CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LE FLORE COUNTY • CJ-2026-00104

DEERE & COMPANY v. JASON MATTHEW NICHOLS

Filed: Apr 28, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s just say you’ve got a lawn that needs mowing, a field that needs tilling, or—hypothetically—a giant industrial-grade tractor just sitting in your driveway that you definitely didn’t pay for in full. Now imagine the company that made that tractor, a corporate titan with tractors so iconic they’re basically the Ferrari of farm equipment, showing up in small-town Oklahoma court to collect what amounts to a stack of overdue lawn mower payments. That’s exactly what happened when Deere & Company—the green-garbed, gold-starred agricultural empire—filed a lawsuit against one Jason Matthew Nichols of Poteau, Oklahoma, for the grand sum of $11,851.42 in unpaid loans. Eleven thousand, eight hundred and fifty-one dollars and forty-two cents. Not a rounding error. Not a typo. This is serious business. And yes, John Deere is suing a man over four separate loans, each with its own interest rate, maturity date, and quiet sense of betrayal.

Now, let’s talk about Jason. We don’t know if he’s a farmer, a landscaper, or just a guy who really, really wanted to live the agrarian dream. But what we do know is this: he borrowed money—four times—from Deere & Company, presumably to finance equipment. Maybe it was a riding mower. Maybe it was a full-on combine harvester that he parks at the end of his cul-de-sac like a suburban dinosaur. Whatever it was, he signed loan agreements. And like so many of us who’ve stared down a credit card bill and whispered, “I’ll deal with it later,” Jason apparently decided to deal with it… never. Each loan is itemized like a breakup letter from a very patient, very corporate ex: You promised to pay $1,781.66. You did not. You promised to pay $1,470.99. You did not. It’s almost poetic in its monotony. Four loans. Four broken promises. One very persistent bill collector with a legal degree.

Deere & Company, for the uninitiated, isn’t just some guy in a garage selling refurbished tillers. This is the company whose logo makes grown men weep at tractor shows. They’ve been in the business of making things that plow, mow, and generally dominate the American heartland since 1837. They’ve got more lawyers than most small countries. And yet, here we are, in the District Court of Le Flore County—population: not that many—where Deere is patiently listing out each delinquent debt like a disappointed parent tallying up unpaid chores. “Jason,” they seem to say through their attorney, Jody D. Jenkins of Jenkins & Young, P.C., “you owe us $3,206.15. Plus interest. And also $6,289.63. Plus different interest. And also the other two. And also attorney’s fees. And also costs. And also dignity.”

The legal claim? “Account and Money Lent.” Which sounds like something out of a 19th-century novel, but in modern terms, it’s basically: “We gave you money under a contract. You agreed to pay it back. You didn’t. Now we want it.” No drama. No accusations of fraud or identity theft. No wild story about a stolen tractor being driven through a Walmart. Just cold, hard, spreadsheet-level disappointment. Four separate loan contracts, each with its own interest rate—ranging from a modest 4.25% to a slightly more aggressive 5.50%—all pointing to the same conclusion: Jason Nichols did not keep his word. And in the world of corporate finance, a broken promise is just a bill with a lawsuit attached.

So why are they in court? Because Deere, despite its size and power and army of accountants, couldn’t get Jason to pay. They sent the invoices. They ran the calculations. They waited until April 10, 2026—yes, the future, because in court filings, the future is already here—to declare the debts due. And when silence was the only reply, they did what any self-respecting corporation does: they lawyered up and filed a petition. Not for revenge. Not for spectacle. But for $11,851.42. That’s the number. That’s the hill they’re willing to die on. Or, more accurately, the hill they’re willing to hire Jenkins & Young, P.C. to die on for them.

Now, let’s talk about that number. Is $11,851.42 a lot? Well, it depends. If you’re Deere & Company, it’s a rounding error. Their quarterly coffee budget probably exceeds that. But if you’re Jason Matthew Nichols of Poteau, Oklahoma, it might as well be a million bucks. For context, that’s enough to buy a decent used car. Or pay off a chunk of a mortgage. Or, ironically, buy a slightly used John Deere lawn tractor—just not finance it. The fact that it’s broken into four separate debts suggests this wasn’t one big splurge, but a series of smaller promises, each made and broken. Maybe Jason thought he could outrun the interest. Maybe he thought Deere wouldn’t notice. Maybe he thought, “What are the odds a company that makes tractors for giants is gonna come after me in Le Flore County?” Spoiler: the odds were 100%.

