CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
BRYAN COUNTY • CJ-2026-00068

ELITE UNIVERSAL INVESTMENTS, LLC v. NEW GREENS GROUP, LLC

Filed: Mar 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: two LLCs—one from Texas, one from Oklahoma—are locked in a legal staring contest in a Bryan County courtroom, and so far, the only thing we know is that someone named JingJing Zhu got handed a piece of paper saying “you’ve been sued,” but not why. No dollar amount. No dramatic backstory. Not even a whisper of what this is about. It’s like opening a thriller novel and finding the first 50 pages missing—except the characters are tax entities, and the plot twist is probably a breached contract nobody read.

But let’s back up. Because behind every dry-sounding LLC lawsuit, there’s usually a human mess waiting to be uncovered. On one side, we’ve got Elite Universal Investments, LLC, a Texas-based limited liability company that sounds like it was named during a late-night infomercial for wealth seminars. The kind of name that promises “universal” success but delivers a PDF and a Zoom link. They’re being represented by the Burrage Law Firm in Durant, Oklahoma—which is already a little spicy, because why would a Texas company hire local counsel in Bryan County unless something actually went down here? Maybe they’re playing the long game. Maybe they’re just really bad at interstate logistics. Either way, they’ve lawyered up, and that means someone’s about to get paperworked into next week.

On the other side: New Greens Group, LLC, an Oklahoma-based business with a name that evokes either organic salad franchises or a very optimistic cannabis startup. Their registered agent? JingJing Zhu, at an address in Durant—yes, that Durant, population ~18,000, home of Southeastern Oklahoma State University and, apparently, now, the epicenter of a mystery business grudge match. We don’t know what New Greens does, but the name suggests either sustainability, smoothies, or a very niche line of eco-friendly lawn care products. Or maybe it’s a front for something more dramatic. (Spoiler: It’s probably not.)

So what happened? Well, that’s the million-dollar question—except we don’t even know if it is a million-dollar question, because the petition hasn’t been filed publicly yet. All we have is the summons: the legal equivalent of a “we need to talk” text sent via certified mail. The actual why is still under wraps. But let’s do some forensic speculation, because if there’s one thing civil court teaches us, it’s that money disputes between businesses usually boil down to a few classic tropes: broken promises, unpaid invoices, ghosted deliveries, or one party realizing too late that the other was running a shell game with more shells than a beachside con artist.

Given that Elite Universal Investments is based in Texas—where LLCs are practically a lifestyle choice—it’s possible this was a cross-state investment deal gone sideways. Maybe Elite poured money into New Greens with promises of green energy returns or a revolutionary new kale chip. Maybe they were supposed to co-develop a property, or launch a joint venture that was going to “disrupt the sustainable snack market.” And then… nothing. Radio silence. No profits. No updates. No kale chips. Just a series of increasingly passive-aggressive emails ending with “per my last message.”

Or—here’s a juicier theory—maybe this is a case of LLC betrayal. Two business partners form a venture. One handles operations (New Greens, in Oklahoma). The other provides capital (Elite, from Texas). Then, somewhere along the line, the Oklahoma side starts diverting funds, rebranding the business, or cutting the Texan partner out entirely. Classic “you gave me the money, but I have the permits” energy. Or worse: maybe Elite Universal realized New Greens Group wasn’t so “new” or so “green” and more like “existing solely on a fake website and a dream.”

Now, why are they in court? Again, we don’t have the petition, so we’re reading tea leaves here—but in plain English, when one business sues another in state court, it’s usually for one of a few reasons: breach of contract (you promised to do a thing, you didn’t), fraud (you lied to get my money), unjust enrichment (you benefited from my stuff and didn’t pay), or maybe even misrepresentation (you said this was a gold mine, and it’s a hole with a sign that says “maybe gold?”). The relief sought? Unclear. The filing says no monetary damages are specified, no punitive demands, no request for the court to step in and stop someone from doing something (injunctive relief) or declare who’s right (declaratory relief). Which is… bizarre. It’s like showing up to a fight with gloves on but refusing to punch.

