly went full lead foot and zero brain cells on that fateful day. And then there’s the real heavyweight in this drama: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., the corporate Goliath that’s being dragged into this not because it caused the crash, but because it may owe McCarty money under an underinsured motorist (UIM) policy. That’s the kind of clause most people forget they have until disaster strikes—kind of like that emergency flashlight in your junk drawer that runs on three dead AA batteries.

Now, let’s talk about what actually happened. Or rather, what allegedly happened, because we’re not judges, we’re entertainers with a flair for dramatic retelling and zero legal liability. According to the petition filed on April 29, 2024—exactly one year to the day after the incident, which feels suspiciously like someone waiting until the statute of limitations was about to expire—Courtney Adamson was operating a vehicle in Grady County when she “negligently and recklessly” caused a collision with McCarty’s car. That’s the legal way of saying she wasn’t just a little distracted; she was allegedly driving with such a blatant disregard for safety that it crossed the line from “oops” into “what were you thinking?!” territory. The filing doesn’t give us the cinematic details—no screeching tires, no slow-motion glass shattering, no dramatic last words—but the aftermath speaks volumes. McCarty didn’t walk away with a dented fender and a stiff neck. He walked away (or maybe didn’t) with ongoing medical expenses, past and future pain and suffering, and injuries so serious they’re described as “permanent, disabling.” That’s not a sprained ankle. That’s life-changing.

And here’s where it gets juicy: the lawsuit isn’t just about Adamson’s bad driving. It’s also about money—and not just any money, but $75,000 worth of it. That’s the threshold in Oklahoma for cases that can go to a jury trial, and McCarty’s team is demanding exactly that. They want a jury of his peers to look Adamson in the eye and say, “Yeah, you messed up.” But they’re also going after State Farm, which might seem unfair—after all, the insurance company didn’t cause the crash. But here’s the twist: McCarty had a UIM policy with them. That means if Adamson didn’t have enough insurance to cover all the damages (and let’s be real, most people don’t), State Farm is supposed to step in and make up the difference. It’s like having a backup generator during a blackout—except instead of powering your fridge, it’s supposed to help pay for your spinal surgery. The petition claims McCarty met all the conditions to trigger that payout, and State Farm hasn’t coughed up. So now they’re not just a bystander—they’re a defendant.

Now, is $75,000 a lot? In some contexts, sure. It’s not “I won the lottery and I’m moving to Bali” money. But in the world of personal injury, especially when you’re talking about permanent disabilities, ongoing medical care, and lost quality of life? It’s not chump change, but it’s also not outrageous. One MRI can cost $3,000. Physical therapy adds up fast. And if McCarty can’t work the same job anymore—or at all—that number starts to look downright modest. Then there’s the punitive damages request, which is the legal equivalent of slapping a “you did this on purpose, didn’t you?” sticker on Adamson’s forehead. Punitive damages aren’t about covering costs; they’re about punishment. They’re the court’s way of saying, “We don’t care if you can afford it—we want you to feel it.” And for that to happen, the jury would have to believe Adamson wasn’t just negligent, but wanton and reckless—like, “texting while drifting into oncoming traffic” reckless. That’s a high bar, but the petition is swinging for it.

So what’s our take? Look, car accidents happen. People make mistakes. But when you cause $75,000 in damages and leave someone with permanent injuries, it’s not just a fender bender—it’s a life sentence for someone else. The most absurd part of this whole thing? That we even have to sue to get basic accountability. McCarty didn’t choose to get hit. He didn’t sign up for chronic pain. And yet here he is, one year later, asking a court to tell two defendants— one who crashed into him, and one who won’t pay up— to do the bare minimum: make it right. We’re not saying Adamson should be thrown into a cage (that’s criminal court, and this is civil). But we are* saying that if you’re going to drive like you’re in a Fast & Furious audition, you better be ready to face the music—especially when the music is a lawyer demanding $75,000 and a jury trial. As for State Farm? Come on. You built an empire on selling peace of mind. Now’s the time to actually provide some. We’re rooting for McCarty—not because he’s perfect, but because he’s the one who showed up with injuries, not excuses. And in the petty civil court drama hall of fame, that earns him at least a standing ovation.

Case Overview

$75,000 Demand Jury Trial Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$75,000 Monetary
$1 Punitive
Plaintiffs
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 negligence Plaintiff was injured in a car accident caused by Defendant Adamson's negligence.

Petition Text

347 words
FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Grady County, Oklahoma IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRADY COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA STEVE MCCARTY, an Individual, Plaintiff, v. COURTNEY A. ADAMSON, an Individual, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., a Domestic Corporation, Defendants. MICA HACKNEY, Court Clerk By: [UNREADABLE] Deputy Case No. CJ-2026-91 PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Steve McCarty ("PLAINTIFF MCCARTY"), with his causes of action against the Defendants, Courtney A. Adamson ("DEFENDANT ADAMSON"), and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. ("DEFENDANT STATE FARM"), a Domestic Corporation, and alleges and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff is a resident of McClain County, State of Oklahoma. 2. Based on information and belief, DEFENDANT ADAMSON is a resident of McClain County, State of Oklahoma. 3. Based on information and belief, DEFENDANT STATE FARM is a domestic corporation doing business in the State of Oklahoma. 4. On or about the 29th day of April, 2024, in Grady County, State of Oklahoma, DEFENDANT ADAMSON negligently and recklessly caused the vehicle she was operating to collide with the vehicle being driven by PLAINTIFF MCCARTY. 5. As a result of DEFENDANT ADAMSON's conduct, PLAINTIFF MCCARTY suffered damages as follows: a. Medical expenses incurred and expected to be incurred in the future; b. Mental and physical pain and suffering, past and future; c. Permanent, disabling injuries; and d. Other damages to be set forth after discovery; all of which are in excess of Seventy-five Thousand Dollars ($75,000). 6. DEFENDANT ADAMSON’s conduct was in wanton and reckless disregard for the rights and safety of Plaintiff, warranting punitive damages. 7. DEFENDANT STATE FARM held a UIM policy for the benefit of PLAINTIFF MCCARTY. All conditions precedent were met to trigger payment from DEFENDANT STATE FARM to PLAINTIFF MCCARTY. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF MCCARTY demands judgment in excess of Seventy-five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) against both DEFENDANT ADAMSON and DEFENDANT STATE FARM as set forth above, costs, interest, and such other relief as the Court shall deem equitable and proper. Respectfully submitted, JOHN P. MELOT, P.C., OBA #15813 1601 E. Veterans Memorial Hwy. P.O. Box 1609 Blanchard, Oklahoma 73010 Telephone: (405) 485-4620 Facsimile: (405) 485-4641 E-mail: [email protected] ATTORNEY’S LIEN CLAIMED Attorney for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.