And what do they want? Judgment. Specifically, judgment for the full amount of each loan, plus interest, plus costs, plus “reasonable attorney’s fees.” Which, given that Jenkins & Young, P.C. is based in Lubbock, Texas, and had to file this in Oklahoma, probably means they want enough to cover the gas money for the paralegal who drove the documents over. But still—this is about precedent. This is about sending a message to every other man, woman, and part-time hay farmer who thinks, “Hey, maybe I don’t have to pay back the tractor company.” Spoiler two: you do.

Now, our take? Look, we’re not here to judge Jason. Maybe he lost his job. Maybe his equipment broke. Maybe he was victimized by a rogue groundhog with a vendetta and a chainsaw. Life happens. But the sheer bureaucratic audacity of Deere & Company showing up with four separate loan statements, each with its own interest rate, like a finance professor grading a failed exam—“Here’s where you went wrong, Jason. Here’s where you went wrong again. And again. And again.”—is almost beautiful in its mundanity. This isn’t a crime saga. There’s no body in the cornfield. No secret tractor cult. Just a man, a corporation, and a paper trail so precise it could only be generated by a machine that also mows grass in perfect stripes.

And honestly? We’re rooting for the paperwork. Not because Jason deserves to lose, but because the idea that a global agricultural giant will go to court over four-digit loans like it’s defending the Magna Carta is peak American absurdity. It’s petty. It’s corporate. It’s weirdly inspiring. And if nothing else, it’s a reminder: when you borrow money from a company whose slogan might as well be “Nothing Runs Like a Deere,” they will come for you. Even if you live on Central Street in Poteau. Especially if you live on Central Street in Poteau.

So here’s to Jason Matthew Nichols, allegedly delinquent debtor. May your grass stay short, your debts stay paid, and your next tractor purchase be strictly cash-only. And to Deere & Company: y’all really said, “We don’t just make tractors—we enforce tractors.” And for that, we salute you.

Case Overview

$11,851 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$11,851 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 Account and Money Lent Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,781.66 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest.
2 Account and Money Lent Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,470.99 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest.
3 Account and Money Lent Defendant owes Plaintiff $3,206.15 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest.
4 Account and Money Lent Defendant owes Plaintiff $6,289.63 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest.

Petition Text

294 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LE FLORE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEERE & COMPANY, Plaintiff, V. JASON MATTHEW NICHOLS, Defendant. PETITION ON AN ACCOUNT AND MONEY LENT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff, DEERE & COMPANY files this Petition on an Account and Money Lent, and in support thereof will show the Court as follows: I. Plaintiff is DEERE & COMPANY, whose business address is 6400 NW 86th Street, P.O. Box 6600, Johnston IA 50131. Defendant is Jason Matthew Nichols, who may be served with process at 2212 Central St, Poteau OK 74953. II. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,781.66 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest at the rate of 4.25% according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX7984 financed by Plaintiff, DEERE & COMPANY. Defendant promised to pay Plaintiff but failed to do so. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,470.99 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest at the rate of 5.30% according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX7927 financed by Plaintiff, DEERE & COMPANY. Defendant promised to pay Plaintiff but failed to do so. Defendant owes Plaintiff $3,206.15 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest at the rate of 5.50% according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX6460 financed by Plaintiff, DEERE & COMPANY. Defendant promised to pay Plaintiff but failed to do so. Defendant owes Plaintiff $6,289.63 as of 4/10/2026, plus additional interest at the rate of 5.15% according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX9215 financed by Plaintiff, DEERE & COMPANY. Defendant promised to pay Plaintiff but failed to do so. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for the sum of $1,781.66 as of 4/10/2026 according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX7984, $1,470.99 as of 4/10/2026 according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX7927, $3,206.15 as of 4/10/2026 according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX6460, $6,289.63 as of 4/10/2026 according to loan contract #XXXXXXXX9215, plus interest and costs including reasonable attorney's fees. Respectfully submitted, JENKINS & YOUNG, P.C. P.O. Box 420 Lubbock, Texas 79408-0420 Telephone: (806) 687-9172 Facsimile: (806) 771-8755 Email: [email protected] By: ____________________________ Jody D. Jenkins Oklahoma State Bar No. 34460 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.