But here’s the kicker: the total demand is null. Zero dollars listed. Which either means the plaintiff is suing for non-monetary reasons (like clarity on ownership or a court order to produce documents), or—more likely—the amount will be revealed later, once the full petition drops. In Oklahoma, you don’t always have to state a number upfront, especially if damages are still being calculated. But come on. You don’t hire the Burrage Law Firm, serve a summons, and kick off a lawsuit just to ask for an apology letter. Someone wants something, and given the effort, it’s probably more than a gift card to Subway.

Now, is $50,000 a lot in this context? Well, we don’t know if that’s the number—but if it is, for a small business dispute, that’s not chump change, but it’s not “sell the family farm” territory either. For a failed investment in a local greens brand, $50K could cover a full year of operations, a custom juicer, and a very sad booth at a farmers market. For a Texas LLC, it might be a rounding error. But pride? Pride is priceless. And let’s be real: this isn’t just about money. It’s about principle. It’s about who gets to keep the logo. It’s about who has to update their LinkedIn and admit they got sued.

Our take? The most absurd part isn’t the lack of details—it’s that we’re sitting here, analyzing a legal ghost story. Two corporations, one in Texas, one in Oklahoma, and the only concrete detail is that a woman named JingJing Zhu has to deal with this mess. That’s it. No motive. No drama. Just a summons floating in the void, like a space probe carrying the last message of a dead civilization: “You have been sued. Answer within twenty days.”

And yet… that’s what makes this kind of case weirdly compelling. Because beneath the corporate veils and boilerplate legal language, there’s almost certainly a story about trust, greed, ambition, and the moment someone realized they’d been played. Maybe Elite Universal thought they were investing in the future of sustainable business. Maybe New Greens thought they were cutting out a deadweight partner. Or maybe this is all just a clerical error, and someone at the Burrage Law Firm meant to sue a different LLC with a similar name and now everyone’s too proud to admit the mistake.

Either way, we’re here for it. We may not know what “Elite Universal Investments” invested in. We don’t know what “New Greens” is trying to grow. But one thing’s clear: when the full petition finally drops, we’re going to find out whether this is a tale of corporate betrayal… or just two businesses who forgot to get their handshake deal notarized.

Stay tuned. The salad wars of Bryan County are just getting started.

Case Overview

Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, Oklahoma
Filing Attorney
Burrage Law Firm
Relief Sought
Plaintiffs
Defendants

Petition Text

219 words
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF BRYAN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA ELITE UNIVERSAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company; Plaintiff, v. NEW GREENS GROUP, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company; Defendants. Case No. CJ-2026-Le8 SUMMONS To the above-named Defendant: New Greens Group, LLC % JingJing Zhu, Registered Agent 2954 Cypress Rd. Durant, OK 74701 You have been sued by the above-named plaintiff, and you are directed to file a written answer to the attached petition in the court at the above address within twenty (20) days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. Within the same time, a copy of your answer must be delivered or mailed to the attorney for the plaintiff. Unless you answer the petition within the time stated, judgment will be rendered against you with the costs of this action. Issued this 13 day of March, 2026. Stacey Canan+ Court Clerk by [signature] Deputy Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s): Name: Burrage Law Firm Address: 1201 Westside Drive P.O. Box 1727 Durant, OK 74702 Telephone: 580/920-0700 This summons was served on ________________________________ (date of service) ____________________________ (Signature of person serving summons) YOU MAY SEEK THE ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY ON ANY MATTER CONNECTED WITH THIS SUIT OR YOUR ANSWER. SUCH ATTORNEY SHOULD BE CONSULTED IMMEDIATELY SO THAT AN ANSWER MAY BE FILED WITHIN THE LIMIT STATED IN THE SUMMONS.
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.